Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Strange Journey of Larry Johnson

By David Weigel, The American Prospect. Posted July 1, 2008.


The former CIA officer has morphed from defender of Valerie Plame to crazed purveyor of a debunked Michelle Obama rumor. What happened?
Advertisement

On May 13, 2006, Larry C. Johnson -- former CIA intelligence officer, counterterrorism pundit, classmate of Valerie Plame -- put up a breaking post claiming that Karl Rove was under federal indictment for perjury and lying to investigators looking into the leaking of Plame's identity.

"Rove Indicted," Johnson blogged. "Frog march the bastard. As Freddie Mercury sang, 'another one bites the dust.'"

The post linked to the investigative site TruthOut and an anonymously sourced story that, it turned out, wasn't true. Still, on May 21, Johnson approvingly linked to TruthOut's explanation for the blunder. "They are sticking to their guns and justifiably so," he wrote. "Time will tell." In response, National Review's Byron York asked how an intelligence consultant who'd downplayed the threat of terrorism less than two months before Sept. 11 became a player in the Plame scandal and an icon on the left. But Johnson had been attacked by the right ever since he became an advocate for Plame; the criticism rolled right off.

But, by May and early June of this year, Johnson had become much more hated on the left than he ever was on the right. He was instrumental in spreading the rumor that Republican operatives possessed a tape of Barack Obama's wife Michelle railing against "whitey." The affair has turned some of Johnson's old friends and allies into raging, red-eyed enemies. "Smears of this type are unforgivable," wrote blogger Booman, who said that his friendship with Johnson had ended over the matter. "You're a sad and pathetic piece of shit," wrote Brad Reed of Sadly, No! Daily Kos, the left-wing blogopolis where Johnson's diaries once drew upward of 400 comments, became a carnival of Johnson-bashing. "You," wrote Kos regular Bob Johnson (no relation), "and the denizens of your cesspool of hate have promoted and stoked every fringe-lunatic, right-wing smear of Obama."

In the space of six months, a man who had been one of the most high-profile, credible recruits of the liberal blogosphere became as loathed as the White House apparatchiks he used to attack.

Johnson's following at places like Daily Kos was always something of a fluke. He followed four years as a CIA analyst with four years at the State Department's Office of Counterterrorism. Johnson left intelligence work in 1993, going on to build a dual career as a business consultant and a pundit on intelligence issues. He argued throughout the 1990s, on shows like "The NewsHour" and "Larry King Live," that domestic law enforcement was dropping the ball on terrorist threats while the threat of international terror was decreasing. In this age before blogs, Johnson's commentary, whether printed in the New York Times or submitted in congressional hearings, was dry, analytic and laced with facts.

Of course, part of the reason Johnson was able to build such a public profile was that his analysis was colored by his flinty, swashbuckling personality. In 2001 Peter Lance, an Emmy-winning investigative journalist, was writing the screenplay for a movie called "Terror.net" for Showtime, a project for which Johnson was retained as a consultant. The Sept. 11 attacks occurred in the midst of pre-production, and as part of his rewrite, Lance followed a tip that Abdul Hakim Murad, a plotter of the 1993 World Trade Center attack, had revealed some of the planning for the next attacks while under interrogation in the Philippines. Johnson told Lance not to follow the tip: "He went ballistic," Lance remembers. When Lance's tip turned out to be right, Johnson worked to discredit it and keep it out of the movie. "Larry, to me, is one of the great empty suits," Lance says now. "He is emblematic of what goes wrong in the agency, emblematic of the attitude that let 9/11 happen."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: clinton, obama, plame, blogging, larry johnson

David Weigel is an associate editor of Reason.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
who cares???
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Jul 1, 2008 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
man this is old news and larry johnson shot himself in the ass a long time ago. If it's going to be "hey,look over there!" all over again let's just not fucking play. I am soooooo tired of desperate rethugs. Time spent on their tired schtick is time wasted. let's face it they all suck. I know it,you know it, everybody knows it. Laughter is the best response to most of their shit. and a quick smack down is the only other response they understand so. sharpen your pens. hire some thugs. and kick some asses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A quick note ...
Posted by: Ryan on Jul 1, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"He is emblematic of what goes wrong in the agency, emblematic of the attitude that let 9/11 happen."

Not totlly: the president and others in the administration were warned of threads but never, let me repeat NEVER, acted on it and even dismissed people. Talking about a pre 9-11 mindset!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A quick note ... Posted by: compu
» RE: A quick note ... Posted by: Lauren
wrensis
Posted by: wrensis on Jul 1, 2008 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Truthout post was from Jason Leopold. who had a reputation for filing not totally accurate information. I do not recall Larry Johnson involvement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wrensis Posted by: helenwheels
What this article doesn't cover
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 1, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I think it's still well-written, is the level of out-and-out SCARY racism and hatred against Obama that Larry allows on his blog. I was following this story beginning in early June, and I went up to the thread about this rumored video and asked some questions. I was totally bombarded, name-called (Obamabot is their fav), and treated WORSE than even Freepers would treat me. It was really galling and I actually was quite shocked. I emailed Larry telling him about the treatment and how surprised I was at the change in his blog, and his posting, and the rabid other folks posts. He just said flag any comments where I'm name-called... really not much help.

In any case, I did notice that the pro-Hillary crowd was nearly all rabid backers that acted as if they had some stock in her campaign beyond even winning. The over-the-top, true-beleiver comments were really freakish and unreal. I think actually a lot of the people posting up there (if not most) are the ones who left the rethug party as Lush Limpballs requested, in order to vote for Hillary. I truly believe this because if you go up there, and see the comments, you won't believe they come from liberals or democrats. They are rabid, incoherent, name-calling, racist, bullshit comments and nothing more.

The only rational comments I saw up there were from disgusted liberals who used to hold Larry in high esteem and were as shocked as I was to see what a cesspool his blog had become.

The TruthOut Rove fiasco was tame in comparison. Not only does Larry continue to defend this fake tape, but he has definitely encouraged vitriolic comments and slander to run rampant on his blog. It's pretty disgusting, really.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part of a larger story of human action in the medialand.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Jul 1, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This fellow sounds like a flake, someonw who doesn't have much depth and moves to extremes and can't say "I am wrong." The fact he worked for the CIA should have made anyone suspicious of him to begin with. The CIA and the other 15 clandestine organizations work from the standpoint of the 10 commandments by how many are broken to get their job done. Next time anyone from one of those organizations should always be looked at with a skeptical eye. The 'whitey' disinformation campaign is certainly classic. Perhaps he supported Plame because she was one of his peer group dissed by the gov't for political expediency and he didn't like that. Those on the Left just didn't understand this stance in his overall relation to the right-wing he is a part of. It was a tribal reaction not political.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

October Surprise
Posted by: Timberbee on Jul 2, 2008 12:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article says alot to me. I find the 9/11 reference to be quite something. As to the "whitey" aspect, it sounds as though this is something being tested and, developed in the Republican community. Did she in fact make such comments at some point in her life?

The question is, was she an activist? There is racial disparity in this Nation. How should someone who sees this disparity, and, is moved by it, how would they respond if this were an important element in their life?

National politics versus real life. To me this looks as though Republicans are setting something up, testing what could best damage Obama, on the one hand, and, building current and precedent to make some future exposure much worse than it really is.

Rumors have weight. They have force and presence, more so than fact in the camp of ones enemy. Obama's enemies are building consensus among themselves, bits and pieces are being shared. Already people react to the name, to the back ground, to the link to Osama, to Husein, and, to a Muslim identity. This is a deep, and prevalent view which was constantly reinforced by programs which "mistakenly" misprinted Senator Obama's name as Osama. This doevetailed with the short, very direct, and memorable "joke"; Obama / Osama.

Michelle is a vulnerability. It is currently unknown, to the greater mass of Senator Obama's supporters what Michelle's life has consisted of. What did she do? What was she passionate about? Who were her mentors? What were her experiences? What were the driving forces in her life?

Statements that she reportedly said something about being finally proud of America have traction in a National campaign. Sad? Yes. It will take an awful lot to bring racial unity to our Country. There is currently a great deal of fear, among whites, of black activists in general. True, radical activists. Why? Such activism would likely target recent revivals of very, very strong hate groups, which are springing up, again, all over the Country.

Whether these rumors are true, or not, I think is irrelevant. The attack is already been launched. It is now something which can be used in conjunction with Obama / Osama. Should there prove to, in fact, be some real, activism on Michelle's part... it will be something separate, but, it will ride upon a powerful base of fear.

That fear is what should be the focus. This is the line of attack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: October Surprise Posted by: Lauren
watch out for true beleivers, is the lesson
Posted by: whealeydj on Jul 5, 2008 3:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to me. I dont recall hearing about Larry Jcohnson before--perhaps the common last name makes him forgettable to me. Sounds like another Clintonista who wanted her to win so bad he would repeat anything to get the nomination. Time will tell if such tape exists or whether white racial fears of black radicals are falsely projected onto Michelle and/or Barack. Jesse Helms has passed on but his attitude lives on in most Republicans and Southernerners over 60 and many whites of any party over 40. To win Obama will have to give more speeches trying to soothe these fears and he cannot denounce and disown his wife.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]