Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Movie Mix

A Self-Made Death

By Monica Mehta, AlterNet. Posted July 26, 2005.


Tonight's PBS documentary makes the case that the end of life is something we should be preparing for -- and not just with a 401(k).
Advertisement

Death. It's a topic most people shy away from. Try starting a conversation about it and you'll be labeled morbid or depressing. Talk about planning it and people will refer you to a therapist or a life insurance plan. People love to talk about love, sex, babies -- all life-affirming topics. Not death.

Bob Stern
Bob Stern wanted to die on his terms.
Susan Stern's documentary, "The Self-Made Man," airing tonight on PBS at 10 pm (check local listings), makes a compelling case that death is exactly what we should be talking about, much more than we do now. Stern's father, Bob Stern, was a successful entrepreneur who had enough money to retire by age 37. He had three successful children, a loving wife and a gaggle of grandkids. But he didn't have his health. At age 77, he discovered he had an aortic aneurysm and prostate cancer -- after having had a stroke and a lifetime of high blood pressure and cholesterol. Instead of going through months or years of surgeries, procedures, hospital visits and other agonies associated with end-of-life illnesses, he started thinking seriously about ending life on his own terms and with his own hands. Susan Stern's movie documents his life and his decision.

The vast majority of the health care system's expenses are incurred taking care of individuals in the last few weeks of their life. This figure partially illustrates that for most families, it's hard to let go of a dying member; they pull out all the stops and pursue every possible treatment, because not to do so would seem inhumane. Even with the terminally ill, family members don't have a plan for what to do in the end; they just continue medical care until the patient dies. They agree to resuscitate 80- and 90-year old parents; they sign forms for countless procedures. There is often a great deal of pain associated with these treatments, and in the current health care system, there are very few ways to die old with dignity.

Most doctors know when enough is enough, and when it would be better to let a patient return home to die among her loved ones, or even when it might be better to hasten death after all but palliative treatment has already ceased and the pain is unbearable. The problem is, most families don't know how to say goodbye. And most people haven't discussed with their families when they'd like the treatments to stop and the goodbyes to begin. There's also the issue that in western culture, death in old age is not seen as an inevitable next stage; it's a grievous defeat that should be battled at all costs. "Do not go gentle into that good night," the poet Dylan Thomas writes. "Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light."

But most elderly, if asked, would prefer the option to go gently, and painlessly. The Hemlock Society, now known as End-of-Life Choices, advocates for the legal right of Americans to have such options. They say they do not support suicide; they are advocating for patients to have the right to have their doctors hasten death for them with the use of lethal drug doses. The recent Academy Award-winning Million-Dollar Baby brought the issue of euthanasia into the national spotlight. Susan Stern's documentary takes it a step further, addressing it on a personal level.

On the eve of his decision whether or not to end his life, a perfectly sane-looking Bob Stern makes a home video for his daughters. "I am seriously considering whether ... I can put an end to this very nice life which you girls have been a part of for many, many years," he tells the camera. He talks about wanting to avoid the unhappiness of loved ones that goes along with caring for a terminally ill patient. The "memories of the [sick] person are changed by virtue of this agony," he says. He uses a "cost benefit ratio" to weigh the pros and cons. But what he doesn't say is that he endured four long, painful years caring for his own dying mother. That experience may have made the decision for him.

Regardless of how we feel about the right to choose when to die, we can make a few choices about how we want to die. It's called an advance directive, and it helps generate decisions about whether we'd rather rage, or go gently. It also teaches us how to talk with our loved ones about death. That's something we should have learned about along with the birds and the bees.

Digg!

Monica Mehta is an associate editor at AlterNet.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Another failure of American religion and American culture
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 26, 2005 5:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody would have an opinion about what a total stranger should do facing a possible end of life situation if it wasn't for the incessant meddling of Judeo-Christianity which insists that your life is not your own, that you don't have a say in how or when it ends, and that God expects you and others to do whatever is possible to preserve it regardless of the suffering caused by or futility of the interventions. At all other times, you are to have your eyes on heaven and lust for the time when you will be with your maker, except that time. What a shabby belief system. What a piece of crap culture we have created.

The bonus of this Frankensteinian end of life effort which takes place in the cold sterile American hospitals with the victim festooned in catheters and wires where he dies alone or else is surrounded by strangers beating on his chest, making extra emergency incisions and then shocking him into oblivion is that it sucks the financial life blood out of the health care system to force Medicaid cutbacks in vaccines and well baby checks. I am so proud to be an American. This truly is the greatest country ever, the land of the free and the home of the brave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oregon's Assisted Suicide
Posted by: needlefoot on Jul 26, 2005 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am 62 years old and facing a relatively easy surgery next Monday. Even so it finally prompted me to fill out an advanced directive for the first time in my life. Copies of it are going to my sisters, my sons, the doctors involved in my care. It was an easy form to fill out and did give me the opportunity to talk about death with those who are close to me.
Oregon's Assisted Suicide law, as long as the federal government will leave it alone, will also be an option for me at a later time. I want that option. I want it desperately. I may never use it - as most of those who apply for, and get, it never do. But for a person such as myself who has always been in control of my life it is imperative to have that option.
Also, recently, The Oregonian published a marvellous article about an elderly woman who chose to forego food and all liquid not used to wash down medications as a way of hastening her death. In the interviews she talked extensively about how it felt to die this way (fasting) and also about the time she was able to spend saying good-bye to her loved ones. At the time of publication she was sleeping most of the time; she may have passed by now.
I am looking forward to seeing the PBS special this evening.
Diane
Hillsboro, OR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oregon's Assisted Suicide Posted by: holojojo
» RE: Oregon's Assisted Suicide Posted by: needlefoot
Rev. Fowler
Posted by: Rick Fowler on Jul 26, 2005 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a UCC pastor and a hospital caplain, I agree wholeheartedly with the statement that Judeo-Christian nutcases (who emphasize that only the "afterlife" is important, {by the way, that is an ancient heresy, its efficacy much scorned and discredited except by the neo fundamentalists}) continue to meddle with an individal's right to die. The major tenet of Judeo-Christian beliefs is one of mercy and love, and freedom from fear and oppression. This is a far cry from the "culture of life" that emphasizes "life at all costs, at any cost". In my ministry, I have witnessed first hand the abuses of medical practices that unwittingly prey upon fears, and therefore become complicit in the furthering of oppression. Fortunately, patients sometimes die before we can "save" them. The concept of "quality of life" is often secondary, if not outrightly tertiary. Why? Because of our obsessive need to control, and "succeed", and to artificially effect a "positive" outcome. I've come to realize, thankfully, that dying a peaceful, uncomplicated death IS a positive outcome, especially for my surviving family! Yes, I do have my advanced directives, and short of getting "DNR" tattooed within the universal recycling symbol on my forehead, everyone I know knows my wishes. Modern medicine is indeed a gift... but only if utilized properly, without ersatz values and smarmy, sentimental religiosity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Rev. Fowler Posted by: LMNOP
Have those discussions with YOUR family!
Posted by: faye on Jul 26, 2005 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a registered nurse in a small ICU, I have witnessed more that my share of deaths. The good ones are those in which families have had those conversations that address what the individual values in life and how they want to live their final years, months, days or hours. It is an honor to be a support to families in those times, facilitating each family member doing what they need to ease the process and say their goodbyes.

In contrast, more than a little of the problem of burnout for medical professionals is the stress created by a society that wishes to preserve "life" at all costs, and the medical-ethical dilemmas created by this expectation.

I applaud the coming broad- based discussion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» On GOOD DEATH Posted by: LMNOP
Death with Dignity
Posted by: hhartman on Jul 26, 2005 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In May my grandfather died. He had cancer for 13 years, since I was in the sixth grade (I am 25 now), and fortunately was able to agressively fight it for those thirteen years. Allthough he never went into remission, he was able to sustain a full lfe including visiting Europe, Asia, and Central America with my grandmother. In the last five years it has been a struggle for him, on New Years Day 2000 he was given two weeks to live. Since then, we have heard such pronouncements on several occasions, where he would somehow bounce back.

In the last six months it had become painfully obvious that he was going to go at any time. My grandmother spent 24 hours a day caring for him. It was during his last hospital stay that he decided that he was ready to stop his fight, he went home and my grandparents signed up for hospice care. I was fortunate enough to be in town at this time and was able to say goodbye. After less than a week of not eating, but taking in the necessary liquids to be comfortable, he died. This was on his own terms, and in his home with those that love him all around.

I have always been a proponent of the Death with Dignity Act, but this affirmed my beliefs even more. Even though I am young, I have begun planning my living will and avanced directive, so there is no question of my wishes. As much as I missed my grandfather, I know he has moved on, his soul finally at peace. Most of us should be as lucky, and hopefully be as ready and die on our own terms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very Important Article
Posted by: nakis on Jul 26, 2005 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lots of good posts too.

My whole life I believed that we have the choice in when to die. That is we can decide when to leave this world.

My fellow Christain family members say I am dead wrong. That I do not have a choice. So who is right? This knowing I have that we have the right to choose when to die or the Church authority saying we do not.

Death is an important as life. How we live our life directly relates to our death. Not just cause and affect of lifestyle choices but our mental and emotional preparedness.

We are all going to die. To not prepare for the inevitable is foolish. And I most certainly would like to die on my own terms. Taking into consideration the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chance, fate or luck... my grandma died with dignity.
Posted by: mousch on Jul 26, 2005 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My grandmother had Parkinson's diseaase for a long time (I don't remember when it was first diagnosed, I always remember her with tremors). When I turned twelve her tremors got worse, her head would shake. She tok a lot of it in god humor - if my mom was shaking dressing, my grandma would come up and offer to "just hold it", and say she could do a better job than my mom, she practices all the time. She was a strong lady, and didn't like us to see that the Parkinson's was beating her.
She died the year I was fourteen, and I don't believe she could have been luckier. She was crocheting in her chair, her favourite craft, and watching her favourite television show. My family often wondered if she'd had the heart medication she was on a waiting list for, if she would have lived longer. I don't think she could have planned anything better. We miss her a lot, but she died with dignity and the important part was that she was happy. None of us could have planed it for her to have gone any better. If only I will be so lucky.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Article is as biased as the documentary
Posted by: sndrake on Jul 26, 2005 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please be aware that the main group criticizing this documentary is a disability rights group.

Three out of the four "advisors" credited in the movie are long-time assisted suicide/euthanasia activists. Not surprisingly, the documentary frames the debate as one pitting "religious values" vs. "autonomy."

There's another way of looking at it. Some of us are very leery of changing public policy so that while most suicidal people are pulled off the ledge, old, ill and disabled people are told it's OK to jump. (But to please not leave a mess behind.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No, it is not, your view is extreme Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
I remember when I learned about death.
Posted by: Ken Daves on Jul 26, 2005 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was about 4 or 5 years old, and one of my dogs had been hit by a car. I remember where I was, that my sisters and I were all in the car with my father driving. He said that one day our "Granny Daves" would die, because she is old. I asked if everyone dies? Dad said, yes. I will die, and you will die.

That was the end of our conversation. It is, in fact, one of only a handful of conversations I can ever remember having with this distant father.

Given that many children suffer lack of involvement of parents, I think it's great that PBS is putting the subject forward.

Having recently been extremely ill, fearing the worst, I considered that I would rather NOT live and suffer. Fortunately, I am merely a hypochondriac, I recovered. Still, the event was stirring, and I have reached an age when I look back on what little I have known about death. Middle age does that to people; mortality becomes real and more immediate, and I find I must rely on what my own body tells me.

Still, the moments of realization, that this body, ours, will all be gone. What will we become? What will become of us?

Mysteries of life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more things to think and talk about
Posted by: mwildfire on Jul 26, 2005 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to point out that there are other issues good to discuss in advance besides the living will stuff, once you decide it's okay to talk about death. A couple of years ago, a neighbor of mine died; he was buried by all of us who lived nearby, on his own land, without embalming, in a box put together by a family friend. The whole thing cost nothing, and was a beautiful, moving experience, in sharp contrast to the commercial funeral of my father-in-law a few months earlier.
Lisa Carlson is an activist who wrote a book, Caring for the Dead: Your Final Act of Love, which has a chapter on the laws of each state. Check it out, and discuss with your loved ones how to handle this so they won't have to make decisions on the worst day of their lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thought
Posted by: brcollins on Jul 26, 2005 9:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I don't agree with the position that life must be maintained at any cost, I would like to point out that this man's death seemed to be more of an immediate reaction than a considered decision.

I was raised in a religious household. In those days, they prayed for what they called a good death. Quick, painless, and as little hospital time as possible. I knew what they wanted and I knew my job even when I was young was to be an advocate for what they wanted.

My father always said he would rather be dead than be on life support. So when he had a stroke, I relayed his wishes immediately to the ER doctor. But he was already on life support and she asked me to give him 24 hours before we made the decision.

24 hours later he was turning the corner. A week later he was off the life support. Three months later he was back living on his own. Seven years later he died. In his own apartment.

The man in this documentary was logical and funny and very winning. But I kept thinking he got the diagnosis on the 1st or 2nd of July and he killed himself on the morning of the 5th. That's a gut decision. Immediate. Emotional. With all the weight of it right then and there.

He watched his mother die of cancer forty years before. Medicine has changed a lot in forty years. The father-in-law was dying from a stroke at the same time at the mercy of the hospital.

Would he have made the same decision if he waited another three days? Would he have made the same decision if the FIL had not been sick? If his daughters had been there?

I think people should not have to suffer unnecessary treatments. But because of life support, my father got to see his granddaughter be born. And she got to meet him. He made new friends, started dating again. My father got a second chance and he made the most of it.

And I know if the choice had been put to my father that had been put to this man, his first thought would have been to kill himself too. I know how angry he was when he woke up on life support. But because it happened so suddenly, he was getting better before he even knew what was going on.

And looking at it from that side, I wish Mr. Stern had given himself three months just to see. Even at 77, not every operation is the beginning of the end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rhett Butler said it best, Posted by: Sojourner
Towards a better death, a better life
Posted by: IanA on Jul 27, 2005 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent and necessary article followed by many gentle and well meant comments, from people who are sharing their experience to try and help others. It gives us a real insight of the importance and meaning that death can give to life. Why is the concept of the inevitable reality of death not brought more into normal life in Judeo-Christian cultures? In our daily society cameos of death, usually spiced with violence, is regularly served as escapist entertainment, while surrealist versions with abstract words like civillian casualty or numbers in the form of body counts, confront us in the daily news of ever more crimes, conflicts and aggressions, but the fact is that dealing with the reality of inevitable death has a socially cathartic effect. From reading the comments of the people who described the deaths of their loved ones here, I’m sure many like me felt the pure honesty of pervasive love and gentle compassion.

The passing of someone loved, or contemplating my own death, for me at least, is a time to face some important questions of life, mostly without “me” being in the centre. In other words for a moment mortality shows us the need for selfless compassion. It is a time when love can overcome all, hence the sadness, the pain, even guilt and anger sometimes. But in dealing with these emotions we are dealing with the reasons for life. Death is not the opposite of life, as many have been led to believe. It is as much part of it as is birth. For that reason we should prepare for death throughout life, becoming familiar with it, bringing it into our lives with the same love as we have for life itself, thereby we take away some of the fear, pain and suffering. Perhaps, to live life with a frank and honest view of death, others’ and our own, for what it really is, would make for a more caring and more civilized world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a personal choice
Posted by: FlapJackSeven on Jul 30, 2005 3:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a personal choice and it comes for everyone. Some will face it with joy, if they believe in the hereafter. Others will fear the end, knowing that they lived a life of sin, perhaps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]