Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Right-Wing Pathologies Revealed After Adkisson Shooting at Unitarian Church

By John Dolan, AlterNet. Posted July 29, 2008.


When Free Republic forum posters learned that the gunman was from their own demographic, out came the conservative madness.
Advertisement

A classic drama full of hatred, ignorance and irony played out this week in the forum section of right-wing Web site Free Republic, as "Freepers" tried to make sense of a church shooting in Tennessee that killed two parishioners and wounded many others. The grotesque irony of the FR discussions is that, after early posters had indulged all their bigoted guesses about the identity of the killer, they found out the gunman was actually straight out of their own demographic: a 59-year-old white man named Jim Adkisson, who left a four-page letter ranting against liberals, was known by his acquaintances to hate "blacks, gays and anyone who was different from him," left a pile of books by O'Reilly, Savage and Hannity behind in his car, and even wore a red-white-and-blue shirt to his church killing spree.

It's morbidly fascinating to watch the FR threads as the posters wriggle and bluster to try to accommodate this most inconvenient truth. And if you have the stomach to read them, you can learn a lot (perhaps more than you'd like) about the pathology of the contemporary American Right. For myself -- and I realize this will be the most profound heresy to progressives committed to the populist line -- reading these posts is a timely slap in the face, a painful reminder that maybe, just maybe, heartland Americans aren't such wonderful people at all. What you see in these posts is the oldest, deepest and meanest strain in American culture: the Ulster America founded by violent sectarians who moved westward again and again, from Scotland to Northern Ireland and then to the southern United States, then again westward into the American continent, to find a place where they could hone their hair-trigger intolerance without fear of interference from warmer, more humorous people. But that's me, and I'm often accused of "cynicism," whatever that means. At any rate, I'll present a little background on the site and then discuss a few of the posts. Make of them what you will.

For those who want to do their own analyses before reading on, here are the Web addresses of the three FR threads discussing the Tennessee shootings, in the order they appeared:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?;s=tennessee%20church

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2052204/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2052590/posts

For those unfamiliar with online right-wing culture, Free Republic is a far-right Web site established in 1996. It soon found a huge, loyal audience among the right wing's most rabid, ignorant and openly fascistic voices -- or as FR calls them, "grassroots conservatives." Even other right-wing Web sites shun FR, and you'll often observe posters to these sites worrying, when online discussions become openly racist or fascistic, that they're becoming too much like "the Freepers," as FR's ranting posters proudly call themselves.

The same hatred of "liberals" that drove the Tennessee killer is on display, with unconscious irony, in the house advertisement appearing at the top of one of the forums on the church shooting. A bald eagle stands before an American flag, with the caption, "Driving liberals crazy and having fun doing it!"

The first posts reacting to the church shooting are smug gloats. Many posters were absolutely certain that the gunman would turn out to be a Muslim:


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: jim adkisson, free republic

John Dolan is an editor of The eXile. He is the author of, most recently, Pleasant Hell (Capricorn, 2005).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Conservative Insanity
Posted by: vivachavez on Jul 29, 2008 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They never hold themselves responsible for their own behavior- it is always some liberal conspiracy to destroy them. Liberals are everywhere, hiding behind every corner, ready to pounce and convert white, God-fearing heterosexuals into gay muslim socialists.

Modern conservatism is the refuge of racists and religious bigots, who, rather than actually propose policies that would help the country, seem to delight in turning back the clock and ridiculing the very people and movements that made this country a better place.

And being from the heartland, I can personally attest to its backwardness and intolerance. It is not elitist to point out the dark side of human behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Conservative Insanity Posted by: revjmike
» RE: Conservative Insanity Posted by: DaBear
» Suddenly permissive on murder? Posted by: grailsnail
What Needs to be Done
Posted by: vivachavez on Jul 29, 2008 1:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is important to publicize the very hateful, overtly racist, and reliogiously bigoted comments of these right-wing fascists.

Free Republic is where the average conservative can let lose how they truly feel, not that they ever hold back to begin with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Needs to be Done Posted by: marie.vorrath
» RE: What Needs to be Done Posted by: johng
Money for people with minds that hate
Posted by: doodahman on Jul 29, 2008 1:41 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, maybe Dolan's right-- these folks are just the fruit of bad seed and nothing is going to change them or make them able to get along with everyone else. So then what? Shoot 'em?

His anger, I understand. His implications, I reject. Cattle you judge by the herd or breed. People, you judge one at a time.

"But when you talk about destruction
Doncha know that you can count me OUT."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» People are cattle Posted by: dudelette
Insightful and something every liberal should read
Posted by: pdxlinuxchix on Jul 29, 2008 2:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was a great piece because it encourages liberals to do what some of us have been doing for a while now; take these folks seriously! Too often, we liberals comfort ourselves with the idea that those who talk about how we are subhuman and should not be suffered to live don't *really* mean it. They can't *actually* mean that because we don't think that way. If you believe this, if you hear the utterances of a Coulter or Savage or Limbaugh or one of their fans, put aside how YOU take it for a moment and assume that the person means it. I take Coulter at her words. She would like to see violence done to liberals until we are either eliminated or cowed into invisibility. I take Savage and Limbaugh at their words. I take their fans at their words that they mean everything they say. It is folly to do otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I saw it differently Posted by: nightgaunt
I'd like to see the GUN TOTERS reply on this article.
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 29, 2008 2:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite the worst economy and the fact that America is far less safe than at any time in American history, it's tragic that there are too many gun toters who will gleefully give up their jobs and even homes just to cling to their guns and bibles. If the killer were liberal or Muslim, the media would have labelled him a terrorist and not a mere gunman. It's so sad that despite the fact that it was the conservatives who made a killer out of him by ruining his career with the policies of wars and outsourcing, he blames the liberals who actually tried to rescue him financially. When will this madness end?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scary wake-up call
Posted by: Blondinista on Jul 29, 2008 2:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While we more enlightened, progressive folk roll our eyes, shrug, and laugh at the venomous stupidity spewing forth from the mouths of people like Savage, O'Riley, and Coulter, we forget that there are rabid and hate-fueled fruitcakes out there taking them very seriously.

I hope this isn't the beginning of more violent acts against us.

Note to author: It's spelled "McVeigh."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perspective on Gun Control
Posted by: Nebris on Jul 29, 2008 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let this be a lesson to many my fellow progressives regarding their semi-suicidal insistence on disarming themselves. These fascist m***** f******s ain't giving up their guns and only the delusional think they can be disarmed without considerable bloodshed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perspective on Gun Control Posted by: Balanchine
Some still think religion is a good thing...
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Jul 29, 2008 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you force-feed lies to people, which include purposely conflicting pretenses of truth, wisdom, and justice these events should surprise no one. Remember the crusades, slavery, Inquisition, witch-burning, genocide, child-rape, the war on terror, etc., etc., etc.? How can people be so deluded as to think that murder is a "righteous" act? Righteousness originally meant the zeal for truth and justice. No wonder Rome and the founders of Christianity killed off the "zealots" and later worked so hard to equate it with their delusions instead.

People like this have been purposely duped and deluded for profit. I think we need to start holding the leaders of these religions responsible for profiting from widespread and purposeful deception. The proofs that these religions are purposeful deception is overwhelming. The harm caused to civilization as a whole and to the psychological well-being of individuals is vastly underestimated. Why are they still given special status?

It certainly has nothing to with truth, wisdom, or justice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» **Rapping fist against skull** Posted by: Gungneir
» RE: Gee... Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
excellent article, unfortunately
Posted by: comradebob on Jul 29, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If "cynic" is the correct term for Mr. Dolan, then I must be one as well. I live in Texas, "born and bred" as the cliche' goes, and have spent a half century observing simians like Adkisson & the Freepers. They run this state (although our changing demographics might soon alter that) - or, more precisely, they vote in sufficient numbers to keep electing the cheap, bogus-religious, fake-patriotic frauds who DO run the state, and who swindle the white trash who vote for them just like they swindle the rest of us. Difference is, the trash are too degraded to even realize it. I recommend a close reading of H.L. Mencken's "The Anglo-Saxon", as well as HLM's coverage of the Scopes trial (collected recently as "A Religious Orgy in Tennessee") to any romantic populists wishing to take issue with Mr. Dolan. Very little has really changed since Mencken wrote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dolan Suddenly Upset by "Sneers"? Alterneters, Careful Where You Point That... Finger.
Posted by: grumble-bum on Jul 29, 2008 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's funny, because every single piece of his that I've read is nothing but arrogant, broad-brush sneering.

In fact, this double standard on Dolan's part (hateful sarcasm is noble when he makes his living off of it, but hateful when Conservatives do it for free), brings to mind the often cruel tone of various Alterneters on threads dealing with all kinds of issues.

Making broad, violence-tinged & snark-filled statements is stupid, intellectually lazy, & small minded whether the person making them is a so-called "freeper" or a so-called Progressive.

You name it, from personal threats to dissenting posters, to death threats to politicians, to suggestions that millions of humans aren't fit to breath, based on their politics or religion (or, in the case of this article, their geographic location), Progressive comment sites are neck & neck with the Conservative ones.

The shock here shouldn't be that there are people that think this way, it should be that we're becoming more & more like them every day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Huh? Posted by: grumble-bum
» Seriously, Though. Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: Huh? Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Huh? Posted by: jwverez
» "We're Not Dangerous"... Yet. Posted by: grumble-bum
How sad it is...
Posted by: progressivepam on Jul 29, 2008 2:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a regular church-goer at a Unitarian congregation for the past five years. Our membership is full of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Pagans and Wiccans, gays, straights, agnostics, atheists, etc. It is the most caring, loving and committed community I know. One that is willing to step out and take the unpopular stands (like being among the very first to oppose the war, always standing for reproductive freedom, gay rights, civil rights, etc.) I couldn't be prouder of my UU affiliation. Reading the posts on FR is such a profound reminder of the vast illness of hate, fear and loathing that permeates our country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Politics/Religion Posted by: edith
» RE: Politics/Religion Posted by: progressivepam
» RE: Politics/Religion Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Politics/Religion Posted by: edgar1
Irish/Scottish history
Posted by: kilmeny on Jul 29, 2008 3:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, historians believe that the Celts traveled from what is now Northern Ireland into Scotland, not the other way around. So that would actually be moving east.
(What we now call the) Scots (or Scotti) were actually Celts (Irish) from (Northern) Ireland. This, too, is how Christianity spread, predominately through the evangelization of St Columba (521-597).
It is true that the Picts were already in central and eastern Scotland before the Irish/Scotti came.

KR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Irish/Scottish history Posted by: valkyrie
» RE: Irish/Scottish history Posted by: davmills
» RE: Irish/Scottish history Posted by: bobtr900
The author is correct about the midwest being backward
Posted by: PaulC on Jul 29, 2008 3:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the most upscale suburbs of the Cleveland area is Westlake (the westside is bedroom-community Republican while the eastside is more intellectual and Democratic). A couple of years ago a large woods was leveled to put in THE church - the one that anyone who is anyone in town goes to to be seen. During the early heady days leading up to war and thereafter, this church would be blanketed with signs and huge banners proclaiming "Support the troops" "God Bless America" and this sort of thing.

About this time the paper reported that three men cornered the janitor early Sunday morning and demanded to see the pastor. It seems that the pastor was preaching unkind things about gays and these three fellows were there to pound some sense into the unkind preacher! Unfortunately the preacher was not there and the episode passed. But I seem to recall that a few weeks later a sign appeared on that church calling for compassion and understanding!

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Burn Those Damn Violent Roving Bands Of Westward-Moving Scottish Sectarians!
Posted by: loxias on Jul 29, 2008 4:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew it was them! No kidding! I install church PA and acoustic treatments. Every time I go in a church and there are any Violent Roving Bands Of Westward-Moving Scottish Sectarians, I get really anxious and start shoving Heartlanders...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Final Solution
Posted by: mike_burns on Jul 29, 2008 6:05 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stalin, Po Pot, and Mao new how to put those kinds of people in their place.
Go RED!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Final Solution Posted by: greenthumb
Liberal Gun Owner
Posted by: Van23 on Jul 29, 2008 6:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I’m a gun owning liberal. I’m also a Unitarian Universalist who attends services regularly. I also have a concealed carry permit in my state and I DO carry concealed when I go to church.

Why? I’ve been afraid of this EXACT thing happening– some fanatical right-winger going to the “liberal fag church” and start blasting away. I’m sorry that this happened, but I’m not suprised.

Needless to say, I’m going to continue packing in church.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent point Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» Typical gun toting BULLSHIT Posted by: jwverez
» Typical GOOD CITIZEN Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Typical GOOD CITIZEN Posted by: Van23
» RE: Typical GOOD CITIZEN Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» I yield. Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: I yield. Posted by: vksa
» Right On! Posted by: Ethical1
» RE: ight On! Posted by: Van23
» RE: ight On! Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Typical GOOD CITIZEN Posted by: greenthumb
» Questions for liberal gun owner Posted by: Genevieve
» RE: Liberal Gun Owner Posted by: kazz
Dolan, My Man, are you the War Nerd?
Posted by: notabilia on Jul 29, 2008 6:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A review of John Dolan's book "Pleasant Hell" contained an outing of him as the true author of "War Nerd," en execrable book of foaming war enthusiasm in which the author, now known to the public as this John Dolan here, expresses great and undying love for this same FreeRepublic.com. What gives? Dolan here seems to frequent this Free Republic.com of which he professes such censure a little too much for comfort - is he a closet nutjob himself - a Freeper? Even if so, I like to think he is James Frey coming clean here, and though I actually have bought his books, I don't feel that bad for doing so - this is not exactly best-seller territory here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dolan, My Man, are you the War Nerd? Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Dear Alternet Editorial Staff
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jul 29, 2008 7:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know that you guys don't worry too much about journalistic scruples but taking a tragedy like this and using it to fan the flames of the liberal vs. conservative divide in this country helps absolutely nothing. This is a case of a deranged sociopath vs. innocent people. This is not a case of typical conservative vs. liberal people. Its a sick man who did a terrible thing and you guys are all over this like vultures on a fresh carcass.

I also checked out the freerepublic links and there were far more commenters expressing sympathy for the victims and disgust at the perpetrator than any sort of bigoted and hateful remarks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dear Alternet Editorial Staff Posted by: Illiteratilumen
the success of the Right--or failure of the Left?
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jul 29, 2008 7:38 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find myself asking the question: does the surge of right-wing and far right feelings in this country reflect a success of people like Limbaugh and O'Reilly? Or is is possibly a failure of Progressives to provide a viable alternative? Obviously this guy was deeply unbalanced, but are all of the millions who tune in to Fox and Limbaugh and visit sites like FreeRepublic unbalanced also?

Too often I have heard and read (including Alternet posts) Progressives dismissing people in the midwest and south as boors and hicks or "they're just not smart". Well they may be "hicks" but they are definitely not all stupid! I live in the rural midwest (Nebraska) and I don't see how the angry and desperate young men out here could possibly resonate with the advice that Progressives have for them: "you shouldn't shop at Walmart...you defnitely need to get rid of your guns...you need to welcome illegal immigrants and share your jobs and schools with them...what? You don't want to? Obviously you are a racist pig!...you need to eat vegetarian, you cruel animal hater..."

I am also wondering what are the reasons that millions tune-into the right-wing hate message now. What are the forces at work that are moving people in this direction in this country right now? We need to find out, because the dismissive attitudes of too many on the Progressive/liberal side remind me of what the "good Germans" must have thought/said in the early 1930's when faced with the rise of Nazism. And in hindsight they did so at their own peril.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So what is your solution? Posted by: dmwsd92
two wrongs don't make a right
Posted by: garlicgirl on Jul 29, 2008 7:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am appalled by the shooting and the bigotry that led to it. However, responding with more bigotry toward the Ulster Scot-Irish simply increases the problem. As a southern progressive and a descendant of those Ulster Scot-Irish, I know that your board condemnation is as inaccurate as those you complaining about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What the hell?!?
Posted by: pbutler on Jul 29, 2008 8:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why all the ethnic slurs against the Scots-Irish ("Ulster") American population?

Imagine a criticism of violence against Muslims with five repetitions of "Jewish" citizens, or similar chants attacking any other group.

Dolan offers a freeper-level (vague, unsupported) "history" of one demographic subset - a path also followed by, e.g., German immigrants - to pin "bigotry" on one set of citizens he then blames for social ills across the board.

This is an odd sort of rant to find on AlterNet - particularly when every comment box sits directly below a policy statement forbidding "racist, sexist or other discriminatory or hateful language".

Dolan seems to have spent too much time reading the lowest-level blogs on the 'net. Who knew knuckle-dragging was so contagious?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What the hell?!? Posted by: ankhet