Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Media Climate Pushes Brides to Say 'I Do' to Lavish Wedding Spending

By Sheila Gibbons, Women's eNews. Posted August 6, 2007.


Wedding costs have doubled in 20 years and lavish destination weddings are up five-fold from a decade ago. The bridal media are courting women to consent to fantasy-land spending.
Advertisement

In this season of "I dos," it's the rare bride who goes down the aisle without having absorbed information from ad-packed bridal magazines, Web sites and TV programs advising her on every facet of her wedding day and honeymoon.

Where once a bride could design a memorable day using an etiquette guide and a good caterer, the specialized wedding media of today feed a $161 billion per year industry enriched at the expense of many of the people it purports to serve.

While recommending that their readers work from a budget, at the same time wedding media flood them with glossy images of apparel (one tip: spring for a dress with a glamorous back because guests will be looking at it throughout the ceremony) and exotic locations for "destination" weddings, which are costly for guests as well as the couple, but are up five-fold in 10 years.

The average cost of a wedding has nearly doubled since 1990 to $28,000, according to the American Wedding Study 2006 conducted by the Conde Nast Bridal Group, publisher of Brides, Modern Bride and Elegant Bride magazines.

What the glossy magazines don't point out is the pointlessness of such expenditures. As they soar into wedded bliss, some couples simultaneously sink themselves into debt. Only 30 percent of brides' parents still foot the bill. More than a third of marrying couples admit spending more than they had planned, according to the American Wedding Study.

And since finances have long been the No. 1 point of conflict for couples, confronting a stack of bills on their return from the Disney World destination wedding is not a good way to begin a loving partnership.

The money spent on nuptial extravaganzas could be better used as a big chunk of the down payment on a starter home, with some funds reserved to support local arts, culture and community needs.

Peeking Behind the Tulle Curtain

In a book that has been compared to Jessica Mitford's "The American Way of Death," a 1963 classic on the excesses of U.S. funeral rites, New Yorker staff writer Rebecca Mead deconstructs the wedding business in One Perfect Day: The Selling of the American Wedding, published by Penguin in May.

She discusses aspects of what Conde Nast calls "the wedding lifecycle" that its bridal magazines are apt to ignore. One stage of the process, for instance, could be Chinese sweatshops where gowns sold in the United States are made by workers who sleep eight to a room and earn 30 cents an hour. Another stage is the overspending by brides and their relatives as they get caught up in status-conscious anxiety.

Mead's book has attracted deserved attention from outlets such asUSA Today, the Columbus Dispatch, the Christian Science Monitor, the International Herald Tribune and ABC's Good Morning America. But it's a lonely outpost in a crush of commercial messages in traditional and new bridal media, including cable TV.

"Get Married" debuted in April on the WE cable network and then on Lifetime and, of course, has a companion Web site. The show has a "look and book" segment, essentially an infomercial, featuring honeymoon and wedding resorts with an 800 telephone number so viewers can book on the spot.

There's a "celebrity wedding" segment on both the show and the Web site where lots of brides-to-be can experience vicarious thrills. When I visited the site, the "get married" poll asked, "Which celebrity couples nuptials was the most surprising?" Among the pairings were Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher, Heidi Klum and Seal. If you register at the site, you can also view "touching details" from celebrity romances. Blecch.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: women, bride, weddings, media

Sheila Gibbons is editor of Media Report to Women, a quarterly news journal of news, research and commentary about women and media. She is also co-author of "Taking Their Place: A Documentary History of Women and Journalism," Strata Publishing Inc.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Blecch!" is right!
Posted by: ankhet on Aug 6, 2007 2:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even the more modest "green" wedding is gimmicky and inflated. No wonder brides are trashing their gowns. Too bad the light doesn't go on till after the damage is done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so very true
Posted by: mombot on Aug 6, 2007 3:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband is a photographer and does mostly weddings. The thing that sets him apart from most other wedding photgraphers are his prices, which are lower than the average. He offers more and is priced less, so business is going well. We do not believe in gouging brides just for sake of making a quick buck. I am amazed at the cost of weddings these days (we were married almost 18 years ago). I did everything on a budget, but still had a great wedding. You do have to do a lot of foot work to find the best prices and quality. It's worth it not to go into debt just to be married. There was a piece on one of the morning shows (not really the news!) a few years back about a couple that prior to getting married had traveled and basically had fun. Afterwards, they had no money to have fun and were miserable. I think they spent/charged over $30,000 on their wedding. Big lavish weddings don't make a marriage last. I think the main objective is to have a fun wedding, not the tony go-into-debt affair. Who cares 6 years later if you had the perfect wedding if you're divorced, as happened to a good friend of ours? Save the lavish affair for when you can afford it, and have been married a while and have a renewal of vows. If you have to impress your guests, maybe they shouldn't be invited!!! Our wedding is still talked about, LOL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just say NO
Posted by: Lizmv on Aug 6, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jeez....do people really have to do what the media tells them to? Quit blaming the media for America's appetite for self-centered over-indulgent gluttony. Humans beings DO have free will. We are not just a bunch of mind-controlled zombies.

Having just attended a low budget backyard wedding, I can tell you that it is possible to have a beautiful wedding with 100 guests for less than $3000. I didn't hear a single guest whining that it wasn't good enough. What made it beautiful was the sense of community everyone felt as we gathered to celebrate the young couple's next step in their journey through life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just say NO Posted by: Leman
» A real-world scenario Posted by: Leman
Since nearly half
Posted by: karyse on Aug 6, 2007 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of marriages end in divorce, it's particularly ludicrous to spend so much money. I wonder if there is any correlation between how much one spends on getting married and how much a divorce costs. If someone gets a divorce at the five-year mark, and the wedding hasn't been paid off yet, which of the two spouses inherit the debt?

Perhaps this is one area where the underclasses and working poor have it right -- just live together until you don't want to anymore, or if the decision is made to "tie the knot" make an appointment with the justice of the peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ironic.... Posted by: Libertine
PATHETIC!
Posted by: H_H on Aug 6, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, so it's not brides' desires to have a big ol' wedding that causes it to be such. It's the Media Climate which Pushes them to do so.

And like a mindless piece on a chessboard, women are forced in a certain direction and simply have no way to help it. But if these creatures are mental invalids who can't make-up their own minds, why are they even allowed to vote?

No, really, answer this. How are we supposed to believe that women are totally capable of making their own decisions, but the media "pushes" them to want a lavish wedding? If a woman can't make-up her own mind about "her big day", then I don't see how we can know that "the media" didn't implant other ideas in their heads as well, "pushing" them to open savings accounts and brush their teeth and apply for law school?

Was Hillary Clinton "pushed" into her position by some unseen force? I don't see why we should dismiss that possibility. I hear she had a big wedding day, too.

Pathetic. As I have said many MANY times before, you can't have it both ways: proudly boast that women are "independent" with their own minds, yet every dumb thing they do is "teh Patriarchy's" fault.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah, you're right Posted by: H_H
» RE: PATHETIC! Posted by: bluebirdella
husband and partner
Posted by: T.I.M. on Aug 6, 2007 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The wedding is just a party, a first step. The marriage is the real event, and should be planned for accordingly. Couples should have a reasonable wedding, and put the rest of the money in the bank, so they can enjoy their marriage (and retirement) instead of sweating over bills for years -- including perhaps the cost of a divorce lawyer brought on by impulse buying. My wife and I are about to get married for the 20th time in 20 states in 20 years years, and we still haven't come anywhere near what the average single wedding costs. And we'll never be "single" again.
You don't need a destination wedding; you need a destination marriage, one that will really go the distance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget the blood diamonds!
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Aug 6, 2007 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bridal literature is just more porn for women, however mainstream it may be. Which is why it's all about her, with the groom hardly being anything more than another accessory. Simply put, a wedding is an orgy of female narcissism. Party on...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We just need a new "tradition"
Posted by: defrag on Aug 6, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As AlterNet has pointed out before, most modern wedding "traditions" are not all that old.

Since the modern wedding is all about the bride, there really isn't a need for a groom. Or indeed, for any male involvement whatsoever. Or any pseudo-religious component whatsoever.

We just need an updated version of the "Sweet Sixteen" party or Quinceanera, pushed up to the age of 29. Any 29 year old woman (make that GIRL) who wants one could order all her friends, co-workers & relatives to attend her party & give her presents. Many, many presents. She'll wear an outlandish white dress & put on a show.

And no messy divorce will follow!

"Veintenuevoanera"? That's the idea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Part of what disturbs me most... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
All the more...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Aug 6, 2007 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Allt he more reason to stop listening to the media.. and make your own choices about how to live your life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Biggest Day Of Her Life
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Aug 6, 2007 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I visited Mexico nearly 30 years ago, and was impressed both by a level of poverty that I had never encountered, and by the number of wedding-apparel stores. No matter how poor the town, there was always a plate-glass window featuring a beautiful mannequin in a white dress. Sometimes it was the only "pretty" thing for miles around, that window with the dress in it. On a dusty beige street, the white dresses in the windows could be seen from a long way off.

There are millions of women for whom the ONLY time they'll ever be the center of attention, and made up as pretty as they can be, with everyone SAYING how pretty they are, how special, how angelic, how perfect, is on the bridal day. For a girl without stunning looks, education, or family capital to launch and assist her toward a life of recognition and sufficiency, many women settle for "one special day" when they are the celebrity. They know, at some level, that they will soon be overblown and faded with childrearing, and know (or believe) they have no special talent or gift, either.

But they CAN have one day in which everyone will bow to their wishes and make as much of them as can humanly be made. A day that will be photographed and filmed and remembered, and no one can take it away from her.

It's sad that we don't have a form of Quinceanera or Bat Mitzvah for all young women, or even debutante balls--some time and place to celebrate the flowering of young womanhood.

Would that we could recognize the worth and value of every young woman, instead of making it contingent upon marriage to an "appropriate" male.

I'm no fan of bridal narcissism, but one part of me has to sympathize with the human need to be recognized and "not fade away."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mom's advice to granddaughter
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 6, 2007 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mom and dad lived on a farm in Nebraska all their lives. They were married in 1936 in the depths of the depression. The marriage took place in my grandparent's living room. Mom wore a wedding dress she borrowed from her sister. Dad borrowed a suit from his brother. The wedding reception afterwards was sandwiches and punch. For their honey moon they drove in a Ford Model A to my mom's relatives in North Platte (about a 100 mile drive).

Mom and Dad never forgot the depression years, very frugal all their lives. Mom passed-away a few years back, but I will never forget what she told one of the grandaughters. This girl was planning this huge wedding costing thousands, and working herself sick getting this big production ready. One day this bride-to-be was telling mom about oh how stressfull all this planning was, how much it was costing, what kind of dress to buy, etc. etc. My mom quietly told her: "Remember dear, money doesn't buy happiness. And this wedding is only a beginning, and not an end in itself."

Mom and Dad were married for 50 years exactly. My niece got divorced after 18 months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You CAN be married inexpensively!
Posted by: wireup on Aug 6, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been married twice.

The first time was in our backyard, just for family, and it costs very little.

The second time we asked about 30 people to meet us at the local arboretum. We were married there and then returned to the house. I hired a local natural-foods caterer and for under $400 we had a huge quantity of the most FANTASTIC food and beautiful wedding cake. We asked people to dress as they pleased - it was summer and shorts were welcome - and NOT to bring presents. It was a really lovely wedding enjoyed by all who attended.

And, it didn't cost an arm or a leg!

Last - but not least - one can always go to city hall!

It is absolutely UNNECESSARY to spend a fortune to get married. This is done for the economic benefit of the wedding industry and has NOTHING to do with marriage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The larger issue
Posted by: Trazom on Aug 6, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is how bereft of financial organization a great deal of our population is, and is increasingly becoming. What is going to happen to some of these couples as they buy their first house, or that first car. Will they spend thousands a year on vacations that they can't afford?

There used to be a time when money skills were taught in high school, but no longer. Ironically, that type of stuff seems to be relegated to the lower track kids, when it's really everyone who needs the skill.

Hint, if your wedding is going to cost $30,000 (and we're not even talking about the rings and/or vacation, are we?) and you're making $50,000/year and don't own a home, how are you going to pay that off? Is it worth sacrificing things like owning a home and having a child for just one day?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do they really cost more now?
Posted by: IPFreeley on Aug 6, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The average cost of a wedding has nearly doubled since 1990..."

With inflation around 3.5%, everything nearly doubles in price in 17 years. I don't think the American tradition of having large expensive weddings took off at the same time as grunge rock.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C'mon, EVERY BRIDE knows the more you spend the longer your marriage will last...
Posted by: xbj on Aug 6, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And at current divorce rates, it's about a second a dollar...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm getting married next year and
Posted by: ezstevey on Aug 6, 2007 12:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my fiance is working with a budget of just over $10,000. My family will be chipping in for other things. I still think its too much to spend on one day. But when all of the resources you turn to, whether it be wedding media like magazines, television shows, or websites, encourage outlandish spending, its hard to control. I wish I knew of a place I could go to get advice on how to keep things classy, yet affordable. It seems not many people offer such services. And it would be nice to keep it intimate, but for many people thats just not possible. We're trying to keep the invitation list under 150 people, but its difficult because our families are so involved in our communities. I blame the overpricing of services rendered by event vendors. It shouldn't cost five figures to feed some folks, have some drinks, and dance like asses for a few hours.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you poor thing . . . Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» RE: you poor thing . . . Posted by: ezstevey
Let's Place the Onus on the Real Culprit
Posted by: faultroy on Aug 6, 2007 3:04 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is indicative of a serious gender sickness in the USA. It never ceases to amaze me that today's American Woman can't take responsibility for anything. They can't take responsibility for their children's sexual activities ("it's the rampant pornography"): they can't take responsibility for someone having sex with them ( "he made me fuck him--it wasn't my idea--he "raped" me."): they can't take responsibility for their marriages ("he was an abuser"): they can't take responsibility for pregnanies (" he forced me to shove his dick in my vagina") and now they can't take responsibility for even spending wildly on fantasy weddings ("It's the blatant Wedding Vendors' fault"). Why would any business give any responsibility to a gender group that refuses to take responsibility for anything? No wonder there are such few women in positions of leadership--they can't walk and chew gum--nor can they take responsibility for attempting to do so.
I have never heard a woman say: "You know, I'm an absolute idiot that has no self control, I take full responsibility for this mess." They are forever blaming everyone else--their parents, their husbands, their former husbands, their former boyfriends--food-- Bush, Cheney, the government, conservatives, Democrats, Republicans, the Religious Right--all of which happen to be male? Never mind the fact that there are 3 million more women voters than men, it is always these "the bad men."
No wonder American Women are considered: most contemptible, least deserving respect, totally lacking in class and functionally irrelevant by most other countries of the world.
The World sees that American Women want Rights and Privileges, but refuse to accept the responsibility that comes as a result of those rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

how much is a lifetime of love worth?
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Aug 6, 2007 8:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My anecdotal observations have taught me that the more bucks spent on the wedding, the less likely the marriage will last. I'd love to see some research on this. Why else would these shallows gals need all the "rocks" and baubles and lace and flowers if not to fill their empty hearts and the space between them and their betrothed? Fancy weddings are like padded bras - I pity women who waste money on either.

I've been married for 22 years. I ordered my simple dress from the JC Penney catalog, my friends from school sang, and my reception was cake and punch in the church basement. While it was nice, no one was impressed by the wedding, but they're very impressed with our marriage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is Alternet's agenda?
Posted by: FDPN on Aug 6, 2007 10:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there a Feminist movement against the bridal industry?

These articles keep popping up on Alternet and I have to wonder why. What is Alternet's agenda here? Who is driving their attack on the wedding industry?

Feminists? If feminists are against the bridal industry, could someone please explain why rather than posting these emotionally charged attack articles?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is Alternet's agenda? Posted by: skybluesky
Marriage is basically an outdated tradition
Posted by: ArtemInox on Aug 7, 2007 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It really is. Not that long ago, it was basically the thing to do very young and go from there. If you did something stupid like get your gf pregnant, you were expected to marry her asap, for the sake of the child not being born out of wedlock if nothing else. The only people Ive observed actually being happily married, or somewhat content with it, are older people that have been through a divorce or two already, or that have been lonely and single a long time. It would seem to be a very fear based and selfish act, fear of dying alone being in there somewhere with all the other fears that someone feeling alone or having all the wonderful emotions that come along with a divorce has.

The whole concept of two people expecting to really truly love each other the rest of their lives, to me is just unrealistic and tragically sad. Because some of the noblest, most sublime feelings an individual can feel toward another are almost always doomed to fail and fall apart over time. So let the people that buy into this bullshit have their day, why not? Maybe the lavish, extravagant wedding is the closest they can come to expressing these feelings in a tangible way. This probably made a lot more sense when the average lifetime wasn't all that long. And if you think about all the weddings you have been to that had marriages not lasting, didnt you KNOW or at least have an inkling that it was going to end up that way?

Maybe it just doesn't make sense to get married anymore in the context of our times, or maybe its just another sign of our decaying, decrepit, bankrupt culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Whoa... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Whoa... Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
If so many people MUST be slavish sheep and do what the media tells them...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 7, 2007 4:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...then DON'T ENCOURAGE THEM by marrying them in the first place!

He/She wants to spend ALL your money on 3 tonnes of frippery for bimbos, then DUMP THEM!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chicken or the egg
Posted by: sarahbfine on Aug 11, 2007 4:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure if it's the bridal magazines or people's desire to "keep up with the Jones'" that makes every wedding bigger than the last. As a stationery store owner, I see some of the dumbest, most unrealistic expectations from both bride and mother, based on what they're friends did...
At my store, we encourage people to stay within their budget, and are more than happy to show invitations on recycled paper, especially recycled cotton paper, but it's not always inexpensive. "It aint easy being green."
As for the bridal magazines, get real, who would pay 6 or 7 (or 10!) bucks to see pictures of a "normal" wedding? And think of all the "women's magazines" that have headlines of the latest diet on the cover, over the picture of chocolate cake. What do you expect? Magazines do what sells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Weddings can be affordable... Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Good luck with that...
Posted by: Artemis3 on Aug 12, 2007 6:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From my point of view, this particular 'industry' is just another part of our overinflated, hyper-individualistic, psychotic culture. Tens of thousands of dollars for a wedding that has NOTHING to do with the marriage it's supposed to kick off? Insane! My first marriage was performed in the chapel of McGuire AF base; the reception was in a local Greek diner. Everybody was happy. The marriage lasted 7 years. We have blinders on to how sick our culture has truly become; I stay away from it and am happier than most of the people I see.

Lavish weddings do not = happy married life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dress slashing...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Aug 13, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yup. its a new trend...

the self-indulgence of throwing a temper tantrum on the multiple thousand dollar dresses & having the spectacle photo-documented.

can you say SPOILED little bitches?

honestly: how can one expect to start a marriage full of disappointments, compromises & challenges if a BrideZilla takes MONTHS to focus on getting EVERYTHING she wants & putting people in deep debt?

its like shooting yourself in the foot, isn't it?

months spent throwing tantrums, crying jags, foot stomping & petulant "I want so I'll have" scenes... is NOT conducive to creating a mature "Marriage is a Loving Friendship in the Face of Life" attitude.

Good luck.
No wonder some of these BitchMothers with Strollers demand the sidewalk... its just another opportunity to be demanding & "More Woman Than Thou" because they signed on to reproduce...

"I HAVE RESPONSIBILITIES!! GET OUT OF MY WAY, I'm A BREEDER!
you can't understand what I GO THROUGH
"...

Have you NOTICED the ages of some of these little rajas in strollers?
I've seen kids as old as EIGHT in those things.

gotta wonder what those kids are learning about entitlement & personal effort.

funny, there are millions of women internationally who wouldn't even *recognize* what our society declares 'essential' to qualitative living...

"You can't always get what you WANT"


Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian

"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]