VA Voter Suppression Continues

By Steven Rosenfeld
Posted on September 15, 2008, Printed on December 17, 2009
http://www.alternet.org/bloggers//98883/

Just because victory is declared in Washington does not make it so.

One week ago, the Department of Veterans Affairs announced a new policy to allow voter registration drives on VA campuses, responding to pressure by lawmakers and the media that the VA was suppressing the vote of wounded former soldiers. That new policy was greeted with 'mission accomplished' press statements by members of Congress who have been pushing the VA to change its policy for several years.

But on Monday, as the Senate Rules and Administration Committee held a hearing in Washington on a bill to ensure veterans living at VA facilities could be helped with voter registration, a legal motion was being filed in federal court in California alleging the VA was still blocking efforts to register voters in time for the 2008 presidential election.

Following last week's announcement of VA's new voter registration policy, a VA facility in San Francisco blocked a non-profit group, Veterans for Peace, from registering voters, the legal motion said. The filing said the VA was seeking to require Veterans for Peace members to go through the process of screening VA volunteers, a process that would delay registration efforts. In contrast, the VA does not require screening for most other visitors.

"The VA has disenfranchised veterans and interfered with the freedom of political parties and nonpartisan groups to associate with their members and with other citizens who reside on VA campuses," the motion said. "This Court should prohibit further interference with voter registration at any VA campus for the imminent federal election."

Scott Rafferty, the Washington-based attorney who filed Monday's motion on behalf of a California labor organizer who in 2004 was blocked from registering voters on another VA facility in California, said there were political reasons behind the agency's refusal to register veterans.

“Veterans’ experience in war gives them a powerful voice," Rafferty said. "The VA wants to stop them from using their right to speak out and to vote. The VA knows that many veterans oppose the Administration’s conduct of the War, the overextension of the military, and its inadequate support for returning warriors.”

The motion filed Monday cited testimony from the Senate Rules and Administration Committee hearing on S. 3308, the Veterans Voter Support Act.

"Last week, the VA admitted that it had recruited only 173 volunteers nationwide for its 1400 facilities," the motion said, citing the "testimony of (VA) General Counsel Paul Hutter before the Senate Rules Committee on S. 3308, at 3. Out of a total of 5.5 million unique patients, these volunteers have registered 350 inpatients and 64 outpatients. Id. Only 19 days remain before registration deadlines begin for the 2008 election."

Those statistics show the VA's internal process of screening volunteers who are then approved to register voters has had the effect of suppressing the vote of injured veterans in 2008.

There was no indication on Monday when the federal court would respond.

© 2009 All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/bloggers//98883/