Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

MediaCulture

Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2008.


As Ohio election officials investigate illegal crossover voting in the 2008 primary, questions arise on Limbaugh's role.
Advertisement

As the board of election in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, where Cleveland is located, launches an investigation into illegal crossover voting in the state's 2008 presidential primary, a big open question remains unanswered: Will county officials go after the ringleaders of apparently illegal electioneering where thousands of Republican voters swore -- under penalty of law -- allegiance to the Democratic Party in order to vote for Hillary Clinton?

In case you missed it, Rush Limbaugh, the nation's top-rated talk radio host, was urging Republicans in Texas and Ohio to skip their party's primary on March 4 and instead cast a vote for Hillary Clinton in order to prolong the fight between her and Barack Obama. And that Tuesday, as media in both states reported, thousands of Republicans did just what Limbaugh and others had suggested -- they changed parties to vote for Clinton.

"I want Hillary to stay in this, Laura," Limbaugh told Laura Ingraham on Feb. 29, near the start of his Hillary crusade. "This is too good a soap opera. We need Barack Obama bloodied up politically, and it's obvious that the Republicans are not going to do it and don't have the stomach for it, as you probably know."

And on Wednesday, the day after the Ohio primary, Fox News asked Clinton if she owed Limbaugh a thank you. "Be careful what you wish for, Rush," she replied. Later that day, Limbaugh played the Fox tape on his show and said, "How do you interpret this, folks? She could have said thank you. She could have said thank you! In fact, I was expecting in her victory speech last night to be thanked.

"I helped give Mrs. Clinton the biggest and happiest moment and night of the campaign season so far, maybe her life, and she tells me, "Be careful what you wish for, Rush"? Why, that sounds like a threat, does it not? I've got a Democrat presidential candidate threatening your host. Why, I am stunned! After all I did ..."

While this all makes for great talk radio and sounds like fun, there is one catch: What Limbaugh encouraged Republican voters to do in Ohio was a fifth-degree felony in that state, punishable with a $2,500 fine and six to 12 months in jail. That is because in order to change party affiliation in Ohio, voters have to fill out a form swearing allegiance to that party's principles "under penalty of election falsification."

On Thursday, March 20, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the "Cuyahoga County Board of Election has launched an investigation that could lead to criminal charges against voters who maliciously switched parties for the March 4 presidential primary." According to the report, "One voter scribbled the following addendum to his pledge as a new Democrat: "For one day only."

"Such an admission amounts to voter fraud," the report continued, attributing that conclusion to BOE member Sandy McNair, a Democrat. The report said the four-member board -- two Democrats and two Republicans -- had yet to vote on whether it would issue subpoenas, although Ohio's secretary of state, Democrat Jennifer Brunner, is empowered to cast tie-breaking votes when the BOE is deadlocked.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: rush limbaugh, ohio primary, republican party, hillary clinton, voter fraud

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from MediaCulture! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Stipid Fucking Dittoheads
Posted by: Tom Degan on Mar 21, 2008 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What can one possibly say regarding the intelligence of a group of people who would proudly refer to themselves as "Dittoheads"? The fact that anyone could take a bloviating gas bag like Rush Limbaugh seriously is one of the mysteries of the age. Fifty years from now, historians will look back on the first decade of the twenty-first century, jaws dropped in disbelief, and will wonder what the hell were the American people thinking when they made this jack ass the highest rated radio host of the era.

Al Franken had it right: Rush Limbaugh is a big, fat idiot. If you haven't read that book, you really ought to. Come to think about it, anything by Franken is highly recommended.

When we look back on reactionary commentators of the past - Westbrook Pegler, for instance - 20/20 historical hindsight makes them look like the fools they were. Even though in their time they were taken perfectly seriously. I can just imagine the judgement history will render on Limbaugh. It ain't gonna pretty.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stipid Fucking Dittoheads Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Stipid Fucking Dittoheads Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Stipid Fucking Dittoheads Posted by: PlayFreebird
» RE: Stipid Fucking Dittoheads Posted by: creswell
» Stop dreaming, Tom Degan Posted by: Moore Hognutz
» RE: Stipid Fucking Dittoheads Posted by: anti-herman
Democrats spineless.
Posted by: compu on Mar 21, 2008 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For how long we had been his punchbags ?
Did ever some one on the left counterattack
using his dirty tricks ?
Lets face,this is a war,all allowed.
Do fill this guy has a lot of secrets.
What is need is people willing to dig.
Spitzer demise was planed,if we are to
win this war must adopt their tactics
of scorch earth.
Does Limbaugh like boys ?
Lets find out.This is not only applied
to him,but all of those media figures
and religious right as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democrats spineless. Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Democrats spineless. Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Democrats spineless. Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Democrats spineless. Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Democrats spineless. Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Democrats spineless. Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Democrats spineless. Posted by: Bibsi
"it would be hard to prosecute"
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Mar 21, 2008 3:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or, rather: sounds like work. typical government employee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Best friends!
Posted by: carbon-based on Mar 21, 2008 3:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of whether or not Rush is guilty of breaking some law, he should be charged with being not only stupid, but spewing hate much the same way Wright spews it.

Isn't there a law where both can be locked away..together!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Best friends! Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Best friends! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Best friends! Posted by: creswell
» RE: Best friends! Posted by: Ranger
Wimps
Posted by: lamac66 on Mar 21, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both Ohio's secretary of state and attorney general, both Democrats, were reluctant to embrace the prospect of voter fraud prosecutions.


See this is what is wrong with the Democratic people in positions to flex their authority. Republicans would run with this like a pit bull with a rabbit in it's mouth! I'm sick of them now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wimps Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Wimps Posted by: lamac66
» RE: Wimps Posted by: creswell
» RE: Wimps Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Wimps Posted by: lamac66
Democrat for a day - liars for life
Posted by: mercianomad on Mar 21, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This all goes along perfectly with just how comfortable American conservatives are with lying, including lying about being Democrats.

...and yes, Rush Limbaugh is scum. Look how he irrationally interprets the "be careful what you wish for" quote of Hillary's as a threat:

"That sounds like a threat, doesn't it?" (Uh...No Rush. It really doesn't. At all.)

...which then gets ported over to this:

"I'm being threatened by a presidential candidate."

What a pea-brain. He would fail any semantics class for leaps of logic like that, and probably so would most of his listeners.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democracy?
Posted by: modeler on Mar 21, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL. A 2 year circus to pick a president? What next? The campaign for the 2012 election to start on Dec 1 2008? Time to sober up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democracy? Posted by: carbon-based
Prosecute!
Posted by: kiel on Mar 21, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Note to Ohio Att. Gen: It's not that hard--find one of those "for a day" people, supoena him/her, put him/her under oath to testify that the only reason s/he did it was because Limbaugh told everyone to do it. It's like getting a drug mule to testify against a drug lord, with the promise of light/no prosecution for the mule. There you have evidence of conspiracy to commit voter fraud. Then drag Limbaugh's fat ass into court. Seriously. It's not hard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prosecute! Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Prosecute! Posted by: creswell
idiots!!!
Posted by: dsmidiman on Mar 21, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rush Limbaugh, Ann puke face and the likes are nothing but "back woods inbred meely mouthed punkass mother fuckers" Anyone that gives them the time of day are IDIOTS!!! plane and simple...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: idiots!!! Posted by: creswell
Limbag imprisoned?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Mar 21, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think he might enjoy that. Execution would be so much more interesting. I could think of several others who should go along with him. Of course Faux News would have no one left, and the Bushits would get what they deserve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Limbag imprisoned? Posted by: creswell
You have the law, the evidence of Limbaugh's actions and intent, and evidence of the result.
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Mar 21, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I listened to Limbaugh unambiguously encourage his Republican listeners to cross over and vote for Hillary. His intention was obvious. Callers to his show said they had crossed over at his behest, and he expressed his satisfaction at their actions.

In a unanimous opinion in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court upheld the criminal conviction of a man who encouraged the breaking of the law in leaflets he printed and distributed - simply a different form of mass media.

In the Court's opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote, "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. [...] The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent."

This case is unambiguous. Rush Limbaugh repeatedly stated his intention to subvert the nomination process, and ultimately the election by affecting the selection of a Democratic nominee.

While some officials might find it politically difficult to take on such a paragon of the far right, legally it would not be difficult at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"This is too good a soap opera."
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Mar 21, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's exactly what Limbaugh is all about. Limbaugh is for mindless morons who think that they've got it so good and things will stay that way as long as they continue to worship the scum that Limbaugh shills for. Sorry, but it dont work that way. Limbaugh's controllers are raping the living daylights out of his beloved audience too. They only think they are getting ahead. You will never get ahead by listening to someone who talks to you like you're a retarded 6 year old.

Listen to Alex Jones. He may be a kook, but these are kooky times. If that isnt clear to the yuppies right now, it will become much more clear in the coming years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

patriot
Posted by: jrmart on Mar 21, 2008 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I SWITCHED MY VOTE!!!

I EXCERIZED MY RIGHT TO EXPRESS MY OPINION. MY CHOICE. AND I AM PROUD OF BEING ABLE TO DO THAT.

OF COURSE THERE IS ONE BIG DIFFERENCE.
I LIVE IN MASSACHUSETTS.
MASS HAS NO SUCH STUPID AND RESTRICTIVE LAW. IN MASSACHUSETTS (THE CRADLE OF LIBERTY) YOU ONLY NEED TO BE A REGISTERED VOTER. YOU CHOOSE WHICH BALLOT YOU WANT AT THE POLL. AND YOU DON'T NEED TO SWEAR TO ANYTHING OTHER THAN THAT YOU ARE WHO YOU SAY YOU ARE.
THAT IS DEMOCRACY. WHAT THE HELL IS OHIO AND TEXAS THINKING?
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE RUSH BROUGHT DOWN, BUT HE IS REALLY A FLEA ON THE ASS OF THE ELEPHANT.
IF IT IS A LAW AND HE BROKE IT THEN FINE. BUT IN ALL HONESTY IT IS A STUPID AND I BET UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: patriot Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: patriot Posted by: bloggeddowninMKE
» RE: patriot??!! Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: patriot??!! Posted by: mrfrazzlebottom
» RE: patriot??!! Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: patriot Posted by: mrfrazzlebottom
» RE: Yo! jr! Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Yo! jr! Posted by: Longdream
» Patriot Tact Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: patriot Posted by: creswell
None Dare Call It Treason
Posted by: Sparks56 on Mar 21, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rush Limbaugh clearly, unambiguously encouraged people to undermine the the basic, fundamental tenant of American democracy; fair, open, honest elections. He also trivialized that very process. Day after day chicken-hawk Limbaugh glorifies the bloody sacrifices of men and women spreading democracy in Iraq, but here at home it's just a "soap opera". Putting aside the hypocrisy, as in Ohio electronic voting shenannigans in 2004, Florida vote theft in 2000, it is clear that American conservatives believe in their hearts that they could not win an open, fair and honest election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» best comments on the topic so far Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: None Dare Call It Treason Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: None Dare Call It Treason Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: None Dare Call It Treason? Posted by: Longdream
No Difference!!!
Posted by: weslen1 on Mar 21, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats were doing the same thing, and it's disgusting either way.
Democrats were sending e-mails, making phone calls etc. encouraging Democratic voters in MI and FL to switch parties and vote for Romney. In MI you can vote in either party's primary.
As long as there are so many people willing to CHEAT we will continue to have corruption in government. And as long as there are unlimited amounts of money needed to get elected, we will have only corporate run elections and freeze out decent, law abiding, qualified people from ever again being president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Kind of a BIG Difference!!! Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Kind of a BIG Difference!!! Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: Kind of a BIG Difference!!! Posted by: mrfrazzlebottom
» Yesterday in Florida Posted by: bornxeyed
» daniel1982... tsk, tsk, tsk! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: daniel1982... tsk, tsk, tsk! Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: No Difference!!! Posted by: Crazy H
» Big Difference!!! Posted by: bornxeyed
Are you crazy?!?!
Posted by: Derek Maddox on Mar 21, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you trying to increase Rush's influence? Even an attempt to have him indicted on something as silly as crossover voting would simply serve to further inflame his already ardent listeners. That would be a sure way to take him from 20 million faithful listeners to 30 million overnight!

Except for the handful of idiots who wrote notes on their applications, the only way to prove fraud would be to know who voted for Hillary in the primary and McCain in the general. If there's a way to know how any specific person voted in the general election, then we've got bigger fraud problems than Rush might be causing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Are you crazy?!?! Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: Are you crazy?!?! Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Are you crazy?!?! Posted by: bornxeyed
Flighty
Posted by: fiddler83 on Mar 21, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shouldn't they just make it so that you can only vote in one primary in every state?

It seems like the most effective thing would be that if you want to switch parties, you have to do it before Iowa and that you can then only vote in that party primary. If you are registered independent, you should choose which one you want to vote in more.

And if you forget to change, or register which one you want to vote in, tough luck. That's the closest thing I can think of to fair, without having to change the whole crappy primary system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Flighty Posted by: VZEQICVA
» This is a perfectly good suggestion. Posted by: KeepsonTickn
Texas Crossover's
Posted by: farmertx on Mar 21, 2008 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Texas, where there was some crossover voting, it wasn't illegal. As one dyed in the wool Republican told me, I am exercising my Constitutional right to vote in the Primary of my choosing. And, sadly, he had a point. (This same Republican narrowly missed being elected a Precinct Delegate for Hillary, a fact he is still trying to live down)
In Texas, one can vote in either Primary, but not both. And one can only Caucus where one voted.
Voter ID is stamped as to which Primary you vote in.
There is no rule that you must prove membership nor allegiance to that Party. Just that you are eligible to vote and didn't vote in the other Primary.
As to anybody listening to, let alone following the 'instructions' of a hypocritical pill popping hate monger, that ought to be grounds for disqualification in itself.
Face it, this was only done to spare McCain the embarrassment of losing to a Black male.
Pigpen obviously feels that he can spread lies about Hillary easier than he can Barack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Perspective...
Posted by: dave16 on Mar 21, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please see www.discussrace.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Your Story is totally irrelevant. Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» RE: My Perspective... Posted by: Bibsi
Keepin' it real
Posted by: skivoigts on Mar 21, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like it is time for McCain (and Hillary) to disown Rush!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keepin' it real Posted by: creswell
Bill Clinton hosted Rush Limbaugh's program
Posted by: rbrooks on Mar 21, 2008 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the day before the Texas primary. If memory serves.

With that in mind, let's not overlook the really amazing fact that Bill and Rushie were kind of tag-teaming this one. And that Bill was fully aware of what Rush was doing.

If there is one thing you can say about Bill, it's that he isn't stupid. He would have known it was illegal.

I hope to see the day in the not too distant future when the Clintons and the DLC, just by being themselves, become so politically toxic that not even the supine DNC will be willing to entrust any more elections to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Your memory has failed you. Posted by: KeepsonTickn
I'm rolling my eyes here, and you should be too.
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 21, 2008 8:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:

That is because in order to change party affiliation in Ohio, voters have to fill out a form swearing allegiance to that party's principles "under penalty of election falsification."

Any Republican that crossed over to vote for Clinton, and then votes for McCain in the general election, can use the following defense:

I do have allegiance with the democratic party principles. However, it is my view that McCain more soundly represents those actual principles than the democratic nominee does

And Limbaugh can use that defense as well.

As much as I hate Limbaugh, I'm a really big fan of free speech, and voters getting to vote however they choose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's an entertainer
Posted by: soybeing on Mar 21, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abandoning our guiding principles (or not having any to begin with) when we vote, is how we came to live, here, on Lesser of Two Evils Avenue. Rush Limbaugh suggesting that his listeners do so, or that such a scheme would work, was done so only in his capacity as an entertainer. He doesn't control their intellect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He's an entertainer Posted by: donl51
Puhlease
Posted by: BeverlyAnn66 on Mar 21, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They won't do anything to this TURD. He was poppin' pills in Florida and they didn't indict him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Puhlease Posted by: mrfrazzlebottom
Rush the weasel
Posted by: reinaldok on Mar 21, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way things are run in today's modern society, Rush the Weasel will most assuredly Weasel out. I guess everyone has forgotten his pill popping incident. First rate job of weaseling,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ush the weasel Posted by: creswell
» RE: ush the weasel Posted by: Bibsi
Operation Chaos, its your falit!
Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters on Mar 21, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know what, if your media (New York Times, MSNBC) and friends let the Republicans pick out nominee maybe we would leave your nomination processes alone. Maybe its not far, well close your primary or deal with it. Your media lob softballs at McCain until he became "the guy" and now you try to hit him hard with "he is old" news stories. You get what you deserve Democrats.
Keep Hillary in it so we can win it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

stormy7
Posted by: dpodlogar on Mar 21, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IN A RECENT SAN FRANSISCO NEWSPAPER THE CITY ADDITION, AND ARTICLE REVEALS KARL ROVE'S STRATEGY TO WILL THE NEXT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. HE HAS ASKED REPUBLICANS TO VOTE FOR OBAMA IN THE PRIMARIES SO HE IS THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE. THEN IN NOVEMBER, THE REPUBLICAN CROSSOVER VOTERS WILL CROSS BACK TO THE REPUBLICAN SIDE AND THIS COUNTRY WILL CONTINUE UNDER A REPUBLICAN PLUOCACY.
THEY CAN'T BEAT HILLARY BUT THEY KNOW THEY CAN BEAT OBAMA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stormy7 Posted by: VZEQICVA
Out of curiousity, what charges would be filed against him?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Mar 21, 2008 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've covered pompous, arrogant, and meddlesome...but those aren't exactly criminal offenses.

You could throw "conspiracy" to commit a felony out there, but he never told anyone to lie, he more or less told his general audience, and a few callers, that he thought it would be just dandy if they switched parties and came out for Clinton.

In the same way that it isn't a crime to yell out "We should throw this president behind bars!", whereas actually tossing him across the bar of his favorite Texas roadhouse would be...I don't imagine how this thing is going to play out with Limbaugh in court.

I'm not that well versed in the legal system, especially in Ohio, but if running his silly flap over the silly games the democrats and republicans play called "primaries/caucauses/preference polling" was going to get him thrown up the river...then I suspect he'd be doing hard time by now.

So...what then? RICO? Over meddling in a politically contrived process--for parties' sakes, rather than citizens'--to cement and perpetuate the two-party system that feels most comfortable to the Parties of Money and Power?

Meh. Maybe. Very Bushayan way of doing things though--if you don't like what they're saying, use government lawyers backed by government tanks to shut them the hell up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Conspiracy would work. Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» Maybe...but still... Posted by: ABetterFuture
"No"
Posted by: Crazy H on Mar 21, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
Back to the titular question - the answer is "No."
.
I mean, c'mon - the guy wasn't busted for drug smuggling, drug possession or doctor shopping. He's as bullet proof as Libby and Rove, for the same reasons.
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ohio License Plate Slogan
Posted by: goodfoot on Mar 21, 2008 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Land of Voter Fraud

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ohio License Plate Slogan Posted by: westomoon
You guys are idiots
Posted by: Dittohead on Mar 21, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you don't like a conservative messing with your primaries then change the open primary formats or make it so you can't change your party on the day you vote. It is the demorats that want to make it easy for that anyone, even illegals, can vote with no questions asked. I love watching Billary and O'bomba trading body blows... and it is only going to get nastier. LOL :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You guys are idiots Posted by: Crazy H
» don't you mean crossDRESSERS? Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» Pfft!!! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: You guys are idiots Posted by: Bibsi
» From an idiot, Posted by: donl51
» RE: You guys are idiots Posted by: mrfrazzlebottom
» You are an illegal too, Mr Dittohead Posted by: chief of okeefe
Let's look at this picture
Posted by: donl51 on Mar 21, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wasn't the loudest hipocrit busted for all sorts of laws pertaining to excessive presc.drug use ie addiction! did he not go to several Dr's [to aquire said prescrips [illegally] did he not incriminate others around him who had small parts in helping this man aquire said drugs,..Look I've nothing against his need to quell his awful pain,but I don't do it and chastise those caught up in an addiction situation as he did, now we get to the meat of the matter, was he in jail?..no? ok was he charged? is he on probation? is he on house arrest? parole?, fines don't count because everybody pays a fine, I didn't get the jail part for my lesser drug crime,med MJ use in NJ is illegal!,but I did get all the rest, ..now for this latest charge? I say he gets away w/it because he's a Bush mouthpiece and they have these ''get oughta trouble free cards!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How come a despicable toad
Posted by: paula.c on Mar 21, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like Limbaugh doesn't catch a nasty life threatening disease? Or Rove, Ashcroft, Cheney, Bush(all of them)? Are they immune to everything? Maybe fat Rush could choke on a tough piece of human meat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How come a despicable toad Posted by: Longdream
» RE: How come a despicable toad Posted by: creswell
» Racist toad Falwell is dead Posted by: chief of okeefe
Redrover666
Posted by: tedirene on Mar 21, 2008 11:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree, Rush really came up with stroke of genius. With the current self-induced turmoil in the democratic party and a little tweeking by Republicans, it looks pretty certain the democrats will be on the outside looking in for 8 more years. It's hard to imagine the majority of "typical white people" choosing Obama over McCain now and it seems a heck of a lot of democrats think about the same of HRC as republicans. It doesn't take a crystal ball to see how this is going to turn out. I urge each and every one of you to go to this link (http://www.johnmccain.com/pathtovictory)and donate. It's just the right thing to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 -