Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Movie Mix

Hollywood Flicks Stiff the Working Class

By Robert Nathan and Jo-Ann Mort, The Nation. Posted February 23, 2007.


"Unionized" isn't a word you hear in many American movies. In time for the Academy Awards, here's a look at the dearth of films about working class life.
Advertisement

Here are some words you are unlikely to hear in any of the movie clips shown during the Academy Awards this year:

Ladies and gentlemen, the textile industry, in which you are spending your lives and your substance ... is the only industry in the whole length and breadth of these United States of America that is not unionized. Therefore, they are free to exploit you, to lie to you, to cheat you and to take away from you what is rightfully yours -- your health, a decent wage, a fit place to work.

"Unionized" isn't a word you hear in many American movies. "A decent wage," now there's a phrase that doesn't crop up too often. As for the evocative "your lives and your substance," poetic descriptions of the human condition aren't generally found in contemporary entertainment.

This speech is from Martin Ritt's classic 1979 film Norma Rae, delivered in an impassioned sermon by Ron Leibman in the role of an organizer for the Textile Workers Union of America, a real union at the time and a predecessor to the current trade union UNITE HERE. Norma Rae is an aberration in recent Hollywood history. The movie portrays a realistic union-organizing campaign and the fierce corporate response at the fictional O.P. Henley textile mill in the fictional town of Henleyville. As everyone knew at the time, the mill and the town were unambiguous stand-ins for J.P. Stevens and its sixteen-year war against union organizers in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, and the movie accurately depicted the state of American labor in 1979.

The situation has not improved much since. The only remaining Stevens factory in the United States (owned by its successor company, Westpoint Home) is a unionized blanket mill in Maine. In other industries, union organizers are battling adversaries as unyielding as any in the days of Norma Rae. According to the labor advocacy group American Rights at Work, last year more than 23,000 Americans were fired or penalized for legal union activity.

On a human level, Norma Rae is the story of one woman, played by Sally Field, who finds redemption risking her life for economic justice, and of factory workers demanding to be treated as more than slaves. In the realm of the political, it is virtually the only American movie of the modern era to deal substantially with any of these subjects. Even today it remains iconic -- a major studio movie about the lives of working people with a profound and, for its time, disturbing political message: The little guy may have a prayer of getting social justice, but he'll have to fight desperately to get it. Try to think of a contemporary American film with a similar message or a political statement anywhere near that blunt. The closest thing to a message in this year's crop of Oscar nominees for Best Picture can be found in Babel, which poses the rather mild question, Why can't we all just get along?

European filmmakers, like England's Ken Loach and Mike Leigh, don't shy from the subject of class. Loach's Bread and Roses dramatized the 1990 Service Employees International Union's Justice for Janitors campaign in Los Angeles, and Leigh's entire career is virtually a paean to the working class. This is not to say that American studios don't make topical mainstream films. A kind of renaissance seemed to be blossoming in 2005, with material as varied as Good Night, and Good Luck and The Constant Gardener. But Blood Diamond -- about the 1990s civil war in Sierra Leone partly sparked by international diamond speculators -- was perhaps this season's only major studio picture that could be called politically daring, and it was a box-office disappointment. In the end, of course, financially successful or not, such movies don't fundamentally threaten the established order. They're well-crafted stories delivering conventional wisdom with considerable artistic skill.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: unions, working class, norma rae, academy awards



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yeah, that explains...
Posted by: ahmlco on Feb 23, 2007 3:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In other words, moviemakers are in the movie business, not the social change business."

Yeah, that explains Babel, Crash, Blood Diamond, Hotel Rwanda, Syriana, Good Night, and Good Luck, The Corporation, Inconvenient Truth, Super Size Me, The Constant Gardener, Tsotsi, Catch a Fire, The Woodsman, Kids, Wall Street, An Unreasonable Man, House of Sand and Fog, Philadelphia, Our Fathers, Maya, Erin Brockovich, Cry Freedom, The Killing Fields...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Much angst but no agiprop Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Yeah, that explains... Posted by: wetblanket
» RE: Yeah, that explains... Posted by: willymack
» RE: Yeah, that explains... Posted by: DaBear
» Why no mention of "North country"? Posted by: colinmeister
Great Union Flick
Posted by: indigosarah on Feb 23, 2007 4:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out the documentary Harlan County, USA, about coal miners striking in Kentucky in the 1970s. They don't make 'em like that anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» American Dream Posted by: wetblanket
» RE: Great Union Flick Posted by: Patuxet
North Country?
Posted by: AnnetteGallagher on Feb 23, 2007 4:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about that? Isn't that exactly the kind of movie the authors say isn't being made? Or Erin Brockovich? The victims of the power company were certainly blue collar and struggling in ways Norma Rae couldn't imagine! Or do those two not count because the actresses in both (and both Oscar nominated for those roles are too sexy to fight for social justice and be taken seriously?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: North Country? Posted by: jackie
The authors also didn't include.....
Posted by: Ln on Feb 23, 2007 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real Women Have Curves and A Day without Mexicans. Both of which dealt with the lack of unions and decent working conditions for "immigrant" labourers in the US.
I thank ahmlco for the list of films the authors also left out.
Also when they refer to "Hollywood", it's the big money behind big films that limits the content.
Danny Glover's new film Bamako is a story that shows the effects of Globalization and the IMF at work. In a recent interview on Democracy Now, he mentioned a few other projects he's got, the problem is funding.
Many Hollywood "stars" are waking up, if they hadn't been already and using their assess to the press for good. I have nothing but respect for Tim Robbins, Susan Saradon, George Clooney, ........even Pamela Anderson has a video out that mentions the horrible conditions that nonunion workers are in in KFC's chicken "factories".
I think the authors of the article were on the right track, but didn't do all the research they should have before they finished writing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No it's not.
Posted by: pbader on Feb 23, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was reading this article two movies popped into my mind Erin Brockovich, and North Country. And not because I thought the author left them out, but because they proved him right. Stories about grass roots union organization are not the same as stories about successful court cases. Courtroom dramas are stories about individuals that rise to point out a wrong. These are of course important stories to tell, but they fall perfectly into what conservatives see as the proper lanes for social change. Direct Action is different, it involves numbers, people working together, sacrificing for each other, it is communal. That is what is missing from movies today, stories telling us that if we work together we can win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dirty Jobs
Posted by: Dboy on Feb 23, 2007 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And there's the "Dirty Jobs" show on the Discovery Channel, which is all about real people with real jobs.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Nobody Sees It...
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 23, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, those films were made, but few of them were released beyond the coasts and a few larger cities in-between. They appeared and disappeared quickly at a few chain video stores with no promotion and little notice. They also will never see the light of day on network TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real Working Class Lives Missing
Posted by: Patrick Murfin on Feb 23, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I echo the lament for the dearth of true working class struggle movies—as opposed to some of the generally “left” leaning movies mentioned in other commentaries. They are fine, but most do not live in the real world of working people. Some of the courtroom dramas also filter the lives of working people through a respectable middle-class figure with which the audience is expected to identify. This mirrors most of the well publicized films about the civil rights movement which turn out to be not so much about the people who put their lives on the line, but the white lawyers/cops/FBI agents who rescue them.
ERIN BROCKIEVICH teetered on this precipice, but at least the main character was herself a working class woman, albeit one placed in a law firm.

Some times even good intentions are not enough. Many years ago I was General Secretary Treasurer of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) in 1971 when the Swedish director Bo Widerberg, best known for the “art” film ELVIRA MADIGAN, came to the US to film JOE HILL. In that capacity I helped line up several real younger Wobblies to appear as extras in the film. But the movie was a huge disappointment. It turned into a fantasy forbidden love story between Joe Hill and an opera singer, in defense of whose honor he is willing to be executed rather than reveal her name as an alibi for why he was wounded the same night as a grocery store owner was killed. Even when the film tried to show IWW organizers hopping freight trains to dash off to free speech fights, they ended up looking like SDS members on a summer work in. That the film, about one of labor’s legendary heroes, has virtually disappeared is probably a blessing.

One film left out of this discussion that did focus on a real life--a complicated and messy life--was SILKWOOD, with a flawless, edgy performance by Meryl Streep as the young Kerr-McGee nuclear energy worker who tried to disclose the company’s reckless safety procedures. As in real life, Karen Silkwood worked through her union, the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers, to expose the truth. In retaliation she was purposefully contaminated with deadly plutonium and in all likelihood murdered in a staged auto accident as she was driving to a meeting with a NEW YORK TIMES correspondent with damning documents—documents that were never found at the scene of the crash.

The lives and struggles of working people are rich in drama and in comedy—no need to go for dour Stalinist Socialist Realism or phoney heroism—too bad we seldom see those lives on the screen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meridel LeSeuer, Tillie Olsen
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 23, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just waiting to be adapted... if only one could secure the film rights from their estates' agents. It's like trying to break down a wall with mere spit in the wind.

Then trying to pitch a film like that. Ever try to sell something to a rich prick that completely undermines his worldview? Yeah, that's an easy task.

I was a little disappointed in the article though. I agree with the commenter who said they wished the writers had kept going a little more before finishing. Deadlines can be real pains.

I echo the previous poster's comment about Silkwood. Great piece of work, utterly depressing, pretty mimetic piece that made me nauseous... not one scene with food in it though much film time in the kitchen... just beer and cigs. Reminds me of half the kids I grew up with... the most you'd find was a box a cornflakes or a tin of spam but tons of beer and cigs. I remember folks parents working at Three-Mile Island. Hell, my Dad put his hand on the reactor building as part of the power company's propaganda campaign post-incident. But you won't find that in a decent film. At least Silkwood had some of the world from a working person's life... there's no shortage of good stories out there, but you have to get them past a wealthy gatekeeper. And the era of the cooperative indie "studio" is gone (although there is a rising underground movement of such groups up and coming).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reagan was elected in 1980, remember?
Posted by: Sojourner on Feb 23, 2007 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until then, there was some evidence to support the hope that showbiz might be able to make a contribution to positive social change in the US. However, with few exceptions (Dylan, Young) the whole of the entertainment business fell silent about change. Reagan's style of entertaining the voters became de rigueur.

That showed me that showbiz was only, ONLY, about making a buck. Why change when you (showbiz) sit atop the heap? We have seen more leadership from the real artists of painting and writing than from the pop arts. Remember that as you listen to the frequent expression that the Oscars have something to do with art. Showbiz doesn't even deserve to be called a craft most of the time. It's just another form of exploitation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO "CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS" IS THE REASON...
Posted by: Blade on Feb 23, 2007 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having working in the construction industry for 40 years, I know something about the "working life". I am a carpenter. Here in Arkansas a very small percentage of carpenters belong to a union. You talk to a carpenter about a union, and what you get is a response indicating brainwashing. Unions are equated with communism and thug-ism, for some reason. Another impediment is that everyone identifies with the class above them. Down here in my working world, I have noticed that working class people consider themselves to be middle class, middle class people consider themselves upper middle class, and upper middle class people consider themselves aristocrats! And all identify with the successful guy that made it all the way to the top, and think anything less is un-American. Very frustrating. All we build nowadays is homes that look like small mansions. The styling, inside and out, is ornate and mimics "the rich and famous". Even a little 1500 sq. ft. home is trimmed and styled like a Victorian mansion! What is causing this social phenomena is beyond me, but I know that part of the problem to get the workers I know to band together is that they have no "class consciousness" about the group of people, the socio-economic group they actually belong to, and disavow any alluding to it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sound like class denial Posted by: lessbread
movies don't tout unions...who cares!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Feb 23, 2007 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why on earth would the movie industry want to focus on Unions???... While Unions have a place in some industries, as they became more powerful they have heaped abuses on business much like business heaped abuses on workers in the early 1900’s. As it stand now, it’s contracts are strangling America in some industries. GM is a prime example…

“GM's big shakeup” (CNN)
General Motors Corp. said Monday it would cut 30,000 hourly jobs and close or scale back operations at about a dozen U.S. and Canadian locations in a bid to save $7 billion a year and halt huge losses in its core North American auto operations. ……………
Not surprisingly, the leadership of the United Auto Workers union blasted the move as unfair.

"We have said consistently that General Motors cannot shrink itself to prosperity. In fact, shrinking General Motors only exacerbates its problems," UAW President Ron Gettelfinger and Vice President Richard Shoemaker said in a joint statement. Unfortunately, it is workers, their families and our communities that are being forced to suffer because of the failures of others," they added.

In June, GM announced plans to trim 25,000 hourly jobs in its North American operations by the end of 2008 in an effort to stem losses. The company has lost $2.2 billion in the first three quarters of this year, excluding special items. Most of those losses, about $1.6 billion, have come at its core North American auto operations.

The company's contract with the United Auto Workers union essentially prevents layoffs before it expires in September 2007, as the company needs to pay union members whether or not there is a job for them.


Now is that a sensible clause or what.. if you cant perform, don’t worry, you still have a job… Unions – the down fall of manufacturing in this country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The "real" issue with unions.... Posted by: Conservasaurus
Greed is good
Posted by: Ghoulman on Feb 23, 2007 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... can't believe I went through this whole thread and no one mentioned Gordon Gecko. Helloooo?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's a thought
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Feb 23, 2007 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the March 2007 issue of Harper's, in John Leonard's "New Books" column, there's a brief review of William T. Vollmann's Poor People. He evidently traveled the world trying to get at why they think they're poor. "You live there, and you become one of them" seems to describe how he went about the task.

Leonard writes in closing: "Still, he's less surprised and less discouraged than I am to discover that practically nowhere in the world do the poor want to rise up and slash the radial tires and smash the smoky windows of the stretch limos that chance to slum among them."

I don't know if this is a sign of total capitulation and their acceptance of their powerlessness, or what. But it does suggest the hollywood cliche of the heroic boat-rocking labor organizer out to fight injustice, stick it to The Man, and change the world for the better for the downtrodden is almost pure mythology designed to resonate with a mostly comfortable affluent public which would like to believe the poor could better themselves only if they'd be like Sally Fields and just try harder.

So maybe we're just as well off without the sort of movies Nathna and Mort lament the absence of, since movies and any awareness they may bring to some 'issue' don't much change things out here in non-fantasyland.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Absence of working class...
Posted by: Blade on Feb 23, 2007 11:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should Hollywood make movies concerning the working class, when it hardly even exists? And where it does exist, its members are in such denial of where they are in life, their existence is null and void as members of a socio-economic group? Most of America is caught up in a sort of joining hands as the elite of the world. We all imagine in some sort of subconscious way, that we are above the need to co-operate with one another as workers of all kinds, whether white collar or blue collar. All are too busy pulling on their own bootstraps to bother with helping another pull his. Or hers. The "working class hero" has become an old national myth, like Davy Crockett, Kit Carson, or Daniel Boone. Something from some begone era, a useless totem, not pertaining to our world. Unions? Most people view unions like, say, you'd think of a "wagon train". Something that was needed long ago, is outmoded and useless, and headed by self-centered "Wagon Masters", pulling the train over the wrong mountain passes to mythical countries that don't exist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kids don't aspire to a union job anymore
Posted by: terihu on Feb 24, 2007 8:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And kids are the largest segment of the moviegoing audience.

Even kids who will eventually end up in union jobs don't realize that when they're teens going to the movies, so where's the incentive to make movies about it?

I'm a member of the NEA, one of the largest unions in the country. I've wanted to be a teacher since I was 15, and I NEVER realized that would mean joining a union until AFTER I was hired and went to an orientation where I filled out my union form.

It's just not part of the youth consciousness, and that's what sells movies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one Mentioned Michael Moore's 'Roger and Me'
Posted by: bookmonger on Feb 25, 2007 5:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was in the Army, a buddy insisted I had to see "Roger and Me." I did, and am forever glad. Perhaps when Americans once again are forced due to economic circumstance to raise rabbits for food, more films directly relating to the average working Joe will be made.

During the Great Depression [soon to be renamed Depression I just as the Great War was renamed World War I with the advent of the Second] films were intended to make folks forget their woes, to raise people's spirits. With today's society not too far from plunging over that precipice, perhaps Hollywood is doing the same thing. Surely it is only coincidence that such films are lucrative. Right ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]