Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Movie Mix

No Such Thing As An Old Girl’s Network

By Melissa Silverstein, Women's Media Center. Posted August 3, 2006.


Why are there not more women directing movies? Because gender disparity runs rampant throughout the Hollywood studio system.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

With summer movie season upon us, a potential blockbuster opens each weekend on as many screens as possible throughout the local multiplex. By Sunday morning Hollywood executives know if they've got a hit or a flop. The choice this summer--Mission Impossible III, Superman Returns, Pirates of the Caribbean II--are highly reminiscent of summers past: boy-centric action films directed by men.

The sad truth is the trend is not new. But it occurs at a time when the film and media communities seem to believe that women in record numbers are powerful decision-makers in Hollywood. This perception began 18 months ago when a New York Times article, heralding "Hollywood's New Old Girls' Network," declared that women "have finally buried the notion that Hollywood is a man's world."

But the reality today does not meet the perception. When that article was published in April 2005, women ran production at four of the six major Hollywood studios. Within the last week, the number fell to two and each of those women reports to a male boss.

Gender disparity runs rampant throughout the Hollywood studio system. Martha Lauzen from San Diego State University has tracked women working behind the scenes in top-grossing films for several years. The 2005 statistics are out and the news is grim. Lauzen's The Celluloid Ceiling reports that "women comprised 17 percent of all directors, executive producers, producers, writers, cinematographers, and editors working on the top 250 domestic grossing films." The percentage was the same in 1998.

Looking only at directors, the most creative position in Hollywood, the numbers are humbling: women were at 7 percent in 2005, up from the year before but down from an all-time high of 11 percent in 2000. Other measurements confirm Lauzen's research. The Director's Guild reports only 13 percent women among its 7,400 directing members. Variety stats list just three women directors of 2005's top 100 grossing movies. Angela Robinson comes in at number 38 with a remake of Herbie Fully Loaded, Nora Ephron at 42 with Bewitched and Clare Kilner at 88 with The Wedding Date.

Why are there not more women directing movies? To begin with, Hollywood remains a business of relationships, and the male executives are comfortable with male directors.

"Male competency is assumed," says Lauzen. "Female competency is frequently if not always questioned." According to Nikki Finke, columnist from LA Weekly and Deadline Hollywood blogger, if women have "one movie that doesn't perform they are punished more harshly." Remember Penny Marshall? She was a huge directing star after Big and A League of Their Own. She hasn't directed a film since Riding in Cars with Boys in 2001. Mimi Leder, plucked by Steven Spielberg from the TV set of ER, directed the action movies Deep Impact and The Peacemaker. But she hasn't directed on the big screen since Pay it Forward in 2000.

How could a community that prides itself on its liberalism and progressivism fail so miserably in this area? At the top film schools UCLA and NYU, women and men study film in roughly equal numbers. Are women not tough enough to handle the all-consuming role of director, or unwilling to sacrifice for the chance? Martha Lauzen says she knows many directors who happen to be women, who would say, "I have a husband and kids, but if I can get that job I'll work that out."

Perhaps women do not even want to direct the monster budget, boy-focused films that seem to be Hollywood's favorite product. Probably no director would turn down a job, but look at Nancy Meyers, whom Nikki Finke calls "the most successful woman director working today." Able to tap into the zeitgeist with stories that resonate with women, Meyers worked for years as screenwriter on Father of the Bride and other films her husband directed. Her success reached another level when she directed What Women Want and continued with with Something's Gotta Give, the 2003 film starring Diane Keaton and Jack Nicholson which she wrote and directed. Her film The Holiday, starring Kate Winslet and Cameron Diaz, is slated for release later this year.

But without incentive to change, the status quo will remain in Hollywood, especially at a time when the studios are contracting. "Sometimes I think being labeled sexist in that community is not seen as negative but a badge of honor," says Martha Lauzen. Maybe Hollywood can learn from political women who have made concerted efforts to build a pipeline of candidates. Perhaps a consortium of women opening an independent studio, suggests Nikki Finke.

One thing is clear from Lauzen's research: Hollywood's women support each other when given the chance. "In both TV and film, when women are in a position to hire others they hire women at a greater rate then do men." If ever there is a true "Old Girls Network," women could make films just as good--or as bad--as their fellow male directors. For now, Hollywood should stop pretending that women have power and actually work to get them some.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Melissa Silverstein is a freelance writer and the web editor of the WMC Daily Update.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Track record
Posted by: suprmark on Aug 3, 2006 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether male or female a producer knows a male director's style. That director's co-workers will likely have a good idea what to expect from him. Why? Because they have worked with male directors before. Female directors are more of an unknown quantity. There is little tradition of female directors to draw on when making a decision to hire someone. The average quality and characteristics of a male director is known, the average quality and characteristics of a female director is unknown. Will the box office returns be higher, lower, or the same if a female director is hired over an equally qualified male director? That's a question only numbers will answer and unfortunately for women, and audiences, not many people will gamble their 100 million on a female director until there is a clearer picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On demands for selective equality
Posted by: H_H on Aug 3, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not enough female directors? It's a male conspiracy to keep womyn down!

Hey, in other news, I see that female soldiers are only about 1% of US troops dying in Iraq. Let's demand that women be no less than 50% of soliders whose brains get blown-out! Who's with me?!

*crickets chirping*

Uh, I said "Who's with me?"!

*crickets chirping*

Yeah, that's what I thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Israeli "Girl Soldiers" Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Israeli "Girl Soldiers" Posted by: FauxPorteno
» a question Posted by: Burton
» RE: On demands for selective equality Posted by: Samantha Vimes
» Ironic, ain't it .... ?? Posted by: AdamSelene40
» Eek Eek Posted by: Burton
» RE: ek Eek Posted by: punseez
» RE: ek Eek Posted by: AFWXMAN
javajoe
Posted by: javajoe on Aug 3, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be better to aim for a producer's job, as the producer
hires the director and everybody else that works on the movie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: javajoe Posted by: YogiBear
Typical AlterNet (On women's issues)
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Aug 3, 2006 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When a person of color writes an article about race issues ... the White guys of AlterNet swear and declare that "it's not that way any more.'

And when a woman writes about gender discrimination .. the black guys join the white guys to swear and declare there is not now and never has been a problem in the first place ... or it never was as important as some other problem ... or that the problem in an inescapabable biological characteristic thingie.

(Fortunately, AlterNet authors don't advertise their own orientation when writing on the ONLY Gay issue straights care about: Marriage Equality -- so we don't have to witness THAT example of the person 'who lived with it' being told they've 'got it all wrong.'

OK ... be THAT as it may ... the idea that Hollywood "prides itself on its liberalism and progressivism" is utter bushwa!

In fact, it's pretty much a right wing/anti-semite canard (the Jews and the Communists Run Hollywood) left over from when Ronald Reagan was President -- of the Screen Actor's Guild.

Sure, plenty of Reagan Democrats thought the "Magic Negro*", pro-Integration Anti-Klan dramas of the 60s and 70s were Moscow propaganda ... but by Liberal Progressive standards --" not so much. " (If you really objected to Sidney Portier comming to dinner ... you weren't only a stone cold racists, you were a MALE stone cold racist -- make that an obsessively heterosexual, male, stone cold racist.)

Oh, 'the usual suspects' wear their red ribbons On Academy Award night (that's support for people with AIDS, not commemoration of the Hollywood Black List.) And they let Michael Moore speak -- briefly.

But 'liberal' in film needs something more than showing lots of skin in a PG-13 sort of way ... and 'progressive' ...

The closest thing to a a progressive film I've seen in general release was THE CONSTANT GARDNER? ( a British Film Board project, y'know). Ran 3 weeks on a couple of hundred screens and vanished. Then there's the ouvre of Michael Moore and his imitators (Independent productions Not Studio projects, are they) And what else?

I can't find the 'progressive' content in Studio projects -- and precious few Indies get shown outside the big city Art Houses.

In fact, I wonder how the myth of Libeal - Jew Hollywood survived the '90s at all.

-----------
* A "Magic Negro" is an African American character like "Mr. Tibbs." Good looking, ususually well spoken and clearly the best educated person on the screen, brave, strong, decent -- and his role in the plot is to solve some White People's Problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Uh, yeah ... you're the 'only one' Posted by: AdamSelene40
» I hear "U" and obey ... Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: I hear "U" and obey ... Posted by: Blue Heron
» and then . . . Posted by: kit79
Maybe it don't work this way but...
Posted by: blackinjun on Aug 3, 2006 10:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
aren't you the mothers of those "good ole boys?" And if you raise them to be sexist, then you aren't a good parent or there's something wrong with your own psyche...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» good point Posted by: Blue Heron
» RE: good point Posted by: libby
» RE: good point Posted by: blackinjun
» well yeah Posted by: Blue Heron
» RE: good point Posted by: H_H
» RE: good point Posted by: punseez
» RE: good point Posted by: Blue Heron
Do
Posted by: blackinjun on Aug 3, 2006 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
white women (feminist et. al) know the difference btw "being equal" and "being the same as?" Man do I get tired of turning on the late night t.v. and seeing two women scream'n as they suck what they can't naturally fluck....

Please excuse me AlterNet for being so graphic and direct but somethings you can't gloss over...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not any more tired ... Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Not any more tired ... Posted by: blackinjun
Late night tv aside
Posted by: ezilla on Aug 3, 2006 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The previous post makes a good point. There's a huge difference between "equality" and "sameness".

As a woman I recognize my differences from males, and do not wish to be treated the same, i just wish to be given the same opportunities. Equality is more the spirit in which something is done, rather than the exact manner in which it is carried out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Late night tv aside Posted by: YogiBear
Hollywood is all about image and not about substance...
Posted by: rclord on Aug 3, 2006 6:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why would people expect its politics be any different?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apparently there's no younger woman's club, either
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 3, 2006 11:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet - could we have a story about this please?

insane vomit about cutest photo ever (ie: WHATTHEFUCKISWRONGWITHYOUPEOPLE????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kcwriter
Posted by: kcwriter on Aug 3, 2006 11:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The writer makes a common mistake when she writes that Hollywood doesn't "GIVE" women equal chances to direct. What she fails to understand is that Hollywood doesn't "GIVE" anyone male or female a chance to direct. It is something that is earned, fought for, connived for, politically schmoozed for, or in various and sundry other ways obtained. The primary factor behind the success of men in most of the occupations where competition is relevant to success is that men have much higher levels of testosterone. Women will never be equally successful as men. Not because they're not as capable or as smart or as talented, but because they don't have the drive to compete at the same level. It's fueled by testosterone to a very high degree. Human beings are a part of the animal kingdom and as a result our behaviour is heavily influenced by our hormones. I contend that no matter how level the playing field you will never have a fifty-fifty split but under the best of circumstances a 70/30 or even a 60/40. It's the individual and each individual's drive to achieve their goals that is ultimately the primary determinant. IT'S OUR BIOLOGY so get out there and compete.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: kcwriter AMEN Posted by: Burton
» RE: kcwriter AMEN Posted by: punseez
» RE: kcwriter Posted by: punseez
» Women are competitive Posted by: kit79
» Women have better taste. Posted by: Aussie Kim
Men are better at visualization
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 4, 2006 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men are hard-wired to be better at visualization, and that is necessary for a good director. Ironically, men learn their visualization techniques from women -- analyzing and contemplating various asspects of the female body.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Female Directors
Posted by: kit79 on Aug 5, 2006 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about other countries? Am I mistaken or does Iran have quite a few female directors, for example?

I think in America Hollywood's targeted audience is still young males between 18-35, and I think we have a notion that when something is made by a woman, it's FOR women and not mainstream, like we're some kind of other or something and we're going to make movies about periods and tampons in some other language - something that won't be marketable or accessible to that target audience. There just won't be boobies or hot chicks or stuff blowing up - things Hollywood thinks men go to the movies for - and worse, we might even do things like *gasp* include gay characters! I'd be insulted if I were a guy, but Hollywood doesn't seem to care, nor does it care that I like action as much as anyone else and hate chick-flicks and romance films with a fiery passion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WITASWAN: Pipeline requires "Voters" who support Women Filmmakers
Posted by: Huttner on Aug 30, 2006 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Silberstein ends her excellent article with the suggestion: "Maybe Hollywood can learn from political women who have made concerted efforts to build a pipeline of candidates." But the success of the pipeline depends on voter support & similarly women filmmakers must have support from women in the audience. Therefore, modeling ourselves on the success of EMILY's List, several women's orgs in Illinois have created the WITASWAN initiative (Women in the Audience Supporting Women Artists Now!). Google WITASWAN & see for yourself. The best way to increase the # of women filmmakers working in Hollywood is to "vote" with our $$: walk the talk & put your money where your mouth is! Signed by Jan Lisa Huttner

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]