Digby: Bloggers Are Part of a Revolutionary Participatory Democracy

By Digby , AlterNet. Posted June 22, 2007.

Editor's Note:The folowing is the text of the speech given by the pseudonymous blogger known as Digby on June 19 at the Take Back America conference, when she accepted the Paul Wellstone Citizen Leadership Award on behalf of progressive bloggers.

Those of you who know my blog, know that it is nearly impossible draw me from my secure bunker in the People's Republic of Santa Monica. But when I was approached by my friend Rick Perlstein about accepting this award on behalf of the progressive blogosphere, I knew that it was an honor I could not refuse, not for myself, although I'm grateful, but for my fellow bloggers.

We are proud to be a part of the great progressive liberal tradition of Paul Wellstone and are grateful for your kind acknowledgment. Thank you. As there has been a lot said recently about the netroots and our influence on the Democratic party, this is especially rewarding.

And let's just say we seem to have ruffled some feathers.

We've been called everything from witless to "some guy named Vinnie in a bathrobe and an efficiency apartment" to "blogofascists." Some critics dismiss us as useless elites -- the Metropolitan Opera crowd -- or a "noisy Upper West Side cocktail party for the college-graduate class." Still others take us to task for our "vitriolic, unhinged tone."

The other day Tim Russert agreed "absolutely" with his gracious host, concerned centrist Sean Hannity, that the Democratic party was being unduly influenced by bloggers who were dragging the party kicking and screaming to the left.

Then there is the criticism that we are fascists or Stalinists demanding that everyone march in lockstep to the edicts of our leadership -- generally assumed to be Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos -- who apparently directs us with secret signals deeply embedded in the code of the Daily Kos web site while we carry on an elaborate ruse of spirited political debate and disagreement in public.

We are, in short, something of an enigma.

I like to call this phenomenon -- irrational fear of hippies which has, in my view, become -- irrational fear of political passion. Of all the criticisms I just mentioned, that is one we are all willing to accept.

We are passionate about politics, and in this era of Republican corruption, excess and failure, that passion sometimes manifests itself as anger. But how can you not be angry? So many institutions have failed us in the last decade that being vitriolic seems the only sane response.

And as for the idea that we are modern Stalinists: Does that makes any sense at all? We can't even agree on what to call ourselves.

The netroots consist of a very lively and disparate group of citizens who are political observers, activists, readers and entrepreneurs communicating and organizing via the Internet.

We have opera-loving liberals from Georgia ... Nascar-loving progressives from Chicago ... and Grateful Dead-loving Democrats from ... Florida. We are from everywhere, and our common tribal signifiers aren't social status or professional authority or region.

Our tribe finds each other in remote places and big cities alike on the Internet -- through our politics. Period. In the blogosphere, nobody cares if you are a 70-year-old Chinese immigrant or a 22-year-old Harvard student or a stay-at-home dad.

If you have something to say you can say it -- and if it touches a chord, people will return time and again to read what you've written and discuss the issues of the day with others who are reading the same things.

Al Gore, a man who knows something about the Internet, wrote in his book, The Assault on Reason:

"The Internet is perhaps the greatest source of hope for reestablishing an open communications environment in which the conversation of democracy can flourish ... It is the most interactive medium in history ... with the greatest potential for connecting individuals to one another and to a universe of knowledge."

So ... the netroots is ... a revolution. A revolutionary participatory democracy. And, in this way, the left is more effective than the right. Whether by temperament or philosophy, we are simply better suited to the free-form, constantly changing nature of these new political communities.

Each of us finds their niche. I'm a blogger pundit, a role for which I am eminently qualified, since, exactly like pundits on television and in newspapers, I have opinions, I write them down, and a lot of people read them.

(Yes, that's all there is to it. Sorry Mr. Broder.).

Bloggers Matt Stoller and Chris Bowers are organizers of this nascent movement. They traffic in ideas that affect our ability to keep doing what we do, from net-neutrality to finding a much-needed funding base for bloggers and activists.

With vastly different approaches, Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo and Jane Hamsher at Firedoglake, are creating a new form of journalism. Talking Points is modeled on the more traditional form and Firedoglake is mixing reporting, opinion and direct political advocacy.

See more stories tagged with: iraq, netroots, bloggers

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »