Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Movie Mix

Whoa, 'District 9' Is a Really Good Sci-Fi Action Flick

By Eileen Jones, eXiled Online. Posted August 18, 2009.


There are a couple of strokes of genius in District 9 that renew hopes for the future of genre film.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

There are a couple of strokes of genius in District 9 that renew one’s hopes for the future of genre film.

One is casting Sharlto Copley, who’s not a trained actor, as protagonist Wikus van der Merwe, a dweeby South African bureaucrat who has greatness thrust upon him and doesn’t know what to do with it. Copley plays him so unheroically that he could head the cast of a South African version of The Office right now, no questions asked.

In interviews, Copley says he’s dealt with so many dweeby South African bureaucrats that, when his friend, novice director Neill Blomkamp, asked him to play Wikus in the short film Alive in Joburg, he felt he was up to the job. And with producer Peter Jackson’s blessing he stayed on for the feature.

This casting is so effective because we don’t know how to take Wikus as our protagonist in a sci-fi action film. In a cruelly accurate satire of office-dweeb life, sure, but not in a sci-fi action film. I wasn’t even certain he was our protagonist for a long time, and kept expecting him to be sidelined in the course of the plot developments. Copley plays him that way, as a weedy guy born to be sidelined who is befuddled to find himself at the center of the action once the going gets dangerous and consequential. This is terrific, creating all sorts of tension and uncertainty about what’s going to happen next. How long has it been since a genre film did this? I can’t remember, that’s how long.

Which leads us to the second stroke of genius, keeping the film set in Johannesburg. For most of the world this is a nicely undocumented setting, commercial film-wise, so again we don’t know exactly what to expect. We’re on alert for apartheid ugliness, of course, and expect that the aliens will fill in allegorically for the oppressed black population. They do, but in a nicely complex way, becoming the bottom of the totem pole of oppression with every human across the races despising them and wanting them gone. One plot twist involves Nigerian gangsters exploiting the aliens’ addiction to cat food.

There are lots of great odd details filling the early scenes, suggesting we’re not getting all the cultural references, that make for exciting film-watching. Wikus’ thick Afrikaaner accent is enough to put us on alert, our minds racing to get everything, which is exactly what the experience of a film should be. This whole dominant practice of making slow films for dummies is inexcusable.

The film’s backstory, provided in fake-documentary talking-heads style, is that an alien mothership mysteriously appeared above Johannesburg in the 1980s. That led not to an attack on us, War of the Worlds-style, but to an aggressive takeover of the ship by South Africans. Sickly aliens onboard got herded into a temporary refugee camp that evolved over the years into a crime-ridden shantytown. The film’s action starts with the new government mandate to clear out the shantytown and herd aliens into a modernized camp run by the sinister Multi-National United corporation (MNU). Wikus has been chosen as the corporate representative to go notify the aliens of their evictions. His formidable CEO father-in-law got him the job.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sci-fi, district 9, action films

Read more of Eileen Jones at eXiledonline.com.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's more than that
Posted by: QuestionAuthority on Aug 18, 2009 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IMHO, District 9 is also a powerful comment on the demonization of the "Other," racism, apartheid, human cruelty, the lust for power, outright exploitation and greed. It holds a mirror up to humanity and the reflection is not flattering. Note that humans of all races are depicted equally. There are very few sympathetic human characters in the movie. By the time it ends, the audience is rooting for the "prawns."

Given the premise of the film at the very beginning (ship shows up and South Africans invade it), I can see events happening much as shown in the movie - the ultimate botching of first contact with aliens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's more than that Posted by: JNG_II
"Renewed Hopes for the Future of the Genre Film"
Posted by: jmmartin on Aug 18, 2009 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have not seen District Nine, so I cannot say whether it's as great a film as you seem to believe, but I am left aghast at your implied rhetorical question whether there is a reason to think this movie promises a renewed hope for the future of the SciFi genre in cinema. Oh, my, what an unnecessary statement.

Every few years, we get a superb SciFi picture. One thinks of, say, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Alien, many others, going all the way back to the original (not the remake of) The Day the Earth Stood Still (and earlier even -- perhaps as early as the Melies Brothers' A Trip to the Moon), shot in 1902. Like the western and the crime melodrama, this genre is inherently cinematic.

I hear that District 9 is a first feature for its director and that it cost relatively little to make. This suggests that it relies on ingenuity rather than millions of dollars in special effects. The latter can be advantageous in the rights hands (Spielberg's, for example) or an impetus for stylization in another's (Ridley Scott's).

I just hope that all the hype doesn't build up such expectations they can hardly be fulfilled once I view this much touted picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Daniel Engber, what a tool...literally
Posted by: praedor on Aug 18, 2009 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Daniel Engber of Slate argues that the film’s no good because it trots out that moldy sci-fi cliché, portraying corporations as the enemy,

Hmpf. What planet is Daniel Engber from? Corporations are demonstrably and repeatedly proven to be the enemy. Corporate greed, corporate "personhood" have both collaborated to create virtually all modern ills, including the latest economic debacle, decreasing wages and work conditions throughout the world, continued problems with pollution, and are THE force behind "do nothing" about climate change.

To make a movie that ignores this, or worse, makes corporations the good guy, would simply mean that a corporation got to the director and evacuated both his/her mind and soul.

To NOT have corporations shown as the bad guy (or at least a major bad guy) would simply be bullshit unbelievable. Reality is what it is and Mr Corporate Engber needs to return to life on earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The film is an effective metaphor
Posted by: weathered on Aug 18, 2009 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of Israel's containment/extermination of the Palestinians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Do you know, was that an intent? Posted by: Defenestrator
Nigerian Villians/Stereotypes of the Poor
Posted by: dbuskirk1 on Aug 18, 2009 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There sure is a lot of minstrelsy in DISTRICT 9, for a film purporting to enlighten us about race. I'm surprised this went unnoticed on Alternet.

And for all the talk of originality, doesn't anyone remember ALIEN NATION? I guess borrowing your main concept from a decade old Fox TV show is what passes for original thought these days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yup, Nigerian stereotypes
Posted by: filhtymcnasty on Aug 18, 2009 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That was the biggest pitfall of the movie. Playing off the stereotype of the Nigerian gangsta or swindler was a big disappointment in an otherwise stimulating and entertaining movie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad Movie
Posted by: bh on Aug 18, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Political and Racism comment the Movie makes is strong and good. As for a good Sci-Fi, it's a big piece of crap. Horrible movie, and I love Sci-Fi.......but not this one!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Humanizing the Prawn
Posted by: Fetchcat on Aug 18, 2009 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS
Great review, tho I disagree that the prawn child added gooey sentiment. I think the little guy's loving relationship with his father offered a stark contrast to the way the head of MNU treated his own daughter and son-in-law. It's also a S-F tradition to have a child or pet or cute robot along for the ride (Short Round in Temple of Doom, Jonesy the cat in Alien, Robby the Robot in Forbidden Planet, R2 and C3PO, etc.) . . . to provide humor and give us some relief from non-stop action. And I loved the ending . . . proof that in spite of everything, a certain character had not lost his connection to his species.

I felt the Nigerian gangsters were there to represent the superstitions that still affect much of Africa, and they, at least, recognized something godlike about the aliens even as they were exploiting them. To "eat" parts of your enemy is a sign of respect for his power and potency. That's a lot more credence than the government gave the prawns.

I saw the film three days ago and it's still "with" me. The dueling images of squalor and valor left a deep imprint in my brain and in my heart. I'd rank this film up there with Platoon as a journey of self discovery, both for the characters and the viewers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most of us understand Occupation
Posted by: simuvac on Aug 18, 2009 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the main reason the film succeeds is because its story evokes a strong sense of life under Occupation, which could be an allegory for any number of places: apartheid South Africa, Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.

The more global Empire spreads, the more people will empathize with stories like this one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most science fiction movies SUCK
Posted by: willymack on Aug 18, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Believe it or not, Gene Autry, of all people was in a science fiction movie whwrein earth folks were terrorized by cheezy-looking cardboard robots.
Most of the rest aren't much better than this, and with a few shining exceptions, aren't worth the time spent watching them.
So, an advanced race bridges the vast gap of interstellar space and visits us, only to be overwhelmed by mere humans? Gimmie a friggin' break!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, it certainly pressed Eileen's buttons...
Posted by: dbarber on Aug 18, 2009 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but that doesn't make it a good film.

The protagonist never rises above a stereotype, he just changes from one (beaurocratic nitwit) to another (bad-ass action hero). The stereotypical gangsters aren't much better, but we want to believe that in every dutiful clerk lives the heart of a hero yearning to break free, so HE gets the opportunity to prove himself.

The aliens seem to be a cross between lowly scavengers and humans. The scavenger aspect didn't phase me, after all, those are simple survival mechanisms that would most likely evolve in any number of species, but the characteristically human (and primate) responses struck me as EXTREMELY unlikely, although there was a way they could have fixed that in the script, but they chose not to take it.

I have no problem w/making corporations the enemy, but it made no sense whatsoever for them to get so full-tilt gaga over weapons that were only slightly advanced over our own technology. Somehow big boom-booms are the be-all and end-all of technology, but anti-gravity and probable FTL drive is beneath everyone's notice? The gangsters at least were credible in this regard, weapons were the most useful thing they could possibly get out of the situation.

Probably the best thing about the film was the use of sound to create a disorienting feel to keep a sense of chaos throughout, but the constant switching between documentary style and live action seemed like a confusion of the filmmakers intentions. But ultimately it was too mired in predictable cliches and stereotypes for me to emotionally identify with it in any way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disagree
Posted by: susmart3 on Aug 18, 2009 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way his own goverment was going to exploit/experiment on the hero- and his very real terror- evokes the whole 'debate' on torture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Delightful Ending to this Review
Posted by: Cherenkovrad on Aug 18, 2009 12:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why oh why, bright bulb Daniel Engber asks, are sci-fi films so tiresomely fixated on evil corporate overlords running our dystopian future?

What could be behind this strange fixation? What could it be? What cooooouuuuld it beeeeeeeeee?


Hah. Nothing worse than being clueless in the face of insanity. Think, "good Germans," cubicle monkeys at Monsanto, Exxon, or even MPs at Gitmo.

Why oh why are you picking on the NAZIs? or the polluters? or torturers?

Whatever could be wrong with them? LOL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't you remember Jonathan Pryce in Brazil?
Posted by: doctorsquared on Aug 18, 2009 1:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...[a]weedy guy born to be sidelined who is befuddled to find himself at the center of the action once the going gets dangerous and consequential. This is terrific, creating all sorts of tension and uncertainty about what’s going to happen next. How long has it been since a genre film did this? I can’t remember, that’s how long.

Great dystopian flick, Brazil is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This film is outrageously racist
Posted by: meena on Aug 18, 2009 5:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is just amazing to me that with all the reviews I have read about this film, no-one has commented about the appalling, even outrageous racism depicted in the film. Everyone is talking about the corporation and the aliens, and yet there is no discussion of how the Africans in the film are portrayed! And it is outrageously racist! This was worse than any Tarzan film. It is deeply saddening to me: it is indicative of the depth of “normalization” of these images. We don’t’ even notice them any more.
Well, I did.
We see the aliens destroying trains, setting things on fire and generally behaving despicably. The liberal white talking-head ‘experts’ (set up in mockumentary form), being as culturally sensitive as they are, respond to this behaviour by explaining that the aliens behave in a way that is ‘different’ in our understanding – things the aliens find ‘fun’, humans find destructive. How understanding of the experts, eh?
But the Africans are presented as the irrational mob. The (black) South Africans, who make up the backdrop - the film’s general public – not one white face among them – hate the aliens – “send them home”, “we don’t want them here, put them in camps far away”
( er…an echo here at all of something somewhere? Ie putting the recent victims of oppression as now the perpetrators – a bit sick no?). These Africans are not culturally sensitive, no understanding here, they just have a mob mentality, very reminiscent of the whites who so recently legally oppressed them.
The representation of the Nigerian gangsters used every trope in the book on African stereotyping. Shot in dark, murky settings, the lighting emphasized the whites of their eyes and teeth, camera angles emphasized the irrationality of their crazed ideas: laughing madly, supremely and randomly violent, eating the aliens so that they could gain their power, women sleeping with them so that they could do the same, strong drumbeats in the background – I mean, come on! It would have been laughable if not soooo offensive! And this went on throughout the film. In the screening I went to, people actually cheered when the head Nigerian gangster was shot. When the lead corporation lackey, a white guy, (leading the chase against our white anti-hero) was ripped apart by aliens, no one clapped or cheered. Why was this? Surely he was more evil than the gangsters. But he wasn’t set up that way. No, his chase, his violence, was rational, justified, maybe even in the name of science.
This is a super-insidious film because it is pretending to be humanist, it is pretending to show discrimination as a bad thing, - and it succeeds at that in regard to the aliens. It’s a sad thing when even aliens are portrayed as being far more sympathetic and dimensional than real people – those real people being Africans. This is racist fare packaged as an anti-racist movie. It was even more appalling to find that the film was directed by a white South African. I guess he is so used to these appalling and ‘normalized’ images of Africans, that he didn’t even notice. Or maybe he did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement