Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Movie Mix

Bollywood Is India's Sexual Battleground

By Triveni Gandhi, Campus Progress. Posted March 29, 2008.


The ongoing battle over representations of sex in Indian movies reflects a larger conflict between tradition and change.
Advertisement

It's hard to imagine that two people kissing publicly would cause popular outrage, but that's exactly what happened last April when Richard Gere and Bollywood star Shilpa Shetty kissed at an HIV/AIDS awareness event in Mumbai. Protesters burned effigies of Gere and pictures of Shetty. When Shetty defended Gere, some threatened to boycott her movies. Others went so far as to file legal complaints against the actors, accusing them of violating Indian obscenity laws.

The episode is just one struggle in the ongoing battle over representations of sex and sexuality in Indian movies. The protests against the increase of sexuality come from a highly radicalized segment of Indians and reflect a deeper rift in society. Traditionalists within India are enraged by explicit displays of romance in movies, and they view the increased use of sexual content as an attempt to mimic "Western" culture. That doesn't seem to bother much of India's youth, who -- judging by ticket sales -- enjoy watching movie stars getting physical on screen. The recent controversies over public affection in film demonstrate that traditional parts of society have trouble understanding the desires of younger Indians. This partly has to do with the conservative nature of traditional Indian culture. Young Indians, like Americans, are accepting of new standards for public affection, but still believe in the value of tradition.

The Indian film industry, often synonymous with the infamous Bollywood, produces more than 600 movies a year. (Its American counterpart produces about 400 each year.) Bollywood films, Hindi- or Urdu-language movies made in Mumbai, are typically musicals, and always have happy endings, regardless of any plot twists that occur along the way.

Romance is no stranger to Indian movies, but the methods of depicting relationships have changed over the years. In the 1930s, '40s, and '50s, a love song and dance sequence would involve the stars singing -- well, lip-syncing -- a romantic melody to one another, but from afar, and if they did come close to touching, at most they might have clasped each other's hands and stared into each other's eyes. From the '60s to the '80s, touching progressed from clasped hands to hugs and the occasional face caress, but the audience never saw actors kiss. In the '90s, directors moved to the next level. Lovers would run to one another, drawing closer and closer as if to kiss, but at the last minute the woman would turn her face to the side in shyness and run away. Sometimes filmmakers would obscure the lovers' faces with the woman's duputta (veil) just before their lips met, leaving the rest to the audience's imagination. These moves, while highly entertaining and risqué compared to the romantic gestures of previous decades, were tame enough for the public.

In the '90s, Bollywood redefined the concept of its "item girl." In traditional Indian films, item girls performed a one-time song and dance sequence meant to titillate the audience and enhance its interest in the film. While the item girl dances in pre-'90s films were fairly subdued (in terms of sexuality, at least), the films of the last decade saw a dramatic rise in female sexuality. In an attempt to be more "Western," dancers began to dress provocatively by wearing low cut shirts with bare midriffs that revealed more breast and stomach. Dance moves also became more provocative. While revealing costumes and dance moves are fairly standard and inoffensive for most Western audiences, the changes represented a marked difference for Indian moviegoers.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: protest, india, globalization, sexuality, bollywood



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Item Girls?
Posted by: easter on Mar 29, 2008 4:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting that the debate of sexuality revolves around the women willing to objectify themselves. It is the women who are dressing more provocatively. That the "item girls" being exploited may be seen as some as sexual freedom. I can see how people would be very worried about this influence on such a spiritual society. Of course, I agree with the author that violence is not the way to resolve this understanding. But I find interesting that the west has managed to export a new type of sexism and market it as freedom, for both women and men.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Item Girls? Posted by: AlineSE
Its not just the sexuality in the films
Posted by: fmajor7 on Mar 29, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If one observes the big changes taking place in the Indian way of life and the "culture" over the last 20-30 years one would notice the rapid "Americanization" of the youth. Besides adopting the proverbial Cocacola/Hamburger culture they have started speaking English with an American accent, embraced pre-marital sex, listen to western pop/rock music and wear Levis and Nikes etc. This trend has accelerated due to massive emigration of Indians to the US from the '80s. With the current explosion in the outsourcing job market more and more young Indians travel,have more money and the only easy way to spend their money is on consumer items - hence the explosion of shopping malls.
The Bollywood Film Industry is exploiting this Americanization process by "apeing" the American way of life. Since US is quite successful exporting their "culture" worldwide which is basically their ever popular consumer products - this is what the Indian youth have grabbed enthusiastically.
Of course the traditional Indians are alarmed and rightly so. But the truth is that they can't do anything to stop this trend. India wants to grow rapidly and they are growing very rapidly. Besides. "there's no free lunch". May be the old and the traditional way of Indian life will eventually disappear within the next few generations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Follow The West
Posted by: Gravitas on Mar 29, 2008 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What concerns me more is India is adopting western beauty standards. I enjoy watching Indian movies once in a while because they still have some plump actresses with the most exquisitely beautiful curves. But that is changing as the society Westernizes. Too bad. Not that thin women aren't beautiful too, but only one standard of beauty is obscene. And of course, all societies must share a common morality to hold them together. If they follow our path, as they relax about sex, they will obsess over food. God forbid prohibitions against greed, inhumanity, or hate should ever be any society's true uniting point!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good article but missing queer issues
Posted by: lindabeth on Mar 29, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was a great article, but it missed one of the largest, most interesting aspects of Indian film (continental and diasporic) around representations of sexuality in Indian film by neglecting queer desire, and especially lesbian. Queer lesbian Indian films are particularly significant considering the role that (heterosexual) 'Woman' plays in the constitution of "The Nation' and that resistance to lesbians and gays is termed resistance to Western values in a post-colonial Indian culture.

One interesting aspect of many of the films addressing lesbian desire is a discussion of how such desire is addressed 1) without being 'named' and 2) without attaching desire to an 'identity' as we do in Western gay politics.

Some interesting films include Fire and The Journey, and a really great book is Impossible Desires by Gayatri Gopinath. Find an article here on afterellen and some great academic discussion here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Attitude Started with the Moghul Rulers
Posted by: dudelette on Mar 29, 2008 5:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at the ancient Hindu temples. R-rated, sometimes X-rated carvings on them. The sexually strict attitudes currently being expressed are the result of the Muslim rulers and the Victorian attitudes imposed during the Raj.

So, actually, this is the third wave of Western sexual attitudes the Indians have adopted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yea for another sex article at alternet!
Posted by: timemachinist on Mar 30, 2008 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hooray for Alternet! Another sex article! Real button-pushing topic!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lust for sex, or lust for profit?
Posted by: drcyflowers on Mar 30, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't increasing sex or violence in film, more related to a filmmaker's desire for easy profits, rather than to actual changes in (Indian, or any) society?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Irony with Hindu Culture
Posted by: curiousdwk on Apr 6, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always found it ironic - the Hindu historic culture and the present Indian culture. I have always admired the Hindu culture because they are one of the only religions I know who actually glorify sensuality. Their art of both gods and godesses are very sensual. From here came the Kama Sutra. (Why wasn't the movie Kama Sutra mentioned in this article as that was a ground-breaker?)

Yet the Indian culture doesn't even allow kissing in the movies or on stage. Was this change because of the English Empire during the Victorian period? I find the difference both ironic and disappointing. I hope the future is a return to its historical roots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]