Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Finally, the U.S. Mega-Bases in Iraq Are Under Debate

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted June 15, 2008.


In the last five-plus years, untold billions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on the construction and upgrading of permanent bases.
Advertisement

It's just a $5,812,353 contract -- chump change for the Pentagon -- and not even one of those notorious "no-bid" contracts either. Ninety-eight bids were solicited by the Army Corps of Engineers and 12 were received before the contract was awarded this May 28th to Wintara, Inc. of Fort Washington, Maryland, for "replacement facilities for Forward Operating Base Speicher, Iraq." According to a Department of Defense press release, the work on those "facilities" to be replaced at the base near Saddam Hussein's hometown, Tikrit, is expected to be completed by January 31, 2009, a mere 11 days after a new president enters the Oval Office. It is but one modest reminder that, when the next administration hits Washington, American bases in Iraq, large and small, will still be undergoing the sort of repair and upgrading that has been ongoing for years.

In fact, in the last five-plus years, untold billions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on the construction and upgrading of those bases. When asked back in the fall of 2003, only months after Baghdad fell to U.S. troops, Lt. Col. David Holt, the Army engineer then "tasked with facilities development" in Iraq, proudly indicated that "several billion dollars" had already been invested in those fast-rising bases. Even then, he was suitably amazed, commenting that "the numbers are staggering." Imagine what he might have said, barely two and a half years later, when the U.S. reportedly had 106 bases, mega to micro, all across the country.

By now, billions have evidently gone into single massive mega-bases like the U.S. air base at Balad, about 60 miles north of Baghdad. It's a "16-square-mile fortress," housing perhaps 40,000 U.S. troops, contractors, special ops types, and Defense Department employees. As the Washington Post's Tom Ricks, who visited Balad back in 2006, pointed out -- in a rare piece on one of our mega-bases -- it's essentially "a small American town smack in the middle of the most hostile part of Iraq." Back then, air traffic at the base was already being compared to Chicago's O'Hare International or London's Heathrow -- and keep in mind that Balad has been steadily upgraded ever since to support an "air surge" that, unlike the President's 2007 "surge" of 30,000 ground troops, has yet to end.

Building Ziggurats

While American reporters seldom think these bases -- the most essential U.S. facts on the ground in Iraq -- are important to report on, the military press regularly writes about them with pride. Such pieces offer a tiny window into just how busily the Pentagon is working to upgrade and improve what are already state-of-the-art garrisons. Here's just a taste of what's been going on recently at Balad, one of the largest bases on foreign soil on the planet, and but one of perhaps five mega-bases in that country:

Consider, for instance, this description of an air-field upgrade from official U.S. Air Force news coverage, headlined: "'Dirt Boyz' pave way for aircraft, Airmen":

"In less than four months, Balad Air Base Dirt Boyz have placed and finished more than 12,460 feet of concrete and added approximately 90,000 square feet of pavement to the airfield… Without the extra pavement courtesy of the Dirt Boyz, fewer aircraft would be able to be positioned and maintained at Balad AB. Having fewer aircraft at the base would directly affect the Air Force's ability to place surveillance assets in the air and to drop munitions on targets... The ongoing flightline projects at Balad AB consist of concrete pad extensions that will provide occupation surfaces for multiple aircraft of various types."

Or here's a proud description of what Detachment 6 of the 732nd Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadron did on its recent tour in Balad:

"'We constructed more than 25,000 square feet of living, dining and operations buildings from the ground up,' said Staff Sgt. John Wernegreen… 'This project gave the [U.S.] Army's [3rd Squadron, 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment] and Iraqi army [soldiers] a place to carry out their mission of controlling the battlespace around the Eastern Diyala Province.'"

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: permanent bases, iraq

Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project, runs the Nation Institute's TomDispatch.com. The World According to TomDispatch: America in the New Age of Empire (Verso, 2008), a collection of some of the best pieces from his site, has just been published. Focusing on what the mainstream media hasn't covered, it is an alternative history of the mad Bush years. A brief video in which Engelhardt discusses the American mega-bases in Iraq can be viewed by clicking here.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Evil is as Evil does
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jun 15, 2008 8:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq story should be finished now
Posted by: fanyigongsi on Jun 15, 2008 8:41 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody is tired of the loooong story in Iraq. See some Japanese comments here:

译佰可以为客户提供会议同传系统租赁会议设备租赁服务,并且以杰出的同声传译同传设备租赁服务闻名于上海同声传译上海同传设备租赁市场上。同时公司可以提供无线导览出租,以用于参观工厂和无线导游讲解,并以专业的设备和服务立足于上海无线导览出租市场。

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why expect the rightwing media to even bring this up. Take time off the media and build your own.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 15, 2008 9:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you people stop expecting the media to be your servant? They've been selling the public out for 28 years, if not 50 already. Of course, they're not going to bring this up until it's too late. If you want a more honest and timely media, shut up and take some time off and then counter them. When Barry Goldwater lost in 1964, the "conservatives" didn't just cry about the media looking too "liberal". They took time off and built think tanks and strategies to find ways to take over the media, academics, and even government and keep a long term hold on it. Unlike FDR and the Democrats who believed in only starting from the top of the pyramid, the "conservatives" started from the bottom on up. That's why Nixon was better able to run in 1968(having lost in 1960) and Raygun in 1980 (even though he lost to Ford in 1976) while AlGore isn't even thinking about running ever again. You cannot expect an "entitlement" if you keep begging the media and the government, both of whom are currently in the FUCK YOU mode of selling you out. If you want to win, then get to work on building yourselves a counter-media and stop relying on a silly horserace once every four years. Yeah, it may not be easy at first and might take at least a decade but are you gonna let yourselves of the progressive/liberal movement(s) languish for another decade or more as if 28 years wasn't enough?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SOFA so good
Posted by: solrev on Jun 16, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is doubtful that the Iraqi would make a SOFA agreement with a lame duct like Bush. The nationalists are not going to let that happen and the Maliki backed Shia with close ties to Iran are against it. The Arab Sunni may feel that a US presence would protect them from the Shia, however they will only feel this way as long as the US is forking over cash. Maliki is in a bad position, he has to be a good puppet and balance the US and Iranian interests in Iraq. The Iranians will win that one. The Iraqi are going to wait and see who wins Obama or McCain. A continuation of Bush, if McCain wins, will cause stagnation in Iraq and a continuation of the status quo. Obama could have his cupcake and eat it too. Obama can trade to the nationalists oil sovereignty for a SOFA agreement that would allow a military presence subject to Iraqi laws. The Shia nationalists would not mind a little help in their dealing with Iran. They are not about to become an Iranian puppet. The Arab Sunni would not mind a stabilizing force in Iraq until they become equal players with the Maliki Shia (police and military). The Kurdish Sunni just want their piece of the pie. The greed of Bush and Chaney were the seeds of their own failure in Iraq. Obama can be the big hero by bringing out the combat troops and quietly protect the free flow of oil. Free as long as it goes to where we want it to go, he who controls the spice controls the universe.In order to get the Maliki Shia to stand down, Obama needs to end the hostility between the US and Iran. Contrary to the propaganda that is all Iran has ever wanted. RESPECT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sovereignty is not something a people can vote for or against
Posted by: warble on Jun 16, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Extraterritoriality and immunity as well as freedom over the skies in Iraq are not something that we should demand of another nation nor allow any nation a vote the right to vote on it.

If we allowed congress to vote for Russia's right to be immune from American Law; to allow Russia a free hand to do whatever it wanted; to allow Russia all the mineral and soil rights it wanted; to allow Russia a free military hand over land and in the skies...that would be allow congress to sell us down the drain. That would allow congress to vote away our sovereignty.

So this is what George Bush really wanted when he invaded Iraq. It had nothing to do with Terrorism but to take over the middle East. Just like he lied to the World about Palestine, he is lying about Iraq.

It was not weapons of mass destruction; it was not freedom; it was not preventing civil war; it was not any of the reasons he gave...they were all lies. It was to strip Iraq of its sovereignty and own it and its people. This is a president demanding to enslave the Iraqi people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What for? Base for another invasion?
Posted by: reelectnoone on Jun 16, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One can only wonder why the US feels it needs huge bases in a country it has already defeated.

Hmmmm could they need them to send sorties to neighboring nations?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to call Mau Dibe in
Posted by: Zimbly on Jun 16, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the bases are there to be used as a "Launch Platform" to attack Iran and to "project power".
To items come to mind , Zbigniew Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard" and of course William Kristol's PNAC..oh and their website is now gone...gee I wonder why?

Following Herr Brezinski's "blueprint" things have gone exactly as planned.
Now one has to consider whats behind all of this, well firstly once the "Project " is completed , America will have its finger on the "energy artery of the world"..why wherefore did you so..they ask..simple.. the Oil is a means to an end..in this case Power..raw Imperial power, 100%pure hegemony.
Upon deeper analysis of Brzezinski's "template" we see something profoundly racist and in essence yet another "ideology".
Now we were told for about 20 or 30 years , after WW2 that "never again"..no longer would we be seduced by the Chimera of Ideologies and its terrible tragic consequences..well guess what, here we are "back at it again" yet following or at least being lead by Ideologues and if we look at these first five years as a "thumbnail sketch" of whats to come..well.....good luck America and well..too bad world for being so passive.
Now lest get on with the Novel, Dune and see if Paul Atreides will claim his right to stop the "flow of the spice"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Google HOA
Posted by: JibreelRiley on Jun 16, 2008 9:03 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you find out that the US military has bases in the Middle East, go drink more of your organic beer, fill up your Prius and go attend a WNBA game to make you feel better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Google HOA Posted by: Spot
My brother spent a year doing "reconstruction" in Iraq
Posted by: sarahk on Jun 16, 2008 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My brother spent a year working construction for KBR subconstractor in South Iraq. The reconstruction work consisted only of increasing the size of a US military base--there was no re-building of Iraqi infrastructure. In fact, even though rural South Iraq is a more peaceful place than Baghdad, it was too violent and unpredictable for any real reconstruction to take place as non-Iraqis could not leave the base safely.

He ended up being in charge of a group of 30 Iraqi carpenters who worked on base. Doing the year he worked with them, two of the men had their young children die because of simple illnesses (high fever and diarreha). They were not allowed to bring their sick children on base to be treated.
During the summer, their families coped with 130 degree temperatures during the day with little water and no air conditioning. The families slept on their roofs during the summer nights to keep cool, but there was always the danger of mortar rounds going off during the night as there were fights between competing groups of Iraqi militias in the area.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think another Bush lie was accidently uncovered today
Posted by: Dboy on Jun 16, 2008 6:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone listen to Diane Rehm's show on NPR today? She had a retired US Army interrogator on, and some other people inside the military with specific knowledge on the waterboarding torture technique.

It was reported here on Alternet (late last year I recall?) that the US stated that "a total of 3" prisoners had been waterboarded...thats all. But that completely contradicted the statement made by Matthew Waxman, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs, during the Diane Rehm interview today. He said that the US govt does not want to come out now and state for the record that it considers waterboarding to be torture because there are "several dozen" (he said) interrogators who would be in legal jeopardy. Several dozen people (at least) worried about being guilty of torture does not sound like 3 waterboardings to me. I think we are still being lied to about the extent of the torture.

Also of interest, one of the speakers detailed an absolutely HORRIBLE account of US military personnel TORTURING a 17 year old girl during the Vietnam war..ALSO using waterboarding. He gave graphic details of the girl being tortured by US soldiers, which I will not repeat here. So, our "heroic" military, who is hell-bent on protecting our freedom from the 17 year old vietnamese girls who want to destroy us whine on about "don't look at us, it's the civilian leadership that's screwed up"...is full of crap. US military people are nothing but cowards. They come home from Iraq suffering from "PTSD", whining about all the bad things they saw..most likely they are damaged by the crimes they COMMITTED. Who's going to give free counseling to all the Iraqi families that these soldiers have destroyed?

The US deserves ALL the IED attacks it suffers, for all of the men, women, and children it has raped and murdered, and especially for the voiceless and unknown vietnamese girls raped, murdered, napalmed, and waterboarded. Why do they hate us? Give me a fucking break.


The two military insiders interviewed were:

Col. Stuart Herrington, retired U.S. Army interrogator; reviewed detainee operations at Guantanamo and in Iraq for the U.S. Army

Matthew Waxman, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs (2004-2005); also held high ranking positions in the Department of State and National Security Council; currently, professor of law at Columbia University



Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US TAXPAYER MONEY FOR IRAQI MILITARY BASES?
Posted by: RegisteredVoter on Jun 18, 2008 7:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I certainly hope other readers have the same reflux reaction to the details in this story.

BILLIONS of US taxpayer dollars spent to build airstrips and military bases in Iraq...

But Bush said we had to SHUT DOWN AND DISSERVICE how many US military bases just two or three years ago?

Bush said we had to cut government funding for improving our remaining US MILITARY BASES and rely on the states to manage what little government money they currently receive to make these improvements.

When Katrina hit and we had a skeleton crew of National Reservists to assist US CITIZENS IN NEED -- our billions of dollars went to use to build state of the art bases in IRAQ.

With the current FLOODING OF MILLIONS OF ACRES OF FARMLAND the RED CROSS IS IN THE RED to try to assist AMERICAN CITIZENS -- because US money was spent to create these bases.

And we need these state of the art military bases in Iraq to rebuild a country that we went to war with to find weapons of mass destruction.

And our country is in a DEFICIT SO LARGE NO ONE KNOWS THE EXACT NUMBER -- PROBABLY TRILLIONS..

And when our children, and our children's children, and their children are hopefully still living in the US and they try to understand why AMERICA IS SO BROKE -
We will have pictures (as hopefully all of the investigations will have their gag orders lifted by then) to show them to say
SEE? THIS IS WHY AMERICA IS SO BROKE.

Quick - pass the Immodium...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Time is Now ... Uniting for Justice
Posted by: Wolfie on Jun 21, 2008 12:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Supposedly there is a big wave of Hillary supporters going now for McCain ... Baloney!

Having voted Democratic for over 40 years ... all real Democrats will rally behind the nominee ... Barack Obama in 08.

You know, I fully supported Dennis Kucinich, and always will, but I too came around to Barack's way of thinking.

Every speech I hear, and watching the actions he takes, makes me think I made the right choice.

All I talk to, which is quite a few through blogs and forums, who supported Hillary, say they will now support Obama, and the ones that won't are really probably Republicans, or paid 'shrills' doing the old smoke and mirrors swiftboat games.

Look at the issues ... look at the platforms ... Hillary and Obama are basically on the same page when it comes to policies ... light-years away from the Bush/McCain teams. That is why the Democratic debates started to become so boring ... they mostly all believed the same things about how to fix America!!! Kucinich was a little in the lead, but I noticed as I watched every debate ... ALL the others came along on a number of things ... universal health care along with the war issues. Hillary came the farthest, I thought, and there is nothing wrong, that I can see, with changing and growing, as new information is available.

Blow the smoke away and let's let the world know that we are making a change!!! Our constitution and the Bill of Rights will again stand for something.

The truth will matter again, and justice will start from the top down!!! We will walk our talk! One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all!!!

Let's show the world by our example what a truly great, honest, and compassionate society we can be .... civilized folks who follow the rule of their own laws, as well as respecting all international laws.

Why not???

Do the world, and especially us, a favor ... please sign this impeachment petition

http://impeachment.kucinich.us/petition/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]