Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Movie Mix

For Religion or Money: Jesus on the Big Screen

By Jonathan Jones, AlterNet. Posted December 19, 2006.


Hollywood doesn't care as much about Christmas or Christians as it does about making a profit. But just how much money do religious films make?
12192006story
12192006Story
Advertisement

This Christmas, Christ is back. And this time, you can experience the story of his birth as never before. That's the message foretold in New Line Cinema's $36 million film, The Nativity Story, which opened Dec. 1 in more than 3,000 cinemas worldwide. Although the film is supposed to remind us about the humble beginnings of Jesus, the real message behind the most expensive religious movie ever backed by a major motion picture studio is that there are huge profits to be made by producing wholesome films with Christian themes.

Hollywood Buys Into Biblical Blockbusters

The Hollywood film industry has a long history of finding salvation in faith-based movies, which dates back to 1923, when Cecil DeMille produced the pious epic, The Ten Commandments, in part to help the Hollywood film industry redeem itself from charges of immorality.

But ever since Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ grossed more than $370 million in its first year, there has been renewed interest in producing movies that appeal to conservative Christians.

"Christians go to the moves just like everybody else," said Charlie Nelson of Grace Hill Media in Valley Village, Calif., a public relations and marketing firm hired by New Line Cinema to market The Nativity Story to faith communities. "It's just that now movie companies are making extra effort to tap into that segment."

And these movie companies are working hard to do just that. They are buying advertisements on Christian Web sites and television stations, sending posters and cardboard stand-ups to churches, holding advanced screenings for pastors, and tying their movies to other merchandise.

A coffee table book presents exclusive photos taken on the set of The Nativity Story together with scripture from the New Living Translation. A novel based on the movie tells the story of Mary based on the screenplay. A film study guide provides avenues for contemplating Mary's journey of faith.

And, of course, there's also The Nativity Story: Original Motion Picture Score available on CD, The Nativity Story: Sacred Songs, a compilation of Christmas carols performed by popular artists, and a greeting card that will be available in Christian bookstores -- everything a Christian needs to celebrate the season. And perhaps most impressively, the film premiered at the Vatican and got several high ranking cardinals to give it two thumbs up.

"What's distinctive about this film is that it's the first feature film to premiere at the Vatican," said Paul Allen Williams, editor of The Journal of Religion and Film at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. "What New Line is trying to do is capture this segment of generally conservative Catholics and evangelicals. This is a very Catholic and theologically orthodox nativity story. This movie speaks volumes to those Christians."

And like The Da Vinci Code and The Passion of the Christ, churches are also using the movie to spark discussions about their faith, including at Harbor Light Church, a Pentecostal church in Fremont, Calif., where Pastor Terry Inman urges congregants to see the movie and then "come hear the messages" in his sermons on the Nativity.

Box Office B.S.?

But are religious-themed movies actually finding more favor with Christian audiences or is that just box office baloney from the religious right?

Despite an aggressive marketing campaign, The Nativity Story produced so-so returns at the box office opening weekend, an important gauge of a film's success. According to the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), The Nativity Story took in a humble $7.8 million opening weekend, a disappointing gross for any movie opening on more than 3,000 screens. Compared with The Passion of the Christ, which brought in $84 million opening weekend and has grossed more than $611 million worldwide, there is little reason to believe that The Nativity Story is in the same league.

David Bruce, an ordained minister and webmaster for HollywoodJesus.com, believes the rhetoric about the potential spending power of Christian audiences is exaggerated. He believes that the notion there is a lot of money to be made by producing wholesome entertainment with Christian themes is being generated by a vocal and organized minority that seek to promote a moralistic, Christian worldview with industry executives, commentators and the media.

"It's so bogus that you can make a lot of money at the box office by making moralistic movies," Bruce said. "That's a politically correct argument and it's what those in the religious right want us to believe. People like to see their sensibilities reflected in Hollywood, but I don't believe it."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: christians, hollywood, films, profit, the nativity story, new line cinema

Jonathan Jones is a former religion reporter for MediaNews Group and is the son of a Presbyterian minister.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
God
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 19, 2006 12:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is God the only being who knows that humans like blood and gore and sin and sex and comedy and repetition and massive baloney?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: God Posted by: Ghoulman
» RE: God Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: God and a Bag o' chips! Posted by: Cathyc
Don't Need To See The Movie
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 19, 2006 12:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the book. It's much more interesting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen Posted by: Philip Newton
» The movie vs. the Book Posted by: mirimac
» The End - you know it? Posted by: Cathyc
Makes sense:
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Dec 19, 2006 2:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"..those who were the most conservative in their religious beliefs were actually more likely to see films rated R for violence than those who consider themselves more liberal in their religious beliefs."

These people are in the business of violence and persecution. To them, it's entertaining and educational.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Makes sense: Posted by: willymack
» RE: Makes sense: Posted by: tap17x
We know
Posted by: ryazbeck on Dec 19, 2006 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why even ask the question if this is for faith or profit? Since when has anything in America been for something other than profit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We know Posted by: symcokid
Does every hotel/motel room still have a Bible?
Posted by: Sojourner on Dec 19, 2006 4:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is Hollywood doing anything less than what the portrayers in art have always done with Biblical stories? As with the great painters and poets, the results as art will always be mixed—some great, some not so great, and some nearly repulsive.

Although I grew up learning the theology behind the birth story of Jesus, I no longer accept it. As a story of hope and belief that we will only be saved, from fighting with and among ourselves, by a child, however, it is one of the world’s great stories. I still celebrate the Christmas season and sing the carols, even while most of what they proclaim is untenable.

Measuring the worth of the new film by box office returns has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the business of religion. In the US we practice organized religion as just another enterprise that is paid for by contributions. The positive side of that is that it keeps organized religion close to popular attitudes. The negative side is that developments in religious understanding get so little attention they mostly get lost. For instance, what is taught in the leading universities as part of the training of clergy seldom gets the attention from the membership in the respective institutions.

While Biblical epics still make for great story-telling, they represent only a fragment of the teachings. Ours is a time usually characterized as “old time religion.” It’s a pattern that happens periodically in American popular culture. It fades eventually only to reappear and be so overdone that it fades again. This, too, will pass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

who watches The Nativity?
Posted by: jcutler9 on Dec 19, 2006 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are these viewers of The Nativity movie the same ones who are buying their children the Left Behind video game?

And are you sure some of those millions brought in by The Passion were not from sadomasochists who wanted to watch a man begin beat to a bloody pulp for a half-hour?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nope Posted by: Philip Newton
Very P.O.'d
Posted by: paschn on Dec 19, 2006 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmm, Let's see;

"Christians" in "civilized" nations have, ( for profit), slaughtered , to date, roughly 700,000 human beings in one country alone. More "christians" re-elected them to continue screwing the working class in this country as well as murder MORE in other countries.
The christ I was taught about would be VERY disappointed in these "christians". And the Father of this christ I know would be very upset that the "religeous" right feels he is sooo wimpy and weak that they won't leave judging these "evil" folks up to the one that makes NO mistakes in judgement IN HIS OWN TIME, rather, they will sell their own constituency's well being to a bunch of swine Republicans on the promise of banning gay marriage, which allows more "christians" to slaughter more people in more countries. Hmm, notice a pattern here?
And I'm not even a bible "pounder".
Eww, I bet he's P.O.'d.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very P.O.'d Posted by: Krain61
Missing the point
Posted by: Ansson on Dec 19, 2006 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like so many reviews/comments with regard to this "new" Nativity movie, it misses the point.

The point being there was no Nativity. The point being the so-called birth of Jesus is historical fiction. It never happened.

Biblical scholars have known this for many years. For various reasons that knowledge has not filtered down to the faithful and/or not-so-faithful.

For more on this read, "The Merry Christmas Myth," on Contextual Criticism, http://heavenswork.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Missing the point Posted by: thirdmg
» Hate to break it to you... Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Hate to break it to you... Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Missing the point Posted by: jmooney
» RE: Missing the point: jmooney Posted by: Basenjis
CNN = Christian Nation News
Posted by: mat38 on Dec 19, 2006 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so sick and tired of having Faith and Jesus brought into almost every discussion in corporate media. I try not to watch crap news, I mean cable News, but I am a sinner so therefore I do.
The latest piss off for me was in following the drama of the missing climbers lost on Mt. Hood. One story focussed around a group of people with their hands against a Blackhawk Helicoptor, an instrument invented solely for the purpose of use in surveilling and killing. They were praying that the helicopter would channel Jesus and find their loved ones. I mean, c'mon already. Let's try to get back to realism and stop this religious crusade against people who don't drink Jesus juice.
Here's a news flash, whover Jesus was, and from what I know the guy knew how snag babes, he died long ago and he's still dead and he's gonna stay dead.
Just try to watch the History Channel of Natinal Geopgraphic and notice how many episodes and stories are about and around the Bible and biblical times.
The usa has become a nation of self pitying mourners and prayer freaks who have no clue what's going on in the world beyond our borders. Everytime someone white dies, gets lost, or suffers a little the whole family is trotted out to cry and sniffle in front of the nations. And some how FAITH ios brought into the cry fest.
Then there were US soldiers greeting Bill O'reilly in Iraq as a truthelling servant of Faith. Yikes, the end times really have come, haven't they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CNN = Christian Nation News Posted by: VannaLaRoche
"We Are A Christian Company"
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Dec 19, 2006 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Advertisers on a local Christian station (on The Bott Network--watch for it, it's a lulu) for printing services, child care, hardware, auto dealerships, and most especially LENDING and MORTGAGE companies make a point of saying, "we are a Christian company." They'll demonstrate God's way to make a profit off you!

Look for the Good Christkeeping Seal of Approval to show up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bible believing does not = conservative
Posted by: Philip Newton on Dec 19, 2006 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One need not be a "Conservative" Christian to be a Bible-believing one. This article once again exhibits the blind spot of progressives, who often assume that those of us who are evangelical Christians are automatically conservative.

That is not true.

I don't mind seeing a relatively accurate portrayal of the Jewish world at the time of Christ and a pretty faithful retelling of His story.

Doesn't mean I am not also on the front lines in the Labor movement or the push for environmental sanity.

Progressives ooften display great ignorance about Christians. I would suggest one check one's own assumptions before writing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's Ignorant?
Posted by: patvic1405 on Dec 19, 2006 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Progressives often display great ignorance about Christians"? How about Christians often display great ignorance about Christ and what His teachings REALLY were. I don't think hate and bigotry and ignorance will be found in His supposed words, but modern christers wallow in it and call it family values. Think of the wasted lives, money, time spent on what is basically a myth made up to keep people (mostly women) in line. Make a movie about that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who's Ignorant? Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: Who's Ignorant? Posted by: justAnEgg
» RE: Who's Ignorant? Posted by: Philip Newton
Stealing Mel's Thunder
Posted by: rwmk12 on Dec 19, 2006 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The nativity, as the PG rating indicates, was a hollow film that was as thought provoking as network television. Gibson, despite the unnecessary gore and gloom, produced a film of relative substance. People were talking about it. As a scholar of religion I felt compelled to see the nativity, but I knew from the get go that I was in for trouble. I think the moral of the story for Hollywood is this: people aren't the idiots, at least when it comes to watching movies, that they would often like to make them. And, if they are going to produce crap they are going to get dwindling returns. Even non-Christian viewers are interested in symbol and archetypal stories that convey something more substantial or dare I say "spiritual" about this thing called life. Nobody wants to go see a church sermon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stealing Mel's Thunderdome Posted by: swifturtle
Assorted points
Posted by: BlueTigress on Dec 19, 2006 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is anyone besides me amused that when "The Nativity" premiered at the Vatican the actress who played Mary was pointedly not invited because she was pregnant and unmarried and planning on keeping the baby?

As far as comparing "Narnia" and "Lord of the Rings" goes, "LotR" had a much bigger built-in audience than Narnia and was not as cynically marketed to the Christians. The mainstream churches didn't figure out that one of the themes of "LotR" was the struggle against evil until the third movie came out THEN they jumped on the bandwagon.

As far as "The Nativity's" anemic box office returns go, a boring movie is a boring movie, no matter what it's about and very few people go to the movies to be preached at.

I think the Christian box office clout is a red herring. The bluenoses might want to believe it's true, but if the numbers don't bear it out, it's just wishful thinking.

I'm kind of a cynic, but I also believe that a movie could be made that would have no blood or violence or sex AND do well at the box office, but the plotline would have to be utterly fascinating on more than one level.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOTR remarkably free of religion Posted by: counterpoint
» RE: LOTR remarkably free of religion Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: LOTR remarkably free of religion Posted by: counterpoint
Ironic that Hollywood is
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Dec 19, 2006 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
making Christian movies when many people consider that Hollywood is run by Jews?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prophets or Profits?
Posted by: Dylan F. on Dec 19, 2006 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As soon as "Passion of the Christ" started making big bucks, it occurred to me that if Mel Gibson were truly Christian, he would donate ALL profits to charity. I wonder if that thought ever crossed his mind.

The same should hold true for "The Nativity".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prophets or Profits? Posted by: willymack
frank67
Posted by: frank67 on Dec 19, 2006 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nah, they'll all (Gibson et al.) keep the money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Looking for investors for Flying Spaghetti Monster - The noodly origins
Posted by: counterpoint on Dec 19, 2006 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just discovered that I'm overstocked on spaghetti, have several pots available and a pantry full of canned tomatoes, two Canon Gl2 3chip cameras and all the gear. I'm accepting paypal, and am promising a 20% return on investment (or your spaghetti back).
However, I first need to figure out which plot to follow; you may know that there's been a schism within the church of the Flying spaghetti monster...
spaghetti monster

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'What's on the big screen?' strikes me as about the LEAST important...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 19, 2006 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...question that people serious about the problems we face as a nation and as a society should be asking.

There's a war going on, we've allowed our government to binge on (OUR) debt with nothing to show, and we still predicate much of our livelihood on dirt cheap oil from some of the most awful places in the world.

Why the hell should I care about what movie my neighbor goes to see?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Movies my neighbor goes to see... Posted by: dangerouslysane
Uh...yeah!
Posted by: Philip Newton on Dec 19, 2006 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bingo.

Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tolkien and Lewis
Posted by: Philip Newton on Dec 19, 2006 10:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tolkien and Lewis were both Oxford dons, both members of the “Inklings,” a writers group which met at a local pub, and they were both Christian. Lewis was a born-again Christian, Tolkien a Catholic.

As fellow “Inklings,” they would have heard each others’ work directly from each other. Lewis’s fantasy books were direct Christian allegory. Tolkien’s, in my opinion, were not.

Clearly, their faith is evident in their works. Personally, I think Lewis’s Narnia works, as allegory, are limited by that fact. Tolkien, on the other hand, allowed himself a far more liberal license and, in my opinion, made a better work.

I read LOTR every few years. I’m reading it again now for well over the 20th time.

You don’t so much read it as go there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tolkien and Lewis Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Tolkien and Lewis Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: Tolkien - LOTR is very religious Posted by: Philip Newton
Where are the God fearing Christians?
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on Dec 19, 2006 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm from a town that's 40% (or so) Mormon; while I'll admit that Mormans are more consistant than most -- they seem to take their bombast seriuosly, i.e. (unlike some other churches I could mention) -- still, I can't say I have yet to meet a single "true believer." People just don't act the way they would if they really had any respect for God. After all, Christ did say, "If you will be good sell everything you have and give to the poor." ...And many other things we could all agree with.

I'm not religious, but I am still offened at they way people's religious faith is exploited for venal purposes.

GOD BLESS [all who agree with me!]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jesus Was A Man Like The Rest Of Us.
Posted by: mite on Dec 19, 2006 12:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have we ever read the Bible and compared the Old to the New Testament. Does anyone out there ever think we are missing chapters, and who decided what ones go into the Bible. How many wars and citizens of this world have died from religion? Fear of death and how you spend the rest of eternity is a excellent control source.

Is there not a force that wants to destroy religion period. Yes Hollywood cares about what most of us care about me-myself-and I. If we really cared about each other like Jesus we would walk the talk. There are few of us who would not sell-out our own soul for what makes us feel good.

I know of no one who has a right to judge anyone except God.

Ask yourself if you really wanted to stop Hollywood/ Media from making us think and act like they want us to we would stop watching their propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only thing the Neocons have succeeded at in my opinion
Posted by: Ellie1 on Dec 19, 2006 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is completely turning me off to any Christian religion. As far as I am concerned, I would not want to be "raptured" (or whatever the heck you call it) because I would hate the company. Heck, I won't even live in (or visit) red states.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God fearing?
Posted by: Philip Newton on Dec 19, 2006 12:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am reading “Labor’s Untold Story” at the moment. It shows clearly how the pulpit was just as vital as the billy club in smashing American Labor. Rockefeller, a “true believer” felt ordained – commanded – by God to become obscenely rich. Morgan, the great robber baron, was an alderman. The pulpit, the Pinkertons and the police all combined to crush workers’ dreams.

They had in common the desire to crush the working person and they had in common the misuse of religion to assist in this.

Christ preached in an era little different from ours. In tossing out the money-changers from the temple, and in resisting the power of Rome and the priests, he set an example for all people of faith, no matter what their faith is.

Christ preached a ministry to the poor and the humble, and he stood against the proud and powerful. As a Christian, I have no political party and no ideology other than this:

“The King will reply, ‘Whatever you did for one of the least of these, brothers of mine, you did for me.’”

If we look for faith, we don’t look to the powerful. We stand with the poor and speak truth to power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: God fearing? Posted by: swifturtle
PS
Posted by: Philip Newton on Dec 19, 2006 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nowhere in the Bible is the "Rapture" mentioned. It's just another comfortable, suburban American myth.

My favoriite bumpersticker: "In case of rapture, can I have your car?"

God knows, it will likely be a very nice one. Maybe even a Ferrari. Vrooom vroooom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:My favorite bumper sticker Posted by: swifturtle
Hell, if your that way inclined...
Posted by: may261989 on Dec 19, 2006 6:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why not take Christians for all they've got. If I was a materialistic moviemaker what better audience to exploit than the gullible evangelicals. These guys will believe any old crap.
Moreoever, they'll pay top dollar for it as well. Now tell me Hollywood doesnt want a piece of that action!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the best reason to see it
Posted by: fuzypupy on Dec 19, 2006 11:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i think it looks like a beautiful story told in a new more movie like way, i think it will be a classic and i havent seen it yet but i really want to. perhaps the best reason to see it is its a damn good story. it has a few stuggles along the way and some good moral to tell and in the end its a feel good birth of our savior. i am not a religious fanitic but i do believe jesus lived and taught peace , love and tolerance. and we sure need some of that these days

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the fantasy aspect
Posted by: fuzypupy on Dec 19, 2006 11:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it also has a fantasy or magical element to it that makes for good entertainment , the virgin conception , the man who loves her enough to be willing to marry her even though he didnt imprenate her. and don't forget the wise men coming from afar to worship what they really couldn't have known was the person to start a new religion. i love a good story

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]