Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fair and Balanced, My Ass! The Bizarre Reality of Fox News

By Joseph Minton Amann and Tom Breuer, Nation Books. Posted June 21, 2007.


Watching Fox News can be as funny as it is frustrating. But the new book Fair and Balanced, My Ass! shows we dismiss them at our peril.
061907story
Advertisement

The following is an excerpt from Fair and Balanced, My Ass!: An Unbridled Look at the Bizarre Reality of Fox News, by Joseph Minton Amann and Tom Breuer (Nation Books, 2007).

Well, that's your opinion!

Those of us who watch Fox News professionally, or simply to unwind at the end of the day with a few well-earned belly laughs, dismiss the network at our own peril.

While there may be a considerable measure of Schadenfreude involved in tuning in to, say, The O'Reilly Factor, it's hard to overlook the fact that he influences millions of people nearly every day. Indeed, watching Fox can be a little like watching Jeopardy! During kids' week. Even if you know more than they do -- and you probably will -- it's hard to feel good about yourself for the experience. But it's not like the leading lights at Fox actually enjoy turning America into a nation of fatuous morons. If they could accomplish the same goals by not making their viewers morons, they'd probably do so, just as the tobacco companies would probably prefer their products didn't cause cancer, and Ann Coulter probably wishes the sound of her voice didn't make young men's and small animals' testicles shrivel. But none of that is going to stop any of them from making their money and spreading their propaganda. To be sure, Fox News' sensationalistic brand of personality and opinion-based journalism is a well-crafted sales strategy. And whatever else you want to say about them, they're excellent salesmen. Indeed, with just about any story on Fox, you can ask yourself three questions: Are they pandering to their viewers, peddling right-wing propaganda, or both?

Now, preaching to the choir can be quite lucrative, particularly if the choir has an almost unlimited budget for Rascal Scooters and Civil War chess pieces. And there's not necessarily anything wrong with that. Lots of media outlets preach to the choir. For some, it's their bread and butter. The Nation's not going to solicit a commentary on Social Security privatization from Grover Norquist, after all, and Us Weekly is certainly not going to report that Brad and Angelina aren't hot.

But most people who are engaged in some form of advocacy journalism -- be they Rush Limbaugh or Al Franken -- have the decency to admit it. Fox not only doesn't admit it, it famously cloaks themselves in a tawdry veil of objectivity, endlessly shouting their "Fair and Balanced" and "We Report, You Decide" slogans until their viewers are finally programmed, Clockwork Orange-like, to believe them.

But again, by objective measures, Fox does a demonstrably poor job of presenting the cold, hard facts in a spin-free fashion. For instance, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism's 2005 State of the News Media report, 24 percent of the stories on MSNBC's Hardball With Chris Matthews contained the host's opinion, compared with 97 percent on The O'Reilly Factor. The report also analyzed coverage of the war in Iraq, finding that 73 percent of Fox's Iraq war stories contained opinion, compared with 2 percent for CNN and 29 percent for MSNBC. Fox was also around twice as likely as its competitors to run positive stories about the war and far more likely to run positive stories than negative ones. So what we're seeing more and more in today's news business, and particularly at Fox, is that personality and opinion sell. Not reasoned and informed opinion but blustering, loud, obnoxious, in-your-face opinion. Archie Bunker opinion. We're right and you're wrong. We're going to heaven and you're going to hell. We're patriots and you are traitors. We're men who love women, while you, my good sir, are a homo.

Of course, Fox News' one saving grace is that it's hilarious. Watching Hannity pummel Colmes won't make us better people, but it's kind of like seeing the school bully beat up the really irritating kid. It's not right, but you don't really want anyone to stop it. Seeing O'Reilly get his panties in a bundle when someone questions his ratings is always a good laugh. And having those three loons on Fox & Friends spout hateful lies with racist overtones is like music -- sweet Clay Aiken music.

But Fox can be frustrating, too, because its employees are so unswervingly dedicated to denying their true nature. If your local weatherman dressed up as a Viking every day, called himself Hjørt Bjornsen, and told you there was a 60 percent chance of snow flurries and a 30 percent chance that Thor would rain fire and canned hummus from the sky during midmorning rush hour -- all the while claiming he absolutely was not dressed as a Viking -- eventually it would stop being cute. That's essentially what it feels like to be sane and reasonably intelligent and tuned in to Fox News. It's hard to look away, because there's a guy on TV making a complete ass of himself while saying obviously untrue things. But it would be nice to get the forecast every once in a while. So we understand your pain.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: fox news, disinformation

Joseph Minton Amann and Tom Breuer launched sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com in the spring of 2004. They are the co-authors of Sweet Jesus, I Hate Bill O'Reilly.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fox news is a disgrace
Posted by: paul_revere on Jun 21, 2007 1:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox News has always been a sewer pipe spilling into American's living rooms. The network is a harbinger of fear, dishonesty, racism, bigotry, homophobia and more. Murdoch and his minions are a disgrace and morally bankrupt.

Oh, and by the way, if you have to tell everyone that you are "Fair & Balanced," then you're not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The liberal media myth Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» news is business? Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: news is business? Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: The liberal media myth Posted by: HighburyJD
» I challenge YOUR assertions Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: I challenge YOUR assertions Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: I challenge YOUR assertions Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Ah...that explains a lot. Posted by: mirimac
» RE: Fox news is a disgrace Posted by: Ellie1
What else would you expect given our values?
Posted by: LMNOP on Jun 21, 2007 1:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox is the picture of what the author refers to as “news” that panders and is ideologically driven instead of “presenting the cold, hard facts in a spin-free fashion.” That’s what we expect in the absence of the media safeguards disabled under Reagan (Fairness Doctrine).
It’s the purpose of government to maintain that regulation, and we expected our elected representatives from any party to safeguard that lifeblood of a democratic society, real news.

Why did government lose its grip? That’s easy. It’s the same answer as for why ALL laws are passed in America today: it’s what the people with the most money wanted. And most Americans are soft enough politically and intellectually to accept that fact as reasonable in a free society because it is corporate “freedom of expression”. There is so much wrong with that.

What a whorehouse Congress is. Everything is for sale. When corporations are treated as persons, and are allowed to express themselves to legislators with lavish contributions, you’re going to have legislation going to the highest bidder. No longer is it one person, one vote - the lynchpin of democracy and the mechanism ensuring the equal sharing of political power by all voting citizens – but one dollar, one vote. Nowadays, it’s not whoever gets the most votes, it’s who gets the most dollars. I *did* get one vote at the ballot box (I think), but that didn’t matter. Decisions are made by battling lobbyists, the ones who care the most and pony up the most calling the lion’s share of the shots. What’s good for the country, what you and I vote on, doesn’t even come up in conversation. Why? Because we didn’t really vote. Ballots are green.

In the end, a nation that entrusts itself to people allowed to bought off gets Fox News, and then the jack boot shortly thereafter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OTHER NETWORKS MORE 'BALANCED'
Posted by: gellero on Jun 21, 2007 1:46 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh Puleeze...........all the networks regurgitate pablum for the masses. You can pick up 'attitude' just by the tone of the delivery. Who exactly decides what the latest 'crisis' or 'epidemic' is?? Do any of you still remember those still existing things from 5 years ago?? Who decides when the News Reader (which is what they really are) refers to the invading hoards (my biased term) from South of the Border as 'undocumented immigrants' (those poor huddled masses yearning to breed free - lol) or as 'illegal aliens' (damn criminals ! ). The Hoi Polloi can sometimes see through that. And for that reason alone, FOX has a following. And who's to say, really, what in the news is 'opinion' or 'fact'? If a newsreader refers to GlobalWarming (ie human induced) as 'contoversy' vs. 'consensus', which is it.? I think that's the point of FOX. For that reason alone, I like it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WELL SAID Posted by: gellero
» WELL PUT, TRAZ...... Posted by: gellero
» Oh Puleez! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
4.5
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jun 21, 2007 3:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A bit wordy, but kinda funny.

Good point about Ann Coulter's voice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 4.5 Posted by: mirimac
Good description ...
Posted by: paul_revere on Jun 21, 2007 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FAUX News "journalists" = manure spreaders

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good description ... Posted by: lively56
» RE: Manure spreaders? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
FBC
Posted by: Roverton on Jun 21, 2007 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... is news for bitter, dishonest and ignorant people.

News that lets haters remain no better than they were before. News that makes bad people even worse. They are cancer to the USA.

A tumor on freedom and truth. The followers all say that every network is evil, not just FBC, like that's a good reason to stay a Mud-Junkie for this trash.

None are over a certain IQ or they'd have moved on to more reliable sources.

Of course they disagree. So what? Anyone angrily defending a TV show needs babysitting. I'm too old for that crap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I love Fox News.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 21, 2007 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not as a fan, because I never watch it. I love Fox News because it gives my favorite commentator, Keith Olbermann, great comedy material.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The SS Fox, ABC, CBS, AND NBC Are Sinking (Is That News?)
Posted by: edith on Jun 21, 2007 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yawn.

The Good News: few Americans watch Fox News and even less will watch Fox in the future; young people have stopped watching TV News(they already don't read newspapers).

The Bad News: Few Americans watch any of the evening news programs anymore. Charlie Gibson is "beating" out Katy Couric, but it's like two bums fighting over a tossed away, half-eaten ham sandwich: Who wants that kind of "prize" anyway?

Also, these guys are hung up about the blatantly obviously biased O'Reilly(they have a WEBSITE devoted to bashing Bilious Bill!). They didn't do the hard work of showing how the "regular" newscasts on Fox, or even the Fox Web Site, focuses on pro-Bush news or on entertainment trivia. My God, an O'Reilly fetish!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PBS isn't that far behind either. Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: The Real News Posted by: Dartagnan
» RE: PBS is OK. Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Mr.
Posted by: two7five7one on Jun 21, 2007 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An old college friend I hadn't seen in 30 years had retired in Tucson from an Eastern Univ. (professor), and I looked forward to an interesting meeting.

During the entire evening he and his "southern belle" wife both expressed their admiration for Fox, Hannity, O'Reilly and that entire cesspool. My question as to why you don't every see on Fox news an interview with Gore Vidal, Noam Chomsky, Chalmers Johnson, Howard Zinn, etc., was greeted with--"Who are they? They must not be important enough to appear on Fox News." It was like talking to a brick wall.

I suspect the racism and the provincialism of the wife had long ago pushed them to the Fox Network atmosphere of hate. But no one can discount the influence of Murdoch and his millions on the mentality of our society. It's depressing as hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mr. Posted by: Eragon07
WHY DO YOU THINK FAUX'S VIEWERSHIP IS WAY DOWN?
Posted by: kc10ken on Jun 21, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FAUX cable news (aka GOP TV) is nothing more than WHORES for the GOP.

I was watching FAUX the day SCOOTER's sentence was announced and couldn't believe my ears. For a good video clip of it go to YOUTUBE and punch in a search titled "Why can't Fox news say what Libby did was a crime"....and watch the video clip.

THEY COULD NOT SAY THE WORD CRIMINAL.....over and over during their coverage (which was minimal compared to other networks) they absolutely REFUSED TO USE THE WORD CRIMINAL OR CRIME when referring to what SCOOTER was convicted of. Listen to the ditzy blonde idiot on FAUX cable news fumble and stumble for the right words when she says "the severity of the....uhh.....uhhhh.........uhhh......trial".....no no no...the phrase is "the severity of the crime"....CRIME...that's the word!

BOYCOTT FAUX cable news' sponsors! Write to them and tell them you won't buy their products till they pull their sponsorship!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More preaching to the choir
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jun 21, 2007 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look I get a kick out of these FOX and O'Reilly hit jobs but I'd like to see a little more variety in Alternet's media-bashing. How about a piece on the other networks shitty media coverage? I think nearly everyone that frequents this site, even those of us that aren't left-wing or liberal or democrat or whatever you wish to call it, know that FOX is a really bad news organization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More preaching to the choir Posted by: lessbread
Liberal Media Slant vs. Fox News
Posted by: kbest on Jun 21, 2007 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see, most of the American newspapers tilt left. Newsweek, Time, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker all are liberal rags. The major networks like ABC, NBC and CBS are all liberal slanted. Not too many people watch MSNBC and it's very liberal leftist slant. NPR most definately liberal slanted. Even Alternet is propaganda. Air America has it's couple of listeners.

I Thank GOD for Fox News, along with the hundreds of talk radio stations, around the country, reaching millions and millions of real Americans to counter all the crap above.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NPR Posted by: nickbk
» O'Really? Posted by: tooldoc60
» REAL lies for REAL americans... Posted by: chief of okeefe
That was fun!
Posted by: PJAW on Jun 21, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for a truly enjoyable little ride on the rankle O'Reilly roller coaster. I can't stand the sonofabitch and it's always a guily pleasure to read someone else who can't stand him either.

I quit watching him a long time ago. Of course I was never a regular viewer, but I wasn't in full avoidance mode like I am now. Still, I know he's out there, with people watching and listening, and that bothers me the way seeing carpenter ants around the house does. It may not inspre me to call the exterminator right this moment but I reaize it's a serious problem that cries for attention. So it's comforting to know that the neighbor has called Orkin and I can talk to the guy when he shows up. Just like I can add my two cents here and say, "Sweet Jesus, I hate Bill O'Reilly too!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That was fun! Posted by: WhatNow?
America's Pravda
Posted by: willymack on Jun 21, 2007 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A front for government propoganda is nothing new here. A front for an ILLEGAL government is. Don't forget the original crime of the bushies, which was the theft of the 2000 "election" from winner, Al Gore. Nobody's done a bloody thing to right that outrage. Is it any wonder that our "government" resembles a tinpot dictatorship more than a shining example of what people can accomplish under a REAL democracy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» American Media is the BEST!!! Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Not a Fox fan as I have low tolerance to stupidity
Posted by: bookwoman on Jun 21, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't watch Fox as it only takes about two minutes to make me nuts from their nonsense (Rush Limbaugh take 30 seconds). However, one evening I saw Arnold on with the people at 7:00. The Conservative one tried to get Schwartzeneger to dis Al Gore's big house, many lights, heated swimming pool, etc. However, Arnie came right back with the idea that all public figures, including himself, are targets of such rhetoric. The host was taken aback, but, by watching Fox that evening, I found out there are still sane voices alive and well in the Republican Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sadly
Posted by: mizipi on Jun 21, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today, 21 June 2007, I still know educated people living in the USA who believe that Saddam was responsible for 9-11, who believe that WMD's were found in Iraq, who believe we have the moral right to torture people, who believe that Osama hates freedom and liberty.............
I guess those people should be thankful to live in a society where stupidity and ignorance are not crimes.
And, by the way, they all listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Fox News on TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sadly Posted by: Bozly
» You call that educated?? Posted by: eboogie
» RE: Sadly Posted by: ALANHESTER
Fox News is...
Posted by: acidicjazzhead on Jun 21, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the de facto Ministry of Propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is this really still news?
Posted by: icj on Jun 21, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't get me wrong, I love a good Fox-bashing (not to mention all the conservatives that pop up and accuse us of not being able to handle a challenge), but really, does any thinking person in America not know that Fox News is basically GOP propaganda and most of the people on the channel could barely think their way out of a paper bag (although they could certainly yell their way out of a paper bag!)? Is this really the only thing Alternet can come up with to talk about as far as media is concerned? Does Fox really deserve all this attention? I'd prefer to just ignore it...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Welcome to the "Real" News
Posted by: Trazom on Jun 21, 2007 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This column seems to be an appropriate place to post this link, so please check it out:

The Real News

This is the chance for open-minded truth-seeking individuals to discuss and debate the relevant topics that affect us today. Let's hope they succeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Welcome to the "Real" News Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Interesting...... Posted by: gellero
Fox is treason
Posted by: leafsong1 on Jun 21, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US government consists of a couple hundred multinational corporations who control both major parties and act jointly to eliminate all dissent from the media and "government" puppet theater. This usurpation of powers denied by the Constitution is treaonous, and everyone who takes money from NewsCorp is a traitor who deserves to be shot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT'S FAIR AND BALANCED ANYWAY?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 21, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've recently come to realize that most of what passes for news is simply someone else's opinion about what matters to them and the stations heads. They should however make that distinction. Everyone should have an opinion but we should know that's what it is. Real news should only take 10-15 minutes. Of course that won't sell many SUV's. But 24/7 blabbing does. Maybe that's why the American public seems so apathetic. We're informed to tears. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I WORKED THERE
Posted by: bc234 on Jun 21, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article was being kind!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ROTFL!!! Posted by: Ghoulman
Stop watching TV:
Posted by: phillipalden on Jun 21, 2007 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The solution is that simple. Fox continues to poison the minds of those who watch because they choose to watch. Our mass media is beyond redemption. What passes for "entertainment" on television is the worst kind of crap, (aka "American Idol.")

You want to make a difference? Turn off your tv and read a book. Go out and talk to other people. Take some time to focus on your community.

As long as you continue to watch tv and read American mass media you are as much at fault as they are. Instead of always blaming others maybe people should take a look at their own behavior. Fox wouldn't be doing so well if you weren't tuning in.

You want to change things? Start with yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stop watching TV: Posted by: WyrdSister
Sham Battles in the Media Spectacle
Posted by: cbrislain on Jun 21, 2007 12:18 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The constant identification of fox news as the "evil" media outlet is a perfect example of what Guy Debord would identify as one of the "sham battles" within the media spectacle. In fact, the notion that there is "balanced," "truthful," or otherwise unproblematic media, vs the "bad" media that tries to manipulate your perception, ideologically, is yet another function of the media spectacle. Even advocates of "independent" media, like Democracy Now (which yes, I like better than "big corporate" media), still function within the assumptions of the spectacle: that images, signifiers, indirect experience, can unproblematically be received as a kind of truth.

So we shouldn't get caught up harping on Fox News. Too many people think that's enough. It's not. One media source vs another is largely irrelevant, what matters is the very structures, assumptions, and aesthetics of media in general, and how they construct social relations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fox News and Venezuela
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 21, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox News and Venezuela

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Troll. (nm) Posted by: justaguy
William Belote
Posted by: Radio Willstar on Jun 21, 2007 3:32 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've developed an alergic reaction to Fox news, they truly made me sick. However, your article made me laugh, and for that I thank you. I would like to think in the not too distant future, FOX will be exposed and marginalized even further by thinking Americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HARD-CORE INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM REGARDING THE MEDIA
Posted by: chamela on Jun 21, 2007 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HARD-CORE INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM REGARDING THE MEDIA

IF YOU WANT THE REAL STORY, READ IT HERE --
http://www.danielestulin.com/?op=noticias&idioma=en

NOW THAT'S NEWS. THAT'S WHAT WE WANT, MURDOCH AND ROCKEFELLER. YOU GUYS ARE SISSY NEWS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The boogieman of liberal media
Posted by: RobNLA on Jun 21, 2007 4:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So old Repug sat US down a few years ago and began telling us the scarey tale of the liberal media boogieman. According to the tale, this boogeyman was all over the newspapers and tv, trying to tell you a bunch of lies about the government...that you had to watch out or the boogieman would trick you too.

Lots of US heard that scary tale over and over and now we know that anytime something bad about the government is on the news, we know it's just the bad boogieman again trying to trick US.

But Fox News will save US, the liberal media boogieman doesn't live there. Instead you will get happy faces, and punch and cake...all fair and balanced with 0 calories too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE LEFT DOES NOT RESPECT THE 1ST AMENDMENT OR OPPOSITION OPINION
Posted by: Jak_dah_rippah on Jun 21, 2007 5:41 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is why these commentators and the Left in general is raging about the application of the 1st amendment by a single moderate cable news channel.

Despite the fact that the Left has CNN, ABC, NBC, NPR, and virtually every major newspaper in the nation, the marxist/leftist ideology is slowly but inexorably being dismantled as lies and deprivations by talk radio and Fox news.

It is predictable that the despots on the Left will undermine the 1st amendment to squelch opposition speech. They are already doing this with the "Fairness Doctrine"

Also, note that the leftists on this blog will spew venom and invective toward anyone who exercises free speech or that challenges their "right" to completely dominate the media as they have done up till now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]