Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Buy Bigelow, Fight Bigotry

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted April 11, 2007.


The corporate overlords at CBS and NBC won't fire Imus unless they have to for financial reasons. So let's support the sponsors who have pulled out, and lean on the ones who haven't ... yet.
Advertisement

No, product placement hasn't gotten to me at last. And if the truth be told, I'm a coffee man ... several large cups of java just to get me going every morning. Tea just doesn't do it ...

Nevertheless, I'm going out tonight to buy a big batch of Bigelow Tea. While I'm at it, I'm going to pick up some staples from Staples as well. It's the best way I know to fight hate speech on the Don Imus show, that longstanding bastion of sexism, homophobia and racism distributed by CBS and NBC.

MSNBC and CBS Radio took the wimpy way out after the aptly-named "I-Man" cracked wise again about jiggaboos and hos, merely suspending the bigoted broadcaster for two weeks while waiting to see if the controversy over his repugnant remarks blows over -- and the cash keeps coming in. Meanwhile, however, an office-supply chain and a tea company stepped up and decided just to do the right thing and end their relationship with Imus.

Supporting sponsors who refuse to support Imus and his idiocy is the best way we can put an end to society's acceptance of such stupidity masquerading as fun and frivolity. So three cheers, then, for Cindi Bigelow, the tea company's co-president, who said in a statement, "the company does not condone or support in any way the unacceptable comments made by Imus with regard to the Rutgers University women's basketball team." As Bigelow noted, her company "is a family company that prides itself on honoring and respecting all individuals."

While we're at it, kudos as well to Staples, and Miralus Healthcare, whose executives pulled their ads from the MSNBC simulcast of Imus' syndicated radio program. A tip of the hat as well to Procter & Gamble for pulling all its advertising from MSNBC's daytime schedule. P&G, one of the nation's largest broadcast sponsors, spends more than a half million dollars annually on the Imus simulcast alone.

"We have to think first about our consumers," a spokeswoman for the manufacturing giant told the New York Times, while explaining the basic elements of the marketplace thus: "Anyplace where our advertising appears that is offensive to our customers is not acceptable to us."

Putting moral and financial pressure on Imus' advertisers is working -- so let's not stop now. Consumer complaints to the corporations who continue to advertise on both cable and radio in support of Imus might well yield a similar response.

Sure, public relations personnel for Big Media players like CBS and NBC tell us they are "disappointed" in Imus' actions and characterize his comments as "completely inappropriate" and "deplorable." But let's face the facts instead of the flacks: the leaders of our leading media don't see the Imus flap as black and white -- they only see green.

Threatening their profits is the only sure way to force them back into the fold of civility. Letting corporations who advertise with corporate media know that you as a consumer as well as a citizen are offended by Imus -- and by their continuing support of his program -- is one of the most effective tactics around.

Sadly, it's all about the Benjamins for just about everyone concerned, including the many Imus-enablers who gladly kiss the racist's ring in exchange for his airtime and audience. They legitimate him, and he in turn promotes them, their outlets, their books and their campaigns for higher office. In exchange, they ignore his depredations, accept his apologies, and prop him up each time he "crosses the line."

Imus won't quit -- and neither should we. His pals at the corrupt nexus of Big Politics and Big Media won't stop supporting him unless and until we make them -- so let's force the issue further, and put them to the test. (Hello, Frank Rich, are you out there? John Kerry, why aren't you blogging Imus on the Huffington Post?) Nor will the I-Man's corporate overlords at CBS and NBC fire him -- unless they have to for financial reasons. So let's bring it on -- support the sponsors who have pulled out, and lean on the ones who haven't ... yet.

The issue is bigger than one pathetic, drug-and-alcohol-addled shock-jock. If you're as sick as I am over the seemingly unending vitriol on our public airwaves, owing to greedy, antisocial media corporations, join the battle to topple Imus and send a message not only to him but also to the rest of his ilk. It's a fight worth engaging in -- and one we can win.

Excuse me -- I have to go drink some tea now!

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: racism, imus

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
cottontail
Posted by: cottontail on Apr 11, 2007 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't listen to the ugly man so I don't know who advertises on his show. Would someone enlighten me?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: enlightenment Posted by: roc
Supporter of Rush Limbaugh
Posted by: imus supporter on Apr 11, 2007 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bigelow tea also advertises on Rush Limbaugh. If you are against one comment from Imus you must also be against Rush. Save your money on thet tea. Personally, I think losing Imus is losing one of the last remaining voices of true democracy. Always presented both sides with irony, humor, satire and sometimes some nastiness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DON'T FEEL OBLIGATED
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 12, 2007 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it took you more than fifteen minutes to write this column, you wasted your time. Nothing like a bunch of writers with a no brainer to run with. While your not buying tea you should realize that you're trashing an American instituion. You'll look back at this column one day and be embarassed. Grow up. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nice idea but...
Posted by: CCridr on Apr 12, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't keep up with which corporations I'm supposed to boycott and for which reasons. From gas stations, to computer companies, to caffeine peddlers - it's a constantly changing list. The root problem is capitalism and profit-driven mass media.

And the fundamental tool for enabling all kinds of social change, is politics, and electing representatives that do what's best for the masses. But the same people that listen faithfully to these idiots, who rake in a handsome salary by glorifying all kinds of hate and divisive social memes, are also the same sheep that refuse to vote.

Imus, Stern, Limbaugh... they're all interchangeable. Nothing more than quick-tongued blowhards, talking smack to snare ears, and pimp whatever product their sponsors are pushing. As another poster said, I just don't waste my time listening to these children, and have never understood why anyone one else would.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bigelow Stuck By Imus Did Not Pull Ads
Posted by: Guahan on Apr 12, 2007 10:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“The media has now been saying we have ‘pulled’ our advertising campaign. I need to emphasize that this is an incorrect statement. As I stated before, we are seriously reviewing it.” -Co-President, Cindi Bigelow. 4/11/07 linked text

"Imus made a point Thursday [4/12] to thank, one sponsor, Bigelow Tea for sticking by him." -Chicago Tribune and CBS News. Cindi Bigelow was recenly supporting Imus' 'Radiothon' and still did not denounce his comments as racist and sexist, saying only that, "he made a terrible statement".

Bigelow's blog , www.bigelowteablog.com linked text, also suggested Imus' charitable contributions will suffer just like the terribly hurt and sorrowful but giving man is now. One critic of Cindi Bigelow's continuous support of Imus had this response, "The charitable fundraising does not mitigate his other actions. What he said was offensive, hateful, and should not be tolerated. Period. Not offensive to just black people… [or] … women, but offensive to people - all people." linked text

Bigelow Tea has been with Imus for 9 years. I will ask stores not to stock Bigelow Teas and I will not buy Bigelow Teas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A horrible cliche from the PC era
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 13, 2007 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you go to the Museum of Liberal History, you'll find this article in a dark, dusty corner of the 80s or 90s wing.

Very out-of-touch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I feel sorry...
Posted by: craigandrew on Apr 13, 2007 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the black community, because they have been used to silence a Bush critic... nothing more has happened.

Simply consider that, of all the racist and sexist garbage that is pumped out in our media the major news media gave Imus - Anna Nicole coverage (another joke). Nothing gets that kind of coverage without permission, and without a purpose. Anna Nicole was used to distract people from reality. What Don Imus said was wrong, but he got railroaded.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SORRY, RORY....
Posted by: Mewsician on Apr 13, 2007 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....but try as they might, I have yet to hear anybody - not Eugene Robinson in Friday's WashPost, nor Joe Conason at Salon.com, not anyone else - put forth a valid argument against MY gripe, which is that if endless streams of filthy, misogynistic, hate-filled rap and hip-hop lyrics can pour across the land day and night, why can't Don Imus say what he said? Talk about the "soft bigotry of low expectations!" Why can't blacks clean up their own glass house before (yet again) sounding the tired "yes but we're victims" alarm. Give me a break.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]