Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Movie Mix

'American Casino': How Our Nation's Financial Sector Became a Massive and Unregulated Gambling Operation

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted September 5, 2009.


An incredibly powerful new documentary finally lets those who've lived it tell the story -- from the "creative" financiers to the home buyers duped by brokers.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

American Casino movie trailer from Leslie and Andrew Cockburn on Vimeo.

The producers of the new documentary, American Casino, don't tell you about the causes of the economic meltdown that's caused so much pain around the world.

They don't tell you how Wall Street, having lobbied furiously to free itself from public-interest regulation, created a furious demand for mortgage-backed junk, which they had laundered into supposedly solid investments with an assist from friendly -- read "bought off" -- ratings agencies. They don't discuss how unscrupulous lenders hawked an array of gimmicky mortgage products to people who weren't qualified to take them out in order to skim off a fat stream of fees.

They let those who lived it tell the story -- from the "creative" financiers who built the house of cards, to the brokers who pushed their products, and finally, to the people living on "Main Street" USA, whose dreams of homeownership were effectively turned into weapons of mass destruction and detonated in the centers of the global economy.

And by opting to not tell a story -- by leaving behind the narrator's voice that's so common to the documentary form -- the story that gets told is incredibly powerful.

AlterNet recently caught up with producers Andrew and Leslie Cockburn to discuss how our nation's financial sector became a massive and unregulated gambling operation and how its ultimate return to reality is causing so many such pain.

Joshua Holland: First, I want to know what inspired the film in terms of your understanding of what was lacking in the mainstream coverage of the housing meltdown? I mean, something made you decide to go out and make this documentary.

Leslie Cockburn: Well, we started shooting this documentary in January 2008. So there wasn't a lot of coverage of the crisis, so to speak. There was some coverage over here of foreclosures going on in different states, and a little coverage of the kind of problems that had been happening on Wall Street, starting with a little crash that happened in August of 2007. And then the market was going up and down -- in these wild swings.

And what struck us was, we looked at it and decided that it was not a crisis that was going to be over in three months or four months, but that it was going to be severe.

We made a judgment about that and decided to kind of just jump into a film. We'd been looking at some very sort of obscure stuff like bond insurers, who were re-insuring with companies that were broke.

There were signs that there was no money backing up a lot of what was going on on Wall Street. There was enormous amounts of leverage that were borrowed. You know, just incredible amounts of leverage in these investment banks. So we decided that it could be a very serious collapse, and that's why we did it.

JH: So you did this when ... I guess there were people like Robert Shiller, Karl Case and Dean Baker and a few others saying that this was a very serious collapse, but a lot of economists were writing books and monographs about why the housing market would continue to rise.

Andrew Cockburn: Well, that's right. I mean, Ben Bernanke was saying the subprime problem could be contained. That was the mantra that the people who were long on the market were telling each other.

You know, we also were talking to people on Wall Street, smart people -- of which there are not a lot -- who were thinking and actually talking in rather apocalyptic terms. So that was one of the things that influenced us.

JH: Now you call the film American Casino, and it starts where the crisis begins -- with then-Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, leading the charge for financial deregulation. Tell me about this idea of the American casino, of Wall Street being a gambling emporium as much as a staid haven for the investor class. We use that term a lot figuratively, but what you're saying is it's quite literal.

AC: It is. I mean, it really struck us when we started frequenting Wall Street financial houses, how people talk routinely -- and not with any apparent irony -- about bets. You know, about the fact that Morgan Stanley had bet on this and the Citadel Hedge Fund had bet on that, or their bet had gone wrong. And the more we understood, the more we realized that much of it is a bet.

And I'll give you a literal example, which is the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of December 2000 that you referred to. It involved the legalization, basically, of credit default swaps. Which are a form of gambling.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: american casino

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This led to the biggest theft of taxpayer money
Posted by: racetoinfinity on Sep 5, 2009 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in history - the bailouts.

And we still don't have the old lifted regulations that enabled this crime back in place - wonder if we ever will (not with the Obama economic team, unfortunately)?

Phil Gramm (along with Dick Cheney) will go down as one of the biggest villains in American history.

The film looks great! Can't wait to see it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dipconsult
Posted by: dipconsult on Sep 5, 2009 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We at JP Diplomatic Consultancy [www.dipconsult.eu] from the start of this financial meltdown have urged that the way out was the therapy recommended by Paul Krugman and other top interventionist experts:

Government buys enough shares in failing banks to get control (don't need 51% - the banks would know that once the Govt meant to get control and would go on buying until it did, even 20% of shares could suffice).

Then sack the top echelon of the guilty, and ensure responsible lending for now vitally needed projects such as renewal of infrastructure, alternative energy and energy saving, technology for cleaning up coal, education, health care etc. etc.

Starting on a new path for the economy would quickly translate into jobs and psychologically create hope in a new positive direction for the US. And at the same time address the mortgage crisis to limit foreclosures (there are several ways to do that) so returning consumer confidence.

Alas, Obama - whom we much admire - chose the "boost banks" policies of Geithner and Summers resulting only in a meagre trickle down to the high street and the "man in it" .

What is vital is NOT to go back to the unsustainable era of monstrous waste of the post-war years. What is so dangerous is that almost everyone is praying for just that - back to the those joyful days when everything seemed to be going so well. Dangerous - because it was not, and a return to that period would be catastrophe for humanity and the existential problems it now faces. These can only be solved by a new direction for the economy.

Now is the time for America to recover its leadership for international cooperation after the wreckage caused by Bush's two terms of confrontation

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're right, dipconsult Posted by: pete ess
» RE: dipconsult Posted by: photon's feather
» Tell it like it is... Posted by: zigy
The G-20 Protest Opportunity
Posted by: nihilozero on Sep 5, 2009 3:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The G-20 Central Bank Governors & International Finance Ministers will be meeting in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Sept. 24-25 to continue with their destructive agenda. These are the people most responsible for the current economic crisis, the generally unsustainable global economy, resource wars of aggression, and environmental degradation. The bailouts of the banks were a plain robbery of the average citizen and these were the people who orchestrated such policies. These people deserve a large vocal protest -- and they will get it. Get tuned in to the protest movement and help spread the word!

@ NihiloZero

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its actually a serious question. Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Sadly it seems Obama . .
Posted by: pete ess on Sep 5, 2009 3:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. is sewn up, bought and paid for. It does not look like real regulation is going to happen. Right now the thieves are spending millions in lobbying, lying and influencing (including threatening) politicians to enact laws that are just as fraudulent as the ones they (may) replace. And so it will stay as long as Americans are caught in your 2-party pseudo-democracy. Corporatocracy, really.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sadly it seems Obama . . Posted by: Sister_Lauren
SYMPTOMS are not CAUSES of FASCISM
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Sep 5, 2009 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another weak story about a doco that fails to address the root causes of the for-profit Wall Street meltdown and the (even more obvious) for-profit Wall Street “bailouts” looting frenzy. Not that it tried.

As you might imagine, the whole extortion farce is cooked on the public nickel and all defended by runway puppets from BushCo and Obama to the usual Washington-MSM circus freak show.

Naturally “Federal Reserve” Corp front men Alan Greespan and Tim Geithner promoted the derivatives bubble and their successor Ben Bernanke did the same as he pumped for the mass shakedown of Wall Street “bailouts” on the way down. Of course, all of these clowns are part of the Rockefeller-Kissinger and old European banking network. In other words, the ruling class.

And this is the ruling class deal: heads we win, tails you lose.

The rigged “casino” hasn’t changed for over 200 years and the suckers still won’t wake up. Some say we get the leaders we deserve. And I don’t mean the organized corporate crime toadies that pretend to be our “leaders” at the White House, Congress, etc.

What a thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

when and where it all began (1067 in the City of London) and how high the top is...
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 5, 2009 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American Casino makes the case very clearly that this was a top-down crime, really.

You can't get much higher than the Queen of England. She has been granting royal charters for more than fifty years and of the 87 I've been able to locate, 84% of them effectively grant immunity from prosecution.

Probably not her choice, just as many of Obama's "choices" are not really choices at all. There are plenty of thugs who will do the dirty work.

Here in the UK, I have seen professional perjurers (in at least two instances I know of they were men wearing white socks, something almost unknown outside of tennis courts in the UK). Professional perjurers may also be professional killers.

The UK is effectively a lawless country, thanks to Crown immunity, royal charters (all industries and professions, not just universities) and total lack of protection for whistleblowers, and the US has remained, to a very regrettable extent, one of its outposts.

Think of the American bankers as knights of the realm fighting on behalf of the Crown and you won't be far wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vegas gambling has more regulation and honesty
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Sep 5, 2009 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The legal gambling industry in Las Vegas and elsewhere has more regulation and honesty than much of the financial services industry. If someone in a gaming company is caught taking money they are put into a 'black book' and banned from the industry and gambling. There are limits on gross profits on casinos, they will cool off gamblers getting too lucky to limit their losses, they make you pay off loans by them with lawsuits and other 'methods'. The casino corporate bosses are subject to strict financial reporting and background checks to weed out potential risks to the business and the industry. They are in a very profitable industry and they don't want to lose so they are very conservative in money management and investment for the best long term returns. They also don't have the government to bail them out either for their mistakes and not pay a personal price. If they lose a lot of money, they are fired and the company can and will go bankrupt (as has happened with Donald Trump's Atlantic City gaming businesses). That is something the financial services industry needs a lot more - personal risk, limits as to taking risks and far greater limits on government bailouts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's new?
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Sep 5, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Need I remind the readers of the Clinton years and the wonderful .com IPOs that fueled the Wall Street frenzy of that vintage? During the entirety of my adulthood that began with voting for JFK, I have yet to be informed or to recognize a fiscal/economic policy, foreign policy, domestic policy or anything else that is more than a federal Ponzi scheme. What the hell can we expect from the herd of incompetent thieves in Washington today? More? Better? Or, do they just say fuck 'em, they'll eat the shit we call cake and like it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No amnesia, they remember quite well, I think
Posted by: ascii3fhex on Sep 5, 2009 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Wall St. gangsters, to a large extent, share the booty with their vassals in Wash. D.C. Neither group has amnesia at all. Quite the contrary, they are accumulating evidence (in the form of a waterfall of money) that financial deregulation has been an enormous success... for them. It's at least plausible that we'll see more of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

be careful pointing fingers
Posted by: dover23 on Sep 5, 2009 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cspan video speaks for itself - congresspeople fighting regulation...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4A0RuXhnQA

and fed agent krugman calling for easy money for housing...
krugman

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's wrong with you?
Posted by: oregoncharles on Sep 5, 2009 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't you know we aren't supposed to be "looking back"? We're supposed to be only "looking forward." That's why they took the rear-view mirrors off all the cars.

I mean, how can we possibly forget what went wrong and do it again if you insist on all this looking backward and holding people accountable?

Footnote: where are the prosecutions? Where are the new regulations to prevent this sort of thing? Why on Earth would we give the Federal Reserve yet MORE power over our lives?

Truth is, it was all an exercise in massive corruption. So why isn't it still?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My First Question
Posted by: JSquercia on Sep 5, 2009 9:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My first question on this mess is If the institutions were too big to fail and therefore had to be rescued , why have we made them even BIGGER ?
Too big to fail is by definition too big to exist.In my home town it seems as every day Chase takes over ANOTHER bank

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It started with "Urban Renewal" (aka Negro removal)
Posted by: tokerdesigner on Sep 5, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without having seen it, I surmise this documentary doesn't start the story early enough. Yes, there are, or were, inner-city residents "hungry for credit". The main reason was that their neighborhoods were being condemned and destroyed (in that order) on some excellent pretext or other, such as the need to build fast highways for cars to travel in and out of town at 55 miles an hour, or more recently "university expansion" which was the excuse to exterminate Chicago's Maxwell Street neighborhood (the last place in North America named Jewtown). Actually in the latter case not only the university expanded, but "townhomes", "condos", "upscale" shops, for returning "Yuppie" children of 50's exurbanites etc., were constructed by big bucks "developers" who had political clout with both major Parties (the City Daley Democrat machine and the Il. State Republicans under James this and James that).

When black neighborhoods are abruptly canceled out, the result is the scattering of extended families (the village that Hillary Clinton said children need), the breakdown of many aspects of human support. But one particular overlooked result is the impact on children forced to change schools. Tough urban schools are places where a kid needs to have friends to avoid being picked on, and new kids have the toughest time of all. Forcing families to move because their house is in the way of some $500-mil. pork is one way of suddenly hurling a kid into this dilemma. (Of course there's also the insult to owners who had been trying to upgrade their housing and fixed this and that, and the fixings were speciously condemned by city inspectors to support the demolition agenda.)

Anyway, families hoping to protect their children saw a refuge on the horizon-- maybe we can move to a suburb where there is safe schooling, children are protected against beatings and intimidation and can actually learn something!

Uh oh. Strict "codes" effectively prevent you from living in any house that costs less than $200 grand! You got to pay for whatever gingerbread luxury it takes to clear this hurdle and get into a house out there.

That's where the cry for affordable mortgages rises!

I'm sure the above cited documentarians can take it from there-- Acorn and Barney Frank and all others the right wingers blame, Greenspan and Goldman and all others the left wingers blame, for having figured out those weird innovative "solutions" to the Displacement Crisis (that's what it originally was and is).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bubbles are structural feature of capitalist crisis...
Posted by: yellow on Sep 5, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crises are internal mechanisms of capitalism as a system. Capitalism is prone to recurring "bubbles" (uncontrolled speculations in real assets or financial instruments, excessive investment in productive capacity, etc.) that can threaten its survival. Thus, it has evolved crises (rising unemployment, bankruptcies, foreclosures) to "correct" its bubbles. Today, for example, after years of out-of-control lending and an unsustainable housing industry bubble, a crisis corrects those excesses by wiping out billions in debts, collapsing home prices, and so on. In the late 1990s, after years of out-of-control stock market speculations and unsustainable stock prices, a crisis in 2000 corrected those excesses by collapsing stock prices. In both examples, the corrections entailed the mass suffering associated with unemployment, bankruptcies (especially of small and medium-sized businesses), fiscal crises that cut public services, reduced pension and other social funds, and so on.

The capitalist system's method of self-healing is crisis. When one of its recurring bubbles bursts, wealth is destroyed, people are fired, and production facilities are closed in a downward spiral of contraction. Eventually, the increasingly desperate unemployed, underemployed, and the still employed who fear job loss accept lower wages and fewer benefits. Likewise, bankrupt or downsized enterprises dump idle machinery onto the second-hand market, rent less space, buy fewer inputs, do less advertising, etc. The costs of equipment, space, materials, and ads then drop alongside the falling wages and reduced benefits. Costs will fall until businesses see profits in once again hiring workers and resuming production. The crisis has then done its job. The recovery starts, and capitalism begins its climb to the next bubble when the whole cycle repeats.

The above is a quote from a recent article from the Monthly Review online Magazine by Rick Wolff whose analysis of the recent housing bubble is the most precient. Sure, the current crisis was policy driven; low real interest rates created a bubble in the US housing market from about 2002 onward. But this is not the only factor. As pointed out previously by Arthur MacKewan in an article posted here from Dollars & Sense 1997 Taxpayers' Relief Act allowed households a $500,000 tax free capital gain from the sale of a house. Furthermore, Greenspan began to lower interest rates (after raising them in 1999 and 2000) in late 2000 in an unsuccessful attempt to avoid the inevitable recession. From 2004 to 2006 Greenspan would try to raise interest rates but global capital markets would suppress them mostly in the form of foreign purchase of US Treasury securities. Thus, the bubbles live on until they burst when they can't be sustained.

The underlying problem is the tax cuts and the annual decline in effective consumer demand brought on by chronically high unemployment, low real wages, the outsourcing of jobs and cuts in government spending. Reversing these trends are essential if the economy is to be stimulated and stabilized. We need higher wages, a stable middle class, a program of massive public investment and full employment. Only then will a difference be made and the current problems become history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Must read article for all...
Posted by: zigy on Sep 5, 2009 3:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
interested in this issue. Please go to: www.globalresearch.ca (that's Canada) and read Stephen Lendman's "America's Economic Drises". He predicts that if our current economic direction and intent does not fundementally change very soon, America will collapse as a nation, probably in 2010. Very sobering piece.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MORE SHALLOW BS
Posted by: PointMan on Sep 5, 2009 3:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An incredibly powerful new documentary... (?)

(Yawn)

Not so.

This AlterNOT story with the documentary it touts amount to just another decoy that puts blame on small-time Wall Street "brokers" or "financiers" and never at the corporate Police State system and its bosses that run the entire snake oil fraud.

It's like blaming a petty pickpocket for the world's problems while ignoring sociopath Mafia bosses with a license to kill and steal under a Murder & Looting Inc. regime. The Police State has been taking lives and blood cash since before their pet private "Federal Reserve" scam was put into place to rule the economic life of the nation and bleed it dry for the oligarchs. (a fact nowhere seen in this incredibly birdbath shallow piece of work)

Anybody that believes this obvious skin-deep story or the fluff documentary behind it is incredibly powerful knows jack about what is going down or why.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, what now?
Posted by: willymack on Sep 6, 2009 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, we've finally realized we've been bamboozled and fleeced by a gang of crooks in $3,000 suits, crooks so sleazy they'd make the most dishonest used car salesman blush.
So, now that instead of putting the thieving crooks in JAIL, where they belong, we've rewarded their avarice with taxpayer money, therefore encouraging them to continue with their obscene bonuses and lavish lifestyles.
So the "Federal Reserve", which is neither federal or a reserve, but a clearing house for corporate crooks, continues merilly on with the Crook in Charge sporting a brand-new four year appointment.
So, what happens now?
I'll tell you what will most likely happen.
The thieving bastards will steal from the rest of us until there's nothing left to steal, and they'll go down the slop chute right along with us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow
Posted by: DossyDomo on Sep 6, 2009 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never really thought about it that way before but you are right on the money!

RT
www.privacy-resources.tk

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zealots
Posted by: diof09 on Sep 6, 2009 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They will huckster and defraud as long as they are allowed to. They don't see that they've done anything wrong, even if the government steps back and lets it all collapse, they will likely flee to a weakened country or somewhere that would allow their "free market" principles to continue bubbling and flourishing. They only correct and adjust their behavior to current conditions. Wasn't Enron, released from any regulation another big casino as well?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Every animal, including humans, is a major con artist
Posted by: dayahka on Sep 6, 2009 6:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The surprise is not that the financial system is a criminal system, but that people find this unusual or strange. Just what did you expect?

Certainly the whole of human society is a con from Day 1. Think of religion--invent an imaginary problem and then invent a "cure" and sell people on that. This is just exactly what the pharmaceutical companies in cohorts with the medical profession do--constantly invent new illnesses and patent new "cures" that you sell for enormous profits.

The American Declaration of Independence and Constitution are major con jobs: a few of the rich and landed gentry want their own laws to protect their own wealth, so they start a chain of events, convince the masses enough to lay their lives on the line, then start a new country on the basis of a con. So what do you expect, that the economic system is not going to be a con, also? Get real.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reich or Rubin?
Posted by: whealeydj on Sep 12, 2009 8:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robert Reich left after Clinton first term ie in 1997 and was Clinton's Labor Secretary and a real progressive . like the other poster I suspect you mean Robert Rubin Clinton's Treasury Secretary associated with Citigroup and council on Foreign Relations.,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement