WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST  
comments_image -

Time to Respond to War

On Saturday, April 20, Americans of all stripes will mass in Washington and around the country to oppose Bush's war in Afghanistan and Sharon's war in Israel.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest War in the Middle East headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

As Red Crescent medics began retrieving dead bodies from the devastated Palestinian refugee camp of Jenin, as many as 100,000 pro-Israel demonstrators massed at the Capitol in D.C.

The demonstration brought together conservative Jews and radical right-wing Christians, conservative Republicans and Democrats. Among the speakers were Ralph Reed, former director of the Christian Coalition, and Gary Bauer, the Christian Right's latest Republican presidential candidate. Israel's former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, New York's former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, holocaust writer Elie Wiesel, House Majority leader Dick Armey (R-Texas) and House Minority leader, Richard A. Gephardt, (D-Missouri) were also on hand.

What brought them together was a war on terrorism, two wars, in fact -- George W. Bush's and Ariel Sharon's. Speaker after speaker drew the parallels between the attacks of September 11 and the suicide bomber-attacks in Israel. "Americans know that Arafat is nothing more than Osama bin Laden with good P.R.," said Netanyahu, who knows how to whip up an American crowd for a Middle East war, as he did almost nightly during the Gulf War.

Observers from the left responded with vehemence. "A Jewish Nuremberg rally," professor Norman Finkelstein called it on Pacifica's Democracy Now. Does the metaphor fit? You'll have to take that up with Finkelstein. Does such vilifying language about everyone who chose to show up at Monday's rally help grow a peace and justice movement? No, I suggest not.

Concerned progressives have been rightly raging for weeks over the Israeli assault on Palestine. Collective punishment, extra-judicial execution, lack of food and water, denial of access to humanitarian and medical assistance -- the stories from the re-occupied West Bank horrify and outrage.

The problem, some observers would like to suggest, is the Jews. "At the heart of it, isn't the idea of a "chosen people," what makes all this possible?" one anxious New Yorker -- a Jewish woman -- asked on Working Assets Radio a few weeks ago. You know what? Americans act like chosen people too.

Americans, all of us, appear to believe we're entitled -- to consume two thirds of the world's resources, for one thing, (though we comprise only one 20th of the population) and to live off land that became "ours" through a genocide.

Every year, the majority of our elected representatives roundly reject the suggestion that today's taxpayers should reimburse from our collective coffers those whose stolen labor and land made possible our national wealth. By segregation, Jim Crow, racist immigration policies and denial of the vote, the United States, over hundreds of years, passed laws to keep those who weren't "special" (which is to say, land-owning, white and male) in their "place."

We Americans know about supremacist thinking, therefore. We know about vilifying the "other" -- the slave, the criminal, the terrorist, the queer, the kook. Belief that we are somehow "special" or better or more deserving, or more hard-working or more godly, makes it easier not to worry about the humanity of those "others." And our government, like the government of the Israelis, does whatever it takes -- up to and including mass slaughter -- to "punish" those who would have it otherwise, and to keep the good things of life for itself.

There is good news. Conservatives are at each other's throats over Israel. When White House hawk, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul D. Wolfowitz deigned to mention the suffering of Palestinians and the "future of Palestine's children," at this week's Israel rally, he was aggressively booed down by the crowd.

William Bennett, who just last month launched a whole organization to pursue disloyal Americans who "fail to support or understand" Bush's stand against terror at home and abroad, told the New York Times, that by sending Colin Powell to negotiate with Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat, Bush was angering "his entire political base."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest War in the Middle East headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]