Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Movie Mix

A Pedophile Priest Speaks Out

By Jesse Hamlin, San Francisco Chronicle. Posted October 26, 2006.


The notorious Catholic priest Oliver O'Grady -- who sexually abused children for 20 years, including a 9-month-old baby -- is the subject of a chilling new documentary, 'Deliver Us From Evil.'
43472story
43472_story
Advertisement

He was the closest thing to God they knew. Bob Jyono can still picture the priest he and his wife, Maria, called Ollie, a family friend who often spent the night in their Lodi home, saying his morning prayers with a Bible in his hands.

"And all during the night, he's molesting my daughter -- not molesting, raping her! -- at 5 years old,'' wails Jyono in "Deliver Us From Evil.'' It's a devastating documentary about Oliver O'Grady, the notorious pedophile priest who sexually abused children, including a 9-month-old baby, in a string of Central California towns for 20 years -- and the Catholic bishops who moved him from parish to unsuspecting parish, allegedly covering up his crimes.

"For God's sake! How did this happen?'' Jyono cries.

That's one of the questions posed by this wrenching film, which opens at Bay Area theaters Friday. "Deliver Us From Evil" has rekindled long-standing accusations that Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, a powerful church leader who was bishop of the Stockton Diocese from 1980-85, knew O'Grady was a pedophile but failed to keep him away from children.

Directed by former TV news producer Amy Berg, the film is built around chilling interviews with the defrocked priest, who was deported to his native Ireland in 2000 after serving seven years of a 14-year prison sentence prison for committing four "lewd and lascivious'' act with two young brothers. He speaks in a lilting Celtic voice that sounds like Mrs. Doubtfire, making him even creepier. He dispassionately recounts his heinous acts as if describing someone else. He wears a sly smile as he says what arouses him: "How about children in swimsuits? I'd say, yeah. How about children in underwear? I'd say, yeah. How about children naked? Uh-huh, yeah.''

Berg spent eight days interviewing O'Grady in Dublin, where he moved freely about the city, walking through parks where children played, pondering his obsession as he sits in an empty church.

"Basically what I want to say is, it should not have happened,'' says the fallen priest in the film. He told Mahony of his "situation,'' he says, and "I should've been removed and attended to. And he should have then attended to the people I'd harmed. I wish he'd done that.''

He writes letters of apology to his victims and invites them to Ireland for a conciliatory reunion ("God speed, and hope to see you real soon,'' he says with a wink).

In the film, another victim, Adam M., reads the letter in disbelief. "I could kill his mother,'' says the man, pointing to the San Andreas rectory where O'Grady sodomized him. It was Adam M.'s mother who brought the priest into the family home. As she says in the film, "He was the wolf and I was the gatekeeper, and I let the wolf through the gate.''

O'Grady later retracted the invitations and, according to Berg, has fled Ireland in the wake of publicity about the movie. His whereabouts are unknown, a frightening development to those he abused decades ago, who are still haunted by him.

"There's not a day that I don't suffer from what he did to me,'' said Ann Jyono, a 40-year-old insurance agent, on the phone from her Southern California home.

Jyono says O'Grady began molesting her when she was 5 and kept at it until she was 12. Jyono didn't tell her folks for years, until O'Grady was arrested in 1993. She testified at his criminal trial and in a 1998 civil case that cost the Stockton diocese $7 million -- a small fraction of what the Catholic Church has paid out in scores of sexual abuse cases that have scandalized the institution. Jyono's suit was thrown out because of the statute of limitations.

Seeing and hearing O'Grady again, even on film, "was traumatic. I felt like I was 5 again,'' said Jyono, who appears in "Deliver Us From Evil.'' "I was still so afraid of that man. At the same time, I was pleased that his psychotic, narcissistic personality allowed him to tell the truth and show how psychotic he is. I was proud of him: He finally did it, he finally said the words. ... His craziness and his evil were captured onscreen.''


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: film, movies, pedophiles, priests, catholic church, child abuse

Jesse Hamlin is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
SOS
Posted by: edith on Oct 26, 2006 1:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy is the best example of why a death penalty for repeat offenders makes sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SOS Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: SOS Posted by: mdruss42
» RE: SOS Posted by: Intraspecto
» RE: SOS Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: SOS Posted by: Intraspecto
» RE: SOS Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: SOS Posted by: miles
» RE: SOS Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» If you oppose the death penalty Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» AC/PC Posted by: edith
» RE: AC/PC Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: SOS Posted by: edith
» RE: SOS....HELLLLLLLP! Posted by: mdruss42
» You're in good company. Posted by: edith
» RE: You're in good company. Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: SOS Posted by: crashgrab
» litmus? Posted by: edith
» RE: litmus? Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» Relax Posted by: edith
» RE: elax Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» My name isn't Eugene Posted by: edith
» RE: elax Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: elax Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: elax Posted by: crashgrab
» It's also a scientific fact Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Well thank you, too. Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Well thank you, too. Posted by: edith
» RE: Well thank you, too. Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» Are you joking? Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Are you joking? Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» An alternative method... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: SOS Posted by: mountainmama
twisted
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 26, 2006 3:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Twisted beliefs that depart from human reality create twisted actions that depart from human decency. Sometimes the twisted beliefs are caused by false religious dogma and sometimes they are caused by abusive parents or other relatives or by abusive officials or by false prophetic visions from the past. In any event we need to seek the twisted causes so we can end the abuses. Killing abusers is counterproductive for it eliminates one path to truth, understanding and correction of faults.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: twisted Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: twisted Posted by: Sundaymonkey
» RE: twisted Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» Law is perfect? Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: twisted Posted by: Sundaymonkey
» RE: twisted Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: twisted Posted by: Intraspecto
» RE: twisted Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: twisted Posted by: Intraspecto
» RE: twisted Posted by: Sundaymonkey
» RE: twisted Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: twisted Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: twisted Posted by: Colin
Staying the course on child-abuse
Posted by: Sundaymonkey on Oct 26, 2006 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice to see the Catholic Church using the tried and tested swift-boating tactics of the Right to dodge its culpability for giving paedophiles free rein to molest children.

Do the facts displayed in this film prove that senior Church officials protected these rapists and tried to silence their victims? Yes? Then, obviously, the only Christian thing to do is to smear anyone involved in the film, accuse them of being in it for the money/fame, and claim that there are 'facts' which would prove that the Church is totally innocent of these charges... without making even the limpest effort to say what these 'facts' might be.

What, is there like an online template you can download for this shit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do progressive encourage sex abuse hysteria???
Posted by: jedson on Oct 26, 2006 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Factoids and the Sex Abuse Panic

Who Gains from a Sex Abuse Panic?

The Radical Right, including Religious Extremists, has been deliberately fomenting a moral panic about sex abuse for decades now. (“Moral panic” is a term that social scientists use to describe a massive wave of fear, usually unfounded or greatly exaggerated, that engulfs a society. Often it leads to placing blame for some real or imagined moral outrage upon a scapegoat group, with lethal consequences. The period of the Salem Witch Trials is an example.) What political purposes does the current moral panic serve? Three primary ones stand out:

1. Those who tacitly assume that their views cannot prevail in a “free marketplace of ideas” benefit from presenting the Internet as a place of great danger to children. In this way, the public is being prepared to accept censorship of the Internet. The nearly exclusive focus on children serves to mask the fact that if this censorship is successful, it will destroy the last widely available medium where meaningful free speech is to be found.

2. By creating an atmosphere of hysteria about sex, those who advocate a narrow morality to be enforced upon all regardless of their own beliefs have silenced intelligent public discussion of sexuality. In particular, the sexuality of children, adolescents and adults in their relationships with each other has been declared a taboo subject, and even respected scientists in that field are intimidated and frightened from pursuing their work. The few socio-political gains made in these areas during the 1960’s and 70s have largely been reversed.

3. Those who fear the democratic process and the extension of civil rights and equal opportunity to minority groups of all kinds have created a radically disenfranchised group, “pedophiles,” defined not by any specific behavior, but merely by their innate orientation toward bonding with young persons. As with racial or ethnic stereotypes, once so identified, there is nothing a person can do to shed her or his scapegoat label. It is well known that throughout human history the relegation of a scapegoat group to sub-human status is a first substantial step in the abrogation of the rights of all citizens and the establishment of despotism. The long-established presumption in the United States that all persons are entitled to constitutional protections already has been dismantled by the Fanatical Right. Such rights include confronting the accuser, specification of time and place in criminal charges, not being subjected to the retroactive application of laws, freedom from double jeopardy and freedom from entrapment. (See, “Scapegoats and Shunning” at CounterPunch. < http://www.counterpunch.org/pariah0304200 >.)


Factoids

A factoid is a statement of presumed fact that people believe to be true because they hear or see it repeated over and over. (The term was coined by Norman Mailer in his 1973 biography of Marilyn Monroe. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factoid .) The extensive use of factoids has been a central strategy of the radical right as it has endeavored to create and maintain a high level of sex abuse hysteria. Why do progressives cooperate with this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is there no real abuse? Posted by: jedson
» Insensitive Posted by: pzzp
Mother Fuckers like him make a cross for Catholics to bear!
Posted by: hot_rad_man on Oct 26, 2006 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Catholic I feel ashamed that these bastards are getting the spotlight instead of the gallows! I have first hand knowledge of priests that have been shuffled from parish to parish to ply their sexual perversities on the young and I say lets have an open season on these pricks and get them in jail for life! I wont stop being a Catholic but I will be a Berrigan Catholic and expose the lies that go as doctrine sometimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "we should hang'em" Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Oh come on! Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Traffic cop? Posted by: edith
» RE: Traffic cop? Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: Traffic cop? Posted by: plarue
Sexual abuse is always
Posted by: mysticalrae on Oct 26, 2006 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
an act of violence, it has to do with power, and very little to do with sex. Using sex is only a distortion, a vehicle to gain life or death power over the victim. The response of terror and suffering on the part of the victim is the reflection of the perpetrators own fear and suffering.

How is this action taken by the very ones who have convinced millions of followers that they are the representation of the Most Holy, any different than what our nation is carrying out in Afghanistan and Iraq? Is a hunger for sex different than a hunger for oil, or dominance, or land?

The recidivism rate for pedophiles remains at close to 100% simply because the behavior is a lifestyle, and accepted by our society. To overpower any who are weaker, whether by force, deception or coersion and take whatever gifts they have; money, freedom, oil, or innocence, for ourselves seems to be the modern way. WE are all guilty by way of allowing our leaders to continue unimpeded, in the same way the leaders of the Church are allowed to continue.

I work with individuals who have survived sexual abuse, and am a survivor myself. One thing has become crystal clear to me over the years from this work: those who abuse suffer in the same ways that the abused do. Perpetrator and victim are the same energy, just opposite ends of the continuum.

I beleive the solution here is to take responsibility for oneself by refusing to be neither victim, nor perpetrator in every area of one's life. Taking full responsibility for every thought, word and action that we take insures a role as a non-victim. And on the other end of the continuum, making sure that one does not infringe upon any other beings right to have their own thoughts and actions, sets us apart from those who engage in predatory behavior. Start with self, first and always. Going to the core of the problem will provide lasting change, rooting out the cause and replacing it with new belief systems that support compassion and freedom.

"Be the change you wish to see in the world!" -- Mahatma Gandi

Blessings for peace
Rev Rae G. Hiimori

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sexual abuse is always Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: Sexual abuse is always Posted by: ifyousayso
» RE: Sexual abuse is always Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» Babs Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Sexual abuse is always Posted by: mysticalrae
costs
Posted by: ifyousayso on Oct 26, 2006 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When people talk about the costs of lifetime incarceration, they should also consider the costs to humanity in sanctioning murderous revenge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More costs Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: costs Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
Horrible but, sadly, common
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 26, 2006 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
amongst the elites of the world. Power corrupts and no rules means the worst in human perversion is released. Witness the depravity often found through-out history of royalty and dictators (sex orgies, s&m, Marquis de Sade, child abuse, prostitution, 'first night', etc.) Learn about the "Franklin Cover-Up". Male prostitutes of a young age visiting the White House. Remember the "Call Boy" ring run out of Frank's DC office? Remember the recent Foley "incident" and the 'lists' of the others to be outed? Remember that the Arabs oil barons still have harems and slavery still exists in Arab Africa and there is a 'trade' in children and women. Remember Japanese business magnets 'buying' American models? Sadly, children have more likehood of abuse from the 'establishment' then strangers or even family members! Remember the stories about the child abusers in Florida's CPS (running the service!) And all those stories of teachers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

progressivetype
Posted by: progressivetype on Oct 26, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think your point that people need to clean their own houses is a good point and that sensationalism is just that. I think the point of the article and the film is about the cleaning of our collective house and that the more light you shine on ANY abuse, the better.

To equate sex with pedophilia just makes no sense and is missing the collective house cleaning yourself. Children are always defenseless and as adults, we are responsible for their well-being. There are many many people who won't look at the Catholic Church honestly, even now with all the information there is out there. And often, they are the people who continue to allow this abuse to continue or they are the apologists for the Church and continue to defend the Catholic Church's inability to take responsibility for many of it's past actions: the Inquisition, collusion with the Nazis, the current Pope stirring the pot of anti-Arab rhetoric to the molestation of kids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Catholics
Posted by: kelt65 on Oct 26, 2006 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The entire catholic church is a sick medival delusion. the preisthood has always been a haven for queers who later become dangerously perverted due to a life of attempted celibacy and intense self loathing.

The catholic church not only protects its perverts, it creates them. I doubt this priest was a sick man at the age of 13.

Sexual repression is one of our greatest problems today. The Catholic church is at the core of this problem (in the west, anyway) and it is time all human beings who value truth at all to abandon its sick, medieval, self hating ideology.

Catholocism is nothing more than a complete denial of reality.

DIE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Catholics Posted by: Intraspecto
» RE: "pedophilia is about power" Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Catholics Posted by: gerty954
» RE: Catholics Posted by: kelt65
» RE: Catholics Posted by: kelt65
Accountability
Posted by: Ruperic on Oct 26, 2006 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Give any group of people power with no oversight and it leads to abuse. Priests got away with it because society let this group make their own rules and did not demand that they must answer to authorities outside the church. They were "religious" and that was enough. In the same way, politicians now feel they are invulnerable, above the law, not accountable, because society has treated them with deference. Don't let any group with power over others pretend they are above the common laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yep Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Pedophile Priests
Posted by: Gonzales_jo on Oct 26, 2006 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe that we definately have a real issue on that subject, Pedophile Priests, it's happening way too often. If we could stop awarding them by producing films, writing documentarys, or even publishing their story on every newspaper and magazine, I feel it would help change things a bit.

The different religions, churches, dioceses need to make stiffer penaltys for these priests and stick to them instead of transferring them from one church to another. This type of person needs professional help. Eventually people are not going to attend church because they are too afraid of what could happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pedophile Priests Posted by: kelt65
» RE: Pedophile Priests Posted by: MatthewSavage
» A real issue - pedophile priests? Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Pedophile priests are merely a symptom of the bigger problem
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Oct 26, 2006 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much must humanity endure before it becomes clear that religion has always been a purposeful deception that attracts those who seek power and control over others, even if it means pretending to serve the creator. What must transpire before people finally discern that religion and its leaders are wolves in sheep's clothing?

Whether we're tallking about politicians, national and imperial leaders, popes, priests, or other charlatans, these people simply use the strong delusion that is religion to profit from the ignorance of deceived followers and the inaction of others. If a large percentage of the executives of a major corporation were found to be systematically raping children for decades, would people permit that organization to continue in power?

No leader of an empire ever truly believes the religions used to manipulate subjects, and that includes religious empires. That would be like a drug dealer hooked on his product; its bad for business...

Christians often quote things like "know them by their fruits," yet after millennia of being duped into abetting blatantly evil scoundrels, many still don't understand the meaning or import of much of what they read. The same canon paradoxically propounds "faith," which means the complete opposite of "know them by their fruits," i.e., to discern the truth by analyzing deeds and results (works) and to weigh actions instead of merely believing what is said. The deceptive circular logic of posing a fantasy messiah who urges both discernment of the truth and faith (belief without proof) clearly represents a skillful and purposeful effort to impose ignorance and confusion through "strong delusion."

This is the answer to why religious followers so often support and perform blatant evil. They have been purposely deceived and deluded in a manner designed to destroy their ability to discern the truth. Consequently, religious adherents are easily misled about the differences between good and evil, truth and lies, and justice and injustice. Those who cling to "faith" in the presence of stunning and comprehensive proof of errors, lies, and outright deception in these religious canons and by blatantly duplicitous, holier-than-thou leaders are clearly suffering from strong delusion!

Always rely upon the wisdom of knowing them by their deeds and results (fruits, works), when in doubt!

Here is Wisdom !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some of these commentators need to read Cornel West's "Democracy Matters"
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 26, 2006 3:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was about to launch into a long tirade on totalitarian institutions and their effects on personal moral responsibility. Read this instead:

(T. McNally interview excerpt, 9/29/04 http://www.alternet.org/story/20017/)

...You contrast two strains of Christianity. You call them prophetic and Constantinian. As Elaine Pagels points out ... a religion of revolutionaries and free-thinkers, which Christianity was, became an authoritarian state religion with Constantine’s conversion...who is a prophetic Christian?

Certainly Martin King is a grand example, but also William Sloane Coffin of the antiwar movement, then head of SANE, fighting nuclear weapons. He’s a white brother of course. The white Catholic sister, Dorothy Day, founder of the Catholic social movement. Daniel and Phil Berrigan, Catholic brothers. One can go on and on.

Why do you use the term prophetic to describe them?

Prophetic goes back to the Jewish invention of the prophetic in Hebrew scriptures. It has to do with believing fundamentally that he or she who loses sight of the poor insults one’s maker, he or she who is in solidarity with the poor exalts one’s maker. Proverbs 14:31. Biblical folk, you can look it up. For Christians the Old Testament, for Jewish brothers and sisters, the Hebrew scripture.

Just as Sister Roy says, it’s about justice. How do you care for the most vulnerable? In the words of Jesus, “the least of these,” in Malcolm X’s language, “the ones who are catching hell.”

…and the contrast with the Constantinians?

The Constantinians defer to the empire. We see it today in the market Christianity, the gospels of prosperity, the prayers of let’s make a deal with god, spinning the wheel of fortune to keep up in the rat race. All the paraphernalia of the empire -– power, size, and might become the benchmarks of Constantinian Christian churches.

I see a cynical contract between the Christian zealots and the corporate libertarians in which both sacrifice their own interests in to this alliance. The economic-political face of the nation serves the wealthy and not those working class Christians. The moral and social face of the nation serves a...minority that espouses a morality that those rich who use them don’t themselves believe.

It’s true. Many of the Constantinian Christians are working people being pushed to the wall, who will not see that the very elites they defer to promote policies that are doing them in, doing their children in. You hear a lot of people these days say, “Well, I don’t really like either candidate, but I‘ll vote for Bush because he’s a Christian.” I say, “What do you mean by Christian?”

Do you mean someone who spouts pious platitudes and still crushes the poor with policies in which Leave No Child Behind is a slogan, but you withdraw the funds? One who talks about how important fighting for the nation is, but we have a fighting force disproportionately working class, disproportionately black and brown. 48% of the women in the US Army are black women, though they’re only 6% of the population.

We need an army, no doubt about that. It could be rightly deployed to pursue justice. I’m not a pacifist, but on the other hand, we’re asking who’s actually bearing the cost and paying the price? Let’s look at those thousand and more precious bodies that are coming back.

And ask, “Who are they?”

And “Who are their parents?” How come the US government doesn’t want us to focus on them? Why don’t we have a limelight on them so we can see the real cost? We’ll discover disproportionately working class poor, the very ones who are victimized by the pro-rich policies of the Bush administration...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

perfect poem for this article...
Posted by: Blue Heron on Oct 26, 2006 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the center cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

-- William Butler Yeats, January 1919

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Castration
Posted by: wisewebwoman on Oct 26, 2006 6:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the answer.
For all convicted paedophiles.
Why is this not ever, ever discussed?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Castration Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: Castration or Death: Lift the Card Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» Oh, If I Had Only Known! Posted by: edith
» RE: Oh, If I Had Only Known! Posted by: yoursfaithfully
» RE: Castration Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
A Different Point of View
Posted by: faultroy on Oct 27, 2006 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am always amazed at the comments of Alternet Readers--especially the obstensible liberal ones.
This site certainly has its share of Sexists Pigs, unfortunately they tend to be women.
Take for instance the above article. There is no doubt this priest is a sick "you know what."
However, as usual women are quick to portray child molesting as 1) a male dominated activity, Serious enough to kill someone for the transgression. No comment is made about the considerable number of women that are involved in both child molesting and child abuse.
Yet, if most of these posters would have taken the time to research this subject slightly, they would have found that this specific kind of activity mentioned in the article is very very rare and there is far more child molesting and child abuse going on than is mentioned here.
Most child molesting is done by family members or those very close to the family.
No one mentions the fact that child molesting appears to have increased substantially in the last three decades. Why is this so?
Well, perhaps it can be partly explained by the fact that women more interested in working to purchase another fashion wardrobe than personally taking care of their children. And, when their child is molested by someone outside of their immediate family, they can't comprehend the fact that anyone willing to provide child care services at a salary below a viable livable wage has perhaps other ideas in mind?
Oh and lets not forget that they need to prove that they can be "just asd good as men," so they have to let someone else take care of the children while they are out showing " they don't really need a man".
Lastly, they're not satisfied with their initial relationships--they need to divorce--not once, but multiple times--what is the connection? Well, statistically, more children are molested by and abused by a non bioligical parent living in their home than any other reason--but hey, that's not her fault--she's trying to live the Cosmo dream--you know, the house in the burbs and the fancy cloths and the latch key kids--married and divorced six times so she certainly does not have time to spend and oversee her children--so again, it's not her fault--it's that other guy!
Before you all pull out your knives and sharpen them ready for castration, you may want to consider the fact that psychologically we really don't know what is going on in the minds of these pedophiles, nor will we ever know because we have so many " femiwackos" running their mouths off and turning this into a political hot potato rather than logically and rationally trying to figure out what is really going on here.
Because of feminine hysteria, this subject has so much misinformation attached to it, and there are so many people with political agendas, it will take many years before we can scientifically investigate this bizarre deviant behavior to the point where we can both treat and prevent its occurance.

Nice going ladies--keep up the good work!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Different Point of View Posted by: wisewebwoman
» RE: A Different Point of View Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: A Different Point of View Posted by: celticsweetgrass
He served only seven years!
Posted by: guerillaTHOUGHTterrorist on Oct 27, 2006 10:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its almost humorous (not really) that in a country that expects prison to basically cure people of their criminality that he only served half of his prison sentence. Of course he was going to get out on good behavior, there are no children to molest in prison. Its a sick state of affairs when people like these are just turned back onto the street. There is no justice for the victims. I'm not saying we should use capital punishment, and I'm not saying we shouldn't. All I'm really trying to say is that perverts like these shouldn't get off the hook so easily because then there is no justice for the victims. This creep is now able to live a long and fufilling life fantasizing, and god forbid abusing yet another child, while the victim has to endure a lifelong struggle to overcome a trauma brought upon them by this so-called man of god. Those in power, who abuse their power should be given swift punishment, and given no opportunity to lead a fufilling life, unless they show some sign of redemption or remorse, unlike this prick. If i believed in hell, I would hope this man would spend eternity sitting on embers right next to the furnace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fer cryin' out loud
Posted by: Gregor on Nov 4, 2006 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hello Catholic Church: Require "marriage". What is with this stupid celibacy thing anyways? Like guys really are celebate who are normal???? NOT. Like celebacy insures you will be a kinder and more gentler person devoted to God? NOT.

Geez, people. Lets realize we are human beings first, not goofy idealists who can actually live up to that stupid, pie in the sky, idea. GROW UP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]