Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Movie Mix

Will Smith Tries to Find the Cure for Loneliness

By Steve Burgess, The Tyee. Posted December 18, 2007.


I Am Legend puts Will Smith in a desolated Big Apple.
Advertisement

"Hell is other people," said Jean Paul Sartre. In the new movie I Am Legend, Will Smith is in Sartre Heaven: the deserted island of Manhattan. Wouldn't that famous borough be even better if you could hunt deer from the driver's seat of a Mustang and hit a few drives over the Hudson from the tail fin of an abandoned Air Force bomber? Ah, but if only a man could be truly alone. That way you'd never have to share your hoarded bacon.

I Am Legend is at least the third film to be made from Richard Matheson's 1954 novel of the same name. There was 1964's Vincent Price vehicle The Last Man on Earth, followed seven years later by Charlton Heston's lonely turn in The Omega Man. Along the way minor adjustments have been made to the plot device that kills off Manhattan. This time out it's all Emma Thompson's fault, messing with genetically engineered viruses. By the time she issues an official "oops," it's too late. Suddenly there are empty taxis everywhere, and damned if you still can't get one.

Smith plays Richard Neville, a military scientist who was still hard at work on licking the pesky bug when time ran out, the picturesque bridges were blown up (rather dangerously with rescue ferries still in the water), and the island was evacuated. Now he continues to work in his basement lab, seeking a cure.

The one-mile diet

Considering that the source material is 53 years old, is it unfair to say the concept will remind you very strongly of 28 Days Later? It's pretty much a greatest hits of the Home Alone genre, with everything but Celine Dion belting out All By Myself. Director Francis Lawrence (Constantine, Britney Spears' Greatest Hits) doesn't seem to worry too much about details, though. There's a family of lions wandering the streets, but no stray cats. Neville fishes in an indoor koi pond, but who's been looking after the fish? And what's with the ever-present bowl of fresh fruit on the scientist's kitchen table? I know there'd be plenty of Spam and spaghetti sauce around, but fresh apples and pears? Has the city been colonized by zombie truck farmers?

Sorry, hope that wasn't a spoiler. You know there's going to be zombies. They're called Darkseekers, sunlight-shunning viral victims who have eaten the remaining healthy folks and in the process truly cemented New York's reputation as the City That Never Sleeps. The scene where we finally meet some of the big pink flesh-gobblers may be the movie's best, a tense haunted-house search for Neville's beloved dog Samantha. Sam the Dog seems set to be the movie's own counterpart to Wilson the Volleyball from Castaway. But the real Wilson turns out to be Fred the Mannequin, Neville's very best buddy who hangs out at a local DVD shop. Until we meet Fred we have really seen nothing from Dr. Neville except sober, rational, thoroughly dedicated behaviour, which makes the DVD store scenes seem jarring and out of place.

Abandoned by God

Eventually Neville gets some genuinely interactive company in the form of a mother and son (Alice Braga from City of God, and young Charlie Tahan) drawn by his repeating radio broadcasts. Only then does Smith get the chance to effectively demonstrate his character's wacky anti-social side. Happy to have real human guests, Doc? "I was saving that bacon," he pouts.

Here I Am Legend inserts a double-shot of warm fuzziness, first with Will Smith's elegy to Bob Marley, then with a God-is-real speech from Braga's character. "There is no God," Dr. Neville replies -- not even Haile Selassie, apparently. In the context of the movie the doctor makes a damn fine case. But of course the movie doesn't believe it. Cue a completely unnecessary Christ-figure plot twist, and fade out.

In the end you'll be left with a few jolts, some cool scenes of an empty city, and a renewed determination not to eat genetically-engineered viruses. Next time they remake this, maybe it will be bad HMOs or inadequate health insurance that kill off New York. It would've made this one more topical.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: will smith, i am legend

Steve Burgess reviews films for The Tyee every other week.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Alternet?
Posted by: nexusandroidsix on Dec 18, 2007 12:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, I have not even seen the movie and this article does not even seem like a good review. Now it is easier to criticize and harder to create, and I am not sure I could write a comprehensive review myself. However, this reviewer seems to have the habit of stringing buzz words together randomly. I am not even sure that this would even pass muster in a senior English class.

For crying out loud, what is the thesis? Where is the point?

Alternet, I beg you, surely there must be something better to offer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Review?
Posted by: xenocyd on Dec 18, 2007 3:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is mostly summary and only partially a review. Reviews don't usually give out the ENTIRE PLOT, damn. I'm glad I've already seen the movie.

But what's with this nitpicking:
"There's a family of lions wandering the streets, but no stray cats."

Maybe cats are infected like the dogs and rats shown?


"Neville fishes in an indoor koi pond, but who's been looking after the fish?"

What, Neville can't be the one caring for the fish? It's not hard when it comes to Koi, they don't need much food.


"And what's with the ever-present bowl of fresh fruit on the scientist's kitchen table? I know there'd be plenty of Spam and spaghetti sauce around, but fresh apples and pears? Has the city been colonized by zombie truck farmers?"

Again... why can't Neville be doing this? Is there a rule against him planting fruit trees in the three years he's been alone? Is this similar to the rule against him caring for Koi?

This article is very sloppy. Note I'm no longer calling it a review.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eview? Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Review? Posted by: monkeywrench
Who's Steve Burgess, Anyway?
Posted by: halweiner on Dec 18, 2007 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would watch Will Smith reading a
supermarket flyer. I don't care about
the flaws in a science fiction movie;
that's why it's fiction. On the other hand
I do care about mindless trashing, nitpicking,
and all around sloppy writing from someone
who claims to be a " reviewer ". I have not seen
the movie yet but sure am going to do that now.
Tell Steve not to give up his day job. Whatever it
is, it must not involve literacy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Weak Review
Posted by: Captain Kickstand on Dec 18, 2007 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In reference to the first response, I am a high-school English teacher and this review wouldn't have passed muster in my class.

The writer doesn't really say anything substantial about the film and while he apologizes for an inconsequential spoiler, he later gives away too much without warning.

It's too bad, too, because I Am Legend is not really about the zombies, or vampires, or Dark-Seekers, or whatever, but about the traumatic effect of isolation on Smith's character. I didn't think the DVD store scene was jarring; here's a guy who's entire sense of psychological stability rests upon the facade of normalcy in his life--watching the news, keeping clean,shaved and dressed, caring for his dog, bantering with the 'people' he encounters every day. The only place he can handle uncertainty is in the lab, which is why he cracks so badly later about 'Frank' (or was it 'Ed?')

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a review?!
Posted by: Chirico on Dec 18, 2007 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jeez, is this a review? It sure doesn't feel like it. It's a snarky, cynical job that feels like it was phoned in by someone who was half asleep.

You'd think that there would be a little better discussion of the film and its source material, but, sorry, no dice. The writer seems more interested in lame jokes and one-liners and useless, idiotic nitpicks than actually talking about a true rarity in Hollywood: a big-budget character-driven film that is actually very good and close to the original 1954 classic novel.

That's what this version of I AM LEGEND is. I give Will Smith a lot of credit for starring in this film and giving it his all; the film I saw--which I'm not sure this critic saw--was tense, suspenseful, scary, sometimes funny, and had a strong tinge of sadness and melancholy. Just like the novel. Plus the views of an abandoned New York were eerie as hell.

Was it perfect? No. But then again, I never expect a "perfect" film. What I want from movies--any movie--is to keep my attention for 90 to 180 minutes without boring me to tears or making me look at my watch every five minutes. I AM LEGEND is one such film that fulfilled this wish.

Next time, can we actually get an honest to goodness review instead of something like this? Please?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ladies and gentlemen, the zipless review
Posted by: Philip Barron on Dec 18, 2007 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author is to be congratulated for producing a "review" that is very nearly content-free, if you discount the mean-spirited spoilers. Burgess' piece is all attitude, a too-cool-for-school pose intended to convey nothing but condescension both for the movie and for anyone who plans to see it.

Mission accomplished, as they say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George R Stewart wrote a better novel.
Posted by: bert69 on Dec 18, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have never understood why "Earth" - also called "American Earth" - has never been filmed. Arguably the best in its genre.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will Sniping?
Posted by: gonzodex on Dec 18, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmm...reading this pseudo-review makes me wonder if the author actually saw the movie or just read a handful of other reviews from people who backhanded the movie.

I took my 15-year old to see it. On the way I told him I'd seen about half a dozen reviews of the movie - half loved it, half dissed it. So we really didn't know what to expect.

Smith is really good. As he admitted in a 60 Minutes segment a few weeks back, he's 'barely above average' in acting chops, but he works harder than anybody he knows.

It showed. Will played the roll beautifully - we saw him slowly slip into slight madness, frustration, neurosis; all aided by the insight into his recent history with timely flashbacks.

Yes, the movie is a Big Hollywood Picture. With Will Smith, that's exactly what you get - that's his strategy, as he put it, to star in Big Hollywood Movies. Lots of special effects, good action, etc.

Nothing wrong with the story - I hadn't seen the earlier incarnations - so didn't know what to expect at the end, and thought it was perfectly appropriate for the story.

Oh, yeah, loved the Marley references...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Better to not read this review...
Posted by: bjerko on Dec 18, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read the synopsis instead:
"A terrible virus has spread across the planet and turned the human race into bloodthirsty monsters. Mankind's only hope for survival is scientist Robert Neville (Will Smith), the one person left unaffected by the epidemic. When he's not fighting for his life against the hordes of the infected, Neville searches for a cure to reverse the virus's effects -- all the while battling his own doubt and despair as he spends every day alone" (Netflix).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fruit on the Table
Posted by: DeeOhGee on Dec 18, 2007 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was fruit on Charlton Heson's table in Omega Man. I always assumed it was supposed to be plastic fruit because, as you note, there's a lot of canned food but few fruit trees in dowtown LA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Next review
Posted by: sliver on Dec 18, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe we could review Gilligan's Island next. Where does their fresh fruit come from?

It's easy to make fun of sci-fi movies. But it's much more rewarding to figure out the deeper meanings of the movie themes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Had that feeling
Posted by: donl51 on Dec 18, 2007 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it was the ''Omega Man'' revisited,good story though,I 'll wait 'till in comes out on cable

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Damn, thanks for ruining the plot
Posted by: Phenix on Dec 18, 2007 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know the basics of the story. I am a fan of Omega Man but never read the book. I don't need to know any of the movie characters. Just a terrible review.

O yea and its another example of Alternet finding college freshmen to write their stories.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AlterNet... Fair and balanced. Brought to you by The CW.
Posted by: eddie torres on Dec 18, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope Steve Burgess, The Tyee, and AlterNet got a piece of the $77 million box office take for I Am Legend's opening weekend in exchange for this... trailer.

Did today's FCC decision to ease newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership influence the brazeness of Warner Brothers' movie marketing division?

Will Joshua Holland steal the starring role in that coveted inner-city hip-hop sitcom everyone dreams about on The CW network?

And does this mean AlterNet staff and readers will finally get free subscriptions to "The Hill"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I saw the Heston version and read the novel.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Dec 18, 2007 2:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know about the Price version but am aware that the original ending of the novel wasn't used and will be disappointed in that when I see the film. I think they were afraid that it could sour reviews and cost them money. Always in the mix when these pictures are made. If it was filmed it will be in the 'director's cut' on DVD later. However the article meandered and seemed to lose focus. An uneasy juxtaposition of social comentary and film review. They could do better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forget the reviews!
Posted by: wireup on Dec 18, 2007 7:09 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who, after all, are film reviewers? They're only other folks with opinions, and who is to say that THEIR opinions are valid and MINE are not.

FORGET THE REVIEWS.

See the film.

It's terrific!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Forget the reviews! Posted by: Lector
» RE: Forget the reviews! Posted by: gotgat54
REVIEWING REVIEWS
Posted by: Roverton on Dec 20, 2007 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"LEGEND" review a flop!

The numbers don't lie...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

geez...
Posted by: Racumin on Dec 21, 2007 11:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are people here so condescending? Is it a crime to not do a great job at writing something? Do you people find enjoyment in cutting someone down? You can be a little more constructive than that? If anything write your own reviews. I like this website, but I'm getting sick of the people trying to make themselves look intelligent at the expense of others. Very childish. small penises?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The book is so much better
Posted by: arieden on Jan 16, 2008 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read the book and then you'll see why this movie is not very good. Matheson's story is so interesting and full of nuance - which Hollywood just blew off.
I suppose the movie is entertianing enough, but it could have been so much more instead of just another shoot 'em up action film.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]