Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Movie Mix

Haunted House Films Are Really About the Nightmares of Gentrification

By Sam J. Miller, PopPolitics.com. Posted October 31, 2007.


The plots of haunted house films frequently portray gentrifiers as innocent victims and the people they have displaced as monsters.
20071031story
20071031story
Advertisement

Where all are guilty, no one is; confessions of collective guilt are the best possible safeguard against the discovery of culprits, and the very magnitude of the crime the best excuse for doing nothing. --Hannah Arendt

In the course of 15 years as a tenant organizer, my friend and mentor Artemio Guerra has become intimately, disturbingly familiar with the process of gentrification -- the shifting demographics, the clash of old and new tenants, and the monstrous machinations of landlords bent on pushing out rent-controlled tenants. The threats and harassing late-night calls. Whole buildings left without heat. Bombs planted in lobbies. INS called on immigrant tenants who fight back. A nightmare so pervasive it would surely rate broader attention if it wasn't a "normal" consequence of capitalism.

Artemio and I always end up having long discussions about horror films and politics, so he called me up after seeing the haunted house film Cold Creek Manor. "It's all about gentrification!" he said. "It's a piece of crap, but still ...

He was right on both counts. In the film, an upper-middle class family from New York City moves into a rural working-class community, and finds itself under assault by a crazy handyman who used to live in the house, as well as the angry spirits who haunt it.

Rich city folks move out into the country and find themselves up against nasty poor locals and a ghost in another recent vengeful-spirit film, Wendigo. The more I thought about this recurrent motif, the more I realized: the modern haunted house film is fundamentally about gentrification. Again and again we see fictional families move into spaces from which others have been violently displaced, and the new arrivals suffer for that violence even if they themselves have done nothing wrong.

This thriving subgenre depends upon the audience believing, on some level, that what "we" have was attained by violence, and the fear that it will be taken by violence. In the process, because mainstream audiences are seen as white, and because gentrification predominantly impacts communities of color, the racial Other becomes literally monstrous.

The biggest cliche in the modern haunted house film is that of the Indian Burial Ground. In Pet Semetary, The Shining, and The Amityville Horror, the source of the problem is that the real estate parcel in question has desecrated sacred ground.

The conquest of North America could be classified as our most extensive gentrification, where thousands of communities of color were violently pushed out by white settlers manifesting racist destiny. The ubiquity of the Indian burial ground points to screenwriter laziness, but it also constructs a movie-going public all too willing to accept that our homes are literally built upon genocide and terrified that those dead Indians will come back -- not to scalp us or to take "our" land through armed force, but to suck our children into the television or make our husbands go insane and try to kill us with an axe.

Guilt over the North American genocide persists, in spite of centuries of racist history that have clouded the general public's grasp on the extremity of violence perpetrated against the Native Americans -- the broken treaties, the Indian Removal Act, the smallpox blankets. With the death of the Western as a film genre and the success of the Civil Rights Movement in challenging the blatancy of racism in mainstream culture, the Indian-as-bloodthirsty-savage was transformed into the Indian-as-murderous-ghost.

That's one of the main ways the horror genre, on its surface so apolitical, connects to the United States' histories of genocide. How far a leap is it from the menacing ex-slaves in Birth of a Nation to the zombies in Night of the Living Dead? Even though its subtext of displacement and gentrification might foreground race and violence and displacement, the haunted house film participates in the mystification of demographic change by convincing us that we are innocent, and the people we have displaced are monsters.

Displacement creates a paradox: We acknowledge the wrong that has been done but feel powerless to do anything about it. A sort of collective guilt springs up, a sense that we are insignificant cogs in the machinery of economic and social factors that create gentrification. This is particularly true for the middle class, who are often forced by economic necessity to move to gentrifying neighborhoods or to new suburban developments that have demolished pre-existing space.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gentrification, haunted house, horror films

Sam J. Miller is a writer and community organizer. For the past three years he has organized homeless people to successfully fight for changes in city housing policy. A graduate of Rutgers University, where he majored in cinema studies, he lives in the Bronx with his partner.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sanctions
Posted by: Rolomax on Oct 31, 2007 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USA sanctioned the nation of Turkey over the genocide of Armenians.

Perhaps the government of Turkey should sanction the USA over the genocide of Native Americans?

Maybe the root of all evil is that we've been told what is the truth, but it is actually a lie.

Christopher Columbus didn't discover America. He killed a lot of natives and took as many as he could as slaves back to Spain.

etc..

It seems it is the nature of man to be born, to grow up, and to leave the nest to stake a claim as a homestead. We haven't been able to do that for some time. Nowadays, we are born having to owe someone else for our rights.

These days, it takes a lot of work and payments for 15 to 30 years for substandard housing that isn't worth 1/3 of the payments before interest is added.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are not your ancestors. Posted by: utilitarianist
» RE: You are not your ancestors. Posted by: anonymous black writer
» It's a virtual museum... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Holocaust musems Posted by: DesertStone
» RE: Holocaust musems Posted by: anonymous black writer
Sex in the House?
Posted by: writerman on Oct 31, 2007 1:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe the haunted house genre goes much deeper into our minds than we think? Perhaps it isn't about gentrification, politics and economics; but about our attitudes to sex and our desires and fears?

Couldn't one think of the "house" as a physical hole in the body which we possess and enter and claim as our own? And at the same time we are fearful of the others who may return and claim the hole for themselves? Surely it's no mere accident that sex is an intergral part of the haunted house genre? Jane Eyre is full of sexuality and sexual metaphor, and modern versions of the same basic story are even more explicit. On a very basic level perhaps "ghosts" symbolize the night, darkness and what happens and is hidden in the darkness; the sexual act and hidden desires.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sex in the House? Posted by: anonymous black writer
This article is really about race baiting and paranoia.
Posted by: utilitarianist on Oct 31, 2007 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scientific method is about accumulating as many facts as reasonably possible and inducing answers from those facts but this article very quickly takes just one fact

"In the process, because mainstream audiences are seen as white, and because gentrification predominantly impacts communities of color"

goes straight to the conclusion

"the racial Other becomes literally monstrous."

before spending the rest of the article tying in everything in the horror genre to every race related act criminal act in America's history perpetrated by whites.


This article makes a mockery of true efforts to end *actual* racism, imperialism and tyranny by ignoring that vital pillar of justice "Innocent until proven guilty" which itself is based on scientific method. This is typical of liberal social initiatives in America, because your abstract marxist thought has no effect you continually probe for more and more innocuous reasons why it doesn't work, changing the word "women" to "womyn" does nothing and whining about haunted house movies achieves nothing either. It's time to start questionning your own beliefs rather than lashing out at everything else in a paranoid frenzy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Doesn't apply to me! Posted by: utilitarianist
» Let me explain myself. Posted by: utilitarianist
» RE: Let me explain myself. Posted by: anonymous black writer
3.9
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Oct 31, 2007 2:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know if haunted house films are about gentrification or race per se. The author of the article seems to be overanalyzing the genre, or stretching it to fit his political agenda.

But I think there is a psychological dimension somewhere along the lines he describes...being a fish out of water, or something. Buying that big ol' house is about escape, but you can't escape your demons, or the fact that you're a boring, middle-class dork.

I agree to some extent about the slasher films. I remember an interview with the guy who played Freddie. He said something to the effect that the killers are often sympathetic characters who get back at the trendy, spoiled teenagers. The audience consciously or subconsciously wants to see them die.

Speaking of cliches, could we please stop using the phrase "communities of color"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Correct. Posted by: utilitarianist
Poltergeist
Posted by: Bloodwedding on Oct 31, 2007 4:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How could the author have missed Poltergeist, the ultimate haunted house/indian burial ground/gentrification movie?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poltergeist Posted by: maddy
weak, weak, too weak...
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Oct 31, 2007 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I smelled fish early on the article, too filled with half truthts and overassumptions. But when the author starts mentioning specific films, one thing was clear to me; he doesn't really see that many horror films in the first place.

¿How can Dark Water have a racial or economical subtext when its an almost direct transition for a japanese film in wich those two factors have no place? (Spoilers ahead) In Dark water a mother who is fighting for her daughter's custody moves to an apartment in a building full of old people, and the ghost of a dead girl aching for her own mom haunts the two of them until the mother sacrifices herself to save her daughter. It is a classic ghost story with no economic or racial background.

How can The Grudge, an exaustive translation from another japanese film, to the point of using the exact same director, sets and supporting cast, have anything to do with scarcity of decent housing?. Where is the gentryfied when it (Spoiler alert again) evolves around the sintoist concept of horrible events (a man killing his family) tainting everything? You might dig deep enough to find a denounce of the eta caste status before the meijii revolution, but I doubt that has little meaning outside teology right now.

Scream has to do with class? because... everyone in that flick has the same economical status. It is actualy a meta-film, a film about horror films who is at the same time a horror film. It doesnt punish sex precisely because it aknowledges slasher films punishing sex!

Silent Hill is a gothic film about reencarnation and (again) family ties in wich there is no gentrified persons, just a lot of victims of their own wacky cult who werent replaced by anyone, just left a barren space...

There is a lot of subtext in horror films, and a lot of great analysis written about that subject. This one isn't

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm, doesn't this remind me of something?
Posted by: drouse on Oct 31, 2007 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, does anyone remember Chasing Amy?

http://www.whysanity.net/monos/hooper.html

Is it possible that we are forcing the thesis a bit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
good grief
Posted by: izzyK on Oct 31, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"How far a leap is it from the menacing ex-slaves in Birth of a Nation to the zombies in Night of the Living Dead? "

Answer: Really far! Birth of a Nation is an unabashedly racist film and accepted by mainstream society. Night of the Living Dead is an unabashedly anti-racist film (anyone who has seen the ending of the original knows that, and it was likely the first horror film with an African American in a heroic leading role) that was an underground phenomenon.

i found this odd in the middle of an article which was otherwise pretty knowledgable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: good grief Posted by: mcstewey
» RE: good grief Posted by: YogiBear
John Carpenter's "They Live" ---a REAL social statement!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 31, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is really a stretch from its basic premise.

Amityville Horror---is a social statement? gimme a break!

I think that the "houses can be evil" thing is a leftover from our days when we believed inanimate objects could have "supernatural" properties. From a time when people believed that trees and stones had spirits.

For horror or sci fi with REAL social commentary, I suggest the original "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" and--especially pertinent today even though it was made 20 years ago--John Carpenter's "They Live".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gentrifiers get their comeuppance
Posted by: lamar on Oct 31, 2007 6:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've always thought that haunted house movies were about gentrification. But I see it from the other angle: Gentrifiers get their comeuppance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gentrifiers get their comeuppance Posted by: anonymous black writer
Did Anyone Ever Hear of the Political Unconscious? A Subtext? Historicizing?
Posted by: eugenev on Oct 31, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this is an amazing article. It's written for a general audience -- so the author doesn't bore you with the intricacies of his reading of individual films (and in that sense it is reductive) -- but the argument is hard to deny.

Just because the primary, conscious function of horror films might be to entertain (through, paradoxically, fear), they are also historical documents, written in a particular time and place. They are conduits for the values of their era.

Miller didn't pull racial fears out of thin air. It's not a coincidence that the Indian burial ground is a reoccurring motif in these films. And the same goes for gentrification -- it is amazing how many horror film houses look the same and are in the same neighborhood.

Tying all of that together is just being a good reader ....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm.... what are horror flicks all about?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 31, 2007 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The vast majority are just a series of tension-and-release exercises in trying to scare the audience. THe victim goes into the house alone, the music builds up to a crescendo, spooky things happen - and then, bang! everyone jumps. Do it again, and again, and again. Ho hom.

There are plenty of subliminal arguments that once could make - one could claim that they're all part of an attempt to increase the fear level in the general population as an aid in political manipulation - mental terrorism, in other words. That might be a bit of a stretch.

But that gets a little closer to it. The good horror films always have a psychological aspect to them. Psychopaths are scary - that was the genius of The Shining, is that it portrays an isolated individual who goes crazy and tries to kill his own family - and you've also got a likable protagonist (the kid).

Other "good" horror films include Jacob's Ladder, really a film about war (If I was a psychologist treating a war veteran with PTSD, I'd suggest they watch that film in a supportive setting), and the very disturbing Seven, which provides an all-too-realistic glimpse at the mentality of a religious fanatic.

As far as the haunted house / gentrification notion, I'm really not sure - but the general notion is spot on - films in the U.S. are not just entertainment; they often include various deliberate (or accidental) "subliminal messages."

In general, such strategies are known as "techniques of mass persuasion." For example, the deliberate glorification of war and "sacrifice" was a fairly common theme in movies that were produced after 9/11.

Note that propaganda flicks can often be identified because they usually follow Goebbel's recipe for propaganda: "Take a complex topic, simplify it to the point where a small child can understand it, and then repeat, repeat, repeat."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It was good for me
Posted by: cba11 on Oct 31, 2007 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally! I get why people watch horror films, even if they don't. Great Story. Thanks for the insight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Ghosts
Posted by: jim_altman on Oct 31, 2007 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a second pathology in our love/hate affair with horror tales, the fear of death. We are so disconnected from history that whatever drudges up the past is sure to be evil. In other cultures where ancestor communication is more common, people are not so terrified of the concept of a ghost. In our culture, however, we can't wait to leave home and sever the umbilical connection of family and ancestor. Not satisfied with our genetic maps, we attempt to reinvent ourselves to cultural norms. It's all because we don't believe in the past or the existence of a future. It's all about here and now. Like children who fear to fall asleep, we fear death because, if we die, existence might cease. The "undead" of horror tales have to be defeated so that all of existence is not "uncreated."

To quote the apostle Paul (Acts 26:8): "Why is it thought incredible by any of you that God raises the dead?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe
Posted by: willymack on Oct 31, 2007 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few broad parallels between "horror" films and gentrification can be drawn, but I think they're thin at best. Don't forget those "gentrifiers" include people of color in real life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe Posted by: anonymous black writer
Some other thoughts
Posted by: whoever on Oct 31, 2007 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the critics that the article's premise is not very general. I thought of Beetlejuice (Beetlejuice as Saul Alinsky-clone?) and Halloween as counterexamples right away, along with the Academy-Award horror film To Kill a Mockingbird, which has the obvious counter-theme. The theme of 'new' homebuyers versus 'old' former dwellers is pretty notable, and may have taken over supremacy from the 'scientist-as-villain' movies of yore (pace the Sci-Fi Channel). But we should think through other possibilities than pure internalized racism/classism: since the US has a majority population of fairly recent immigrants, there's no past of Vampires and Golems to draw from--the 'Indians' are our 'mysterious old' dwellers, whose unfamiliar customs and pre-immigrant history lend them to recasting as villains. As are the dislocated, for gentrified areas, just as the old rich are where they have gone away (The Turn of the Screw? Lair of the White Worm?) Horror themes may be responding to CORRELATES of racist/classist/sexist (Play Misty for Me, Fatal Attraction--along with the woman-as-victim theme), rather than direct bias. Correlates can have bad effects, too, but they may need different symbolic antidotes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sam needs to....
Posted by: rbohan on Oct 31, 2007 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
do more community organizing and less writing. I hope he's better at the former than he seems to be at the latter.

What's next? An essay on Yosemite Sam as a symbol of our patriarchal, racist, imperialist society?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sam needs to.... Posted by: anonymous black writer
Let's analyze other genres of film....
Posted by: thelostsailor on Oct 31, 2007 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
since they are suspicious just being art forms alone. Al Qaida must be responsible. Shouldn't we hold an art accountable for being passively terroristic in the eyes of you (the film critic who has the Right Opinion about all these art forms), deep down inside? Wouldn't our 'interrogation' that is the norm today get to the bottom of this?!

Write about something that is about to destroy the world - there's a long list....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Night of the Living Dead Wasn't Racist
Posted by: truthagainst on Oct 31, 2007 11:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The protagonist of that movie was a black man who put a bunch of whiny, middle-class whites in line, and for the time when the movie came out, that was really radical. As for the part at the end when the cops "mistake" him for a zombie, even though he was really the only one of the group who had what it took to survive, I think that was a social commentary.

And yet, you list that movie alongside something like, "Birth of a Nation?" Man oh man, have you ever even WATCHED it (NoLD, I mean)?

Oh, and one other point: horror stories aren't just about what people fear. Oftentimes, they're stories of warning, trying to show people what NOT to do. I mean, horror stories have been around as long as any folklore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Night of the Living Dead Wasn't Racist Posted by: ronfar@hotmail.com
to some gentrification, to others revival
Posted by: heliana on Oct 31, 2007 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a bunch of gunk!

As if monstruous old mansions were specifically built to meet the needs of the working class.

I have a feeling the substandard shoddy structures built by profiteers to be hawked to the working poor (plenty of them in the early th century) have pretty much disingegrated by now. The ones that haven't are meeting the wrecking ball - and for good measure. I challenge you to try living in a 80-year old workers' bungaloo. It will be flimsy, drafty, smelly, moldy, askew on the foundation - if it has any foundation (in which case many banks won't lend you any money to purchase it.) The plumbing will creak and you will never have water pressure - the water line's too narrow and probably clogged with build-up. The electrical will hiss at you - stuff of horror truly.

Meanwhile, the land the house sits on may be close to a metropolis downtown and valuable - thus the dog pile of a house will be razed and a new house will be built on the lot.

All this gibberish about good old houses and great old neighborhoods reeks of snobbishness and superiority.

The houses that are being remodeled ( and thus escape demolition) often boast excellent materials and craftmanship - hence this "gentrification" fashion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting article!
Posted by: WitchyNy on Oct 31, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the author is on to something here. Artists often hide meanings in their work--why not Monster Movies?

Those of us old enough know that many Movies, TV shows and Music-were really about the Viet-Nam war.
Star-Track is a good example. And got itself cancelled when it got to obvious..

We SHOULD feel great guilt over the American Indians. IF this country survives bushandco. I think someday Native American culture will teach the rest of us a lot about how to live here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

obviously hit somewhere near the mark
Posted by: DeAnander on Oct 31, 2007 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you can always tell by the intensity of the denial reflex from the "innocent whiteboys rule" contingent. when they get all hissy and over-the-top and start dragging "how you spell 'women'" into the thread out of thin air, then the writer has managed to touch a nerve (race and gender are never far apart in supremacist fantasy). Miller may not be spot-on in every detail, but he's clearly tickled a deep discomfort and sense of bad conscience underneath all the entitlement and bogus equality/demodracy rhetoric of the US mainstream.

a Truth and Reconciliation effort is long overdue to lance the festering sores on America's public conscience...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rich??
Posted by: gellero on Oct 31, 2007 6:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a house in the country make you rich?? What is rich, exactly??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cold Creek Manor
Posted by: dbuskirk1 on Oct 31, 2007 7:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice to see a critic work politics into his work, so many reviewers refuse to acknowledge the political dynamics often blaring beneath surface of a film. I wrote a piece touching on the politics of COLD CREEK FARM but was surprised when I looked through others writers work that this angle was nearly entirely avoided.

My piece can be read here:
http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/view.php?id=6191

On a positive note, almost every reviewer recognized the film as being awful.

Keep up the good work Sam.

-db

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ridiculous artcicle
Posted by: bim on Oct 31, 2007 8:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an urban planner and former resident of the Phoenix area I find this article amusing. Sun belt cities have terribly boring downtowns and are making strong efforts to bring in density that reduces sprawl and increases mass transit use. Tomorrow there will be an article on the evils of sprawl and the after that about the evils of reducing immigration. See my point? Some people will complain no matter what. A painful reality in my field. Also, gays have historically been the leaders of gentrification a point not made by the author, which leads me to believe they have no idea what they are talking about. Some cities need to do more to provide affordable housing, but protecting inner cities from more density is not the answer to the problem and neither is sprawl.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Land of the Living Dead
Posted by: operdoc on Oct 31, 2007 9:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting theory but I believe the writer got it wrong about the zombie movie metaphor. The zombies generally represent mindless consumers and the heroes are generally anything but innocent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Action films are actually about the fake moon landing
Posted by: Eat Politicians on Oct 31, 2007 9:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bullets that escape out of the guns are actually the shuttle being launched into space and badges are symbolic of the astronaut suits....you know what I'm saying?

Like nothing is what it means, everything is about everything else and nobody understands it but me and my close circle of academic paranoids...I mean friends.

But they actually stand for something else too.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Cannot Believe
Posted by: apophenia_monkey on Oct 31, 2007 9:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you folks are lapping up this claptrap of an article. the author pole-vaults to spin his own agenda on a genre of movie. he's done nothing but assert while wearing dogma-blinders.

there's as much objectivity in this article as a bush 43 press conference or state of the union address.

freud is rumoured to have said "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar".

folks, sometimes a horror flick is just a horror flick--something the author from the MTV generation of "PopPolitics" might do well think on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Cannot Believe Posted by: anonymous black writer
Author's Claim Is Misguided
Posted by: Stickarm on Nov 1, 2007 2:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The claim that films of this type "are really about" gentrification is misguided. These films are not, in fact, about gentrification.

It is eminently possible that the "horrors" presented by the movies may strike a resonant chord for someone familiar with the "horrors" of gentrification. This seems to be the case for the author of this article, as he is attempting to recontextualize the ideas and images in the movies in order to illustrate his own ideas about gentrification. It is safe to say that the author feels that gentrification is pretty horrible.

The connection does not operate in the other direction. A man who spends his whole life trying and failing to build a teleportation device could be compared to Sisyphus. This does not mean that the story of Sisyphus is really about trying to build a teleportation machine.

We may illustrate the issue of gentrification by calling on imagery from movies about haunted houses, but that does not make movies about haunted house "really about" gentrification.

By making such a strong and misguided claim, the author distracts his readers from the point he wishes to make and fundamentally undermines his entire endeavor. This is poor political discussion and miserable art criticism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Author's Claim Is Misguided Posted by: Woodpecker
Metaphor
Posted by: dbuskirk1 on Nov 1, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is amazing how many people here deny the world can be analyzed on a metaphoric level. It seems like most people replying aren't arguing that your metaphoric reading is misguided but they are angry that Miller would dare to see the metaphoric content. It like color-blind people arguing that color doesn't exist. This sort of metaphoric analysis should be picked up and taught in English class but I know I didn't really learn it till years later.

I don't see how one could draw accurate conclusions or wisdom about life and politics if you do not understand how metaphors flow from situations and events.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Metaphor Posted by: anonymous black writer
Gentrification? I don't buy it.
Posted by: Urgelt on Nov 1, 2007 11:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thesis expressed in the article is interesting, but I would like to offer a different take.

The entire notion of "undead" is an intensely religious theme. It's a validation of the idea that Satanic powers are active in assaulting "good Christians." In horror, Christian symbols are often depicted as effective in fending off the minions of Satan. The undead themselves are deplorable, not merely because of their rotting flesh and implacable hostility, but because spiritually, they have fallen from grace. God has rejected them; they are truly damned.

Horror often depicts the living victims of satanic undead as those who are unthinkingly sinful. They are lustful or selfish or cruel. They are "asking for it," and they often become converted into the "damned" themselves. The heroes who overcome the threat, on the other hand, are portrayed as redeemable, noble, unselfish, and often pious.

I have noticed that horror as a genre appeals very specifically to evangelicals. Atheists and agnostics are less likely to be titillated - they see horror through a different lens. In the absence of religion, the idea of evil supernatural powers struggling against "good" holds little narrative power.

Indian burial grounds resonate in horror not because of any lingering guilt over genocide, which in any event manifests mostly on the fringe, not mainstream America. They resonate because those dead indians were pre-Christian; souls unloved by God, therefore falling within the domain of Satan.

It's religion, specifically evangelical Christianity, which explains the popularity of horror, not gentrification.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rorschach
Posted by: screwjack2000 on Nov 1, 2007 2:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ink_blot_test

Everybody sees what they want to see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Rorschach Posted by: dbuskirk1
» RE: orschach Posted by: apophenia_monkey
» RE: orschach Posted by: dbuskirk1
» RE: orschach Posted by: apophenia_monkey
The article is quite clever. I often see popular culture like film as a sublimation of real issues.
Posted by: yellow on Nov 5, 2007 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that innocent families moving into old, fixer upper houses and being subsequently menaced by a violent poltergeist are really sublimations for noble urban gentrifiers replacing urban America's monsters in their efforts to reclaim the city never occured to me but is surely a brilliant analysis of haunted house plots like Poltergeist and The Amityville Horror!! The idea is imparted that the urban poor vex "the good people" in their quest for reclaiming and improving our cities which the former monsters only destroyed. This highly distorted and twisted version of the real story is similar to the simplistic ideas imparted in US horror movies about "good people" being menaced by an inexplicable, absolute evil which is utterly detached from reality and seems to have no reasonable cause. The US horror genre is ahistoric to say the very least. Other than being a sordid source of silly inculcation it is good, clean fun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just a comment
Posted by: anonymous black writer on Nov 11, 2007 11:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who's to say horror films, like all genres of film, are made to both inform and entertain? That is the point of art in general, and film everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]