Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Movie Mix

Indiana Jones and the Fridge of Nuclear Doom

By Michael Dudley, City States. Posted May 28, 2008.


The new Indiana Jones movie marks a new low in American cinema for its disturbingly casual use of nuclear weapons as a narrative device.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The newest Indiana Jones movie Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is generating a lot of derision for an early scene in which Jones finds himself in a mock-up of a 1950s subdivision populated with mannequins. He quickly realizes that this is a nuclear test site, and as a countdown echoes over a loudspeaker he seeks the only refuge he can: a refrigerator that turns out to be lined in lead. The blast hurls the fridge what appears to be several kilometers across the desert, where it crashes into the sizzling sand and tumbles repeatedly before coming to a steaming stop in front of a (CGI) gopher. Jones pushes the door open, and walks away with no apparent injury, watching as an enormous mushroom cloud rolls into the sky.

The scene is admittedly spectacular, and in its sunny evocation of all the requisite 50s suburban stereotypes in the shadow of a nuclear bomb tower (a mannequin family is seen watching Howdy Doody), rather creepy.

But Indy' survival of the nuclear blast has so strained the audience's otherwise willing suspension of disbelief that it has already generated a new buzz-phrase -- "Nuke the Fridge" as a successor to "Jump the Shark" -- meaning, that moment when a film series has gotten so ridiculous that it marks a new low in quality.

To show just how rapidly our culture can gorge on itself, the phrase has, in two short weeks, taken on a life of its own. Nuke the Fridge has its own website and FaceBook Page. There are also a number of creative YouTube videos mocking the sequence.

I too was annoyed by the scene, but not just for its extreme unbelievability. It marks a new low in American cinema for its disturbingly casual use of nuclear weapons as a narrative device.

Steven Spielberg and George Lucas have turned the most horrifying technology ever devised and made it into a minor plot juncture, as if it were just another fight scene. What is worse though, is that the set-up of the scene is so horrifying, so realistic and apocalyptic in its execution that its corny, jokey denouement (the aforementioned gopher stares at Indy and then jumps back into its hole) creates a jarring psychological rupture in the mind of the viewer.

I personally found the cognitive dissonance of the scene very disturbing, and it affected my experience of the rest of the film, which seemed akin to Alfred Hitchcock's -- very purposive -- early set up of Vertigo, in which Jimmy Stewart's character is suspended off a building with no hope of rescue, so that all subsequent action in the movie, too, is 'suspended' over an abyss.

In this case, I doubt very much that this was the intention. But intended or not, the "nuke the fridge" scene suggests a more serious psychological consequence for the viewer, owing not only to the dissonance it evokes, but to the particular juncture in history when this film was released.

The rhetoric coming from the governments of the United States and Israel threatening Iran with attack is getting more frequent and more bellicose. Whether through the direct use of nuclear weapons on Iran's nuclear facilities, or simply through the destruction of such facilities by "conventional" means, we are probably closer to seeing a nuclear war than at any time since the end of the Soviet Union. It has become politically mainstream to threaten Iran with destruction (John McCain went so far as to sing about it) and none of the major political candidates running for U.S. president have stated that nuclear weapons are 'off the table.'

So to my mind Spielberg's and Lucas' narrative use of the Bomb is rather tone-deaf. While Crystal Skull isn't without its political commentary (it makes Indy the subject of a McCarthy-esque witch-hunt and has a character mutter, "I don't recognize this country anymore"), its attempt to bring the series into the 1950s fails, chiefly because of this sequence.

In the 1950s, the specter of nuclear destruction was so recent, so possible and so widely feared that it could not be treated this casually at the movies. In fact, a filmed depiction of nuclear destruction this realistic (minus the fridge, of course) would probably have panicked an audience in 1957 and retained a chilling reputation for decades. Yet 50 years on, it's little more than an inconvenience for Indiana Jones.

While nobody is going to be going out to buy lead-lined refrigerators after seeing the movie, I do worry that, like the actual nuclear tests of the 1950s, Crystal Skull will serve to desensitize audiences to nuclear war, normalizing atomic destruction at an historical moment when we should be most aroused against it.

Michael Dudley is a Research Associate at the Institute of Urban Studies at the University of Winnipeg. He teaches city history, environmental psychology and urban sustainability.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, indiana jones, kingdom of the crystal sk, nuclear bomb

Michael Dudley is a Research Associate at the Institute of Urban Studies at the University of Winnipeg. He teaches city history, environmental psychology and urban sustainability.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Oh boo hoo!
Posted by: g on May 28, 2008 6:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get a grip, people. What did this movie do that the Simpsons hasn't done before (albeit more cleverly)?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cinematic comic-book
Posted by: supercrisp on May 29, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The movie's a cinematic comic book, and the nuclear fridge scene is a great way to quickly establish the new historical period.

The problem isn't the movie; the problem is that our leaders have a comic-book mentality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cinematic comic-book Posted by: Tat106
What?
Posted by: cordas on May 30, 2008 3:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its just a comic book / hero movie dude.... relax....

What on earth, yeah I get the mickey taking of the scene it deserves that, but the rest of the rant is pretty much non-sensical, how on earth can a movie such as the new Indiana Jones film desensitise the audience to nukes.... If anything the movie will inspire fear of them the nuke specail effect is awesome in its destructive powers (Indy and Gopher aside everything else gets destroyed).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American for liberty, truth, and justice
Posted by: Michael_D on May 30, 2008 3:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wake up America - the media and internet and Hollywood are littered with infil-traitors who are confusing you about the war on terror and all kinds of stuff.. taking advantage of your blind patriotism, ignorance of true history, and willingness to overrhwelmingly exist as a nation who does not support it's own Constitution because many of us have been conned like we do not understand just yet.. but it is coming out..

Some of these propagandist DO ever so subtly try to guide us to accepting war profiteering and power grabbing criminal activities in the name of "defending freedom and democracy"..

I would be suspicious of ANY pro-bush, pro-war, pro-war profiteering, pro-torture, pro-break-the-law-and-let-illegal-immigration-destroy-us, anti-United States Sovereignty, pro-AIPAC-lobbyist-for-the-current-racist-leaders-of-Israel, anti-acknowledge-the-truth-of-nine-eleven-and spread who seem to brush everything off as "just a movie" or as "propaganda" (like "just mainstream news, pay no attention to it's non-believers") When you see people ignore the truth or belittle it, (like this post will probably be done to before long.. as these anti-America freaks apparently have a fair sized network of website watchers and the like) any person with common sense can see through the bullshit. (and who is what)

Better research and take a stand now people not tomorrow - spread the truth about the Pentagon lies and cover ups that just came out..

We better realize why serious, largescale terrorism has existed in the first place or these corporate thugs and there religious fanatic friends and their fantasy media spinners who act like they know so much as they lie and belittle real patriots are going to continue to destroy this nation with their strategically placed lies and coverups.

Turn off your tv and

google video:
clinton chronicles
coke bush
iraq for sale
no end in sight
911 Mysteries Part 1 - Demolitions (Full - 1ed.)
bodyofwar com
IVAW org
patriotsquestion911 com
mossad
pilotsfor911truth org
911pressfortruth com
----------------------
revolutionmarch c om

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dumbed down America Posted by: countingdaisies
Disgusting Propaganda
Posted by: perkywa on May 30, 2008 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we being bombarded with scenes of nuclear war from Hollywood the last three years? There was "Jericho" and "24" (where L.A. gets nuked) and "Heroes" where the whole thing revolved around N.Y. getting nuked and several other sub-plots of shows and movies with the nuke theme. Now we have this P.O.S. movie with a nuclear fantasy scene...WTF? Seems like they're getting us psyched up to let loose with the nukes eh?

Add to that all our glorious "leaders" invoking "mushroom clouds" and threatening to "obliterate Iran" and we have a recipe for a real disaster. Time to WAKE UP people this isn't a video game or lite entertainment...we are heading for an abyss I grew up hoping to never see (yes I went to school in the "duck and cover" days of the 1960's).

If anyone needs to "get a grip" it is the Sheeple of the United States of Armageddon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a waste...
Posted by: CosmoViking on May 30, 2008 5:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is ridiculous hysteria and it makes for unimpressive reading. Perhaps in a freshman college course run by a VERY old hippie, this would be a hit.

In a world where nuclear warheads can be moved around the country under highly suspicious circumstances, apparently involving deaths of officers, Dick Cheney (a disgusting human being if there ever was one - in fact i'm sure Anakin Skywalker woulnd not approve of Cheney being called 'Darth Vader' - seems like an insult) vs. high-level military brass active in stopping the neocon war agenda against Iran...

...How can you (the writer and Alternet) get your titties in a twist over something as light (albeit mythologically deep) as Indiana Jones and his experiences inside a Nevada test site (nuclear or otherwise)???

I'm laughing but the laughter prompted by this article was not intended I'm sure.

Verdict: Dud.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just come out and say it.
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on May 30, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nuclear weapons are still as dangerous today as they were when they were invented. They are still the most eminent threat to humanity far ahead of oil and drinking water. Nuclear weapon proliferation is increasing globally. The number of nuclear armed states is increasing not decreasing. Just recently imagines of Chinese mobile launch sites and missile bases have become public. It seems they are expanding their arsenal. Russia is considering pulling out of nuclear weapons packs. Our anti-missile shield is causing nuclear armed countries to create more weapons to circumvent the loses that would be caused by it. Citizens need to pay way more attention to these massively destructive weapons. The USA currently maintains a first strike posture with our nuclear weapons. This also creates the need for countries to arm themsleves with more devastating second strike nuclear weapons that reap revenge rather than tactical victory if there can be one.
Sitcoms and late night guys make fun of being raped in prison on TV.
Nuke the fridge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First the archaelogist with his panties in a wad
Posted by: lepidopteryx on May 30, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because the Indiana Jones movies paint an unrealistic picture of his field, now this.
No one goes to an Indiana Jones movie for realism or for political commentary.
If you want to see real archaeologists, watch the History or Discovery channels. If you want political commentary, go to a Michael Moore movie, not a George Lucas/Steven Speilberg collaboration involving space aliens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The younger generation . . . Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: The younger generation . . . Posted by: lepidopteryx
Oh For HEAVEN's SAKE
Posted by: Gravitas on May 30, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a sociologist, usually I am one of the first to see hidden meaning in pop media, but I honestly think the author is overreacting. The entire series had them survive a string of perils no real human ever could for the sake of entertainmnet. That is where the humor comes from. Do you really think any real human could have survived the waterfalls???

Oh, but WAIT. Come to think of it, the man who took me is originally from Israel. I hadn't seen a movie in years but he somehow convinced me to go. Now it all makes sense. He obviously had ulterior motives. His whole purpose in dating me this weekend was to deliberalize me and send me back to being a brainwashed media addict!!!!Single liberal women BEWARE. It could happen to you too!!!(Sad that I have to insert this declaimer I am being factitious!!!!)

You know, when an article can make an old conspiracy theorist like me roll her eyes, you know you are losing it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh For HEAVEN's SAKE Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: Oh For HEAVEN's SAKE Posted by: loxias
Weenie
Posted by: weenie on May 30, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chill out! It's just a movie. I saw it and liked it. A little fantacy never hurt anybody.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bow your head and crawl under your desk: Nuclear Terrorism!!
Posted by: Ottomatic on May 30, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or
Spleenburg bursts another vessel.
Everything is done for a reason.

Soften the opposition
By
Carpet Bombing them with
Miss-information.
Big vote coming up this week in congress on Nuclear Power
Another half million x a million to be flushed down the toilet
With a Radio Active Chaser
That has a half life of fourteen thousand years.
Some legacy?
For people who forget to take out the garbage.
Check out the hidden pictures of Japan after being Nuked and forget the BU__! SH__!
Nobody walls away.
H. Ford is an old Zio-Spew salesman.

Same Corpirate Crime
Same Corpirate Channel
FRANKENSTEIN
The Mad scientist is still in charge.
They Spend Billions
To enslave millions.
BAD Media is the message.
Turn it off
Turn off the thrill ride, sensationalist
PROPAGANDA!
Put Humanity back on center stage where it belongs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

overreaction
Posted by: vegan27 on May 30, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure no mannequins were harmed in the making of this film. Even if there were, was it really that traumatic for you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

INDIANA JONES?!
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 30, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this a joke?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fridge the Nukes!
Posted by: counterpoint on May 30, 2008 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've read reports about the national enthusiasm for nuclear bombs in both India and Pakistan to make one weep. And do keep in mind that these folks are not illiterate barbarians, India educates an unbelievable number of engineers and scientists. But the utter devastation and worldwide impact of nuclear war are not comprehended there, they see it as the victory bomb: better, bigger, more effective.
Yee ha!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The.
Posted by: Scientz on May 30, 2008 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Movie.
Was.
Great.

Grow.
Up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The. Posted by: mnatra
Casual use of Death Star technology - Where's the outrage?
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on May 30, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am personally appalled by the scene in Star Wars: A New Hope when Grand Moff Tarkin ever-so-casually unleashed the most terrible technology the galaxy had ever seen on the peaceful planet of Alderaan. That scene desensitized an entire generation to the prospect of obliterating an entire planet and has resulted in a decades-long wave of other doomsday devices being unleashed on millions of innocent movie characters.

I can only pray that we have learned our lessons from the Terminator and Matrix series and we will never, ever let the internet become self-aware and enslave us all with with deadly robot technology.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I guess he's right
Posted by: PEACE2 on May 30, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually I think most of these comments validate the author's perspective quite nicely!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The fridge scene was over the top.
Posted by: blogbooks on May 30, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has so many problems I won't bother explaining them.

Or...maybe I will.

First of all, being in the center of a nuclear blast is pretty much going to kill you whether you're behind a few inches of lead or not. The heat alone would fry you.

Second, even if the blast flung the fridge a long distance away (it wouldn't), the force of such would probably kill you.

Third, the radiation when he climbed out of the fridge would have killed him sooner or later.

And....so on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Let's not fight . . . Posted by: Scientz
» Hmm Posted by: blogbooks
Something I thought was interesting...
Posted by: tattery202 on May 30, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't personally see the underlying tone this writer is trying to impress, but I did find something interesting watching the movie. When he opens the fridge, everyone in the theater was laughing, but seconds later when they see the mushroom cloud, the theater went earily silent. I don't think Lucas was trying to convey any messages except that he had some new CGI to show off but I think it did have an impact on the audience. Back to the point of this story, judging by the past IJ movies, I didn't go to see reality. Reality takes a check at the door when you see an Indiana Jones movie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow.
Posted by: puquerda on May 30, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can give you plenty of more important issues to write about if that's the best you could come up with. It's a movie. They are supposed to be fantastic and ridiculous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Much Ado About Nothing
Posted by: sofla100 on May 30, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of this article is making much ado about nothing. First of all, the movie in fact DID NOT try to minimize the actual blast effects of a nuclear weapon going off. It showed a shock wave and fireball. In fact, it shows a pretty horrendous effect of a nuclear weapon. If it would have been shown just like a hand grenade going off, or something like that, I would agree with this article, but it was not portrayed that way at all. As for Indiana Jones surviving in a lead lined refrigerator, of course, that was ridiculous. But like the intra-dimensional aliens portrayed in this movie, hey, it's an Indiana Jones movie, what do you expect? In fact, probably the nuke going off was a lot more realistic then much of the movie. You couldn't watch it and think nukes were a good thing by any stretch of the imagination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you'll remember, my esteemed AlterNet friends . . .
Posted by: Scientz on May 30, 2008 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . similar things were said when 300 came out.

Remember? It was a dress rehearsal for fascism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL . . . Posted by: Scientz
Author could have taken a different approach
Posted by: meesajean on May 30, 2008 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't feel like the film was casual about our use of Nuclear testing, I think it portrayed how casual we (the U.S.) are about it. When I saw that scene I was compelled to think about all of the places we casually have tested nuclear weapons and the residents of those nearby areas having to suffer for it. I think the author is reading into it all as well and the angle may have been better taken to discuss U.S. history with nuclear weapons rather than a film. I think my generation (i'm 26) are really unfamiliar with the 1950's time period, and the Indiana Jones scene reminded me that I need to educate myself more on our past.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Try This at Home Kids
Posted by: jim_altman on May 30, 2008 1:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mother didn't want us watching the Three Stooges, either, because she was afraid we'd poke each others eyes out. But, we did anyway, but we didn't, but we tried. Nyuck, nyuck! Ancient Greeks enjoyed watching actors chase each other with giant phalluses and now there's a Dick in the White House. See! The outlandish will always be a source of humor and box-office receipts confirm that millions of people are getting this particular outlandish joke. Let me see . . . Hillary, Obama, and McCain are onboard a plane that's about to crash, but there's only one parachute . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really?
Posted by: jim_altman on May 30, 2008 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Canadian intellectual named Dudley trying to get us to act correctly? Hmmm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jareilly
Posted by: jareilly on May 30, 2008 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A comment to the many commenters who said not to take a fantasy movie so seriously. I think all of you missed the point. The Nuke the Fridge scene is totally creepy and horrifying and yet Spielberg, who really ought to know better, plays it more or less for laughs. No he could not have survived that experience. Not the energy wave, not the blast wave, not the flying refrigerator and not the radiation at any stage of the blast. And having him stand a mile or so from the blast, watching the mushroom cloud ascend over the desert and over his head is a worse than ridiculous. It's the nightmare of an entire generation raised in the 1950s under the Cold War nuclear threat. Seeing that scene in real life it would mean giving up hope for your own life, untold others and some or all of the biosphere. Seeing it and knowing with 100 percent certainty that there was absolutely nothing you could do about it except die, slowly and horribly for the next few days or weeks of radiation sickness.

Many scenes in the movie used CGI to create unbelievable effects (Shia LeBoeuf doing Tarzan with the monkeys) for laughs. They were preposterous and funny partly because they were preposterous. Fine. The mushroom cloud and test site destruction scenes, unlike the jungle and lost city scenes, were clearly designed to look realistic. They were based at least partly on DOD stock footage of bomb tests in NV. They were not preposterous although the Jones character's survival was preposterous. A mushroom cloud really looks a lot like that; might look like that towering a mile or two over your soon to be dead head.

So, what's the point? Where's the humor in that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cold war callousness
Posted by: brianct on May 30, 2008 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nuke the fridge has one very amusing video offshoot:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2aOoNmCrxcE

However, the nuclear bomb scene is not the only scene that shows Spielberg/Lucas in lighthearted entertaining mode. There is also the scene where the KGB men are friend by the rockets of the sled. Here the audience gets its revenge buttons, pushed when the KBG kills the american soldiers, released. Notice how Indy has morphed into a cold war OSS man! lets hope that this time Indy has been put to bed for good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nuke the fridge
Posted by: YogiBear on May 30, 2008 10:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love the people who say: "No one goes to a movie for reality..." Um. We know they are movies, but you want at least the merest shred of believability to make it fun. Scenes like the fridge just make it boring, because anyone who can survive that can't be threatened by anything, thereby removing the element of suspense from any other scene. Which is why I hate scenes in which people consistently dodge machine gun fire. The more machine guns, the less I enjoy the film.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missing the Bigger Problem
Posted by: ceti on May 31, 2008 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Indiana Jones films are purposely low grade and are supposed to nostalgically reflect old sensibilities of film making with all the stock enemies and orientalism.

This is how they can get away with blatant racism and colonialism as in the Temple of Doom (Largely vegetarian Indians eating insects and monkey brains? WTF?). It is all explained away as some sort of homage to the B-Grade Matinee thrillers of an earlier era. Hmmm... That's a pretty sorry excuse, but then again, there was Jar Jar Binks.

The current movie replaces Nazis with Soviets with Cate Blanchett doing some sort of vaguely East European impression. Not really convincing, especially in South America where the Americans would be the bad guys. Russians have every right to be upset about this, but they can join the club.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm confused
Posted by: mattdanger on May 31, 2008 7:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you saying that Steven Spielberg is part of some vast right wing conpsiracy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nuclear bombs are NOT the most horrifying ever devised
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on May 31, 2008 11:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They really don't come close to the war germs devised by the
Soviet Union that could make us extinct, nor do nuclear bombs
match global warming because global warming could make us
extinct. We would need 10000 times as many nuclear weapons
as we have to make ourselves extinct with them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Author Responds
Posted by: mdudley609 on Jun 1, 2008 4:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some really interesting discussion here. First off, I wasn't suggesting that Spielberg and Lucas were part of some Pentagon-inspired conspiracy. What they are guilty of though is lousy story-telling and subjecting their viewers to what amounts to a total mind-f**k.

To those who think I'm taking a fantasy film too seriously: that's just my problem -- it is a fantasy film, and watching a nuclear apocalypse go off around Indy does irreparable damage to the fantasy universe the films have set up. While the Bomb has driven the plots of any number of adventure films (Thunderball etc) actually setting one off a few thousand yards from the film's hero is a whole order of horror beyond anything the viewer should expect or tolerate. It's kind of like having the film-makers come up with a clever and amusing way for Indy to escape from a gas chamber at Auschwitz. It's too terrible a thing to make light entertainment out of.

But I think the biggest reason why this is a mind f**k is how monumentally unnecessary it is to the film's plot. It's completely irrelevant, a total non-sequitur. It could be completely removed from the film with no loss of coherence. We interrupt this film to bring you a scene from the end of the world.

As a result, a beloved film character is put through an experience the audience knows he couldn't have survived, and for no good reason. It's not just that it's unbelievable; the audience simply *cannot believe* he's still alive. I don't know about you, but I kept waiting for his hair to fall out. Not the kind of thinking you want to be doing at an Indiana Jones film!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MY GOD MAN! GET A GRIP!
Posted by: CyberHULK on Jun 1, 2008 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved this scene! This scene was brilliant! This supposed "most horrible technology ever devised" has spawned very peacful and clean uses IE Nuclear power. I have seen a disturbing trend in people posting comments online. People like nothing more then to bitch and complain about things which, quite frankly, are just so very stupid! This is indana jones, the guy who melted nazi's faces off with the ark of the covernant, The man who ate frozen monkey brains as a desert and found the holy grail to heal his dad. If anything, this is an Indy moment. If anyone could survive a nuclear blast by hiding inside a lead lined fridge, then it's Indiana Jones! I quite enjoyed the plot, the way he mixed ancient mythology with more modern mythology. We all asked for another movie and he delivered a beauty. So back the hell off and quit complaining about this... get a grip and a life!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THANK YOU! Posted by: Scientz
» RE: MY GOD MAN! GET A GRIP! Posted by: loxias
This has been done before
Posted by: JERSEYDAN on Jun 2, 2008 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
some lame Tom Clancy adaptation with Ben Affleck had him surviving a nuclear blast in Baltimore I think. Also the new Iron Man movie has the character surviving a similarly impossible fiasco in the desert....of course it's a comic book movie, but then so is Indiana Jones. All of these movies were about on the same level, though the Affleck one was more contemporary and supposedly rooted in realism. None of them are worth seeing again, and my advice would be to save your money and rent them from your local library when they come out. The writing in this article is actually very good, but methinks the author takes a badly written movie ( many, many of the films associated with this duo are poorly written, even if they make lots of money )and criticizes it for one brief sequence when there is a lot more wrong with it. Like people surviving fist fights that would kill most people. But then, that is hardly new either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement