Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Michael Savage's Hate Speech Catches Up With Him

By Sam Stein, Huffington Post. Posted January 28, 2008.


Major firms are pulling their advertising from Savage's radio show following a campaign highlighting his inflammatory rhetoric.
Advertisement

At least four major firms have pulled advertising from Michael Savage's nationally syndicated radio show following a campaign highlighting his inflammatory rhetoric. One other company, Geico insurance, is expected to follow suit. The campaign, launched recently by Brave New Films, generated thousands of calls urging advertisers on the Savage Nation show to sever financial ties to the widely popular (and frequently offensive) talk host.

In less than a week, four agreed to pull their ads from the show, including Union Bank of California (whose representative says they were advertisers on the Savage show by mistake and were glad to be taken off), Intuit, Chattem, ITT Technical Institute.

"We are thrilled at the amazing response of the true patriots all over the blogsphere who responded to our NOSAVAGE campaign," Robert Greenwald, head of the film company, said in a statement. "People have called and emailed and the responsible sponsors have responded by pulling their ads and asking that their ads not be on this racist and hateful show."

But a group who has segments run on the show is raising eyebrows by refusing to distance itself from Savage. The USO, a non-profit that does work for U.S. armed forces, wrote Brave New Films complaining about being targeted and even hinting at a lawsuit. The organization's lawyer Tony Bisceglie says it does not pay for the USO public service announcements that air on Savage's show.

"As a tax exempt not-for-profit organization, regulated by the Attorney General's Office of the state of California and the Internal Revenue Service, your organization may not engage in making false statements to solicit public support," Bisceglie wrote to Brave New Films. "Therefore, please take the necessary steps to remove USO from your website entirely to avoid further action on our part."

Bisceglie denied that the USO is considering legal action. But John Hanson, a spokesman for the USO, said the organization could ask for its PSAs to be taken off of Savage's program, and wouldn't. "Because then who is next?" he asked. "We provide no revenue for Michael Savage. We may improve his image. But we provide no revenue for him."

The reasoning was not enough to impress officials at Brave New Films who called it a lost opportunity for the USO.

"Considering the USO's role in the world," said Leighton Woodhouse, a spokesperson for Brave New Films, "we would have expected them to be the first to distance themselves from someone who is deliberately fanning the flames of hatred between Muslims and non-Muslims; we were sorely disappointed."

The campaign by Greenwald mirrors an earlier initiative taken on behalf of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. In both cases, Savage's invective was used against him as fuel for advertisers to rescind their financial support. Highlights of the radio host's statements include:

  • To "save the United States," lawmakers should institute "outright ban on Muslim immigration" and on "the construction of mosques."
  • "90 percent of the people on the Nobel Committee are into child pornography and molestation, according to the latest scientific studies."
  • The U.S. Senate is "more vicious and more histrionic than ever, specifically because women have been injected into" it.
  • Adherents of Islam would do well to "take your religion and shove it up your behind" because "I'm sick of you."

Brave New Film's video on Savage can be viewed here:

Interestingly, while Brave New Films and CAIR have run identical campaigns against Savage, the radio host has only filed a lawsuit against CAIR. His claim: that his comments were taken out of context and illegally made available.

A call and email to Savage's radio station was not returned.

According to an account in the New York Times, Savage broadcasts his show out of three "virtual safe houses" -- whose location he will not reveal -- and "is licensed to carry a pistol and does so," out of fears for his life. His program reaches an estimated eight million listeners a week on nearly 400 stations.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: michael savage

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sowing and Reaping
Posted by: Frish on Jan 28, 2008 12:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. The confusion on the right and amongst others who ought to know better, is their certainty that most or all terrorists are somehow "muslim".

The terrorists (when bombing) are as much muslim as kkk'ers are xtians (when lynching).

Far more dangerous and likely-to-kill-terrorists
exist in the USA, witness abortion doctor killings and clinic bombings and OK City.

2. Savage appeals to those "xtian crusaders" and Skull and Bones adherents who somehow believe:
a. that JESUS is coming again, and SOON, since
the end times are being fulfilled and/or
b. Oil is the only lubricant for a nonstopgrowth capitalistic economy and it is the USA's god given right to continue to obtain it any way it can.

3. When terrorism resumes its rightful place as a POLICE PROBLEM and not a military one, the world will become as safe as it was Post-911, not the much more dangerous place it is today.

4. WATCH FOR THE BIGGIE BY BUSH, HE'S GOING TO CAPTURE AND/OR KILL OSAMA BIN LADEN TO SECURE HIS "LEGACY"...WHOA. It is the sacrifice the Saudi's will have to take in order to save a little face, considering how many madrassas they fund worldwide, and how many hijackers were Saudi's on 911 (and how many are suicide bombers and other foreign insurgents in Iraq).

Osama is, after all, a Saudi prince essentially.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is a terrorism? Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
» RE: Sowing and Reaping Posted by: Intellect
» RE: Sowing and Reaping Posted by: mplsgrl
» RE: Sowing and Reaping Posted by: wwittman
The fish...by the mouth
Posted by: compu on Jan 28, 2008 12:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He said very nasty stuff about muslims
hollybook,for alot less Theo Vanghot
was killed in Europe.
This time Savage went way too far.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not even a real savage
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Jan 28, 2008 1:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His last name is Weiner (I don't know if he pronounces it like "whiner" or "weener"), not Savage. Michael Savage is the persona he created for himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not even a real savage Posted by: billwald
» RE: Not even a real savage Posted by: kelt65
lucius0729
Posted by: lucius13 on Jan 28, 2008 1:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been sending Michael Weiner (Savage) emails telling him that (WE) the people that are tired of his hate and the people that read Media Matters were coming to get him. He had my name blocked. He thought he was above everybody that didn't prescribe to his form of hate. I guess he'll know better now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He appeals to
Posted by: bitsfick on Jan 28, 2008 3:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the lowest common denominator, just like the rest of the neo-cons and the Fascist before them. You have to wonder about his opinion of himself when he has to adopt the persona of Savage, and make a living spewing hatered and intolerance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Savage is a psychopath Posted by: socialpsych
The Real Problem
Posted by: RedNeckRed on Jan 28, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real problem is not that Michael Winer is saying these things. This is America, and we should give the highest latitude a possible in free speach.
The real problem is the is no one on the air ways to rip his oppinions to shreds. If he was demoralized on the public air ways. You wouldn't just stop Michael Winer. You would stop him and a hundred more just like him. We need the fairness doctorine reinstated. He needs the loveing words of a true socialist on the air before him, and after him. He would loose advertizers, because he looses credibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you! Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Thank you! Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: cisc
» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: fraterm
» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: Intellect
» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: Intellect
» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: Libsrule
» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: omatravel
Savage is just the rudest of the lot
Posted by: ronheri on Jan 28, 2008 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few years ago, while driving as a courier in the evening, I would listen to Savage and his insane rantings just for laughs. He was so far over the top, that no one could possibly take him seriously. He is far from alone though. Listen to Bill ORielly, Rush, Heannity (Fox News in general). These hate mongers pander to the uninformed and use the airways to spew out their propaganda attempting to pass it off as real news. Much more subtle and worrisome are the other major news outlets TV, Radio, and Print). These mutinational corporations all spin and control the news: NBC,CBS,ABC,Fox of course. All of the major newspapers and magazines: NY Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, Time, the list goes on and on. What's a citizen to do? Go to the last bastion of free thought and do your own investigating...The internet! Check, recheck, verify, go to many different sources. As Alex Jones so aptly puts it via his websites (Preisonplanet.com, and infowars.com), "Don't believe me, I want you to investigate these things for yourself". He then gives the listener the resources, the documentation, the declassified government papers, everything they need to make up their own minds. The truth is out there, but we must do the work to find it. This website, AlternetNews, along with OpEdNews are also great resources. We are being lied to, not just my our government officials, but the MSM (Main Sream Media). It is critical if our Republic is to last; that we have a well informed population. Nazi Germany, Russua, China and all governments throughout history have tried to manage the masses by controlling the news. Today, we still have the internet (for now) for citizens to go for resources, so as to make informed decesions. Believe me, the power-elite, have plans in the works to get control of this also. (as they do in China). America today stands on the brink of becoming a facist-corporate controlled state. We need a well informed public to stop them. Doubt everything, investigate, verify, question. We must if America and the ideals our founding fathers left for us (The Constitution) are to survive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Savage, Medved, Micheal Graham, Jay Severin, and many others
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jan 28, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
use similar talking points. The real question is who is funding these guys, and where do they get their talking points?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The winds of change is howling!!!
Posted by: xvictor on Jan 28, 2008 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even Big Business senses it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bill
Posted by: wdlindsy on Jan 28, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only now they're pulling their support? Now?

After Savage/Weiner has said for years that a gay mafia controls the nation, that gays are freaks and goons who assault those who criticize the "gay lifestyle"?

Where's the invisible line that allows hate speech about LGBT people (which leads to overt violence), but disallows hate speech about any other marginalized minority?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bill Posted by: fraterm
Also may be a self-hating homophobe!
Posted by: defrag on Jan 28, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Savage Weiner has been outed, at least halfway. I think it was by Michael Rogers of the gay news site Blogactive - he's the one who ran stories about Sen. Craig before the arrest at the airport men's room.

Apparently Weiner, pre-Savage, published a novel in the early '80s that is very, um, homoerotic! Of course this may go no further than Mrs. Dick Cheney's (imaginary?) lesbian love scenes, but seems even more notable from an extreme public homophobe like Savage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Before there were pooper scooper laws in NYC, there he was.
Posted by: particle on Jan 28, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read around about Mikey. You'll even find this interesting take on him from The National Review, of all places: Savaged

At the very least he's an odd ball. I love New York, but it tends to cough up some peculiar mutants. Savage has all the light and charm of something left drying on a subway rail bed after a sewer leak.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Savage Fascist
Posted by: shinseiji on Jan 28, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A bit disappointed that Savage is merely categorized as "hate speech". Even a random sampling of his broadcasts will reveal that Savage projects a coherent neo-fascist ideology. His "hate" is not random; Savage does love the "Christian white man", whose nation he declares the U.S. to be. Quite ironic, as "Savage" - not his real name - is of Brooklyn Jewish background, a fact he no doubt seeks to hide from his neo-Nazi followers.

Welcome to another wonderful ideological product of American Zionism, the militant vanguard building towards a Fascist USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Savage Fascist Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Savage Fascist Posted by: Wigs
» RE: Savage Fascist Posted by: Intellect
» RE: Savage Fascist Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Savage Fascist Posted by: Wigs
» RE: Savage Fascist Posted by: Doubtom
I despise what the man says,
Posted by: steven w on Jan 28, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but why should sponsors stop sponsoring? Should he not have the same freedom as Rush, Ann Coulter, o'reilly or Bill Krystal?? Sure he an idiot, but take freedom of speech? What if that happens to a worthy news reporter or a good and honest commentator. Let him Rant!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I despise what the man says, Posted by: GretnaBlast
Nice. Pick a fight with the USO.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 28, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
USO does good in the world, and they do so for selfless reasons. Can the ego-strokers at Brave New Films make either of those claims?

Wait until some band of toddlers wants their way, all the time, at your expense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

organized religion and human rights
Posted by: 7 Levels on Jan 28, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I despise savage, limbaugh, o'reilly but i despise bigotry against homosexuals, censorship, subjegation of women, violence, and ignorance in the name of organized religion even more. That is Islam. We on the left fight against these things constantly and yet we give this culture a pass. Why ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: organized religion and human rights Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
Gail Dolly
Posted by: yellowdog on Jan 28, 2008 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have just sent the USO a message relaying my shock upon learning that they would continue using Michael Savage's show to run their public service ads. I have NEVER listened to his show, mainly because when I hear replays of his comments on other shows I am usually rendered speechless at their vileness (is that a word?). 'Nuff said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Jan 28, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If all the right wing gas bags exploded at once there would be a toxic cloud that would wipe out half of the United States. Now that's a mushroom cloud that we should be watching for not some imaginary one from Iraq or Iran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Another Crazy Neocon Jew With A Big Mouth And A Braindead Audience
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Jan 28, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His real name is Michael Alan Weiner, he is 60 years old, and he was born in the Bronx to a Russian Jewish family. He had a colorful life, started on the left of the political spectrum before drifting to the extreme right. Long bio for him in Wikipedia, also a short interesting article about him here:
http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1100152

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"...catches up to him." How?
Posted by: Marshalldoc on Jan 28, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I highly approve of, and participated in, the campaign to get this savage wiener off the air (just this AM I forwarded another advertiser's response to my letter of protest to 'Fox Attacks'), until he's either off the air or has been forced to apologize (fat chance) for his verbal emesis nothing's really been accomplished and I can't see what's caught up to him.

It's good to see the effect the protest has had on a few of his advertisers but it seems far too early to be patting ourselves on the back for a 'job well done'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SICK OF IT!!!
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 28, 2008 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sick of those people who sneak through the express line with more than 10 items...Go back where you came from!!! Get out of America!!!...It's time we take our checkouts back from those who threaten our way of life.

Wait...What was he screaming about again?...Something about groceries...right?

You can hear his voice quiver, especially at the beginning...I think he was having a "Hillary moment".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hate speech is anything libs dislike
Posted by: Bioya1 on Jan 28, 2008 4:48 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Adverstisers pulling out of Savage's show is just another example of the lack of free speech rights that occur when someone's opinions don't match that of the libs. Hate speech is a term used by libs to silence those who don't agree with them. This all falls under the affliction of "EMOTITIONAL PLAGUE", a disease borne entirely by the Left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» it's the free market at work buddy Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
If anything demonstrates the
Posted by: willymack on Jan 28, 2008 5:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abysmal ignorance of so many of our people due to the neglect of our public schools, it's this one issue. Nuts like Savage are a dime a dozen and like roaches they return under different names when censured one way or another. They're not the problem our undereducated people are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If anything demonstrates the Posted by: Badger1492
Some of you miss the point about Savage
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Jan 29, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you were a patriotic German in the thirties and you believed Hitler - that the Jews, communists, homosexuals etc were destroying the country, your patriotic duty, he said, was to organize and wipe them out. The Nazis organized, took power and proceeded to do their best to do exactly that.

Putting aside the Muslims for now, I beg any of you who have never listened to this rabble rouser to do so - for at least one evening. You will hear that we liberals are the most disgusting scum on the face of the earth, that we are perverts, a threat to America and decent people everywhere. You will hear him fervently wish various people dead - and you will wonder how many gun-toting nuts around you are hearing the same thing. You will hear him doing his level best to inspire violence against us while skirting the very edge of what he has decided he can get away with. And you will hear this on MY public airwaves!

Some here have called those of us who want him off the air haters. OK, I’m not gonna dance around it - I hate his putrid guts! He is inciting to riot, he is fomenting violence - against me and every progressive in the country.

Those who trot out the first amendment so happily know nothing of what it actually means. It is illegal to incite violence! Listen to him spew his hate and judge for yourself: Is he advocating that all “decent,god fearing Americans” rise up and kill us all or not? Should he be charged with a crime? We can’t prove he has actually caused a death yet - but I don’t recommend that you say the kind of things about Bush and Cheney that he has said about Reid, Pelosi and numerous other Democrats - the SS (Secret Service) will come and take you away.

Because of this man and his rants, my life is in danger! If you are a liberal - whether you know it or not - so is yours.

I would never censor someone I merely disagree with - no matter how strongly. Self preservation requires that in this case we recognize that it is not a matter of simple disagreement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tactics / Framing
Posted by: baugh on Jan 29, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a bit disappointed Greenwald (in his quote) resorted to claiming "true patriotism" to contrast with Savage's views. It's an easy rhetorical maneuver, sure. But it still holds patriotism to be the highest, most honorable value; it just becomes a left/right race to embrace it first, most authentically, most enthusiastically.

Can't we come up with better ideals? I don't trust fostering a sense of nationalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, let Savage rant...
Posted by: Artemis3 on Feb 4, 2008 5:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I listen occasionally, and many times he is way over the top. I certainly don't agree with everything he says, but he makes the occasional good point.

The thing is, if you don't like him, don't listen to him, turn the station, whatever. But censorship of Savage isn't the answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]