Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why Is Coke Glamorous and Heroin Scary? Because of Halfwits Like Nikki Sixx

By John Dolan, AlterNet. Posted April 12, 2008.


Sixx, the '80s hair rocking bassist for Motley Crue, offers to the public the memoirs of his drug-addled stardom -- if only he could admit he had fun.
nikkibio
Advertisement

Reviewed: "The Heroin Diaries: A Year in the Life of a Shattered Rock Star by Nikki Sixx (Pocket Books).

Bad books can still be important. This one, which is so bad it's unintentionally funny, still represents an epochal cultural moment: the final trickle-down of a formerly elitist narrative invented by Lord Byron, the wildly talented English 18th century poet, into a sleazy plotline used and abused by a man representing the very bottom of the demographic pyramid -- Nikki Sixx, bass guitarist of '80s rock band Mötley Crüe.

George Gordon, Lord Byron (1788-1824), was, among other things, the greatest English poet of the past two centuries, recognized as such everywhere except England and America. He was also the first and finest incarnation of the self-destructive superstar. In fact, stardom didn't just happen; it was invented by Byron. He showed the rest of the world how to be a star -- the whole storyline of early fame, wild decadence, bitter exile and a lonely, heroic death. Byron's death came in Greece, where he ended up after a lifetime of fleeing southward and eastward from his home in what he scornfully called "the moral North." Greece was in rebellion against the Ottoman Turks, and Byron died of fever while funding, training and trying to negotiate consensus among the rebel factions.

It didn't take long for that genuinely heroic death to be reduced to its lowest common denominator: "live fast, die young and leave a beautiful corpse." By our time, it's pretty much all you have to do -- as long as you are famous when you die. That goes without saying; there's no love lost when an anonymous loser dies, but if a celebrity dies young and pretty, the whole culture explodes in masturbatory frenzy officially presented as "grief."

Nikki Sixx, of course, may never have heard of Byron. The Byronic story came to him through more recent versions. There's a whole subgenre of Bohemian-druggie tales to borrow from, and Nikki (or his ghostwriter) borrows freely, starting with his title, a clear echo of The Basketball Diaries, Jim Carroll's 1987 record of his descent from star jock to hopeless junky. Carroll's book itself represented a clear point on the graph by which this elitist tale makes its way down toward the Wal-Mart crowd: Carroll was a protege/mascot of the NYC Beat scene whose greatest practicioner, William Burroughs, wrote the best American versions of druggie-in-purgatory, including Junkie (1953), which our own Nikki Sixx cites approvingly. Nikki sees it as his job to take this often-abused plotline further down the pop parade to where it has never gone before, and probably never should have gone at all: hair metal. And he manages to come back alive, in case you were worried.

Mötley Crüe is a band most people old enough to remember have tried hard to forget. Mötley was huge in the mid-1980s. I didn't realize how big until I read the diary entry in which Nikki whines that his manager sent his latest paycheck to his home while he was on tour. The check is for $650,000. I'd bet that that's more than really talented American bands of the 1980s like Husker Du made in their entire career.

The Mötley Crüe era was of course a low point in pop history. Nikki actually calls himself "a dreg." I've never heard that word used in the singular before, but it fits. This guy is the ultimate dreg. He does decadence strictly by the numbers. He even considers killing his girlfriend, because after all, the Sex Pistols' Sid Vicious killed his girlfriend. And there's no pleasure in it. Part of that is the big lie in American culture that celebrity decadence always arises from and falls back into some private "pain." But Nikki really doesn't seem to like sex that much. The only part that he really seems to enjoy is the drugs, and since he's incapable of effective description, you have to infer his pleasure from the sheer doggedness with which he gets high.

And his drug stories are full of lies and bathos. The most interesting lie is the deflection of blame to heroin, when it's clear that Nikki was never a junky. He's a cokehead, a classic L.A. white-trash cokehead. So why is this called The Heroin Diaries? Because Nikki's publisher realized cocaine is too sleazy and too 1970s to interest anybody. Heroin, which only entered the middle-class California druggie's repertoire in the 1980s, still retains some of its exotic, forbidden appeal.

Occasionally he slips up, admitting that he does much more coke than smack, admitting at one point, "I'm not having [my dealer] bring smack very often but my coke intake is up 1,000%." And since Nikki's typical binge ends in paranoia, with our hero locked in the walk-in closet of his mansion hearing voices outside, it's clear that it's the coke, not the smack, messing with him.

Yet heroin that gets the blame when Nikki's retarded band mates discuss his descent to what Tommy Lee calls "a dark fucking place." If you've spent any time in L.A. you've probably met guys like this. For them, cocaine is simply part of a normal healthy diet, whereas heroin is just plain evil. Odd, because among intelligent druggies opiates get a lot of respect, while coke is simply despised. For serious drug people there are two ways to go: up with some variety of speed, or down with some kind of opiate. Coke is scorned as a short-acting verbal emetic, a silly drug for moneyed trash. The only intellectuals who took it seriously were Freud and Sherlock Holmes -- one a half-baked intellectual who masqueraded his literary criticism as therapy, postponing effective treatment for schizophrenia and depression by generations, the other an apotheosized peeping tom, who of course never really existed. Indeed, both were nasty voyeurs; perhaps that's a feature of coke addiction too.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: the heroin diaries, nikki sixx, motley crue

John Dolan is an editor of the Moscow-based English-language alternative paper, The eXile. He is the author of, most recently, Pleasant Hell (Capricorn, 2005).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Law-abiding modern Americans prefer Vicodin, Viagra and Ritalin to coke and smack.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 12, 2008 12:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Note that Jimi Hendrix, by all accounts, was not a junkie. His death was as accidental as Heath Ledger's was, and involved barbituates (sleeping pills) taken after drinking. He was once arrested at an airport in Florida on trumped up heroin charges, but the case was dismissed by the judge and it's generally believed that those drugs were planted on him. Janis Joplin and Jim Morrison, however, really were heroin addicts, by all accounts.

In any case, today's opiate addicts are not burnouts from rock bands. They are outwardly normal people who get their drugs from the doctor's office, not off the street. There is a fair amount of illegal heroin in the U.S., (via Afghanistan and Mexico) but the real opiate drug problem in the U.S. centers around prescription drugs, as this coroner reports on his blog:

"We always think of heroin as the real “bad guy” opiate of abuse and it is. It is associated with presentation to the ER with problems of various sorts, increased risk of various infectious diseases, suicide and death. SAMHSA estimates (and admits that it may be an underestimate) that nearly 400,000 folks used heroin in 2004 (most recently studied year), including about 120,000 first-time users.

But what is even more concerning to me, 11.2 million Americans used prescription opioids for “non-medical” purposes in 2003 (most recent SAMHSA data). They estimate that there are 4.4 million “current non-medical users” in this country. Talk about a real problem with huge numbers.

Certainly this agrees with what we see through our office. Death related to non-prescription use of prescription drugs outpaces the heroin deaths we see and we see our share of both."


It's also true that modern medicine would not exist as it is today without the opiate drugs. The whole point is that we need to stop treating drug abuse as a criminal problem, but rather as a public health problem. We also need to acknowledge that it's OK for people to take drugs in order to achieve the fleeting pleasures they offer. This is true for alcohol, for caffeine, and for tobacco - but not for any other drugs, such as cannabis, coca leaf or opium.

The solution is the same as for alcohol and tobacco: legalize, tax and regulate, and place severe restrictions on advertising, especially to kids (though that hasn't stopped the beer and cigarette companies, has it?).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Weed Junkies? Robbing Banks? Posted by: loon879
» You did not read the article Posted by: improperly_sedated
» RE: You did not read the article Posted by: improperly_sedated
» Have you ever met real alcoholic? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» did you bother reading Posted by: e rice
» On the contrary..... Posted by: mjabele
» loved your last sentence Posted by: e rice
This is the dumbest article I have read on AlterNet in a long time.
Posted by: fanny666 on Apr 12, 2008 12:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that's saying something. I just finished "Is Cooking A Feminist Act?"

What a mindless rant against... well, the author is not exactly sure. Celebrities in general? Music he does not like? Sigmund Freud?

Let's attack the real enemy: Nikki Sixx. Who by the way is donating the money from this book to a shelter for runaway teens (he was a teenage runaway). Maybe he fails at writing an anti-drug book, but that was his intention. It's a fucking diary. He didn't write it for English majors like you to poo-poo on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Waste of words
Posted by: Kevbo on Apr 12, 2008 1:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well. That certainly was a roundabout way of saying Nikki Sixx's book is sucktastic.

Why would you even need to pick up the book to know that?

Someone's obviously jonesing for romantic drug use cut with rock star strut.

It's all been done before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hunter S. Thompson was not alone
Posted by: mvonballmo on Apr 12, 2008 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:

Byron died without finding God or AA's "higher power" or groveling to the sanctimonious majority back home. In our time, perhaps only Hunter Thompson showed that sort of lifelong heretical courage.

Another recent social critic who also had quite a sense of humor, Bill Hicks, was unabashed about his drug use, defending the lifestyle thusly:

No, I don't do drugs anymore, either. But I'll tell you something about drugs. I used to do drugs, but I'll tell you something honestly about drugs, honestly, and I know it's not a very popular idea, you don't hear it very often anymore, but it is the truth: I had a great time doing drugs. Sorry. Never murdered anyone, never robbed anyone, never raped anyone, never beat anyone, never lost a job, a car, a house, a wife or kids, laughed my ass off, and went about my day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Its not a war on drugs... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Heroin more glam than coke?
Posted by: Todd Kimmell on Apr 12, 2008 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AlterNet needs to raise the bar here a little.

I read as far as the suggestion that smack has more cache, more real street cred, and somehow more class than coke.

Philadelphia has one of the highest murder rates in the country. A much higher figure, without benefit of any headlines, is deaths by overdose in this city and the surrounding suburbs... an outright epidemic.

Drugs are drugs. People do them, and then they grow out of that phase in their lives or they die. But don't work so hard to try to add some sort of justifying mystique to the one that is killing local kids around here by the hundreds, every year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Drinking and Smoking Posted by: Cathyc
» Heroin and Nurse Feel Goode Posted by: Thomas.Jefferson.Friend
Drugs are bad MMMKay
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Apr 12, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter how you slice it, in my opinion anyways...The drugs that impair your judgment are no good. that definitely does include alcohol.. which I do use from time to time..Glorifying any drug use is counter productive to furthering change in society. I will take a great walk in the woods or having a great conversation any day over any sort of mind altering drugs. I like my mind and body and I want to keep it that way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» SOCIETY Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: SOCIETY Posted by: e rice
» some drugs are really fun Posted by: stuarts
» RE: some drugs are really fun Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Mountains of Molehills
Posted by: jmmartin on Apr 12, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just wondering, if the book is this bad, why does anyone have to use over 5,000 words to trounce on it?

Also, I have a minor cavil. William Burroughs never published a book under that name. He used the initial of his middle name, Seward, so it should read William S. Burroughs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mountains of Molehills Posted by: drsivana99
The drugs that really kill lots of people
Posted by: snarlah on Apr 12, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are tobacco and alcohol, and they are legal. Why? Big money lobbyists, that's why. There is no comparison in the amount of deaths caused by illegal drugs.

Remember, while we're at it, that William Randolph Hearst, Mexican hater (we don't have those do we?) caused marijuana to be made illegal and it's been that way for a hundred years or so, yet there's no proof that it does anyone's health any harm. And hemp used to be among the most heavily used products in the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heroin is a Poison
Posted by: Vic Fedorov on Apr 12, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heroin is a poison and it should be clearly known as such.

Byron defaced the temple of poseiden in Greece, cutting his into a pillar there.
That's bad, irresponsible karma, doesn't sound like a mediator at all.

Both heroin and graffiti may profess a little rebellion, but really are acts self-degredation onto one's own soul.

You almost have to be a victim of some mind controll to do heroin or carve your initials in a 2500 yr old temple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» victim of mind control Posted by: e rice
» Acting out Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Acting out Posted by: e rice
» RE: Heroin is a Poison Posted by: theallegro
» RE: Heroin is a Poison Posted by: Vic Fedorov
» RE: Heroin is a Poison Posted by: meeneecat
This article is terrible
Posted by: everton9 on Apr 12, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see how "having fun" serves as justification for potential harmful action, such as taking drugs. Consider, for example, a person who has taken a liking to thrilling activities. Sure, he may "have fun" playing Russian roulette, but that doesn't mean he's not an idiot for doing so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» develop a backbone Posted by: e rice
Uh... is your keyboard broken?
Posted by: sean000 on Apr 12, 2008 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Mtley Cre?"
"ClichEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?"

At first I thought it was just a typo. After many repeats I decided it must be intentional. Maybe I just didn't read your article carefully enough to understand that you were being clever, but I didn't want to devote too much time to reading about Nikki Sixx. His band already cost me many hours of my life in the 80s as I sat through their craptacular videos while watching MTV and hoping they'd play a better band next.

I'm not surprised that a has-been rock star wrote a book, with help, about drugs and how lonely his partying lifestyle has left him. I'm just surprised this particular one merits an article this long. You're obviously familiar with drug-addled superstars who are much better writers, and you're also familiar with more talented bands like Husker Du. You've also seen Spinal Tap. Rather than devote so much of your time and words to Mr. Sixx, I would have simply borrowed from the infamous review of Spinal Tap's album "Shark Sandwich" and written the following two-line review of Mr. Sixx's book: "S**t Sandwich."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

drug use is fun?
Posted by: e rice on Apr 12, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for whom?

whatever the drug of choice, the effect of consumption past a certain point is, ultimately, the same: complete self-involvement and self-isolation, total disconnection from other people.

how is this 'fun'?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» i should have added Posted by: e rice
» This is your brain on propaganda Posted by: improperly_sedated
» RE: This is your brain on propaganda Posted by: improperly_sedated
» clearly Posted by: stuarts
» drug use Posted by: e rice
So self-indulgent mewling is unacceptable?
Posted by: Asses of Evil on Apr 12, 2008 9:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, to claim that Sixx's book is so execrable and then spend three pages writing about the various ways is almost as self-indulgent as Sixx. Sure it might be a bad book, and sure he might be making money off the misplaced sympathy of others, but it happens. People buy Britney Spears records. They go see Miley Cyrus. New Kids on the Block were big. So what? Live and let live. And for those of us with no serious drug experiences, the taxonomy of harmfulness and/or moral acceptability of the drugs mentioned is really stupid. Geez, what garbage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everything Crue-related
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Apr 12, 2008 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SUCKS.

Why would this book be any different?

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A first time for everything....
Posted by: deastCarey on Apr 12, 2008 10:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've never participated in the comments section here, but feel I must after reading this profoundly 'dull' article. The writer seems to have used three pages an his readers time to spew his hatred of celebrity, Los Angeles, cocaine and 80s hair metal in general - where's the substance? What's the point? We all know anything Nikki Sixx does isn't worthy of our attention - why drag us along for three pages just to tell us that? There's a brief touch on prohibition and legalizing drugs, but that too goes nowhere. The writer seems to think all problems would just up and disappear if we could legally sit around in opium dens and get high all day. Maybe his would, but the problems drugs cause would not. I'm for legalization, but it's not a solution to a problem, it's just taking a problem and making it more manageable. I've done a lot of drugs and can attest to the fact that yes they can be fun, but they, like all things, can be dangerous and harmful when over indulged in - and that goes for heroine just as much as anything else. By the way, Hunter Thompson used plenty of coke in his time, believe me, he even uses it on camera in a bio piece the BBC did of him in the late 70s/early 80s. Alternet.org please don't publish BS like this. We come here to learn a little something - the only thing I've learned today is that at least Nikki Sixx has a ghost writer to point a finger at while this writer only has himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ALTERNET, BE ASHAMED
Posted by: lasirene on Apr 12, 2008 11:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is SARANWRAPPED IN CRAP. S**T SANDWICH INDEED. As Mink Stole said in "Desperate Living", "Are you aware that you have just stolen a minute of my life?"

What I'd like to see from Alternet are articles about drugs relating to COINTELPRO and information that proves once and for all that "the man" uses drugs to control the masses and put down any kind of popular movements. Look at what happened to the Black Panthers. I did my share of drugs when I was younger and I still use my drugs of choice (alcohol, chocolate)but these days I take every opportunity to tell all the young people I know that if they buy into the drug scene, especially now, they are being made a big fat sucker by the man who is trying to stop them from being part of the solution.

Alternet, please! I don't pore over every single article every week, but I keep coming across these boring fluff pieces-this article could have perhaps been interesting if it was more than just a review- and used Sixx's book as a jumping off place. I'm really getting tired of this lowest common denominator type article from Alternet. I expect better. I can get low-brow bullcrap everywhere else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ALTERNET, BE ASHAMED Posted by: lib3288
why?
Posted by: sunnywater on Apr 12, 2008 12:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have never posted a comment here before, but felt compelled to for the obvious reason.

This may be the worst article I've ever read on Alternet. The tone of the piece snarky, and childish. Reminds me of the sophmoric writing in Circus magazine.

Come now, you guys can do better than this thin tripe.

Sorry about my negative attitude guys, I guess I expected too much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why? Posted by: Moira61
Alternet and Drugs/Sex/Religion
Posted by: progdem on Apr 12, 2008 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet has some really great stuff. It really does. But sometimes coming to this site is really annoying because you have to sift through all the drugs and sex articles. Maybe I am confused about what Alternet is about. I thought it could be seen as the news source for a political movement, or to several related political movements. The environment, fighting the war, corporate fraud and corruption, voter suppression. All these issues have to do with corporate control of government, and don't get reported because of corporate control of media. And I thought that black hole in the reporting of corporate media was what alternet was here to address. Maybe I am wrong.

But the drugs stories, the sex stories and especially the religion stories that are hostile and demeaning (as an agnostic I am not insulted myself, but I know lots of people on the correct side of the political issues who do get their feelings hurt and feel excluded because of this aggressive secularism.), all serve to divide and distract. For one thing focus on drugs (unless it is focus on the racist aspects of the drug war and how it is destroying low income communities) is just childish. Who gives a flying fuck about Nikki Six? Besides the people sitting in front of the TV watching MTV and VH1 for their pop culture fix that is.

It is worth thinking back to the civil rights and anti war movements of the sixties. They got associated with the counter-culture movement, the preffered rebellion of spoiled rich brats, and now you can't talk about protesting without being labelled a hippy. This focus on silliness just lets people stereotype you and write you off as another coddled, bourgeois limo liberal.

If I am wrong and alternet is not here to fight the central fight of our time, then please forgive me. I am not claiming there is zero use to some of these articles (this one maybe, but not all the drugs, sex and religion articles), but that the pull down the movements that matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grotesque
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Apr 12, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it a bit grotesque that a literary critic would find fault with a writer's choice of drug to abuse himself with. Just too weird. All druggie/alcoholic autobiographical tell-all books are self-serving crap anyway, regardless of where their proceeds are going. This is the strangest literary review I have ever read. No focus whatsoever. Like the writer was high on something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You may edit the eXile, but...
Posted by: dogbeach on Apr 12, 2008 1:51 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're no Matt Taibbi.

Nice try.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cautionary Tales Need To Be Told
Posted by: realmuzik on Apr 12, 2008 4:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to admit some of the very best VOCALISTS/SINGERS I have ever heard in music have been hard-rockers and metalheads. But the addictions and tragedies that have plagued the genre are all too real and are cautionary tales that need to be told time and again.

I just finished Valerie Bertinelli's book [that included] her account of her ex-hubby Eddie Van Halen's alcoholism and cocaine abuse, which destroyed their 20-year marraige (A miracle in itself, especially for a show-biz couple). It can easily be told right alongside Sixx's accounts of his heroin abuse.

Let's not forget that it's not just the hard rockers and metal heads. Kurt Cobain and Courtney Love, anyone?? Heroin destroyed Cobain, too (It definitely led to his either suicide or murder, depending on what story you wish to believe), and Love is barely sober at best.

Young people really need to read these books for their cautionary tales. Never mind the relevancy or unrelevancy of their subjects' talents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Irony, It Burns In My Entrails Like the Aftermath of A Habenero & Pickle Sundae...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Apr 12, 2008 5:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a few pointers for this cavalier, hateful little shit...err, "editor".

1.) Limit your writing to something you actually know something about. That would apparently rule out the following topics; Psychotherapy (One may debate the lasting merits of Freud's work, but to deny that it was a paradigm shift is friggin' dumb), Addiction (Have you ever known any actual addicts, or even done, & I mean done, any drugs? Or are your observations solely gleaned from required reading texts back in Prep School?), & finally, Literary Criticism (kinda have to be able to put together a cohesive series of thoughts to pull that one off).

2.) Make sure that when criticizing others, that you aren't guilty of identical failings. In this case that would preclude basing the bulk of your critique on your target's reliance on cliche (ignoring for the moment that drug addiction & recovery stories are by nature rather cliche- What'd you expect Nikki & Friends to do, invent a new vocabulary for pain & isolation?), when your whole article is nothing but a tired retread of the false concepts that Heroin is somehow heroic, & that Prohibition is solely to blame for its lethality (I'd ask some of my Heroin-addicted friends if they'd stop injecting & start smoking if it was legal, but unfortunately many of them are fucking dead, & the rest of them are way too busy procuring & using Heroin to read your joke of an article). While I'm on the topic, it may surprise you that the observation that an 80's Hair-Metal rock star is a poor writer is also, well, rather obvious.

3.) Quit writing articles about how incredibly stupid the entire population of the United States is (especially in comparison to yourself). After all, we are just too durn stupid to appreciate yer jeenyus. It's a tragic waste of your brilliance.

4.) Learn to include some measure of redeeming substance with your bile. A smidgen of humility or self-awareness (not "-importance", mind you) might be a good start. Your idols (Thompson, Tiabbi, Burroughs) had this. That's why they have had enduring careers. Blind arrogance, aimlessly applied & ungrounded in any human virtue, is ultimately just "dull". We're all bozos on this bus, but most of us have the decency to masturbate in private.

So, congratulations are due; you have, through consistency, dogged effort, & useless observation, joined the elite ranks of such Alternet-supported "writers" as Kathy Freston of "Stepford Born-Again Vegans for Prius!" infamy. Albeit, from the opposite end of the spectrum.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Irony Is Compounded... Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: The Irony Is Compounded... Posted by: meeneecat
All junkies are deeply unhappy people...
Posted by: Cathyc on Apr 12, 2008 6:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... who know it. Then there are those (the masses) who are addicted to conforming to a sick culture - oblivious to the fact that they are addicts - to a deadly virus!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

has anyone read this book
Posted by: bayrr326 on Apr 12, 2008 7:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is a joke. I am not a fan of Motley Crue but a friend of mine recommended this book to me and I picked it up. It was a great book that looked into the year in the life of a heroin addict. It was made up of his diary entries during that year and comments from the people around him at the time. It is really amazing to see and confirms what i have thought about many heroin addicts. That most have mental problems(depression, etc) and that is why they often turn to heroin to numb the pain. This critic doesn't know crap. It doesn't make drug use look glamourous at all. At the height of their fame this rock star spent many a night locked in his closet in his house.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great article
Posted by: lib3288 on Apr 12, 2008 7:54 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Judging by most of the comments here, you've rubbed some of his friends and fans the wrong way. Anyway, for what it's worth, not all Alternet readers have sticks up their asses and pretend they know more than they actually do. I thought it was a great read! Well done. Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's see.....
Posted by: DropTheOBomb on Apr 12, 2008 10:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Byron the most talented poet? Hah, even his friend Shelley was ten times the poet he was.

William S. Burroughs the best practitioner of the Beats? Better than Kerouac and Ginsberg? Really??

Husker Du is talented? Could have fooled me.

Hunter S. Thompson didn't brag about his drug use? Seriously?? "Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas" was essentially a long brazen brag about how much drugs he and his friend once did and the hilarity that ensued.

Ay yi yi.

At least you got one thing right...I'm still trying to forget Motley Crue ever existed (and I refuse to write "Motley Crue" with the ridiculous dots over the vowels.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Husker Du rules! Posted by: Coleman
LA, LA, LA
Posted by: theallegro on Apr 13, 2008 1:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
first of all, in LA.... cocaine is easier to get than candy, and very popular - even though it's probably the most boring drug ever. also, in LA, heroin is distributed as "black tar", which is really, really impure (on average, 15%)... as compared to, say, newark and camden, nj (roughly 90-95% pure on average, and powder, instead of the aforementioned injectable tar)- and the cities next to them (new york and philadelphia) that get slightly less pure substance, but still in powder form... "higher class" people generally don't inject drugs (although i've seen a few exceptions). this is why new york has a higher incidence of wealthier street opioid users than los angeles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What the fuck is wrong with the Crue?
Posted by: biginJapan on Apr 13, 2008 3:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article sucked donkey balls on many levels... but fuck Dolan and his bash on Motely Crue. Hey, I like Husker Du too but the condescending attitude placed on a great American band (bring it on if you want but if your head doesn't rock when you here Dr. Feelgood then you need some help) just for the sake trying to give any creedence to his faulty arguments in this article is a low blow. Big deal if Niki is selling out his rock and roll lifestyle for a few bucks now... his choice, and fuck if I'm wasting any money buying it. He and Jose Conseco should start their own book club or something.

But saying they are a band we are all still trying to forget pissed me off. Screw you and your "god on high" attitude about what is cool or not. Try writing about something that matters next time. Please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What the fuck is wrong with the Crue? Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
» Guilty pleasure... Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
Serious drug people?
Posted by: jw56 on Apr 13, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For serious drug people there are two ways to go: up with some variety of speed, or down with some kind of opiate.

Serious? What is this love affair we have with narcotics all about? Sure, I'm all for the legalization of drugs (too many people in prison for nonsense behavior and drug use), but why do we always try to glamorize it?

A couple of years ago my brother had his last three teeth yanked from his mouth. His other teeth fell out from constant use of meth. Serious drug people? When have drug people been serious about anything but keeping their buzz?

I guess he was serious when he stole from family and friends. I guess he was serious when he got his son for weekends and then left him with me or my mother because he was out looking for more meth. I guess he was serious when he'd borrow a vehicle for a week and forgot where he parked it. I guess he was serious when he forgot to go to work and expected everyone to pay his bills. I guess he was serious when we received calls asking for bail money. I guess he was serious when he crashed on someone's couch for a week or two.

I don't know if he ever used heroin. At this point I don't care, but the stories I've been told by people who did or had loved ones who did aren't any better than his.

When it comes to drug use, American's have their heads up their asses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the comments
Posted by: karyse on Apr 13, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mostly seem to have gotten way off track. This piece was hilarious. Don't amerikans understand good writing anymore?

Or maybe they're just clueless. Anyone who lived through the late sixties remembers fondly doing drugs -- and no, we didn't rob, steal, or cheat, anyone to get them. Maybe because then they were virtually free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I liked the article
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 13, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could care less about motley crew. They suck, but there was some good tidbits in the article like:

"Of course injected street heroin has a terrible potential for fatal overdoses, because you don't know the purity of the dose until it's already in your bloodstream. What no one seems to realize is that this too is a side effect of Prohibition."

Yep, legalize all drugs with accurate weights and potencies and then let the idiots overdose if they want. That might do wonders to improve the gene pool. And then the destruction would likely be more localized to the individual instead of spreading the chaos.

"Conversely, in countries like Iran which prohibit that allegedly safe, mainstream drug, alcohol, many users die or go blind from ingesting street booze lac