Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Movie Mix

Moore and SiCKO Are a Hit at Congress

By Brian Beutler, Media Consortium. Posted June 22, 2007.


Michael Moore's visit to Capitol Hill to talk about the sorry state of health care in America was accompanied by swarms of excited activists and a packed committee room.
Advertisement

It's ironic, but outside of hospitals and day care centers, perhaps the best place to acquire some kind of illness on Wednesday in Washington, D.C., was at Michael Moore's press conference on Capitol Hill. The long lines and the sweaty, claustrophobic committee room were emblematic of the enthusiasm that Moore's appearance and SiCKO, his new film on the decrepit state of U.S. health care, have generated both in Washington and around the country.

Behind the podium from which Moore and influential House Democrats spoke and answered questions, an array of sign-wielding activists stood along the back wall. Facing them from the other side of the room, women from the group Code Pink lofted a large, painted sign reading, "Healthcare now, for all." At one point, a security officer approached them about lowering the banner. His face, though, showed a reluctance to scold a group of people who were exercised about a worthy cause. He gave them a thumbs up.

Such was the atmosphere in the committee room, a vibrancy that offset the doleful stories -- about patients dying and insurance companies fleecing -- that were fired off in rapid succession by members of Congress at the podium. It's no surprise that SiCKO features many similar stories -- matched, of course, with the faces of patients themselves, many of whom died for lacking health insurance, and others who died despite it.

The film, characterized by Moore's usual mix of wry humor contrasted sharply with deeply somber personal narratives, traces the health care crisis back to the early 1970s when Richard Nixon, under pressure from Edgar Kaiser, helped launch the Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) system. That system, one of the largest in the world of for-profit medicine, is the prime cause, according to Moore and many others, of phenomena like uninsurance, underinsurance, and adverse selection that have caused our health care standards to topple well below similarly wealthy nations, including France, Germany, and Japan, all of which have government-paid universal health care systems. Today, as Moore noted both on Capitol Hill and in his film, there are four health care lobbyists in Washington for every member of Congress.

Perhaps the greatest, and most awkward, part of yesterday's hearing -- the part that most resembled something from a Michael Moore movie -- occurred when Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), chair of the House Judiciary Committee, spotted Rep. Darryl Issa (R-Calif.) standing quietly in the back of the room. Conyers thanked Issa "for making this a bipartisan issue," and invited him to stand in front of the crowd. Issa gestured in protest, waving his hand back and forth like a cutthroat in front of his neck. It was a losing battle. He was ultimately cowed into standing with Moore and the Democrats anyhow.

When Issa finally spoke, he did so extemporaneously, joking that his scheduler must have somehow forgotten to inform him of this engagement and dodging attempts by Conyers and others to bring him to the D.C. premiere of SiCKO. Though he received a lukewarm welcome, Issa sought the common ground, calling health care a "bipartisan issue," approvingly citing Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's health care plan for California, and suggesting that, while the parties "may differ on the specifics," Congress and the president "must take steps toward universal access."

On those specifics, Issa differs wildly from either Schwarzenegger or most Democrats. Schwarzenegger, one of a small handful of governors to bring his state's health rolls anywhere near universality, recently enacted an individual mandate to buy insurance that will cover almost everybody in California. His policy, however, exists on the long line that connects Conyers' single-payer plan to provide Medicare for all and Issa's 2005 plan, which works much more incrementally. It would provide credits to business owners in states where the minimum wage exceeds the federal minimum to secure health insurance for their employees.

Aside from Moore, the loudest applause of the afternoon went to Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), who beseeched universal health care activists not to "get in bed with the right wing who means us no good." More poignantly, Conyers compared his efforts on his bill -- H.R. 676 -- to his efforts years ago to make Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday a national holiday. Back then, as today, he told the crowd, many of his colleagues said to him "you have a great idea, but you know you can't win."

Neither Conyers nor Moore sees things that way. And Moore, surpassed perhaps only by Al Gore as the most recognizable activist in America, is advancing his cause in a decidedly un-Gore-like way. Yesterday afternoon, he rented out a theater in Washington's Union Station to hold yet another free screening -- food and drink provided -- for anybody in the city who has a career lobbying on behalf of private health care companies. No word yet on how many people attended.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sicko, congress, michael moore

Brian Beutler is Washington Correspondent for the Media Consortium.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Moore finally steps up, comments on the 9/11 cover up.
Posted by: johndoraemi on Jun 22, 2007 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unlike many in this political hemisphere, Mr. Moore has finally acknowledged the firefighters, the explosions, the first person eyewitness accounts of demolition charges in NY on 9/11.

That should be the subject of a major article here:

"I've had a number of firefighters tell me over the years and since Fahrenheit 9/11 that they heard these explosions-- that they believe there's MUCH more to the story than we've been told. I don't think the official investigations have told us the complete truth-- they haven't even told us half the truth."
--Michael Moore, Jones Report, June 19, 2007

http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Follow-up on Career Lobbyist Showing
Posted by: progressive farmer ME on Jun 22, 2007 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I surely hope someone at AlterNet reports on attendance at M.Moore's free theatre-food-drink showing of SICKO in DC
for career health-care lobbyist employees. What a great idea! We all spend so much of our energy 'talking to our own choirs'...this is properly reaching the other church's choir.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SICKO WILL LOCK-IN HEALTH CARE AS THE DOMESTIC ISSUE THAT WILL ELECT THE NEXT US PRESIDENT
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 22, 2007 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With earlier presidential primaries and caucuses and growing bipartisanship on US Health Care reform, Moore's film SICKO will ensure that health care reform will be the domestic issue that will elect our next president.

I too am for a modified Single Payer HR 676-"Medicare for All" but with MUCH more emphasis on both individual (=behavioral change) and institutional prevention(=public health) . Implemented with fairness and compassion.

A high tech treatment oriented health care system is simply NOT economically sustainable here or in other nations especially those with aging demographics

My statement does not take away from the power that Moore's SICKO packs. It is a movie- like Gore's Inconvenient Truth- that comes along once in a while that will change our nation on an issue of profound importance.

(another Oscar for Moore in 08)

I posted my own blog piece on the film yesterday on my Critical Condition blog

Be Well,

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The USA does not have a Healthcare problem....
Posted by: kbest on Jun 22, 2007 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....it is a Health Insurance problem.

Yes healthcare is too expensive. Blame the lawyers and those who refuse to put resonable caps on torts.

Universal healthcare is not the answer. Socialized medicine is not the answer. Get a decent education, get a good job, with benefits. That is part of the answer. Another part is the millions of Americans who are lazy and want to milk the system for every dollar instead of working hard. Nobody promised them a rose garden except for liberals who want to give everything away at the expense of the American taxpayer. REFUSE TO BE A VICTIM!! That is the rest of the answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Calling all Alternet readers! Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: Have you even watched the movie? Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
thank you Michael Moore
Posted by: packofwolves on Jun 22, 2007 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Michael Moore for bringing this country's issues to the theater so at least those of us who keep saying we need change feel as if we are being heard. This country is literally rotting from the inside out and if we don't do something to stop it and put an end to the greed that is devoring us, we will rapidly crumble and fall. There are so many things wrong with this country right now and all of it is because of greed and corruption. Sadly, we have allowed greed to grow over us like a weed. We must stop this decay. What is it about our country? We seem to worship corruption and greed, whether in politics, sports, or business...and even when these greedy criminals are caught red-handed in illegal activity, which is hurting you and me and this entire country, there is no punishment. Our country really is a sicko and if we don't do something about it soon we'll die of our disease! IMPEACH BUSH.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An oldtimer's tribute to Michael Moore.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 22, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For AlterNeters who don't know me, I'm a 72-year-old Vietnam veteran, ex-USAF pilot and amatuer investigative journalist.

In 2004, I self-published a narrative nonfiction work titled, George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT. Because of Mike’s powerful film commentaries, I referred to him in my book in regards to Bush 43’s first reaction to 9/11 at the Emma Booker Elementary School in Florida, when he learned that America was under attack.

Here's what I wrote:

In Bob Woodward’s Bush at War, Dub-ya said he remembered thinking at the time, “They declared war on us and I made up my mind at the moment we were going to war.”

For reasons I don't understand, Woodward never mentioned the famous frozen seven minutes, maybe 10 or longer, during which President Bush did nothing. They only came to light because of Fahrenheit 9/11.

I saw Michael Moore’s film at a local art theatre. Even though I understood the reason behind Dub-ya’s startling inaction [exlained previously as lack of military leadership training], it stunned me nevertheless. I have no doubt that when Andrew Card told him about the second 757, that was the first time in Bush’s entire pampered elitist life that he had to make a decision by himself.

And I don’t buy his claim of instantly deciding to go war. As Fahrenheit 9/11 showed, he was dumbstruck. You could see it in his face -- a glazed dumbfounded expression, eyes wide-open like black holes, occasionally darting about the room as if looking for help.

Then, even more astonishing to me, despite knowing our country was under assault, George Dub-ya picked up a book and started reading it aloud to the kids, a story ironically titled “The Goat.”

I couldn’t believe it.

Prior to that incredulous moment, the audience around me in the packed movie house had snickered as Moore’s slow-rolling film showed Bush doing nothing in the midst of his greatest crisis. But when he opened that storybook instead of leaving the room, silence smothered the theatre.

I could hardly breathe as my astounded brain uttered a single expletive deleted.

Holy shit...

I wanted to shout out an old axiom from my Air Force flying school days: “Do something, George—even if it’s wrong!” But he didn’t.

Instead, the future wartime president just sat there -- helpless, frozen by fear, waiting for someone to hand him a note or whisper instructions in his ear. In one stunning stark moment, Fahrenheit 9/11 revealed George Bush for what he is―a GOP emperor with no clothes―a Republican Wizard of Oz with the curtain pulled open.

End of PHONY FIGHTER PILOT extract.

Hopefully in my written tribute to Michael Moore, I captured the essence of his great film-making talent. To me, his enthusiastic reception on Capitol Hill wasn't surprising. It was way overdue.

For AlterNet visitors curious about my 2004 Bushwhacking work, visit its promotional website: PhonyFighterPilot.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dentists Refuse to Treat the Poor
Posted by: nyscof on Jun 22, 2007 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until universal healthcare is passed, dentists should be required to treat low-income Americans. 80% of dentists refuse to treat Medicaid patients. Emergency rooms fix dentist neglected problems after a simple cavity, abscesses and spreads, which costs the taxpayer up to tens of thousands of dollars where a simple $60 filling could have prevented this from happening.

Organized dentistry only backs legislation that puts more money in their own pockets. They effectively hold the poor hostage until dentists' pockets are more thickly lined. Wealthy dentists, whose dental education and/or schools are government subsidized need to give back by being required to treat a certain number of people without insurance and/or poor people for free, on a sliding scale, or for what Medicaid offers.

Don't let them divert your attention with water fluoridation. Modern science proves that water fluoridation is ineffective at reducing tooth decay, harmful to health and a waste of money. http://www.FluorideAction.Net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

UK vs. US vs. Canada
Posted by: dkm on Jun 22, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My daughter-in-law (dil) is a citizen of the UK presently doing a postdoc in Canada. My son is a US citizen who studied five years in the UK. I asked them to tell me about their experiences with the various medical systems.

My dil is absolutely in love with the British system. Once her doctor detected something wrong with her heart and she was in the hospital within an hour. My son needed knee surgery and while he would have had to wait a few months under the regular system, under the private system for $US 2000 he got the whole shmear - workup, surgery, hospitalization, aftercare, and physical therapy. The reason it was so cheap was that they were in competition with the national system and had to provide service that people would pay for. It shows you what medical care really costs, as opposed to what the medical business charges.

So far we have had only one minor encounter with the Canadian system (a visit to the emergency room after an accident), but there were absolutely no problems.

The US system is well known to everyone. It sucks, even for the well-off. My parents have gone through the heart problem, diabetes, and mental/physical degeneration route and it has not been a particularly good experience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: UK vs. US vs. Canada Posted by: makeadifference
» RE: UK vs. US vs. Canada Posted by: deaudonnee
Thank you Michael Moore
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jun 22, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is one of the few holding a bright candle in the dark age we are now living in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HMO's
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jun 22, 2007 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not sure why the dig on Nixon about HMO's. I remember when HOM's came out.. great concept gone bad over the years.. now it's the worst thing one can get, but still more affordable than anything else..

NJ seems to be going to universal health care.. and it will be interesting to see who is going to pay for it and what the level of care will be! One has to remember all the better doc's that don't take ANY insurance....

Not to pass up any chance to dig on Moore - he is still self serving pig not capable of telling the truth on any issue!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HMO's Posted by: rrsounds
» RE: HMO's Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Do I have a FAN!!!! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» let's kill this rat, johngary66 Posted by: monkopotamus
» RE: HMO's Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: HMO's Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: HMO's Posted by: makeadifference
» RE: HMO's Posted by: Conservasaurus
Having chided MM earlier on this thread about tossing Kaiser into the same pot with…
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 22, 2007 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hallliburton, I want to thank him for taking on the greedy vultures known as "HMOs."

To show where my heart lies, I need only mention having a 43-year-old, single mom daughter who is self-employed and can’t afford medical insurance.

Pardon my French, folks, but overall, America’s medical industry is a fucking disgrace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ECONOMISTA NON GRATA
Posted by: ECONOMISTA NON GRATA on Jun 22, 2007 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the best sound-bites used by those representing the Heathcare Industrial Complex is that "foreigners fly into this country from industrialized countries to attain the benefits of our health care." That is true...

Many private jets depart from foreign lands destined for Baltimore (Johns Hoppkins), Cleveland (Cleveland Clinic), etc. etc. Not only are the passengers on these flights excused from the tediousness of having to go through any kind of airport security, but they are attended to by a private staff including medical personell as well as concierge sevice. They are takent to luxurious suites where they are pamppered day and night. Many of these patients are "ruling class elites" Royals, Industrialist, Bankers and sundry celebs. I know this, because my mother was one of these patients.

Yes...! The health care system in the U S is the best, but only if you happen to qualify because of your status. Otherwise, it's a piece of shit.

Americans need to challenge this type of injustice in healthcare. They need to challenge this system of inequality in the distribution of resources at all levels of society. The day will come when the American People will no longer "EAT CAKE".

Best regards,

Econolicious

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CONOMISTA NON GRATA Posted by: dangerouslysane
Fixing American Priorities
Posted by: sofla100 on Jun 22, 2007 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, health care dollars and resources spent in the USA do not need to be a scarcity. The USA spends more, as calculated by GDP, on health care than anyone else in the world. The problems, of course, are in the distribution of that health care and America's political system.

Extravegent care is given the wealthy who can pay, at the expense of the poor and middle classes who must do without.
The distribution of wealth in the USA is also becoming increasingly skewed towards the upper classes. Progressive taxation would also allow for income transfer, especially in the form of services such as health care, for the middle and lower American classes.

So, the solution is really pretty simple, I believe. Adopt the single payer system and also America needs to move towards a more equitable system of progressive taxation. And, of course, if we could gut our national security/defense and prison infrastructures, the money saved would be enormous.

We just need to start moving, as Moore has eloquently pointed out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the point is?
Posted by: opeluboy on Jun 22, 2007 3:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Moore has made several hard-hitting films, each of which reveals the slimy underbelly of whatever cause he has taken on (though Fahrenheit 911 left too much out).

Each time one of these films comes out, it is huge. Oscars are polished up ahead of time. The media goes apeshit. The subjects of each film cringe, knowing they will be revealed for the shit they are.

And then not a goddamn thing happens. Nothing changes.

Why? Because Michael Moore is just a film maker. To affect change in this country it is going to take the American people getting in the street, in their representatives faces, marching on the White House in the millions and not stopping until the issues we want addressed are addressed and change is made.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But there *is* an EXCELLENT single payer plan in the US....
Posted by: lonpine on Jun 22, 2007 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for Members of Congress and their families.

It really is good by all accounts.

Hm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a single payer suggestion
Posted by: Mamarianne on Jun 22, 2007 6:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There would be little inventing required to simply lower the age for medicare to 62 or even 60. I wonder how many of our uninsured could be covered under a plan that is already in place. I am holding down a job--even though I could retire and let some youngster start his or her career in my place--in order to keep health insurance. I am thankfully healthy, and I would probably use medicare very little (though one never knows).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A CRYING SHAME...
Posted by: omatravel on Jun 22, 2007 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I learned this week of an incident which is a crying shame in this country. A young single mother on Medicaid who, upon finally gaining employment at a local assisted living home, needed a statement from her doctor verifying that she has no communicable diseases. She was told by the receptionist that she had a balance of $1.00 (ONE DOLLAR) and would have to pay another $1.00 (ONE DOLLAR) to see the doctor to receive the signed statement.

Standing at the glass window separating the waiting room from the receptionist desk, she painstakingly counted out $1.45, the total money which she had. She said that she would have to go home for the difference and went to her car. She called back on her cell phone to say that she would have to reschedule because she didn't have $2.00. At no time did the clerks offer to let her see the doctor and pay the huge sum of $2.00 later.

Lest your readers draw the same callous conclusions that the doctor's staff did - that "she has a car" and "she has a cell phone" thereby somehow justifying their cruel treatment, let me clarify that both are provided by my Good Samaritan daughter who has helped this young woman to get her GED certificate and this new job in order to provide a better life for herself and her child.

Regardless of how she got herself into this situation, her past is no more despicable than this professional leech of a doctor who, according to the receptionist whom I questioned about this incident, is "adamant" that Medicaid patients pay the $1.00 per visit. Had I been the receptionist, I would have paid the $1.00 from my own pocket rather than embarrass anyone over such a trivial sum of money.

As a result of this experience, I am taking $20.00 to the receptionist and asking that it be used to pay the $1.00 for ANYONE who visits them who is refused treatment because they lack their copay. I will take additional money when the $20.00 is exhausted; in the meantime, I am requesting my personal medical records and will find another doctor because I don't want anyone who is so callous and greedy to receive the benefits of my excellent insurance which I am so fortunate to have in this country. Unfortunately, I probably will find only another one who holds the same "charitable" Hippocratic (hypocritic) beliefs so prevalent in America's health care system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you are a good person Posted by: deborama
» RE: you are a good person Posted by: omatravel
» MORE THAN YOU KNOW Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: MORE THAN YOU KNOW Posted by: lonpine
Michael Moore is to be commended
Posted by: Jeanne on Jun 22, 2007 7:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is focusing attention on what I hope will be a huge issue in 2008 -- right behind ending the Bush' War in Iraq.

Single payer is the only system that makes sense. Why is there an industry that profiteers off of the health, or lack thereof, of the populace? Profit motive is motive to deny care. Profit motive is motive to minimize care. Profit motive is motive to discourage active, preventive care. Why is there always a middle-man between patient and provider? A middle-man who has veto power over what constitutes proper and prudent medical care. A middle-man who in many cases is not even medically trained. And why is this middle-man so much more aggressive when the patient is poor and not abundantly insured? The wealthiest among us have no concern; what insurance won’t cover, they pay from chump change. The rest of us just pray that we don't get seriously sick. And if we do, that it'll kill us quickly before we leave our families destitute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bad for physicians too
Posted by: lonpine on Jun 25, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to say, I never see my PCP b/c it's too dang hard to see her, and when I do, she's stressed out and needs to be somewhere else 10 minutes ago. She's a PA and tries her best given her situation, but it's not nearly as satisfying, say, as seeing my great PTs or my chiro, who spend time with me and tell me what I need to do to stay healthy.

In fact, I've met no mainstream doc who exemplifies the health that I'd like to achieve or maintain. Maybe a Chinese trad'l med doc I've seen (who looks 10 yrs younger than she is, and has an iron grip), or a massage therapist/accupuncturist, or my athletic PTs- but usu. docs are stress cases. In fact, I think a big reason that alt therapy is as big as it is is b/c practictioners give what all patients fundamentally want: someone to listen to them and spend time w/them.

The new medical insurance model ignores this aspect of care.

I have fantastic insurance- work for a big, rich company, and myself am quite healthy- knock on wood. But seeing a mainstream doctor is very unsatisfying.

How about this- the micropractice?
Marketplace segment

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]