Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Senate Votes to Reverse FCC Decision Allowing Media Consolidation

By Josh Silver, Huffington Post. Posted May 16, 2008.


Thursday's Senate vote is good news for everyone who is fed up with a media system, that, in the words of Jon Stewart, is "hurting America."

Thursday night, the Senate cast a near-unanimous vote to reverse the Federal Communication Commission's December 2007 decision to let media companies own both a major TV or radio station and a major daily newspaper in the same city.

Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), who introduced the rarely used "resolution of disapproval," said last night that "the FCC is supposed to be a referee for the media industry, but instead they've been cheerleaders in favor of more consolidation. … We already have too much concentration in the media."

Senator Barack Obama added his support to the resolution saying, "I urge my colleagues in the House of Representatives to expeditiously pass the legislation."

The Senate vote is good news for everyone who is fed up with a media system, that, in the words of Jon Stewart, is "hurting America" with propaganda pundits, embedded journalists, horse-race election coverage, and celebrity gossip posing as news. It reflects growing awareness -- in Congress and with average Americans -- of the perils of concentrated media ownership. Namely, insatiable profit pressures that gut newsrooms, replace labor-intensive investigative news with salacious, cheap-to-cover stories, and encourage the dumbing-down of the most pressing issues into 30-second sound bites and partisan shout-fests.

Media concentration is also central to the rise of extremists like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, who overwhelm the dial on conglomerates owned and run by businessmen with far-right politics.

Back in 2003, Senator Dorgan and then-Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) passed a similar resolution of disapproval to overturn the last effort by the Bush FCC to loosen ownership limits after 3 million Americans -- both liberal and conservative -- decried the FCC's handout to the largest media companies. That resolution languished in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives, and the proposed rules were later rejected by a federal court.

The "newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership ban" that the FCC is trying to get rid of has been in place since 1975. It keeps media outlets from merging already stripped-down local newsrooms in the name of "synergy" and protects diversity of viewpoints in the local press, something the Supreme Court has recognized is critical to the health of our democracy. Thursday's vote sends a clear message to media executives and the FCC that further media consolidation will not be tolerated.

The resolution of disapproval now moves to the House, where it already has bipartisan support. Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.) is ready to push his companion bill in the House, or alternately simply adopt the Senate resolution if it will speed it to a floor vote and passage. Rep. Inslee says he will likely talk with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other House leadership next week about the fastest way to get the bill passed

President Bush has threatened to veto the measure. A statement from the White House yesterday called the FCC's new rules the product of "extensive public comment and consultation" but failed to mention that only one percent of the public that testified at public hearings or sent letters to the FCC supported the administration's position.

Typical of most Bush appointees, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin disregarded the will of the American people and granted another handout to the largest companies. A veto-proof majority in Congress supporting the resolution would stop Bush from doing the same.

The fight is far from over. But last night's vote is a historic victory for the public interest over one of Washington's most powerful lobbies.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media news, rupert murdoch, media consolidation, media, kevin martin, fcc

Josh Silver is the Executive Director of Free Press a national, nonpartisan organization that he co-founded with Robert McChesney and John Nichols in 2002 to engage citizens in media policy debates and create a more democratic and diverse media system.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Different Country,Same Battle.
Posted by: BlueGorilla on May 18, 2008 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This could be a step in the right direction,for the US,and by extension,for the whole world.
There is though,reason to fear, that in the UK,there could soon come, a strengthening of right wing propaganda tools.

The United Kingdom's conservative party,are if elected in 2010 (which is the probable date,of our next general election),keen to pass legislation,which will allow television news,to show political bias.
Of course bias ,exists anyway,as news outlets,operate within a shared concept of what is or isn't beyond the pale..ie they are all biased against the far left,and far right.

As it stands,our television stations are prevented by strict laws,from showing partiality between political parties.Even Rupert Murdoch's Sky channel,is a beacon of objectivity,in comparison to it's US equivalent.
The conservative partie's agenda,appears to be based, on allowing their rich chums,to pump out propaganda.Billionaire press baron's do seem to have, an ever so slight bias, to the right,funnily enough.

However in the UK,this freedom, to propagate right wing views,has been restricted,when it comes to new's on the telly.

Since Murdoch and his dark shadow,came,into our country,he has turned a formerly Labour supporting tabloid into a right wing,faux patriotic,free market tool.This now closely reflects ,his own narrow needs (accumalation)and views(legitimation).

Although it could be argued,though only with
superficiality,that Murdoch has supported Labour at the last three elections.It would be erroneous to beleive,that he has in any way ,moved his political position.
This is the most right wing,pro-business,pro rich, Labour government that has ever been elected.

Of course (as you bright people probably know),it has stood "shoulder to shoulder"with the US, ruling, military elite, in it's wars of terror.Even though,a majority of British people were anti-war,prior to the invasion of Iraq.

At home though, this "labour"government has carried through policies such as,giving a greater role to the corporations in our public services,whilst residing over a huge increase in economic inequality.These are of course,all policies that Rupe, no doubt loves.
There has been a determined courting of said Count Rupeula,by leader's of both UK main parties,as they beleive (with some evidence),that his support can help win elections.Most dangerously,this has resulted in the probability, that government policies, have been trimmed,or shaped,to please The Rupert from the Bog.

The conservatives,game may have the added benefit,of making them The Kingmaker's new favourite right wing party.It is frightening ,that the Rupeman could be allowed, to take Sky, all the way down the Fox road.

Hopefully,democracy and fairness in the US will be enhanced,by the breaking up of consolidation.Murdoch owns two daily paper's out of nine,in the UK.He also owns a Sunday title.The worst news, will be if we get bad news,on our television,which will look a lot like Fox news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hopefully we'll see even more reversals.
Posted by: Libsrule on May 24, 2008 11:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There really is far too much concentration already so when I see the senate start breaking up some of the concentrations already out there, then I'll believe there is some teeth in this reversal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]