Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Fragility of the Information Age

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted February 6, 2008.


Our brave new infrastructure is failing around us even as we claim that it offers a shining path to the future.
Advertisement

I was raised on the idea that the information age would usher in a democratic, communication-based utopia, but recently I was offered at least two object lessons in why that particular dream is a lie.

First, a dead surveillance satellite, one roughly the size of a bus, fell out of orbit and into a collision course with Earth. It will likely do no damage, so don't worry about being crushed to death by flying chunks of the National Security Agency budget. The important part is that nobody knew when the satellite died. Maybe a year ago? Maybe a few days? A rep from the National Security Council would only say, "Appropriate government agencies are monitoring the situation."

Is this our info utopia, wherein we literally lose track of bus-size shit flying through space over our heads? I mean, how many surveillance satellites do we have? It's not like I love the techno-surveillance state, but it is a little shocking that the SIGINT nerds who run it are so out of touch that they can't even keep track of their orbiting spy gear. Still, it's hard to be too upset when Big Brother isn't watching.

But that satellite could just as easily have been a forgotten communications satellite dive-bombing our atmosphere. And that would have sucked, especially since last week's mega Internet outage across huge parts of Africa, the Middle East, and Asia didn't bring down the global economy largely because people had satellite access to the Internet. This Internet outage, which took millions of people (and a few countries) off-line, happened when two 17,000-mile underwater fiber-optic cables running between Japan and Europe were accidentally cut. And this week, five more cables were mysteriously cut. No one is quite sure how they were severed, but it was most likely due to human error -- an anchor was probably dropped in the wrong place.

And so big chunks of Dubai went dark, as did many Southeast Asian countries. Businesses couldn't operate; people couldn't communicate. The people and businesses that were able to keep running were by and large the ones that didn't depend on cheap Internet services that use only one or two cables to route their traffic. It's cheaper to rent time on one cable, but if that cable is cut, you lose everything. Most customers don't research how their Internet service providers route Internet traffic across the Asian continent -- or across the Pacific Ocean -- so they don't realize their communications could be disrupted, possibly for weeks, if some drunken sailor drops anchor in the wrong spot.

In fact, few of us anywhere in the world consider the fact that our info utopia is a fragile thing based on networks that are both material and vulnerable. We think of the Internet as a world of ideas, a place "out there," unburdened by physical constraints. Even if you wanted to research which physical cables your ISP uses to route your traffic, it would be very difficult to do without a strong technical background and the help of the North American Network Operators' Group list, an e-mail list for high-level network administrators.

So why do a crashing spy satellite and a partly dark Internet mean we've entered the age of information dystopia? Quite simply, they are signs that our brave new infrastructure is failing around us even as we claim that it offers a shining path to the future. It's as if the future is breaking down before we get a chance to realize its potential.

But the information age doesn't have to end this way, in a world where can-and-string-network jokes aren't so funny anymore. There are a few simple things we could do. We could help consumers better understand what happens when they buy Internet access by showing them what routes their traffic might take and giving them realistic statistics about possible outages. People could then make better choices about what services to buy. And so could telcos and nations.

Why shouldn't we have solid research on which ISPs are most likely to suffer the kind of network outages we just witnessed from the severing of those two cables? Consumer groups could undertake this research. Or, since developed nations suffer more, perhaps the United Nations might want to conduct the investigation as a matter of Internet governance. We know where car traffic and sea traffic go. Why don't we know where Internet traffic goes?

Another thing we could do to stop the information dystopia is to cut down on spy satellites, but that, as they say, is another column.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: technology, internet

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who is investing in semaphore communication networks.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cables?
Posted by: aethr on Feb 6, 2008 5:05 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aren't cables a little like tubes? Are you saying that the internet is a series of tube and when those tubes break so does the internet?

I still remember those comments from internet geeks about how the internet could always just route around outages, so entire regions going down wasn't something that needed to be worried about.

The internet lives on top of a telecommunications network (and always will) so any vulnerabilities in that telecommunications network also apply to the internet. But you couldn't explain that to internet geeks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cables? Posted by: Techubus
» RE: Cables? Posted by: newtype_alpha
» RE: Cables? Posted by: TrilateralRegression
Anchors aweigh
Posted by: John Annis on Feb 7, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One anchor - maybe. Although ships tend not to anchor at sea. Seven anchors? Must be BIPEDs at work - bloody Iranian pipe-exploding devices. Try nine.

Because of the importance of these pipes they are subject to surveillance by cameras, and the evidence from these cameras is that no vessels were in the vicinity when the 'anchors were accidentally dropped'.

Of course, it is a complete coincidence that the new Iranian Bourse will be coming on line very shortly, something which upsets the US greatly because it adds to the undermining of the USD.

It is also a complete coincidence that the US and Israel continue to ratchet up the pressure against Iran. One benefit of this unfortunate surge in anchor-dropping mishaps would be the additional information to be gleaned in relation to Iran's command and control systems.

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/ConnectingTheDots.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Spot on, John Annis! As explained in that article, Posted by: Robert_Hoogenboom@leftfoot.com.au
Just two?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Feb 7, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I was raised on the idea that the information age would usher in a democratic, communication-based utopia, but recently I was offered at least two object lessons in why that particular dream is a lie."

There have been uncountable examples that prove that all to be a lie since the whole damned thing began.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Technofascism
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Feb 7, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The cables werent cut by anchors.

As far as the satellite story not making any sense, you need to consider another possibility. And that is simply that they are not telling the truth about this satellite. Sometimes that results in a story not making any sense.

But at the moment I consider both of these a side issue next to the topic of the fragility of the information age. What truly makes it fragile is the fact that the vast majority of people dont care to be informed at all, and are so vulnerable to manipulation that they would be willing to relinquish complete control of all information to any authority who wants it. Once that authority has control over information, it can shape the minds of the masses any way it wants. We saw this with television, and our culture has been sliding downhill ever since. Had it not been for the internet, we would have collapsed by now. But there is always that threat that they will shut down the free flow of information. In the name of fighting al qaeda, or some other boogyman. And in doing so, they will stifle innovation and the noose around the necks of the average citizen will get so tight that the whole house of cards will just fall apart. This Technofascism is what we need to fear most.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Television... Posted by: Cathyc
I'm No Techie. . .
Posted by: Russ Wellen on Feb 7, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . but this piece is another reason Annalee Newitz is my favorite AlterNet columnist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simplistic Evaluation
Posted by: Sigil on Feb 7, 2008 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Annalee, for somebody who has a reasonable level of technology adeptness, I'm surprised to read such a slapdash assessment of the recent infrastructure outages. The telling statement is the idea of a rating system for which ISPs are more or less likely to be affected by such a problem.

Um, this is the Internet, which by its definition, means it is a network of networks running a stack of protocols which is inherently and massively fault tolerant. Not that we need a history lesson, but the whole design was based on a network that can survive a nuclear war and still have a reasonable chance of moving data across vast distances.

By participating in such a network, any internet node, ISP, user, data haven, satellite, server, gateway, and transoceanic cable has the exact same level of reliability as the rest of the network. And this, friends, is why the Internet is such a transformative force. It forces us to face the idea that we are, in fact, all in this togther... and a piece of glass buried in the mud on the other side of the planet might have some impact on the content of my day in Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. How cool is that!

And if, through some unfathomable catastrophe, the entire internet were to somehow stop, I could still go out, raid some dumpsters for old PCs and wireless cards, start it right back up again in my little neighborhood. I would watch it spread and connect with other likeminded people, start routing packets, and see the whole thing up again.

Or, perhaps you hold the opinion that only larger corporations or governments have any sort of control over the Internet? Surely not such a progressive mind as yours would think such a thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Simplistic Evaluation Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Simplistic Evaluation Posted by: Sigil
Opps! I Dropped My Anchor On Your Internet!
Posted by: kalizoid1313 on Feb 7, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Undersea cables may break or be damaged by anchors and trawls more often than we realize, since the operators don't make all that information public. But doesn't it seem a little, um, *fishy* that so many of these dropped anchors have been on target the past couple weeks?

Supposedly, undersea cables are buried a few meters beneasth the sea floor to protect them from dropped anchors and errant trawls. This cluster of breaks may be just a coincidence, but coincidences sometimes get everybody thinking.

I'd like to see regular public reports on these trunk cables, service, and accident rates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Um, petrocollapse?
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 7, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, it took the middle east going down for Annalee to learn the fragility of our tech infrastructure? I guess we all have our triggers....

Just wait to petrocollapse. Then we'll get to have BIG fun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Wire Goes Both Ways
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 8, 2008 11:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You figure out the rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

libratographer
Posted by: libratographer on Feb 10, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I appreciate your article, you sound like one of my younger colleagues, brought up to look at the future through geek-colored glasses. Yes, I enjoy flying down the communications highway, but of course I cannot rely on it. There are lots of potholes!
I lived in a 3rd world country during the 80s, grew my kids up there. I had to learn about how to handle the lack of energy, lack of water, lack of food, and how to make something out of nothing. And how to assist my neighbors in surviving day to day.
It was an unanticipated shock returning to my country some frighteningly negative changes. One of them being the issue of world-wide-web. It is FUN, isn't it? But in the long run it doesn't mean much other than entertainment and self-perpetuating employment for the webteks. All too often this info highway is a trough from which bandits feed from; a dump where the digruntled can incite irrational anger. This highway doesn't provide water, power, food; these are things we must remember how to do for ourselves and future generations. It scares me to think that we are so infatuated with bells and whistles that we might not remember how to build a train.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: libratographer Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» ALL of us assume? Posted by: Cathyc
Duh! Attack on Iran is what all this stuff is about
Posted by: Bobsays on Feb 10, 2008 3:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The cables were cut to test how well cutting the cables worked. And worked well. And interestingly, nobody in the west let out a pip. So, we could also get comfortable with not knowing what happened that night before the morning we will wake up soon and hear George talk about brave coalition forces and the success of the wiping out of Iran's infrastructure.

Just you wait my dudes and dudettes - it is coming!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» *IT* is already here... Posted by: Cathyc
Fragility
Posted by: Urgelt on Feb 10, 2008 8:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's a bit of hyperbole to characterize the infrastructure as crumbling around us, on the strength of a wayward anchor and a malfunctioning surveillance satellite.

Still, your main point is valid enough. The infrastructure, while hardly crumbling, is indeed fragile.

What it is most vulnerable to is state and corporate interference with it. The defeat of net neutrality will encourage the rise of corporate schemes to milk their new-found control for ever-expanding profits. You will buy bandwidth, then pay extra to use it, and some messages might be shut out completely if they run counter to corporate interests. As for states, they also have a keen interest in shaping the messages people can hear. The internet doesn't sit well with some of them. They have the resources and, in some cases, the will to interfere.

If we hope to secure a future in which a free internet serves as a curb to corporate and state abuses of power - a role once relegated to the press, and one the press has pretty well abandoned in the US - we'll have our work cut out for us. We have enemies.

As for that wayward anchor, who knows? Governments don't hesitate to lie when it suits their purposes. One of them might well have been testing both the technology of interruption and its effects. It could even have been our government. We might never know, since so much of what our "democratic" government does is completely hidden from us. Especially when they decide to break the law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lying governments Posted by: Cathyc
IT? Where is IT in the meeting room
Posted by: flymulla on Feb 19, 2008 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a fallacy for many to think, even now, that the employees are assets like the slaves. The idea of the family like attractions of the Japanese firms also does not work. I say family like.
The times are changed. The youths are the assets now for 100, I repeat, 100 years, are for the teen and youths and they think very different. They are after cash more then the loyalty. In fact the family families are better then the public image. Many have made money in millions with the family types of working. If there is a choice there is also the independent way of surviving if needs be rather then work under the bossy boos.
We had the personnel Department once; we altered this to Human Resources Management thinking that the chairman, presidents and the other managers looked after the employees. No sir. We altered this to Human Resources. This too is expensive to many on the top.
This may fool many but not all. Hence the union movement came to see that the employees get the rights. Alas the fault, the big crack made by the Shylocks like the Enron and many followed including rogue trader in the Societe General, leave little room for the small savers who are the employees. . "Even in strong economic times, the workplace can be, and usually is, a pressure-cooker". You said this.
I see scenarios. There is a meeting and the candidate is in font of the board of directors or the interviewer. The candidate has all the qualifications. Then comes the phone form the wife, friend, top boss, etc, "George. I have my son/daughter/friend, who has just come out of the college/university is desperately looking for job. Remember the golf game".
The candidate is told , he looks surprised as he was on the ball up to the time the call came, "Sorry I am just told by the director,,(wife) the post is filled up:. Please keep your papers with us we will get in touch with you. We really appreciate you taking interest in our company. Julie, please give the gentlemen the bus fare and the lunch.”
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD
P.O.Box 6044
Dar-Es-Salaam
Tanzania
East Africa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]