Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Movie Mix

Life 'After Innocence'

By Laura Barcella, AlterNet. Posted January 20, 2006.


A powerful new documentary explores the struggle of seven former prisoners, newly exonerated of horrible crimes.
life
Life 'After Innocence'
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Perhaps it all started with Harrison Ford's role as "The Fugitive" in 1993. Or perhaps it's because in recent years almost 400 inmates have been proven innocent and released from prison after being convicted of crimes they didn't commit.

Whatever the reason, the idea that America's criminal justice system is insufferably flawed is steadily gaining traction in the public mind. It's due, in large part, to the work of activists like Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld (founders of groundbreaking legal clinic the Innocence Project), and artists like Taryn Simon (acclaimed photographer of The Innocents). The plight of these erstwhile "criminals" is also the focus of a new ABC television series, "In Justice," starring Kyle MacLachlan.

But what's been largely missing from the media's love affair with innocence is the soul behind this sensational story: the fact that behind each exonerated prisoner is a person with a life and a family beyond prison bars. The tragedy of post-conviction exoneration isn't just what it reveals about the grim state of our legal system, but the fact that after being released, many exonerees receive little more than an apology: no compensation, education, job training or emotional counseling. They're expected, instead, to walk away smiling from cells they didn't deserve to inhabit in the first place, grateful for the chance to re-enter old lives that, for many, feel as outdated as an ill-fitting high school sweater.

It's this struggle -- not just to readjust to life post-exoneration, but to win state compensation for wasted years -- that Los Angeles filmmaker Jessica Sanders attempts to capture in her powerful new documentary, "After Innocence," which premiered to wide acclaim at last January's Sundance Film Festival and opens in theaters nationwide today.

"Wrongful conviction can happen to anyone," Sanders reminded me during a recent telephone interview. "It's not just about race, or being poor. We are all potential jurors."

Sanders' feature-length film follows seven ethnically diverse male exonerees through their traumatic post-prison journeys. The men have little in common except their wrongful incarcerations: Scott Hornoff, a former cop from Rhode Island, served the least amount of time -- six and a half years -- behind bars; the longest sentence was the 23 years on death row served by Pennsylvanian Nicholas Yarris. After their exonerations, nearly all became politically engaged by the experience.

A bear of a man with a thick Boston accent, Dennis Maher manages to be both good-natured and indignant about the 19 years he served for three violent rapes he had nothing to do with. (The real perpetrator has yet to be found.) "The administration of justice in Massachusetts is a crock of shit," Maher pronounces at the start of "After Innocence," before repeatedly breaking down in tears during the film. Maher's quest to make up for lost time, and get married and have kids as soon as possible, is one of the movie's sweeter subplots -- he obsesses about his Match.com profile like it's his job.

Maher wrote to NYC's Innocence Project after seeing founder Barry Scheck interviewed on the "Phil Donahue Show" in 1993 and was freed via DNA evidence a long 10 years later. Both Scheck and Donahue, who are interviewed in the film, say they received countless letters from prisoners claiming innocence, like Maher, after the program aired.

In some ways, Maher is one of the luckier exonerees profiled in Sanders' film. Though he served a longer sentence than some of the other subjects, the state of Massachusetts passed an exoneration compensation law during the course of the film, granting Maher some financial recoup for his time served.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Laura Barcella is AlterNet's front page editor.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A great number of the incarcerated....
Posted by: adp3d on Jan 20, 2006 3:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...are simple drug users and small time dealers. As long as we have privitized for-profit facilities that are being run by corporations who, naturally, donate to Republican politicians, we are going to have prisons that are full of "innocent" people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have marked my calender.
Posted by: natalie on Jan 20, 2006 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't go see many movies but I am really looking forward to this. I wonder how they can go about their lives after having served time for an unwarranted crime. How can they not hold animosity toward not just the system, but the government and even the nation? It's as if the sentence never ends. This really saddens me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Have marked my calender. Posted by: redroadtraveler
otto
Posted by: otto on Jan 20, 2006 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No doubt there are still plenty of people in prisons who are innocent. One I've become aware of is Jens Soering, in a Virginia prison for 20 years. Son of a German diplomat, he was (probably) wrongfully convicted of the murder of his drug-addicted girlfriend's parents at age 18. In that time he has managed to survive by turning to prayer, and has written books on prayer and on the penal system. His published books are THE PRAYER OF THE PRISONER, and AN EXPENSIVE WAY TO MAKE BAD PEOPLE WORSE. He has been punished for the second book by being put "in the hole" for two months to teach him a lesson. He points out how the rehab programs are a complete failure, and how many of the prisoners need mental help or help with drug abuse, not time in prison that teaches them to be real criminals. He would like to be sent to prison in Germany where he would hope for justice and a chance to be set free. He does have a web-site provided by his publishers: www.jenssoering.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Compensation.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Jan 20, 2006 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The state should:

Give these people a good, secure govenment job with lifetime employment guaranteed.

Financial compensation enough to own a new home.

Retraining benefits.

Lifetime mentical treatment.

And a full pardon for all past crimes whether or not they were convicted.

These are little things the state could do to correct the wrong. However, the state never admits mistakes, so the injustices will continue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Compensation. Posted by: Lizka
» RE: Compensation. Posted by: rise up
This is shocking.
Posted by: Lizka on Jan 20, 2006 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Britain you can certainly claim for wrongful imprisonment: and the state would certainly have to expunge your criminal record! I sometimes think that in America the state, for all its constitution, etc, is far more "imperial" than that in Britain: it seems to behave with all the highhandedness of an ancient Roman emperor. No wonder the British are known for fair play.

The problem for someone in that position in Britain would be to prove how much they had lost FINANCIALLY as a result of imprisonment, if they didn't have a very good job before, or if they were incarcerated at a very young age - like, in or just after their teens! That was the problem for some of the "Birmingham Six", who were incarcerated on false IRA-related charges.

Whereas that woman who was wrongfully imprisoned for "murdering" her babies (they were cot deaths) was a high-powered lawyer... so I daresay she will be getting a very large undisclosed sum!

Anyway. You know what I think? I think that the strange paradox (for it is one) of those who find themselves wrongfully convicted, and then exonerated, should make us think about them: but it should also make us sorry for what the state does to prisoners in general. Most of them have families and "lives" too. (And, as some people here have said, a lot of them in America are increasingly very petty offenders, who have large tranches of their life stolen away from them and their employment prospects permanently impaired.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another example
Posted by: YogiBear on Jan 20, 2006 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This American Life detailed an amazing story of a man who couldn't get released from prision on parole because he refused to admit his guilt -- except he wasn't guilty.

It's Episode 282:

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/

RealPlayer link:

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/ra/282.ram

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes good link also: Kneel.. Posted by: RandomAction
thanks
Posted by: hollihoho on Jan 20, 2006 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
great story -- thanks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never Privatize Justice
Posted by: SBK on Jan 21, 2006 1:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The minute we privatize anything, it needs a market. As soon as a market is created it must be fed, in this case with the lives of innocent, young, and poor boys. Many of them will commit a petty crime here or there, but most of these are due to crappy circumstances to begin with. Profiting off of misfortune is horrible and against our American way. The whole system becomes fixated on filling the prisons instead making society safer. There should never be a market for crime, justice is ONLY the government's responsibility, otherwise we end up with more men of color in prison than in universities!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great movie
Posted by: neogaia on Mar 5, 2006 8:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to the premiere of this move in LA. It was very eye-opening. I recommend anyone who can see it to do so. I was raised knowing that the justice system was flawed. We have to work to better it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]