Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Caucasian Please! America's Cultural Double Standard For Misogyny & Racism

By Dr. Edward Rhymes, Black Agenda Report. Posted June 26, 2007.


The public is far more disturbed by misogynistic lyrics in rap music than in rock music -- the domain of white musicians. Seems it isn't sexism that the dominant culture is opposed to, but rather the black voices communicating the message.
Advertisement

Editor's note: Despite the firing of Don Imus, corporate media continue to attempt to divert attention from long-established institutional sexism, in order to depict Black youth culture as the vector of the disease. The American reality is one of pervasive celebration of violence, in general, and violence against women, in particular -- a white cultural invention. Black rappers, who are owned and controlled by white corporations, did not create this culture of violence and misogyny, but are made the scapegoats for a much deeper national social crisis -- a landscape in which "The Godfather" and "Goodfellas" are revered as "classic" films.

Introduction

In this composition I will not be addressing the whole of hip-hop and rap, but rather hardcore and gangsta rap. It is my assertion that the mainstream media and political pundits -- right and left -- have painted rap and hip-hop with a very broad brush. Let me be perfectly clear, hardcore and gangsta rap is not listened to, watched, consumed or supported in my home and never has been. I will not be an apologist for anything that chooses to frame the dialogue about Black women (and women in general) and Black life in morally bankrupt language and reprehensible symbols.

In the wake of MSNBC's and CBS's firing of Don Imus, the debate over misogyny, sexism and racism has now taken flight -- or submerged, depending on your point of view. There are many, mostly white, people who believe that Imus was a fall guy and he is receiving blame and criticism for what many rap artists do continually in the lyrics and videos: debase and degrade Black women. A Black guest on an MSNBC news program even went as far as to say, "Where would a 66 year-old white guy even had heard the phrase nappy-headed ho" -- alluding to hip-hop music's perceived powerful influence upon American culture and life (and apparently over the radio legend as well) -- and by so doing gave a veneer of truth to the theory that rap music is the main culprit to be blamed for this contemporary brand of chauvinism.

However, I concur with bell hooks, the noted sociologist and black-feminist activist who said that "to see gangsta rap as a reflection of dominant values in our culture rather than as an aberrant 'pathological' standpoint, does not mean that a rigorous feminist critique of the sexist and misogyny expressed in this music is not needed. Without a doubt black males, young and old, must be held politically accountable for their sexism.

Yet this critique must always be contextualized or we risk making it appear that the behavior this thinking supports and condones -- rape, male violence against women, etc. -- is a black male thing. And this is what is happening. Young black males are forced to take the 'heat' for encouraging, via their music, the hatred of and violence against women that is a central core of patriarchy."

There are those in the media, mostly white males (but also some black pundits as well), who now want the Black community to take a look at hip-hop music and correct the diabolical "double-standard" that dwells therein. Before a real conversation can be had, we have to blow-up the myths, expose the lies and cast a powerful and discerning light on the "real" double-standards and duplicity. Kim Deterline and Art Jones in their essay, Fear of a Rap Planet, point out that "the issue with media coverage of rap is not whether African Americans engaged in a campaign against what they see as violent, sexist or racist imagery in rap should be heard -- they should. ...[W]hy are community voices fighting racism and sexism in mainstream news media, films and advertisements not treated similarly?

The answer may be found in white-owned corporate media's historical role as facilitator of racial scapegoating. Perhaps before advocating censorship of a music form with origins in a voiceless community, mainstream media pundits should look at the violence perpetuated by their own racism and sexism."

Just as the mainstream media and the dominant culture-at-large treats all things "Black" in America as the "other" or as some sort of science experiment in a test tube in an isolated and controlled environment, so hardcore rap is treated as if it occurred in some kind of cultural vacuum; untouched, unbowed and uninformed by the larger, broader, dominant American culture. The conversation is always framed in the form of this question: "What is rap's influence on American society and culture?" Never do we ask, "What has been society's role in shaping and influencing hip-hop?"


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: racism, sexism, hip hop, rap

Dr. Edward Rhymes, author of When Racism Is Law & Prejudice Is Policy, is an internationally-recognized authority in the areas of critical race theory and Black studies. Please view his website: Rhymes Reasons. He can be reached at Edward@rhymesworld.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why is it misogynist to want to F*** a woman?
Posted by: NLU on Jun 26, 2007 12:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree there is a double standard when it comes to hip-hop / rap vs rock.

But I think the term misogynist is used far too much by a lot of people who take part in this debate. Misogynist means hatred or a strong prejudice against woman. I can't ever remember hearing lyrics in which the singer says that he or she hates woman. Though I'm sure it exists. There is no relation between singing about sex, though the way sex is portrayed may not be to your taste, and hating woman.

Also what is wrong with seeing woman as sex objects? Note I'm not saying exclusively as sex objects.

Human beings are sexual creatures, both men and woman. What's wrong with that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» quick question Posted by: schokoprinz
» RE: quick question - typo Posted by: schokoprinz
» RE: quick question - typo Posted by: schokoprinz
» Hidden? Posted by: suprmark
» RE: quick question - typo Posted by: carcinoid112
» RE: quick question - typo Posted by: Shade
» RE: quick question Posted by: pure_genius
» RE: quick question Posted by: NLU
» RE: quick question Posted by: NLU
» RE: quick question Posted by: schokoprinz
» You make it seem like such hard work... Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
a couple of comments...
Posted by: rue on Jun 26, 2007 12:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
first off, i'll agree that there is a double standard, to some extent. michael franti said it best back in '94 when he noted that "they're f***ing with ice-t but they don't even care if - eric clapton's singing 'i shot the sheriff'".

however, i would like to point out that the vast majority of 'rock' music the author sites is either 20 years old or older (elton john? guns 'n' rose?), or was made by bands who were active during the 1980s (faster pussycat; george lynch of lynch mob/dokken). was that music gratuitously sexual and violent? absolutely. but why not site music that has it's roots more recently.

marilyn manson? he pushes buttons, and i'm glad he's doing so. kid rock? yes, he's rock, but with a foot firmly in hip-hop.

in the end, if something is going to shock or offend, there will always be someone who will say/sing it, regardless of genre. if it offends you, don't listen to it. if you're worried about your kids listening to it, talk with them, make sure you're raising them to be morally upstanding people. don't blame music, whether it's rock, hip-hop, or whatever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a couple of comments... Posted by: karensickler51
» RE: a couple of comments... Posted by: vangogh69
» 80's metal bands Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: 80's metal bands Posted by: Robba29
» The radio is the worst Posted by: dannrusso
» A phrase from the 60s Posted by: fitzjohn
» RE: a couple of comments... Posted by: jeandarc
haha
Posted by: schokoprinz on Jun 26, 2007 1:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Im pretty sure misogyny stopped for rock when bands like whitesnake, def leppard, damn yankees, inxs (although i think they're still around), van halen - and other kick ass 80's rock groups died out. Then again their lyrics arent anything to even get flustered about. i've had a few hot teachers myself back in the day. - Rap is just the 'now' and now people have something to rant about, thats all. Frank Zappa had the same problem. Check out his interview on Crossfire from way back when. He had to defend himself against these two crazy conservative dudes who were just angry cause viagra didnt exist then. - this issue is nothing new. -pz

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: haha Posted by: Fade
An interesting parallel
Posted by: pure_genius on Jun 26, 2007 3:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when I listened to old school rap as a child it was either political in nature, or meant to be just plain fun. Before gangsta and hardcore rap came along, I only heard vicious lyrics from groups like Motley Crue or Poison. I do think the lyrics of rap today are far worse than anything I heard from those groups. I simply find that to be a product of environment. While violent themes in rap music are disturbing, they are often based in reality. This is in stark contrast to movies which display images of gratuitous and senseless violence for entertainment purposes.

The author's contention that it's not what is being said but who is saying it is very interesting to me. It can also be said that it is not what is being done but who is doing it. Until the mid 20th century, pimping and pandering of white women was in the domain of whites. When minorities began pimping white women, the societal view of the practice changed drastically. Pimps were viewed as predatory and some of the lowest criminals around.

Equality cannot exist when two groups of individuals are treated in such drastically different ways for committing the same or very comparable act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An interesting parallel Posted by: pinkfloydd
» RE: An interesting parallel Posted by: karensickler51
» RE: An interesting parallel Posted by: vangogh69
Bands
Posted by: fallout1 on Jun 26, 2007 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Metallica? Are you kidding me? I can't think of anything Metallica has ever written relating to women aside from "Dear Mama" which hardly qualifies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I was gonna say... Posted by: kepstein7777
Jefferson Spaceship?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jun 26, 2007 4:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Strip away some of the PC rhetoric, and the author brings out a good point.

Rap may be crude, cartoonish, and so on...and I sometimes wish it would go the way of hair metal. But if it means protecting freedom of expression and the freedom to listen to whatever we want, then we should let it be what it is, and switch the station if we want to listen to something else. I don't want my favorite rock tunes to be caught on a slippery slope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Editor's note
Posted by: YogiBear on Jun 26, 2007 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That editor's note is absurd. Just let the man make his own comments without some editors sticking their noses into it.

As for white-owned, corporate control of rappers, I'm not sure corporate ownership has in the history of the world ever inspired any artist to greatness. They tend to use their power and influence to steal from musicians after they've come up with the content. Whites should not be given credit (or blame) for black successes, even if it better fits one's paradigm for a racist and misogynist media.

Intriguing website, that Black Agenda Report, by the way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the editors are idiots Posted by: EasterBunny
» RE: the editors are idiots Posted by: YogiBear
Just a few thoughts...
Posted by: moflard on Jun 26, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Firstly the editors comment at the beginning of the piece;

".....celebration of violence, in general, and violence against women, in particular -- a white cultural invention"

There's no way this argument can be supported, and will no doubt turn some people off reading the rest of the article as it sets up a false image that the article will be an attack on whites for the crime of being white. It's a stupid throwaway comment that should not have been given such a prominant position.

As for the main article, whilst I agree with it's general thrust there are some things that strike me that are a little problematic and where greater research would have helped.

Firstly the comparrisons between some of the (white) songs, and those of rap. "Ticking", "Nebraska" and "Johnny 99" all paint a picture of violence begetting tragedy, and death for the culprit - unlike much "gangsta rap" they do not, as the author suggests glorify violence. The same can be said with "I shot the Sherrif" - which is a case of self-defence, vs "Cop Killer" which explicitly glorifies premeditated murder and extolls listeners to follow the characters example. I must also point out that Bob Marley's original version did not recieve negative press. Oh and "Catholic Girls" was by Zappa, "Centerfold" by the J.Giles band neither by Van Halen.

As for the drugs - well yes "Cocaine" obviously, though may I point out the earlier (often regarded as black) folk song "Take a sniff on me". As for "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" the author, I feel, should check beyond urban myth and find that this song was about a drawing John Lennon's son showed him - not LSD. I think in genreal Rock is far more guilty of drug glorification than rap, gangsta eulogises about dealing not necc. the taking, rock the reverse.

Now we come to lust. Rock and Rap are arguably aimed at a teenage/youth audience and as such both are bound to have a certain degree of lust filled lyrics. There is even going to be a certain amount of mysogeny involved for the target audience of testosteroned males. The problem "gangsta" has is the linking of all this with violence. And contrary to the authors contention, a white band did get into trouble over combining the two - The Prodigy with "Smack my Bitch Up".

The author looks for examples of white bands causing the same shock and outrage as rappers and only finds Marylin Manson? A bit of basic research would have found - The Beatles ("mop haired" remember?), David Bowie, the entire Punk movement, Alice Cooper of course, (Mansons far more intelligent antecedent) Black Sabbath, and Ozzy Osbourne - these just from the top of my head. All reviled and even feared at one time.

As a final point - rock relies more on debauchery to sell itself, whereas gangsta rap certainly plays on violence and images thereof - when was the last time you saw a rock band showing off it's bullet wounds?

Overall I thought the article was good and certainly there is a double standard, I just thought it would have benefited from some deeper research.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PLEASE REREAD THE ARTICAL Posted by: soft2u47
» RE: Just a few thoughts... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Just a few thoughts... Posted by: moflard
Author Misses the Mark
Posted by: EncinoM on Jun 26, 2007 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So blinded by his quest to find racism in the mdia he forgets what the 80's rock music also produced, Tipper Gore and parental lables on records by the industry to prevent government censurship.

It was not rappers testifing before congress by Frank Zappa adn Twisted Sister.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps the celebration of violence against women...
Posted by: RandomAction on Jun 26, 2007 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is a white cultural invention. But actual violence against women isn't. The vast majority of women that have ever lived have lived in a culture where they are considered to be, at the very least, second class people, which is a form of violence invented by many cultures. Even today violence against women, in some areas, is a cultural requirement under certain circumstances. If the celebration of violence is a white invention, then so is female equality, and so is their right to be free of violence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A white institutional creation? Puh-lease.
Posted by: redceres on Jun 26, 2007 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I seriously resent the misdirection in the editor's note. There is nothing inherently "white" about violence against women.

This crap has been going on since prehistory.

Why? Because straight men feel a great deal of both insecurity about and possessiveness toward women. This drive has been and continues to be the cause of many social problems throughout the ages. The problem here is the male need to "own" and control women. Add in some very weak and malleable women who suffer from the "PLEASE think I'm pretty!" complex that's brought on by cultures who define possibilities and values for women in narrow, shallow ways, and you've got a full-on war on those of us women who don't WANT to be "pretty."

When you look at the right-wingers and their crazed anti-abortion rhetoric, just about NONE of it has to do with protecting the "baby"--if it did, why wouldn't they target the fathers as wrong-doers instead of focusing wholly on the behavior of and choices made by the women involved?

It's all about a need to own and control women. When women go along with it, they are usually the kind of women who WANT to be owned because they think that it proves they're desirable. And agin, according to MANY cultures, being desirable is just about the best thing a woman can be, right? Women who show up in rap and rock videos, selling out their sisters by perpetuating this crap, are just as bad as people who "sell out" those of their race or social class.

These are weak, needy people. They do not belong to one race or another. They don't even belong to one country or time period.

I prefer strong men who are attracted to strong women. And I love sex, too. What I don't appreciate is this idea that a drive for sex and a drive for control are the same thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stupid article
Posted by: supercrisp on Jun 26, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the idea that African Americans get unfairly blamed for rap. But the whole chicken and egg argument of where the violence against women comes from is specious. If you read African myth and European myth, the misogyny is about the same. Rap does seem to me to be more violent in general, but I'm not listening to pop music, so I don't know. See: not informed, no opinion. If you're going to be making these kinds of claims, it seems to me you need to listen to the music, discuss the music, and have a pretty damn big sample size. I think the argument is interesting, but it seems to me to miss the whole point, which to me would be how to improve things, not figure out who's at fault for what. But hey, hand-wringing and finger-pointing are the natural occupaptions of Homo bloviatus, whether from the right, left, black, white, up or down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unless I missed it, the author neglected to mention one more irrelevant "rock" band.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 26, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
N.I.N.: I wanna effa u like an aminal!

Oh, and the Bloodhound Gang and their song...well, all of them, really. They've got an uncensored video that's hilarious, though. Oh, and I think he missed some Aerosmith Ragdoll action. Did I miss it, or did he forget to dig up Kurt Cobain and kick him a few times for doing whatever he did to make Courtney Love meltdown? "Hole", indeed! If I think of any more numbers that contribute to the author's premise that old acts have been immoral, I'll ammend them.

With regard to duh gangstuh wrapping, if you tell someone she's worthless garden tool, and a b--ch enough, and if you tell someone that the lives of their fellows aren't worth the bullet it would take to end it, then perhaps, eventually, your peers begin to believe you? Isn't that one of the tactics of military interrogators and dirty cops--if all else fails, tell someone something enough times, under conditions of duress, and they will eventually start nodding (bobbing?) their heads.

P.S. Kenny Rogers--"Coward of the County": if I remember correctly, he "took his daddy's rifle" to the bar in response to the Gatlin boys who "took turns at Becky, and there were three of them", "locks the door", and at the end of the song we are told that "not a Gatlin boy was standing", which leaves the violence--both against Becky and the Gatlin's--and the ending (somewhat) ambiguous and a little bit up to the imagination. Well, maybe not exactly ambiguous, but certainly more so than explicitly telling the listenership that he busted a cap in their bubblegooses for fecking his bizzatch. Also, the author might take note that the song does more or less the opposite of celebrating violence against the chickadees, what with the perps ending up flat on their backs. Perhaps the harsh condemnation and retribution for violence against women in this song was of little relevance to the issue of misogyny? I'll leave that one for social scientists looking for their junior achiever badge to ponder.

Me? I'd have chosen some Croce if I wanted to pick on explicit violent 30-year old country-ish acts that only aging farts like me like to tap their toes to:

"When the curtain went down, the only thing that wasn't bloody was the soles of the big man's feet/He was shot in a hundred places, he was stabbed in a couple more./You better believe they told a different kind of story when Big Jim hit the floor"

But that's just me, and that song is admittedly absent the misogynyst flair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fine Posted by: Robba29
» Silly, didn't you know? Posted by: ABetterFuture
What about the very real violence that rappers commit?
Posted by: blueskies on Jun 26, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article completely ignored the fact that some of these rappers are not just singing about violence - they are actually committing it as well.

And rock singers for the most part do not base their popularity and personas on the illusion - or reality - of having committed violent crimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rock-Just as Misogynistic=Check. Just as Violent? I dont think so
Posted by: Fade on Jun 26, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The double standard applied to rap music makes it easier to sell the idea that "gangsta rap" is "more" misogynist, racist, violent and dangerous than any other genre of music."

Rock is easily just as Misogynistic, but as violent, racist, or dangerous? I don't quite think so.

I mean, do you remember the time Metallica's lead singer tried to shoot the guitarist for Megadeth? No, I don't think so.
They may sing about cartoonish violence and anarchy, but its just angst and bullshit. These guys aint carrying guns, shooting people and starting fights left and right. They're just getting drunk and getting laid. Slayer don't "keep it real" by actually becoming the satanists they pretend to be. Moshing is about as violent as metalheads get. So, the points on misogyny are right on, but come on, don't tell us how NONVIOLENT "Gangsta" rap is. There are too many dead gangsta rappers out there to prove you wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally!
Posted by: Robba29 on Jun 26, 2007 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been saying this for years! Just listen to the lyrics of early Motley Crue, Poison, Warrant, etc! Today we have Hinder and other crap bands that do the same. For god's sake, just look at the inside of Guns and Roses' "Appetite for Destruction" album that shows a rape scene! Its not the mysogeny, its race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Finally! Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Finally! Posted by: Robba29
» RE: Finally! Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Finally! Posted by: fitzjohn
The Bell Hooks Article...
Posted by: nothreat on Jun 26, 2007 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...cited in this article is well worth reading and much better than this one.

http://race.eserver.org/misogyny.html

These lists of songs in Dr. Rhymes article really distract from the point. It seems to be all you people want to talk about: "Oh Kenny Rodgers violence wasn’t as extreme as Ice-Ts." That’s just not the point. The point is that "gangsta rap" didn't evolve in a vacuum. It's a reflection of the larger culture of patriarchy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Choices Posted by: moflard
» RE: Choices Posted by: nothreat
» RE: Choices Posted by: moflard
Perhaps
Posted by: vangogh69 on Jun 26, 2007 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We'd do well to be more careful about assigning too much power to art to influence life. We have, for a while now, lived under a patriarchical, capitalist, racist, misogynist system of laws, economies, commerce, and socialization, the reflection of which is made more apparent in certain times than others. The author makes some sound points but doesn't go far enough. It's foolhardy to condense the meaning of music (in any genre) down to the lyrics (which this author does), ignoring the musician's melodic skills, timing, composition, and innovation; would that we held a (white) pop album to the same lyrical standard of brillance as we do the (white-owned) mainstream gansta rap, we'd have Bach-quality music all the time. That said...

Society is in decay, of which art is a symptom. In case you haven't been paying attention, the world is pretty fucked up now with two wars going on (orchestrated by the US), liars & criminals in Washington, candidates that aren't worth a dime, wages that go for less than they did 40 years ago, people working longer for less, etc.

The film HOSTEL II has a scene with a woman bathing in another's blood and it's a mainstream, Hollywood flick. Only a sick society condones such torture and calls it "entertainment". Only a sick society looks at one artform while ignoring the rest, as this author does. (AND, seeing as how there are many genres of "porn", the author would do well to not condemn the entire idea...it makes as much puritanical sense as his spelling "f**k" instead of "fuck".)

Sorry, my two cents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perhaps Posted by: EncinoM
If Rap is music . . . .
Posted by: billwald on Jun 26, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Rap is music then so is the the 60 cycle hum that comes from power transformers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If Rap is music . . . . Posted by: lawstudent08
» RE: If Rap is music . . . . Posted by: lawstudent08
» RE: If Rap is music . . . . Posted by: rhinojos
not all rap artists are black
Posted by: treesarelove on Jun 26, 2007 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think one broad, unfounded assumption that the auther makes is that all rap artists are black. Yes, the majority are, but what about Eminem? I recall a song by him called Kim, where he beats his wife, including soundclips of her screaming and crying.
("HAHA, gotcha! Go ahead, yell
Here I'll scream with you,
AHH SOMEBODY HELP.
Don't you get it bitch?
No one can hear you, now shut the FUCK up and get what's coming to you.
You were supposed to love me.
Now bleed bitch, bleed!
BLEED BITCH BLEED!
BLEED!")

This exemplification of violence is prevalent, and in my opinion, obviously linked to violent music and movies. (Anyone ever hear of Mirror Neurons?)

I do agree with the notion that the majority of rap music is ruthlessly violent. Yet it is so popular; does this say something about market demand?

The largest supporter/listener of gangsta rap music is teenage white males living in Suburbia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A few thoughts
Posted by: willymack on Jun 26, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read this article and the responses with intrest. I'm an old fart and thought I'd throw in a few words of my own. I grew up in and around Newark,New Jersey-the poor man's Paris. The ethnic composition in my neighborhood was Italian and Black, (except for my Celtic family). I acquired as many black friends as Italian ones. While in company of my Black friends, I listened to them "play house" (playing the dozens on the West Coast). The object of this game is to insult each other in as vulgar and obscene a manner as possible-all in rhyming verse. Mothers played a prominent role in these verses. A few examples of this are: "Listen mutha fucka, gonna set you straight. Yo' mama got a hole like a P-38. Yo brother's in jail, yo daddy's on bail, yo sister's on the corner yelling pussy for sale! and :" Yo mama's so black, you cain't see her at night until she smiles. Finally, "I met yo mama in Atlantic City. She had a wooden leg and a rubber tittie". All this was accompanied by uproarious laughter and good fellowship. No malice was present or implied. The thought processes were shaped by POVERTY and the certain knowlege that the Black people occupied a subordinate position in the scheme of things. Keep in mind, this preceeds what I've read here by several decades, as I'm talking about the 1940s and 1950s. Now, of course, it's been commercialized and transformed into something truly obscene and hostile. The fact that I can remember some of these verses verbatim, is one measure of how dire the plight of Black people was, and sadly, still is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The corporatocracy doesn't like political messages in music
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 26, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For example:

"KRS-One talks about police officers and plantation owners:

Yeah, officer from overseer
You need a little clarity?
Check the similarity!
The overseer rode around the plantation
The officer is off patrolling all the nation
The overseer could stop you what you're doing
The officer will pull you over just when he's pursuing
The overseer had the right to get ill
And if you fought back, the overseer had the right to kill
The officer has the right to arrest
And if you fight back they put a hole in your chest!

- Sound of da police"

The same thing is true for other genres of music - recall how Clear Channel banned artists like Dixie Chixs for being 'unpatriotic?' Similarly, heavy metal songs that have political messages (Black Sabbath's War Pigs, for example) are not being played on corporate radio much:

Generals gathered in their masses,
just like witches at black masses.
Evil minds that plot destruction,
sorcerers of death's construction.
In the fields the bodies burning,
as the war machine keeps turning.
Death and hatred to mankind,
poisoning their brainwashed minds.
Oh lord, yeah!


Music has a great deal of power and can reach a lot of people. Corporations have tapped into this reality and are now promoting artists that promote corporate values: greed, selfishness, manipulation of others, and consumerism. Get the expensive car, the puff daddy sunglasses, the obedient female harem, the gold chains and luxurious house - that's a message that corporations and advertisers are comfortable with. Bob Dylan's "Master's of War", on the other hand?

Let me ask you one question
Is your money that good
Will it buy you forgiveness
Do you think that it could
I think you will find
When your death takes its toll
All the money you made
Will never buy back your soul

And I hope that you die
And your death'll come soon
I will follow your casket
In the pale afternoon
And I'll watch while you're lowered
Down to your deathbed
And I'll stand o'er your grave
'Til I'm sure that you're dead


Bob Dylan, America's greatest songwriter...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thug life
Posted by: Fade on Jun 26, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that last fact is breeding a whole new set of thugs, these ones white, smacking their bitches up, banging and slingin.

What ever color they are, its bad for the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Within the article
Posted by: magistre on Jun 26, 2007 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Within the article and the comments there are many valid points made-good and bad. Misogynism and racism are not the sole property of any race.
I also think the good Doctor needs to do some research on the history of some of the music he cites. Doctor if you would look up the history of the song "Cocaine" the question then becomes: "Does the song more extol the use of ilegal drugs when its sung