Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Prime-Time TV Sweeps: As Demeaning Images of Women Rise, So Do Ratings

By Sandra Kobrin, Women's eNews. Posted May 2, 2007.


As TV networks head into their big sweeps and hotly compete for ratings and advertisers, Sandra Kobrin gapes at the demeaning and downright scary portrayal of women in our most powerful communication medium.
Advertisement

Last week began sweeps month, when networks put on their season finales, bring in special guests and do everything they can do to get more viewers and higher ratings so they can charge more to advertisers.

The focus is on prime time, those after-dinner hours from 8 until 11 when TV serves as the fire burning brightly in the national hearth.

If anybody reading this is in a Nielsen family -- one of those that keeps a Nielsen meter in its home or keeps a viewing diary for the company -- perhaps keeping watch of your dial in the coming month can help improve how women are treated by our most powerful form of mass communication.

For starters, you might think that since women watch more TV than men we would be reflected in the programming, with at least an equal proportion of male to female characters in prime time. But you would be wrong.

Women are less than 40 percent of the characters on prime time and are underrepresented as creators and writers.

But what's worse than the quantity is the quality of women on TV.

Bimbo, Bitch or Ball Buster

For a long time TV has cast women in one of three basic roles: bimbo, bitch or ball buster.

Back in the 1970s a Mary Tyler Moore sort of character would come along every once in a while and offer a friendly and eager-to-please exception to this pattern.

But Suzanne Somers' bimbo-style character in "Three's Company" -- which went off the air in 1984 -- was more typical. She walked around in short shorts, a tight shirt and never really understood what was happening.

And there have always been bitches like Katey Sagal's character today in "Married With Children." She never stops heckling her husband Al for not making enough money and being a lousy lover. Nagging wives are a TV staple.

As for a ball buster, look no further than Candice Bergen in "Murphy Brown." There was an executive-level woman with authority over men and guess what? She also had a nightmarish personal life. The message was clear: professional women should give up trying to have it all.

But at least these characters had some kind of heart, were funny, witty or marginally sympathetic. And if they were bimbos, at least they were allowed some individuality.

Now bimbos are being mass produced as Vanna Whites, to be seen and not heard.

Just look at NBC's newest hit, "Deal or No Deal," which will air its 100th show during sweeps. There are 25 women on the show, but they're more like wallpaper. They stand posed in the background waiting submissively for host Howie Mandel to point at them so they can open a case, smile or frown. They are identically dressed in short tight cocktail dresses. They march down the steps in unison, stand identically and smile the same plastic smile. Silent. While their names and ethnicities vary, they are undistinguishable in their commodity-like appeal.

Reality TV is Really Scary

But what really scares me is the way women are portrayed in reality TV: in the big-budget and intensely popular shows such as "Trading Spouses," "The Bachelor," "America's Next Top Model" and "Pussycat Dolls: The Search for the Next Doll."

We have hit a new low, with what Jennifer Pozner, director of Women in Media and News, describes as "the cultural arm of the backlash against women." Of course reality TV doesn't actually have much to do with reality. Writers and producers typically have a "show arc" already written and wait for a "moment" to film what they already expect or want to happen.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: women, television, misogyny, sweeps

Sandra Kobrin is a Los Angeles based writer and columnist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fantastic
Posted by: bornxeyed on May 2, 2007 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"All of a sudden we're really regressing," says Martha Lauzen

Great!

With any luck women on TV will be portrayed as negatively as men have been for the last four decades.

Or do these critics think all men really are as inept as Tim Allen, as stupid as Homer Simpson, as out of touch as Ed Norton, as overbearing as Ralph Kramden or Fred Flinstone, as pussy-whipped as Barney Rubble, as incompetent as that fat guy from King of Queens, as self-centered as Jerry Seinfeld, as neurotic as George Costanza, all "hipster dufusses" like Cosmo Kramer, as redneck as Arlen, Texas, as ...

Well I guess you get the point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fantastic Posted by: thha
» RE: Fantastic Posted by: Badger1492
absurd analysis
Posted by: Alec Freeman on May 2, 2007 2:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In other words, women are now equally as despicable as men, which, of course, mirrors real life. I have to laugh at these inane comparisons between men and women. The truth that many people cannot comprehend or bear is this: Most people -- particularly in the workplace, families, schools, and on highways -- are unkind, belligerent, aggressive, inauthentic, shallow, mean, superficial, and ignorant REGARDLESS of their gender.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deeper layers
Posted by: talkville on May 2, 2007 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It'd be well to remember that the characters portrayed on programming (get the word?) are played by women themselves -- albeit, justifiably, they too must "make a living". With any actors-male or female or anywhere between-so long as the logic of capitalism and exploitation rules, very little else is to be expected, especially from television. Integrity will always be corroded by the "rewards" of celebrity. There's plenty of men and women who comply - the characters to be portrayed will always be dictated by the valorization of value. Whether as producer, director, actor or audience we are each of us complicit in maintaining it. Each production is merely a reflection of our own social relations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OFF buttons anyone?
Posted by: NonnyO on May 2, 2007 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I admit I don't watch any of the shows mentioned for the simple reason the ads for them are pure drivel. I'm great friends with the Mute button on my remote (it's being worn down) when their ads come on. I don't watch that much TV, and when I do I usually record those few shows so I can fast forward through those irritating commercials.

However, the simplest thing possible to avoid watching idiocy like that is to hit the OFF button and go read a book....

No viewers = no ratings = no corporate sponsors = those irritating low-brow shows are taken off the air....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Now that's a great alternative! Posted by: talkville
I keep wondering...
Posted by: hera62 on May 2, 2007 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about the majority of the comments each time a story with a feminist angle is posted on AlterNet. Not only the commenters who are apparently male but also part of the female commenters. Evidently there is something threatening about suggesting, in whichever way, that Western society is still very much white-male-oriented and that misogyny (mostly in implicit forms) is stll rife. We still have a long way to go, I'm afraid...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Missing the point Posted by: H_H
» Couldn't agree more. Posted by: Catherine Martell
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: thha
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: mviscid
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: Catherine Martell
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: Sledge28
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: thha
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: elfinito
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: Catherine Martell
» RE: Couldn't agree more. Posted by: elfinito
» RE: I keep wondering... Posted by: bornxeyed
» Hilarity Posted by: H_H
» RE: I keep wondering... Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: I keep wondering... Posted by: Lizard
» RE: I keep wondering... Posted by: elfinito
Women are always facing some crisis, aren't they?
Posted by: H_H on May 2, 2007 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee, and men are never demeaned or stereotyped anywhere in popular culture. This is (yet) another problem that only affects women, isn't it? Kind of like how Salon.com recently had a post saying that Tsunamis hit women the hardest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everybody loves a cat fight.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 2, 2007 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What are the demographics? I suspect more women watch these shows than are willing to admit.

I find these shows annoying. Some of the girls might be nice to look at, but I can't stand to listen to them for more than 5 seconds. I'd be willing to watch Top Model for longer than that if all the models were to gang up on Tyra and make her shut up. She's the worst.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: everybody loves a cat fight. Posted by: MartianBachelor
How about the commercials?....
Posted by: nise52 on May 2, 2007 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The worst is the diet commercial where one woman says ..."I'm a 2!" (the average American woman is a size TWELVE). Another commercial for the same diet plan has women (who have lost weight) wearing bikini's and saying "my husband says I'm hot!" and "my husband calls me his trophy wife"!

I was so disgusted I found their website and emailed them regarding their blatant "sexualization" of women in their commercials. I also complained about the poor image that young girls would have if they weren't/couldn't become a "size 2".

I never received a response. But at least I complained. And along with commenting
here on AlterNet, we all need to complain (via emails/phone calls) to the company web sites. Use the power of the Internet to effect change!

Good companies will respond (I've had many who have). And they appreciated feedback.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think it is WOMEN who need to stop watching this crap.
Posted by: jasonk on May 2, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America’s Next Top Model was number one this week in three demographic categories (adults 18 - 34, women 18 - 34, and women 18 - 49) and second with adults 18 - 49 (2.6 / 8-tie), one-tenth of a point from first place.

As well, the combination of America’s Next Top Model and the Wednesday encore presentation of Pussycat Dolls Present: Search for the Next Doll has brought The CW to second place in their favorite demographics for Wednesdays - adults 18 - 34 (2.5 / 7), women 18 - 34 (3.9 / 10), women 18-49 (2.9 / 7-tie.).

Article Link

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE OLDEST CURE IS STILL THE BEST
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 2, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TURN IT OFF. I often wonder if people really watch this stuff or if they just happen to have the television set on while they do other things. But, there is a serious effort to persude women to be cute and adorable and learn how to giggle. It comes at us from all angles: clothes, books, TV, religion, movies, music, etc. I think they're trying to tell us something. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can catch me playing LOTRO for an hour or so on the computer...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 2, 2007 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...if I'm not working late, doing something around the house, catching up on the HTLV-1 literature, or surprising my wife with a bit o'cooking, during the hours between 5 and 11.

Who watches television anymore, anyway?

(Oh, and to throw a bone to those who insist on finding sexismantifeminismclassismismismism in everything, the LOTRO devs chose to omit the female gender from the Dwarven race to coincide with the traditional roles of Tolkienesque Dwarves. Therefore, my preferred form of mindless entertainment is also in dire need of some activistingivating by those convinced they see wrongs...they see wrongs everywhere. Now, grab an e-protest e-sign, and e-hop to.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lectures, presentations and writing on reality TV misogyny
Posted by: jennpozner on May 2, 2007 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was quoted in the article above as calling reality TV "the cultural arm of the backlash agains women." That's the premise for a new book I'm just beginning to work on. I've been monitoring gender representations in reality TV dating, mating, makeover and competition shows since 1999, and more recently representations of race in reality TV as well, and have been writing about and speaking on college campuses about the genre for the past seven years. See http://www.wimnonline.org/analysis/lectures.html for info on these programs. If anyone reading this is based on a college campus or at a community organization and is interested in sponsoring a multimedia presentation on reality TV and gender roles, media economics and more, please get in touch with me via Women In Media & News http://www.wimnonline.org/about/contact.html

I truly believe that reality TV is not a guilty pleasure, but a serious indicator of cultural and political backlash against women's social rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clarification?
Posted by: sweetlou on May 2, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, I take it that the women who appear on these shows lack free will, or intelligence, or are somehow victimized into participating. Because if they do it of their own free will, isn't that an empowered choice? And if so, where's the backlash against them for contributing to objectification? Or is it just that they are so damaged by the male patriarchy, that they need special treatment - in which case, I guess the equality argument goes out the window.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bingo Posted by: H_H
» RE: Bingo Posted by: Lizard
» RE: Bingo Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Bingo Posted by: Lizard
» RE: Bingo Posted by: sweetlou
» RE: Bingo Posted by: jasonk
» RE: Bingo Posted by: Lizard
» RE: Bingo Posted by: sweetlou
» RE: Clarification? Posted by: carlon
why we tune it all out...!
Posted by: ggmurray on May 2, 2007 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this is why many of us simply turn off the offending images and have a real life, real conversations, a level of zest and freedom unknown to the purveyors of sitcoms and UN-reality TV!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who watches America's Next Top Model anyway?
Posted by: steamboatbarnes on May 2, 2007 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know 8 people that watch at least 1 of the reality shows given by the author as most misogynous, and they are all women with at least bachelor's degrees - several have master's and one will have a PHD at month's end. If a show's primary audience is women, is it really misogynous?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where to begin?
Posted by: Logic's Edge on May 2, 2007 12:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are so many points to reply to.

Why isn't the negative portrayal of men mentioned? Once again, only women matter?

Oh, actually, it's all done to please women and feed their sense of superiority so that they'll go out and buy products, from what I understand.

The fact that more women watch TV than men suggests to me that more TV is aimed at what women want, too.

"Let's just all scratch our eyes out"... you know, anyone who has worked in an office environment will understand that this more closely represents the sorry reality than an image of a bunch of halo-wearing beings of light seeking consensus and happiness for all.

... more points omitted out of pure weariness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember The Bachelorette?
Posted by: jasonk on May 2, 2007 1:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bachelorette was a reality television dating game show that debuted in 2003 on ABC, which took the runner-up date from the first season of The Bachelor (Trista Rehn), and let her choose a husband. The 2004 season of The Bachelorette again took the runner-up from the previous season of The Bachelor. The show lasted from January 8, 2003 to February 28, 2005.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bachelorette

Would that be Misandry then?

Misandry (IPA [mɪ.ˈsæn.dri]) is the hatred of males as a sex, as opposed to misogyny, the hatred of women. Misandry comes from misos (Greek μῖσος, "hatred") + andr-ia (Greek anér-andros, "man").

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Women ARE THE MAJORITY, not a 'minority'. They, women, could
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 2, 2007 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
solve this problem very easily, but yet, for some reason, do not do so.
1) don't watch the programs
2) don't work on those programs
3) don't buy the products on those programs
4) stop exploitation in Africa (and elsewhere) by not buying (or accepting) gold or diamond jewelry
5) stop buying comestics, 'sexy' clothes, or whatever 'objectifys' you
6) don't buy your daughters pretty dolls, makeup, earrings, 'sexy' clothes etc
7) vote
8) don't date/marry/havesexwith any guy who doesn't treat you as an equal
The bitching and hand-wringing is ridiculous. You have the numbers, simply use them. Businesses, like tv, exist to make money. If you don't watch/buy/accept they will change their format and programming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boo Hoo
Posted by: TWilliams on May 2, 2007 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People of every culture, every race, both men and women are degraded in one way or another. What is the point of this article? It just states the obvious while excluding a ton of other relevant facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sitcoms & reality tv = apples, oranges (& don't forget "Jeopardy!")
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on May 2, 2007 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author could have focused on the new reality shows to better effect; we can take the age-old (or at least 60 year old) sitcom traditions in a simpler way. The wife/mom is almost always the competent one & the hubby/dad is a dodo -- as stylized as the Greek tragedies ever were.

In fact, her one positive sitcom mention, Mary Tyler Moore, can be examined with a much darker view than the author's. The humor there generally boiled down to: Mary is competent at work, and her wacky co-workers and friends are not... but Mary's personal life is a disaster, and her wacky co-workers and friends invariably do better. Thus, Mary always "deserved" better than she got, therefore (?) the situations were funny. Kind of disturbing when you look at it that way, no?

"Survivor" and "American Idol" treat women fairly well, I think, and they are the biggies in so-called reality.

And a female champ on "Jeopardy!" used to be as scarce as hens' teeth, but gender equity advances steadily there. They don't need a Jane Austen final nowadays for a woman to win. Congrats!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Silver Lining
Posted by: lessbread on May 2, 2007 3:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of the shows mentioned in the article made last week's top 20: Network Primetime Averages by Total Households week of 04/23/07 - 04/29/07

Better still, the ratings for the top rated show indicate that far more people have their televisions turned off. Shows are ranked according to their rating and their share. The rating shows the percentage of televisions out of all televisions (on or off) that were tuned to a given show. The share shows the percentage of televisions turned on at that time that were tuned to a given show.

Apply a little bit of algebra to these definitions and the formula for determining the "off rating" turns out to be "(1 - rating/share) * 100" and the formula for determining the "off share" turns out to be "(share/rating - 1) * 100". The highest rated show last week was American Idol on Tuesday at 8 pm with a 15.7/25.0 rating/share. Plug those figures into the formulas and the off rating was 37.2 and the off share was 59.2 at that time.

Now the last time I checked the Nielsen website, they said there were 110.2 million television households in the USA. The off share is a strange metric since a television turned off can't be tuned in, but the off rating can give us an estimate of how many television households did not have their sets turned on last Tuesday at 8 pm - nearly 41 million.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TURN OFF THE TV PEOPLE
Posted by: ateo on May 2, 2007 4:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't watched TV in probably 6 years and it's been great. I can't hold a very coherent conversation regarding the latest episode of Lost or American Idol with my imbecile coworkers but I can talk about the financial markets, politics, world events, foreign cultures/countries, science and practically any other topic other than television entertainment.

I understand that TV is still very influential among the majority of Americans and that is the point of the article but that doesn't mean you can't unplug yourself from it at the least.

TV is garbage and the sad fact is most American parents let it raise their children for them these days. Is it any wonder that people are the way they are? Raised by the public schools and television to be the perfect little consumer/wage slave. Parents, family, community etc. are effectively taken out of the equation.

For the good of yourself and your family disconnect from the television.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TURN OFF THE TV PEOPLE Posted by: dangerouslysane
SOME GOOD SHOWS STARRING WOMEN-
Posted by: WitchyNy on May 2, 2007 8:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't watch much TV out here in the Nevada Desert..not much reception. Not much worth watching.

But tonight is my favorite-MEDIUM. And it actually shows a functional- realistic family.
We also love HOUSE- 2 smart women doctors.
CROSSING JORDAN-another woman doctor-cutting up dead people-my boys love that.
Oprah.

Sadly that is about it. Maybe what we should do is start writing old fashioned fan letters to these shows. Maybe we will get more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop Watching Them
Posted by: chomsky on May 3, 2007 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have never watched any of the mentioned shows. Not into trash TV. Actually I don’t watch much TV, just news, politics and educational documentaries.

Most of the reality TV is aimed at women and being kept on because of popularity amongst women. So if you want these shows to be off air then stop bitching and try and persuade women to stop watching them. This is not the fictional white patriarchy as some commentators have mentioned this is supply and demand – avarice at work.

We have the freedom to be trash. The main problem is not with the TV networks, the problem lies with the individual who watches these shows; they have the power to desist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]