Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Movie Mix

My Tranny Valentine

By Logan Hill, Nerve.com. Posted December 17, 2005.


Actress Felicity Huffman of 'Desperate Housewives' opens up about playing a woman in the middle of a gender reassignment in the new road flick 'Transamerica.'
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Before Felicity Huffman won her Emmy -- and prime-time stardom -- with "Desperate Housewives," she filmed Duncan Tucker's smart debut filmTransamerica.

She plays Bree, a pre-op transsexual who discovers that her estranged son suddenly needs her. Against all formulas, they embark on an often-comic road trip. Huffman shakes off the weight of playing one of relatively mainstream cinema's first transsexuals by delivering a performance that is deeply idiosyncratic, even strange at times; ultimately you're so taken by Bree's born-again piety that you forget all about her gender reassignment.

In fact, her performance -- as a male in the middle of a transformation to womanhood -- is so complicated, that I forgot to ask her the hot-button question everyone else pops: "Wasn't it weird to land this part, as a woman?"

Honestly, it hardly seems to matter.

I loved this film, but I've got to admit, going in, I had all kinds of fears about what it might be.

You did?

I was convinced it was going to be another one of those Isn't-This-Person-Just-Like-You movies. You know, like those kids' books: My Two Daddies.

Oh, so you were surprised it wasn't just like, "Transgendered people are people too! They go to the grocery store just like you!"

Exactly.

Well, a lot of that was Duncan (Tucker, the director). In the script, Bree was prissy, uptight, well-educated. Like that stuffy old aunt that drops French phrases.

And you certainly don't play her like the girl next door either.

He gave me a lot of freedom. When he gave me the part, I asked, "What am I going to look like?" He said, "Don't change your voice, Don't change your look." He was concerned with the internal part, the truth of the heart, so I just did a lot of research, and met with a broad spectrum of transgendered women.

But you did change your look and your voice. [She dropped five octaves.]

The first time Duncan saw it all was on the first day of the shoot. He said, "Oh!" Then he jumped into it with me, and said, "Great." He became my champion from that moment on. And he was my watchdog too. If anything fell a certain way, or if I didn't walk correctly for her, if my voice went up, or I dropped my hands, he'd stop the shot. And we'd start over. In indieland, that's hari-kari.

I'd imagine any director might give you that kind of freedom now that you've got your Emmy. But back then, before "Desperate Housewives," you didn't have that kind of star power. Why'd he trust you?

I didn't have anything back then. That's what's so amazing. Duncan is just really brave. He'd only seen me in a couple of off-Broadway plays with maybe a hundred people in the audience, and he just kept saying, "I want her."

Of course, David Mamet [a longtime collaborator of Huffman's husband, William H. Macy] gave you your stage-acting break, so I've been wondering ever since I saw the film about how Mamet must be teasing you.

Well, he hasn't seen it yet. But I hope that when he does, we talk about it. That will be fascinating. Of course, no one teases you as much as Mamet -- or is as loving. I'm sure his zingers will be fantastic.

Did you read Jeffrey Eugenides' Middlesex?

Oh, of course. I read anything transgender-interested. And while I was shooting, I read a book about MTS, male-to-female transgender surgery. I had to just surround myself with it all the time. I needed to go to sleep with it, to read it before I went to sleep, and then again and again.

How'd you decide what to read?

I just read everything. Biographies, autobiographies, articles. And I met two women from the production company Deep Stealth, Andrea James and Calpernia Adams. They didn't know me from Adam. I just said, "Hi, I'm Felicity and I'm doing this movie." They said, "Sure, come on over."

We started by working on the script and they went through it, page by page, to make sure everything was authentic, and then they shared their own life stories. I spoke to a lot of transgendered women about all kinds of questions: what was it like when you first met a woman? When you told your parents? And Andrea helps men to find their female voice, so I tried working with her. But she couldn't help me do it in reverse! It was completely different.

What books made the greatest impression, specifically?

Well, in Jan Morris's book Conundrum, she had a sexual reassignment done and she had complications, she had to go back in several times, and she was married when she did it. It caused great consternation in her family, and she said in the end, something like, "But I don't care. If I had to cut it off, to hack it off, to claw it off, I would've, because it was not who I was."

That always stayed with me. The transgendered community is quite strong, and very clear that the transformation takes place in your head long before you wonder about what's under your skirt. And I learned a lot from those moments when people realized, "That is not who I was."

Jan Morris talks about her mother, ironing her father's shirt when she is about two or three and sitting under the ironing board. Her mother picks up a shirt and says, "One day you'll wear one of these." And she says, "I'm not going to wear that shirt. I'm a girl."

Any other books?

She's Not Here, by Jennifer Boyle, is really eloquent about the transformation, about what happens when you go from male to female. Emotionally, she talks about what it's like when you're a guy -- this big aircraft carrier going through the ocean, and the waves affect you. You're just moving toward your destination. But when she takes the hormones, she felt like a rowboat, going up and down the wave. She talks about just being buffeted by life much more just through the hormones, and she's really eloquent . . .

How much of those in-person interviews actually made their way into the performance? Sometimes actors do research and interviews, and throw it all out. Other times they pick one or two people to mimic.

Actually, it was amazingly productive. I needed to meet the women who were not yet at home in themselves, to see their experiences, to meet women who were newly comfortable with themselves. I needed to see people's walks, their makeup, their hair. I needed to cast a wide net, as they say, and it was incredibly informative and inspiring.

Was there anyone in particular?

Well, some women were so uncomfortable that taking a cab to the hotel where convention is, just walking the 200 feet to the front desk and finding what banquet room. For them, that walk is excruciating, they feel like they're a target and they're very uncomfortable.

Bree seems terribly uncomfortable.

She carries around so much pain, so much self-loathing, just this deep reservoir of agony . . . I found the whole thing difficult. It felt like walking across the country with full glass of water, riding a unicycle, juggling with the other hand, and if you spill a drop it's life or death, because that's what it's like for Bree: life or death.

But it's such a fun movie. I mean, I heard Harvey Weinstein describe it yesterday as a "transsexual road movie." Which it is.

Well, great comedy comes out of great pain. And her comedy, her sense of humor, and her irony definitely come from her pain. I mean, it's not a transsexual road movie, really: it's just a wacky funny road movie, transgender or not.

I have to finish with a question about Andy [the name she gave her prosthetic rubber penis] and your full-frontal scene. One of the strangest things about it to me is that it didn't really derail the story at all.

I'm so glad. Because it is so shocking. What I loved about that moment in the movie, was that on one hand, it's this Brechtian moment, just like how he would pop the audience out of a story. You see the penis and pop out of the story.

But I think when you do that here, you pop into Bree's experience: You're just as shocked and horrified by that picture as Bree is . . . It's a brilliant piece of psychological filmmaking. I got so upset when Duncan told me that he wanted to show Andy. I burst into tears. I thought, "I can't do it." I felt exposed and it felt like betrayal and somewhat of a travesty. I was so embarrassed, and I kept telling myself, "It's just a piece of rubber -- it's pathetic." But I'd lived inside of Bree for so long, I think that's how she would react.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Mainstreaming of the Transgender Icon
Posted by: Naomi on Dec 17, 2005 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure there will be thousands of giggling male to female transsxuals and crossdressers rushing to the theatres to see the latest attempt in making transgenderism potable for mass consumption.

And really, let's be clear: this is really what's its all about- consumption. Our protagonist is a white, affluent transsexual woman with a classically medical approach to gender, play acted by a genetic woman no less. How much more "cute" can it get. This is the HRC-ing of gender and frankly, the transgender community should be demanding better for themselves.

Transgender people are more than just another segment of society who deserves (by god!) to be accepted so we can move from one restrictive gender box to another and still have enough money to try to live out the American lie and buy lots of stuff made in China. There are healthier models of living than that but they will never be shown on the big screen.

And to use a genetic woman when there are talented and real transgender people who could play that part is degrading and perpetuates the stereotype that TGs aren't together enough to portray themselves. Bull.

All transgender people aren't white, and all transgender people are not transsexuals. Transsexualism is a medical model and many transgender people refuse to buy into the idea that you have to move from one gender box to be imprisoned in the other. There are alot of other transgender people besides affluent white gentic males becoming transgender white females.

But since its really about consumption - the edgier reality won't play in the theatres over Christmas. HRC, and the public in general, wouldn't stand for it.

Naomi Archer
Asheville, NC

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Curious about your input Posted by: Snoopy Brown
» Get over it. Posted by: bettsoff
» My head explodes! Posted by: Allison
» RE: My head explodes! Posted by: madison50
» RE: My head explodes! Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: Get over it. Posted by: madison50
» RE: Get over it. Posted by: bettsoff
FIVE octaves?
Posted by: bettsoff on Dec 17, 2005 6:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please, someone, put me in contact with her voice coach.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is no one else offended?
Posted by: safety girl on Dec 20, 2005 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I the only TS here who is disturbed and dismayed by the use of the of derogatory epithet "tranny" in what is supposed to be a progressive minded publication? Words like "tranny" and "she-male" are no different from "fag" and "dyke", or for that matter, racial slurs that will go unmentioned due to my squeamishness in even mentioning them.

This word is most often used in the perjorative referring to a (often but not always pre-op) transsexual in the same breath with the words "porn star" or "whore", and I'm dissapointed that both Alternet, and some of its users (even if they are TS themselves) using this "word".

Gays can use "queer" and "dyke" all they want as a badge of honor, they have enough numbers to be able to do so without too much damage to their public image. Those of us in the transsexual community don't have the luxury of numbers and mainstream media representation, and as such cannot afford to refer to ourselves in such soiled terms. And I would expect Alternet to think of the consequences of that, before they mark an otherwise very good article with such a derogatory sounding brush, whether it was intended that way or not.

Anyone who disagrees, feel free to flame me to your heart's content, but I have a right to my feelings, and right now I feel a bit stabbed in theback by people who are supposed to be more considerate to diversity than that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its a movie
Posted by: Malla on Feb 24, 2006 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not yet having seen the movie (YET) but reading all the posts and replys on this site. I agree with most of the posters ( is that the right word as we are talking about a movie) It may not be P.C. to have a GG playing the part but at least the subject is out there and it is getting awards which means that many of the G.P who would not normaly watch a transgender movie will watch it, to see why it got the award ( and hopefuly its not the only one). This can do nothing but help the transgender comunity as a whole to see an award winning portrail of this subject. Who cares about who plays what role as long as the portrail is relativley accurate and sincere which reading the artical I do believe that is what Felicity tried to do. Just remember one thing " All P.R is good P.R."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement