Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Shock Jock Savage Spews Hate at Autistic Kids; Are His Enablers Ready to Abandon Ship?

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted July 25, 2008.


1 in 150 kids have some form of autism. Saying that it's all just a racket to make money is beneath contempt.
Advertisement

Angry citizen reaction to the latest cynical, cyclical outpouring of hateful speech over the public radio airwaves -- top-rated talk show host Michael Savage's despicable attack on autistic children as "brats, morons and idiots" -- has once again injected America's talk radio problem back into the mainstream news cycle. But why did it take a full week of protests, pressure, pickets, pullouts by advertisers, and stations dropping the program -- Savage's remarks occurred on the July 16 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show -- before the legacy media finally responded to the latest outrage? Is it because they are part of the racket? Savage claimed on his program "The Savage Nation" that autism is a "fraud, a racket." He also stated that the ongoing asthma epidemic is "a money racket" staged by "the minority community" to get "extra welfare." Here's how the racket works, according to the hatemonger Savage: "When the nurse looks at you, you go [fake cough], 'I don't know, the dust got me.' See, everyone had asthma from the minority community."

As should be obvious now to all but the most biased observers, the real money racket at play here is the shock jock racket. Everyone involved is getting rich: from top shock jocks like Savage, Rush Limbaugh (who recently signed a new $400 million contract) and Sean Hannity (who recently signed a new deal in excess of $100 million) to local radio stations like New York's WOR (which expressed "regret" over Savage's remarks but took no "responsibility" for them) to national syndicators like Premiere, ABC Radio Networks and the Talk Radio Network (which pushes Savage out to more than 350 radio stations -- and whose CEO, Mark Masters, trumpets the "fearless entrepreneurial environment at TRN" while he fearfully ducks reporters' calls) to advertisers and sponsors (like Home Depot and Anheuser-Busch, which, unlike the estimable AFLAC, continue to advertise on "The Savage Nation"). And let's not forget about the shock jocks' elite enablers, drawn from the upper echelons of the corrupt nexus of Big Media and Big Politics, who sell their political platforms, books and souls in exchange for audience access.

Although children's advocates are calling for his head and demanding that Savage apologize and retract his statements -- and calling for a boycott of stations that air his show -- Savage is offering in lieu of an apology an absurd explanation that his remarks were merely intended to stimulate a dialogue. "My comments about autism were meant to boldly awaken parents and children to the medical community's attempt to label too many children or adults as autistic," he claimed.

Equally absurd is the statement that WOR Radio posted on its Web site: "The views expressed by Michael Savage are his views and are not those of WOR Radio. As Michael Savage is a syndicated show, the content is the responsibility of the syndicator, which is Talk Radio Networks. Unfortunately, it is impossible for WOR Radio to know the subject matter in advance of airing. WOR is in the business of serving the community in which we broadcast. That is our stated goal, and we will continue to do so. We regret any consternation that his remarks may have caused to our listeners."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: michael savage, hate speech, shock jocks, autism

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor is the author of Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio (AlterNet Books, 2008). O'Connor also writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
stalinists? wtf?!
Posted by: Benjaminsjw on Jul 25, 2008 12:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The guy obviously hasn't got a clue! Stalinists wouldn't have protested peacefully outside a building, they would have dragged him off in the dead of night, tortured him for some days in the dungeons of Lubyanka, and then either eliminated him or sent him to Siberia to dig latrines in the permafrost.

Sounds like a plan, actually...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL! Posted by: hagwind
» RE: stalinists? wtf?! Posted by: mainspark
What about the Boy Scouts?
Posted by: Lauren on Jul 25, 2008 2:25 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I woke up early, all sad the impeachment isn't going fast enough. Personal things. The media, they are preventing it. Nobody knows anything.

I was wondering about how people could allow torture, my own torture, the boy scout who started the whole thing and if Boy Scouts had changed their tune on marijuana.

Looking for an official Boy Scout position on medical marijuana, I discovered this site Boy Scouts of America legal issues website. Media people can contact them here media contacts.

They argue the right to discriminate against others based on their religion. I specifically want to know if they are involved with my own personal torture.

Two adult Boy Scouts did some very serious illegal acts against me, one of them was violent and threatening, the other was installing illegal wire tapping into my computer. Now that I think of it, another one did some shit with my phone. That's three, were there more?

They all had full access to my house. Hmm... was it a conspiracy? It did result in me being abused by my angry and unbelieving husband. They should know that would happen. I think some responsibility is being avoided, ducked.

The leader who lead the assault on me, he lives in town, he is big in his church. I called the Boy Scout organization once to try to find out more about him. I hit a big brick wall.

Q. Why is the leadership role so important to Scouting?

A. The responsibility for instilling Scouting values and beliefs is entrusted to adult volunteer leaders. One of the most important methods of Scouting is adult association, because association with adults of high character is critical to a boy’s development. Scouting’s program for instilling values in young people teaches through both principles and concrete examples of adult leaders. Adult volunteer leaders not only espouse Scouting’s values and beliefs, but more importantly they embody them as role models to Scouting youth.

Through teaching, counseling, and role modeling, adult leaders play a critical role in transmitting Scouting values and beliefs to the boys. A boy may spend more time with his Scoutmaster, on weekend campouts and other small-group activities away from home, than he spends with his own father.


I had good reasons for choosing a Boy Scout to build my home, I needed someone I could trust, but instead I got tortured and raped. I almost died.

This boy scout leader has not heard the last from me. I heard from another mom that he was mean to kids too. I believe it, he was very cruel to me. I don't think he should be a scout leader, but how are they vetted? How are they supervised? How can I complain?

It was all about religion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» get help... Posted by: writer7
» RE: get help... OK! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: get help... OK! Posted by: writer7
» RE: get help... OK! Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: get help... OK! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: get help... OK! Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: get help... OK! Posted by: Lauren
» Perhaps they are in league with... Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Typical neocon behavior
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 25, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like most rightwing Republicans, Savage is indifferent to the suffering of unfortunate Americans.

This was never more apparent than during Hurrican Katrina, when President Bush partied with GOP big wigs in Southern California and Condi Rice shopped for fancy shoes in New York City while poor people drowned in New Orleans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Typical neocon behavior Posted by: mainspark
» Exactly, mainspark! Posted by: HughScott
» Brothers in Arms Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Brothers in Arms Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Brothers in Arms Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Typical neocon behavior Posted by: cell9song
The agony of Asperger's
Posted by: Gregory Kruse on Jul 25, 2008 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As if it isn't bad enough that my highly intelligent 11-year-old son hasn't been able to converse with me or anyone else because of some symptoms that run together and are called a Syndrome. It isn't bad enough that no one can tell me why or give me hope that I can do much to help him. It isn't bad enough that I worry how he will survive in the world that he is growing up in because success in it depends on an ability to communicate and network. No, now I have to put up with Michael Savage, an apparently arrogant and fascist man who somehow has been placed in a position of great influence and wealth, who calls my son a moron. It is all almost too much to bear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The agony of Asperger's Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The agony of Asperger's Posted by: JERSEYDAN
dumb shit
Posted by: willd4change on Jul 25, 2008 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are preaching to the choir. The shock jocks are idiots and do what they do for ratings. What should you do? change the fucking station and they go away good god. stupid artical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dumb shit Posted by: c.damian.j
» AMEN Posted by: robbie.seal
Ignore Mickey Savage please. Believe in yourself and stop giving up. Take it from this Vietnam War
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 25, 2008 6:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
veteran who lost two legs and an arm. I had to face hell and discrimination even after but I bypassed listening to rightwing hate talk because I knew from Nixon in the 1970s what the rightwing movement was really all about. Clinton as a total disappointment for not only failing to undo 12 years of the worst of Reagan/Bush but in fact moving further to the right on the economic issues especially on the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which basically enabled rightwing assholes such as Rush Limbaugh, Mike Savage, Ann Coulter, etc ... Obama has yet to give any word on whether he plans to tackle that bill and put a major reform on it once he takes office. In the meantime, understand that Savage, Limbaugh, and the rest of the neocon gang of rightwing hate talk is only for those die-hard wannabes who don't believe in growing up, believing in themselves and each other, and ready to face life's challenges and try to win. If you want to lose, keep listening to them. Otherwise, turn off that radio, team up, and rise and shine SOLDIERS !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for some controlled breeding
Posted by: peterharrell on Jul 25, 2008 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be nice if humans woke up to the fact that we are animals, and practiced the same sort of husbandry on ourselves that we have used for thousands of years to improve every other living thing we interact with (when we don't kill it off, that is :/). Trying to keep all humans alive regardless of defects is a bad move, and contrary to the natural order of things. At the very least, we need to encourage genetic science so that defects can be repaired (or improvements instilled) artificially. Letting the genetic gambler control outcomes is foolish and detrimental to societal and fiscal health.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you suggesting... Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: I thought he was referring to--- Posted by: peterharrell
» RE: Are you suggesting... Posted by: peterharrell
» RE: Are you suggesting... Posted by: BreeMass
» You were born 60 years too late Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: You were born 60 years too late Posted by: peterharrell
» RE: You were born 60 years too late Posted by: Illiteratilumen
How much does Rory O'Connor donate to Alternet?
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jul 25, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enough, it would seem, to get a headline article rehashing the same old greivances once a week.

Enough already. I'm a republican and I know not to get my news from these jerks. Any reasonably informed person can make the distinction between real news and "infotainment". I occasionally tune in for entertainment value if I'm on the road and, to be honest, I'd like to have that option of tuning in.

Calling for them to be shut down and taken off the air when they have such a large audience is just ridiculous. Change the station if you don't want to hear it. The people who get their ideas about government from these guys are going to be poorly informed citizens regardless of where they get their news from. Show me where these guys are doing something illegal and I might agree with Rory.

I hve one comment on Michael Savage a.k.a Michael Weiner. He is not a neo-conservative as many others have labeled him. I would consider him a paleo-conservative. He very much detests George Bush and the current administration and the foreign policy of our country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have to disagree...
Posted by: BreeMass on Jul 25, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...with the basic premise that he should be forced off the air or otherwise shutdown. I am a liberal progressive, but I think people of all political stripes are too quick to call for a person's firing and public tarring because they said something ridiculously offensive and stupid. Turn off the radio, change the station, support avocacy groups in getting the real message out there and forcefully and specifically call out Michael Savage on his complete and utter ignorance. Call the corporate sponsors and ask if they truly want to sponsor such speech if they expect to keep customers like you (good for AFLAC BTW). In those ways, he will be shut down and made to look the fool that he is without giving ammunition to Savage and others like him who just want to brand us as PC liberals who just want to silence everybody who disagrees with them. Let's not trample on free speech to get rid of this ass. Rise above and do your best to get the real message out about autism.

And I'll agree with another poster on this: autism is a major cause celebre right now - anybody who actually takes Michael Savage seriously on this is beyond reaching anyway and shouldn't really concern us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep him on the air!
Posted by: fanny666 on Jul 25, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad he said what he did. Everytime a rightwinger says something profoundly stupid, it hurts their broader agenda among anyone who isn't already a disciple.

Remember when Limbaugh said that it didn't matter if global warming led to the melting of the polar ice caps? His logic: when the ice cubes in my drink melt, it doesn't make the glass overflow. To normal, non-zombies, this shows that he has such a profound ignorance of global climate issues that he doesn't even realize that Antarctica is a continent and not a floating ice cube.

When Savage spouts off about autistic kids are just brats, any THINKING person who is not already a die-hard fan will think, "Hmmm, maybe he has approximately the same level of knowledge regarding Social Security or health care..."

Keep him on the air, let him talk, talk talk!

I have to add though- there seems to be a tendency on the left to say that psychological disorders ARE "a racket to make money" and maybe we should look at ourselves before accusing Savage of the same thing. The anti-psychiatry rhetoric on this website is often on par with a Scientology newsletter. It's amusing to watch everybody pounce- read some of Bruce Levine's dumber statements about psychiatry and you may wonder if Savage reads his blog regularly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep him on the air! Posted by: JERSEYDAN
» Keep him on the air - agree! Posted by: carbon-based
What's next? Deaf children are just brats who won't listen?
Posted by: tlCampbell on Jul 25, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never once thought in the past four years since my sons diagnosis (followed shortly after with my daughters diagnosis) of autism that I'd ever have to take time out from fighting to get disability support because I couldn't work when they were little, the occupational, speech, and behavioral therapies, and working with the school district to get one-on-one aides for support in the specialized classrooms, to think about some over-paid mouth spreading nonsense like this. It isn't enough for them to carry on about minorities and immigrants, they now have to start in on disabled children? That takes the cake in my book.

I know that deep down I support the freedom of speech but at what point do we start holding corporations accountable for the hate-speech they're paying these people to spew? Even if a quarter of the population who actually listens to these people stopped completely, they're still making incredible amounts of money off of their 'personal opinions' that do nothing but encourage idiotic notions in the public.

We need to start putting the flame on that while freedom of speech is a right, there are still consequences for what you choose to say and that's something we all have to live with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong-headed campaign against Savage
Posted by: Sons on Jul 25, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those deploring media hate mongers and those have so damaged America by cheer-leading Bush and lies about WMD have not formulated an effective counter program.

They say write Savage, write the station, write Congress. Savage could care less what we think of his hate talk. Its made him rich!

When the stations hear from us, they just assume Savage has recruited new listeners who would never normally tune to Savage.

Congress is too corporate controlled and ineffective.

Its the MONEY stupid. Do what always works - follow the money.

Where does Savage get his income to spew hate?

Sponsors who sell products. Address them and remind them their laundry soap is acquiring a terrible name being associated with hate talk and they will pay attention. Put up THEIR PRODUCT name as a sponsor of Savage on blog sites. THAT WILL STING THEM AND GET THE REACTION WE WANT. STOP SENDING SAVAGE MONEY TO CONTINUE HIS LIES AND HATE.

But, let's face it, we are slow learners. The Kerry movie dropped by Sinclair propagandists should have been the golden lesson we all needed when sponsors said "NO" to Sinclair Republican propaganda.

Maybe some day we will figure out the obvious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do we want to live in a world...
Posted by: g on Jul 25, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... where one statement that offends somebody could cost Savage his career? Sure! Who wouldn't?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Classic Fascist Personality
Posted by: shinseiji on Jul 25, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's our Michael Weener, or is that Whiner? who for obvious reasons took on the moniker "Savage". Rather as "Schickelgruber" was switched for "Hitler"

One suspects "Savage" was picked on a lot in his Brooklyn Jewish childhood. Who wouldn't with a name like that?

Like Hitler in Vienna, "Savage" is a rejected 1960's San Francisco Boheme. He's been seeking revenge on his former "friends" ever since, projecting his hate onto leftists, gays, "minorities", women, Muslims, etc.

To top it off, like Hitler, "Savage" is a bit of a health nut too, although unlike Hitler he is not a teetotaler, oftentimes bragging about his "mild" hangovers on-air, alternating with his pretenses of wine (or is that whiner) connoisseurship.

And speaking of pretense, "Savage" is convinced he is a latter day Aristotle, wise and knowledgeable on a whole host of subjects, "wisdom" he'll freely share with his listners.

And yes folks, "Savage" has got quite a few of those, in the millions. Proof - to use one of "Savage's" favorite expressions - that there are a lot of idiots and morons out there in the USA.

Rather than simply react in "shock" and "outrage", I'd suggest first that you give this guy a close listen, where you'll here much more than what has hit the public radar, such as

- the USA is a "White mans' Christian nation, not Hindu, not Buddhist, not Muslim".

- mass murder and genocide are "sometimes something that's gotta be done", typically expressed in the context of one of his many Islamophobic tirades. The implications are clear: if necessary, don't hesitate to mass murder Arabs and Muslims, beginning with the Palestinians.

It is at that point that "Savage" expresses the essence and terminal logic of American Zionism - a.k.a "neoconservativism", though there is nothing conservative about the ideology - as a latter day Nazi fascism, replete with its imperialist PNAC "national greatness" megalomaniacal delusions of a latter day Rome.

As such "Savage" is an embarrassment to much of the rest of the American Far Right, as he is exposing their program "in advance" so to speak. So by all means keep "Savage" on the air.

Know Thy Enemy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Actually Savage's "Absurd Explanation" raises some valid points
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jul 25, 2008 12:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you click on the "absurd explanation" link in the article I am actually inclined to agree with Savage that there is a major concern about over-medication of children. His shock jock style of raising that awareness certainly isn't very productive but I generally agree with him that our children are indeed over-medicated.

I am not really in a position to explain the extent to which they are over-medicated but it seems to me that we, as a society, look to medication to fix problems that can be addressed in other ways.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once you drag it out of the street and fix it does it become valid
Posted by: nightgaunt on Jul 25, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Savage's train wreck of an explanation one would expect from that raving drunk of a neighbor or the schizophrenic off his meds, I might agree. But the way he said it and how he positioned it I would definitely not agree. No doubt in his past any problems he had psychologically was treated with this same kind of fix all. Only it had been done by his father to him. So maybe it isn't such a good fix after all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So...I'm getting a conflicting message from Alternet on this issue
Posted by: blogbooks on Jul 25, 2008 2:37 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yesterday there was a story about how doctors are misdiagnosing illnesses to milk money out of aging baby boomers for big pharma.

Now you're defending the the vastly over diagnosed problems of asthma and autism. I suppose, though, that the real message here is "shut down Michael Savage."

First of all, as a child I was diagnosed with asthma and heart problems. I had pneumonia something like 10 times and was hospitalized for it more than once for weeks at a time.

Turns out I had lung problems because my mother filled the house with cigarette smoke. Turns out I couldn't keep up with the other kids because I was fat from eating garbage all my life.

When I got older I lost 100 pounds, got in shape, and joined the military. I even told the military about my supposed heart condition and they sent me to an Army cardiologist that said my heart was completely normal.

These days I run 15-20 miles a week, every week.

Did I have asthma that magically cured itself and allows me to run 5 miles at a stretch with no problem? Did I have a congenital heart defect that healed itself?

It's all bull shit folks. These doctors don't make money from healthy people. They get rich off of perpetually sick people.

Every dentist I've ever been to has wanted to yank out my wisdom teeth. Guess what? I've never had a cavity in my life and I see no reason to rip teeth out of my jaw bone when they aren't causing me any problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Over Diagnosis Posted by: robbie.seal
» RE: Over Diagnosis Posted by: DaBear
» You're an idiot Posted by: robbie.seal
Quantum physicist David Bohm would be considered autistic by todays medical standards
Posted by: JoshuaR on Jul 25, 2008 4:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a problem in this country putting extremely high-IQ children on bad diets, drugs like Ritalin etc. We also label them "autistic."

Face it. We don't know what to do with highly intelligent people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm Autistic
Posted by: Mahjee on Jul 25, 2008 6:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm an autistic person in my forties. I've had a lifetime facing up to this sort of hate speech. These days I sit back and wonder at how gullible and foolish non-autistic people can be to get so stirred up by non-entities like this radio jock. He's just after attention. He's a spoiled brat and probably a very lonely man; and certainly he's a desperate fraud.
Put your energy into helping and accepting autistic people. Don't let this silly little wanna-be radio star distract you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm Autistic Posted by: Lauren
More on I'm Autistic.
Posted by: Mahjee on Jul 25, 2008 6:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was diagnosed as Idiot in the sixties. Even though I was told I'd never have anything to contribute to society I've written fifteen books ( four bestsellers) and recorded eight CDs of original music.
I used to struggle each day to appear normal so I wouldn't attract the abuse of people like this shock jock. But I found the mediocrity they demand is unbearable.
I don't think all non-autistic people are afraid of high-achievers. They're just stuck in an idea of disability based on prejudice. Prejudice is born of ignorance. Ignorance can be cured.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This guy is WAY beyond conservative.
Posted by: robbie.seal on Jul 26, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was traveling across country and found his show. I am a conservative, but I listen to just about anything when I'm traveling, and enjoy listening to other's perspectives. I've heard some of his stuff before and thought him over the top, but when I heard this rant on autistic kids, I couldn't believe the level of ignorance. After that, I decided I wouldn't even listen to this knucklehead out of morbid curiousity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The autism-is-a-scam ilk is the same cloth that spawns other illusions
Posted by: DaBear on Jul 26, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like the ADD/HD is a scam ilk... all the same shit.

Over/misdiagnoses does not a scam make. Fucked up social systems, well, maybe those creates scams by the upper class parasites who own them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vicious Cowardly Cocksucker
Posted by: john2007 on Jul 26, 2008 4:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's be frank, Savage is a vicious, cowardly, cocksucker; much more so than his brethern hate-jocks. And what does this say about his many Republican fans?

It takes a special kind of hateful low-life to attack disabled kids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't hold back Posted by: robbie.seal
Man oh man
Posted by: cell9song on Jul 26, 2008 7:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As much as I dislike Savage personally I have to say the level of misunderstanding of what he said is even more appalling. While he may not have said it in the most PC of terms, he was commenting on the ease in which doctors seem to be assigning the label of "autism" to kids, some of whom may be more appropriate as candidates for tough love. This whole episode seems to be more of an occasion for left-leaning persons to get out a little anger towards the neo-cons rather than any concern for kids with disabilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pharmageddon $$$$$
Posted by: Paxmana1 on Jul 27, 2008 2:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems to me that someone is making big money on other peoples ignorance. Where has all this misery come from?

Why is all this misery and sickness increasing by the day? Who profits? Why do we allow blaring trumpeting fools who have been educated far beyond their intelligence to overrule ones common sense?

Why do we eat shit and why do we spray shit in our bathrooms to cover the smell of our own shit .. why do our women cover their faces with chemical laced shit .. why do we spray chemical shit under our arms and up our cracks?

Why are our women dropping hormones made from horse piss which they then piss back into the water supply?

Why do we allow our children from 5 months onwards to be pumped full of diseased tissue taken from monkey livers and kidneys all nicely pickled in mercury?

Carl Sagan had a few words to say about the bamboozle .. he also said its too painful to admit we have been suckered .. and after all no parent would want to admit that they have damaged their children by their own actions and their own choices.

Corporations do not give a honk about you or your kids why do you all keep popping those pills like they were twinkies?

Not every child diagnosed with this, that, and the other .. has this, that, and the other .. diagnosis is no better than a toss of a coin .. I remember a report in the New England Journal of Medicine where one teaching hospital was actually bragging that 49% of their diagnosis had been proved to be correct on Autopsy .. nice word autopsy .. it has a finality to it.

All those who are weighing in about Savage are probably Pharmageddon shills because it is taking the heat off Pharmageddon.

Wake Up and smell the Matrix .. which pill is it today .. the red one or the blue one?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 -