Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Movie Mix

Must-See Indy Film Exposes Cruel Teen Correction Programs

By Maia Szalavitz, Huffington Post. Posted July 7, 2007.


Over the GW takes us inside "tough love" teen programs which pose as rehabilitation clinics, but offer their patients steady physical abuse and humiliation.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Until now, there has never been a feature film that takes us inside "tough love" teen programs like those headed by Romney financiers Mel Sembler and Robert Lichfield. The New York Times calls Nick Gaglia's indy production, Over the GW a "lean yet harrowing ... look at reprogramming that masquerades as rehabilitation." It is playing for just a short time here in New York City (details)-- and I urge everyone to see it, especially those whose lives have been touched by these monstrous "therapies."

The movie was based on Gaglia's own story. From 1997-1999, he attended the KIDS program in New Jersey, which was run by Miller Newton. Those who follow these issues will probably recall that Newton previously served as national clinical director for Sembler's Straight Inc. Despite having had to pay out over $10 million in settlements related to abuse he participated in and directed and admitting abusive practices to regulators, Newton still sits on an advisory board for Sembler's Drug Free America Foundation.

Gaglia discussed his experience with me recently. Just 25, the writer/director is beginning to hear from Hollywood -- the NY Post, NY Sun and Variety also took note of his debut film. Before being sent to KIDS, Gaglia had auditioned for and was accepted to New York's prestigious Professional Performing Arts School, whose notable alumnae include Clare Danes, Alicia Keys and Britney Spears.

But Gaglia had problems at home. Although he's still not quite sure why, he didn't want to go to school and simply couldn't communicate with his parents, who had divorced when he was nine. "I wanted to do what I wanted to do," he says. "I wanted my independence and they were getting in my way." Soon he was drinking and smoking pot daily-- and coming home late, smashing furniture and punching doors. Until after KIDS, he'd never even tried any other drugs.

When taken to the program, located near a major shopping mall just over the George Washington Bridge from his home, he was told by his parents that he'd be going shopping. "I tried to run away, but a group of five people grabbed me. I was a really skinny kid and I wasn't going to fight, I wasn't violent."

He was strip-searched by teenagers who were already inmates-- made to "chicken squat" naked in front of them. In the film, the violence and potential for abuse in having unsupervised adolescents do such searches is represented with the terrifying snap of a rubber glove and images of a naked boy, surrounded by bigger, tougher kids who are clothed.

What he doesn't show is the urine stains visible on the "clean" underwear he was given to replace the "druggy" clothes he was made to leave behind when admitted. When restrained on the floor, teens were not given access to the bathroom. "At my first group, there was a kid being restrained on the floor and his hands were soiled," he says.

"I was restrained over 100 times," he continues, detailing how fellow participants would throw him to the floor for "offenses" such as responding to being poked because he wasn't paying attention by trying to fend off the attack. These restraints could last hours-- with one person sitting atop the victim while others held down each limb. The most frightening part was fear of suffocation: sometimes the victim's mouth would be covered and his nose pinched close.

Writhing was interpreted as defiance. "One time I felt like I was five seconds away from dying," he says, "I have scars in my mouth which was bleeding. I was panicked and trying to communicate but they think you are resisting. What are you supposed to do?"

Grim as this material is, Gaglia represents only the barest outlines of it in the film: limited both by budget and by recognizing that if he did show the whole truth, he might make a movie that was unbearable to watch. He also avoided the trap of didacticism, which often mars attempts to tell these stories.

"I wanted the viewer to feel like he was sitting in that room," he says. "You don't know why your sister was there, you don't know what day it is, you don't know why they were doing certain things. And that's the way I directed the actors."

In fact, the actor who played the character based on Newton didn't even know that there was a real-life model for the story until later. "I told him to act as though he believed he was doing everything 'to help these kids,'" says Gaglia. The self-righteous rage and "ends justify the means" thinking that characterize the operators of tough-love programs comes through vividly.

Gaglia eventually managed to escape from KIDS by jumping out of a car stuck in traffic at the toll plaza of the GW Bridge. The program parents who were driving the car had childproof locks to prevent escape via the back doors-- but the front seat was empty, and Gaglia went for it. Fortunately, after getting the attention of the police, he was able to convince his own parents not to return him.

But, like many who left, he was at first terrified that the program's predictions of a future of "jails, institution or death" would come true rapidly because he'd left without completing it. And, again like many others, when that wore off, he began drinking more heavily and using harder drugs. "When the drunkest guys you know are saying 'Hey dude, you're drinking too much,' you start to think it's a problem," he says. Ultimately, he studied film at Hunter College and got back on course.

"I don't see how anyone who was in that kind of a situation for as long as I was could come out without post-traumatic stress disorder," he says. "I had nightmares all the time that I was back in."

I attended a screening recently for those who had been through KIDS and similar programs. I was struck by the age range: there were people from their mid-20's to their 40's who had suffered through years at KIDS. Though many were nervous that the film would trigger distressing memories, those I spoke with found that the film validated their experience. "More than anything, I made the movie as an homage to these people," says Gaglia, "We're all speaking with this film."

Let's hope that people who can prevent the abuse from continuing are finally listening.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: film, over the gw

Maia Szalavitz is a journalist who covers health, science and public policy. Her most recent book, co-written with leading child trauma expert Bruce D. Perry, MD, PhD, is The Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog and Other Stories from a Child Psychiatrist's Notebook: What Traumatized Children Can Teach Us About Loss, Love and Healing (Basic, 2007).


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Frightening stuff
Posted by: Cruella on Jul 7, 2007 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ugly!
Posted by: talkville on Jul 7, 2007 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our human history is replete with attempts to balance Reason with the Passions. There is no shortage of "methods" and "therapies" and manners and ways of subduing these most human of all properties each of us have. There's Stoicism, Asceticism, Theology and Science (in our days, "behavioral sciences"). One solution, favored by particularly zealous haters of the passions is simply to eliminate them, crush them out until they are dead and thus no longer a 'problem'. There's good money in social and individual control. It makes 'governance' so much simpler and predictable when one no longer has passions or emotions anymore. It's a pragmatic and utilitarian benefit - for "the good of all". People behave better without passions interfering in the command structure. Business runs more smoothly, workers are docile and do what they're told and everybody's happy with 'their place' in the wonderful world. Everything is rationalized and efficient and excellent. And there's plenty of pharmaceutical commodities to keep the scars numb and pleasant. After a treatment such as described in the article, all the 'cured' graduates can go forth and get ' life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness'. They've been rendered harmless and assigned their place.

It's beyond time to call these "businesses" and everyone involved in them to account. They have rendered words such as love, justice, excellence, and reason more than meaningless -- thoroughly absurd. They don't want to curb or control or dominate or manage or balance the passions of each of us -- they want to annihilate them. What is left of being human after that? It's an urgent and timely and open question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These Programs Seem to Encourage Violence
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Jul 7, 2007 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the most troubling things about this sort of program (and there are plenty to choose from) is how these kids are encouraged to participate in the cruelty. Think about the consequences when these kids leave: how many of them go on to think it's OK to treat other people this way?


elizabethkateswitaj.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Auh-bu-grey Posted by: Krain61
NEW MILITARY BASES WILL OPEN
Posted by: Roverton on Jul 7, 2007 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and need interrogators. It sounds like a training program for Guantanamo guards more than prisoners.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

...and besides
Posted by: rinthy on Jul 7, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...think how nicely they'll fit into private security companies like Blackwater, government agencies like the CIA, or the military personnel needed at places like Gitmo. Think of KIDS, as an invaluable training camp for the implementation of American policy and ideals.
Rinthy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is "Basic Training"
Posted by: Pirate1 on Jul 7, 2007 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I take it a lot of the posters here aren't veterans. These "tough love" deals are scripted after military basic training. It is how they attempt to transform benign youth into unfeeling killers for the "homeland"... generally it works, at least long enough to get them onto the battlefield. It stands to reason that graduates of such youth programs give back in the way they were given to, believe themselves to be "workers", that having a job is all life is about... and kicking ass is how you deal with folk with differing opinions or beliefs or ideas, lifestyles, skin color, gender. It has been going on for eons. How do you think the Pharoahs got all those slaves to do all that work? Movies show fat guys with whips pushing around hundreds of otherwise powerful men... but for so many to have bought the line and not just rise up and take care of the guy with the whip, there had to be training that stripped away all sense of individuality, all hope for any alterate way of being and taught that this was the way it was. You know... "this is the best of all worlds..." "you have it great!" "What are you complaining about... " "this life is just for toil anyway, the NEXT one (ha) is where you get your reward"... and here we are...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You got it Posted by: ateo
Monstrous, and believable
Posted by: ateo on Jul 7, 2007 12:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no doubt that these stories are true because having seen how the military treats its own in training I can only imagine how these former drill instructors (sadists, most of them) would treat kids that are criminals in an even less accountable environment than basic training.

On the other hand many of these kids are presented with two alternatives: prison or one of these "tough love" camps. So either they get tortured by sadistic guards at the camp or they get tortured, raped, and maybe get HIV in prison.

Tough call honestly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is worse than U.S. military basic training
Posted by: ateo on Jul 7, 2007 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the other hand check out Russian military life:

Amnesty International

I think the goal of these programs is basically to show people a side of life so horrible that they will do anything to avoid experiencing it again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» dark side of life Posted by: grailsnail
Non Sequitur
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jul 7, 2007 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as many people have rightly pointed out the fallacy of 'pro-life' conservatives being for the death penalty, I am here to point to the millions of evangelicals that push and support the harsh and caustic environment in our corrections system.

All this so-called tough-love is nothing more than institutionalized sadism and has nothing to do with 'Christian' principles. Grace, forgiveness an second chances are very far from what happens in either our juvenile or adult prisons and jails.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Non Sequitur Posted by: owleyes
» RE: Non Sequitur Posted by: familyfarm
It's private prison for the benefit of crappy, wealthy parents.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jul 7, 2007 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of these 'inmates' are put there by their conservative religious parents who suddenly find themselves 'incapable' of dealing with their children.

Just like in any other prison, these programs are learning laboratories for crime. While the kid's 'drugs' are taken away, all of these institutions have medication programs for their inmates - and the inmates learn how to display the symtoms of 'attention deficit disorder' if they're at all smart - then they get all the Ritalin and Adderall they want. The not-so-smart ones buy their Ritalin from the 'patients'. They also learn that Ritalin works faster if you grind it up and snort it - just like with meth!

When the kids get out of these institutions, they haven't changed - they've simply developed new skill sets, such as how to acquire drugs on the sly, and how to hide their drug use from their parents. It's just like a state prison, where the inmates teach one another how to break into houses and cars, and launder money, and move contraband over borders.

When they get older, they abandon their parents in decrepit nursing homes, steal their social security checks, and generally behave like ungrateful children - now, why would they do that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

adults vs. kids
Posted by: owleyes on Jul 7, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This movie sounds like a distillation of the standard dynamic between adults and kids. Adults have all the power, while kids have none. I want teach kids to rebel against their parents constructively. This article reinforces why that is so important.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: adults vs. kids Posted by: grailsnail
The Xtian Nation at work
Posted by: DaBear on Jul 7, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like an intriguing film. I wonder what the real story would be like on screen... given that "Captivity" grossed people out so much and this is purporting to tell a true story, why not shock the shit outta people with the reality of it?

This is what happens when you allow the Xtian fundie minority to forge a Xtian Nation from the United States. Time to begin testing folks for trauma and punishment obsessions.... and preventing them from holding positions of power anywhere on the continent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mel Sembler
Posted by: familyfarm on Jul 7, 2007 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The forerunner of KIDS, was Mel & Betty Sembler's string of franchised, (funded by taxpayer's money, insurance companies or parent's who paid $!4,000 to the courts) Betty was Jeb Bush's campaign finance manager & both Sr. and Jr. Bush appointed the Semblers to be US Ambassadors! They recently returned for Italy..., where Mel had the taxpayers build a lavish wing onto the residence, and put his name on it!!) Their family has made BILLIONS in Fla real estate deals, and are members of AIPAC, one of the most influential groups of Jewish lobbyists there are..Straight, Inc. was forced to close, finally, after CPS and parents, etc. won major lawsuits against their abusive programs, then they fled the US basically, gratis Bush I..Some of their senior cult members, then opened up branches of the same program, under the name KIDS, or for very wealthy families, ELAN and that is where Michael Skakel was sent..Interestingly, slimy Mark Fuhrhman CLAIMED to have spoken to others in ELAN and they said Michel had alluded to HE being the one to kill Martha Oxley..., which Fuhrman wrote about in his best selling book..Skakel's name was all over the neo-con news, just as the 2000 campaigns were starting, so of course ALOT of opportunity to smear the Kennedy name, and the jury got their scapegoat.....but although convicted, he is still trying to appeal, and the courts seem to turn him down...ELAN ABUSES or just plain old GOP funding, may have convicted him wrongly...NO FOCUS was given to the man staying with the boys that weekend...who ALSO had access to the golf clubs, and had also met Martha earlier that evening....!! He was a former footall coach at an exclusive boy's school where the older Skakel boy had played football. That boy was the first suspect, BUT why NOT THAT COACH...?? Mr. Skakel's hiring him to be with the kids that weekend for Mrs.Skakel had died, left the asst. coach total freedom..WHY not suspiscion however??? Why & how did Mark Fuhrman GET a right-wing radio show and acc/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Humiliation = Laziness
Posted by: Gravitas on Jul 7, 2007 6:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stigma, shame and embarrassment are the laziest ways to enact change. There are always more humanistic ways of going about it. Not only that, but these kids will go on to pass their emotional abuse to others down the line. From tough love, to Paris Hilton making a mockery out of fat kids in her new diet camp program, these are low caliber human beings who should be on the receiving end of therapy - not those pretending to give it.

"Nonviolence calls for us to reject what is humiliating." Gandhi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Humiliation = Laziness Posted by: grailsnail
All kinds of troubled teens get thrown in these places
Posted by: PirateJesus on Jul 8, 2007 1:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a very good friend once who was as stable as a teenager could be, really. Her best friend took the family gun and shot himself in the head, leaving his body for his little brother to find. She struggled with this for a while and a percieved misunderstanding about why he did became suicidal (it was claimed that it was related to a sport but it was really more his father's abuse...) Eventually, she went to seek counciling over her own suicidal risks, was considered a high risk and was sent to a "tough love" facility for rehabilitation. I will note this was the sort of place used for violent teens and drug users, not a place to treat disturbed kids (my father actually ran the only act in town for that.)

Apparently she was locked in to the program unless her parents withdrew her in 24 hours from the time she was taken there. The conditions were appalling and her fellow inmates were less than nice from her descriptions. Luckily she got to make a phone call and barely managed to convince her parents she didn't need to be locked up for 6 months. Still, I can only imagine how f'd up she'd have turned out if she'd been forced to stay in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bullying is LEGAL in America
Posted by: messedup on Jul 8, 2007 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think people need to realize and come to grips with that concept. Their are a few states where they are bringing in legislation for it, but it is only for children who learn it from the adults anyways.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Tough Love" misnomer
Posted by: drcyflowers on Jul 8, 2007 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm so sick of the mainstream media repeating the "tough love" euphemism as if it had anything to do with love.

In fact, "tough love" really means cruelty to young people, especially males, especially racial minority males.

Conservatives love to use dishonest terms, and the media always repeat them mindlessly. Examples:

"Right to work state" really means anti-union state.
"States' rights" really means the states' right to treat black people badly
"Support the troops" really means support US imperialism
"Fair tax" means a tax which is unfair to the lower class
The list goes on and on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Suprise, suprise....
Posted by: jaby on Jul 8, 2007 5:43 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The parenting in this country is sooo god-awful. No one knows what to do or how to do it when it comes to the little ones.

So they (parents) spend 15 years not showing their children right from wrong, not disciplining them in age-appropriate ways, not teaching them what is expected of them, and then they send the kids away because they just can't take the results of their bad parenting anymore.

There is a line where permissivness declines into neglect and transforms into abuse. These camps are so far past that line it isn't even visible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

children & The Powers That Be... : "teach your children well... "
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jul 9, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WTF? - Shock Therapy For Kids in Custody: Torture or Cure?

MK-ULTRA: Canadian Patients allege CIA abuse

The RingWorm Children” documentary: how the CIA sponsored Israel's radiation experimentation on Sephardic children... award-winning documentary.

“Sex Crimes in the Vatican": BBC & Pope bicker over documentary of child abuse collusion

Child Abuse Yields Thousands of Deaths - Obituary: Saddam Hussein

Caged Kids?: caretakers were allowed 11 foster kids?


we reap what we sow...

Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
"We, two, form a multitude" ~ Ovid
==
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too close for comfort
Posted by: alphakat on Jul 11, 2007 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This made me think of Lord of the Flies with kids controlling and handing out punishment to other kids. Nasty stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part of the Solution is to Respect Kids' Individual Rights!
Posted by: alicelillie on Jul 11, 2007 5:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If young people could exercise the right to walk out of these places that would go a long ways toward solving the problem.

What is happening here is kidnapping and false imprisonment, and it should be treated as such. Then if abuses occur, kids would walk, and the "schools" would go broke.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

impeachment
Posted by: gsaephanh on Jul 13, 2007 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call in your vote TODAY for impeaching Bush and Cheney at this number: 202-225-0100

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100. PLEASE CALL TODAY. At the toll free capitol switchboard #s below, you can also call your particular district’s congressional representative to insist that they support impeachment for Cheney. E.g., for Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 for Cheney; please say:

“In addition to supporting Kucinich’s bill H Res 333, I would also support a similar Impeachment Resolution against Bush, especially after the disgraceful Scooter Libby sentence “commuting” and the following issues: wiretapping, torture, numerous 9/11 intelligence misrepresentations, the continued occupation of Iraq, gross negligence during Hurrican Katrina, the Valerie Plame CIA leak, […list your other grounds…] ..”[see resolutions on tab #2 for other grounds for impeachment]).

LANIC requests that Americans call today…Not tomorrow or next week. Every call adds to the extraordinary grasswoots and nationwide movement’s pressures on House Speaker Pelosi to act now .before further innocent lives are lost in Iraq and elsewhere. Last week 28 Americans lost their lives. Over the July 4, 2007 weekend over 400 Iraqis lost their lives…

SEND MAIL TO HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Attn: Nancy Pelosi, House Representative/Speaker of the House, 235 Cannon H.O.B., Washington, DC 20515 ; Pelosi’s Fax # 202 225-8259

Pelosi’s e-mail address :

Americanvoices@mail.house.gov

CC her at: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Please send her a pro-impeachment email and a specific call to endorse H Res 333. Note: On Saturdays/Sundays, Pelosi’s office has a comment line at which you can leave a voicemail. Your message will be transcribed and relayed to her. Please do encourage your family/friends to contact the same number. Refer them to www.bcimpeach.com for the actual telephone #s & contact info.

Find out who your Congressional representative is and call that person. For toll free numbers to your Congress rep: (800) 828 – 0498; (800) 459 – 1887; or (866) 340 – 9281. You will be connected once you name your congress person. The staff aid should take detailed notes and provided to the Congressional representative.

Final Note: Please say “I support Impeachment based on ____. I’d like to know where “[representative name]” stands on this issue.” Let’s strike while the Libby fury keeps the iron hot! Please call and Act Now!

PLEASE ALSO CONTACT THESE KEY CONGRESSIONAL REPS RE IMPEACHMENT:
Representative Capitol Phone Capitol Fax
Howard Berman 202-225-4695 202-225-3196
& 818-944-7200 818-994-1050

MAILING ADDRESS FOR BERMAN
Congressman Howard L. Berman
14546 Hamlin Street, Suite 202
Van Nuys, CA 91411

Henry Waxman 202-225-3976 202-225-4099
Loreta Sanchez 202 225-2965 202-225-5859
D. Watson 202 225-7084 202-225-2422
LindaSanchez 202 225-6676 202-226-1012
L. Solis 202 225-5464 202-225-5467
A. G. Eshoo 202 225-8104 202-225-8890
L. Roybal/Allard 202 225-1766 202-225-0350

http://www.bcimpeach.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement