Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Have You Been Tricked by Viral Marketing? Join the Crowd

By Momoko Price, The Ubyssey. Posted March 17, 2007.


Fake graffiti, bogus hype and other mutations are fooling lots of us into believing that marketed products are the hot new thing, when they're only the latest thing off the assembly line.
Advertisement

Imagine you're sitting in a bar having a drink with a few friends when one of them chimes in about a new gadget they just got -- some kind of electronic daytimer, let's say, with all the new bells and whistles. Your friend takes the gizmo out, gushes about how great it is, shows off a few features, and then sticks it back in his or her bag before you order another round.

Chances are you've been in this kind of situation before: whether it's a new cell phone, MP3 player or album, we all like to tell our friends how much we like or don't like the things we buy.

But what if you found out your friend hadn't actually purchased the daytimer? What if, in fact, it was given to him or her for the explicit purpose of flashing it around and generating hype around it? What if you found out they were reporting back to a marketing firm to let them know how you reacted?

Welcome to the weird world of viral marketing, where word-of-mouth rules, and anyone can be an insider. It may sound scary at first, but it's pointless to panic.

The truth is, you were probably infected long ago, whether you knew it or not.

Catching the bug

Viral marketing certainly comes with all sorts of malevolent connotations attached. Just the term "viral" in and of itself often conjures up images of catastrophe: crashing computers, avian flu epidemics, or maybe that disease-ridden monkey from Outbreak. But in reality, the world "viral" is often used to refer to any self-replicating phenomenon, biological, technological or otherwise. In the case of marketing, it refers to any kind of promotional campaign that relies on consumer endorsement to gain momentum and exposure.

Though computer viruses have been running wild since the dawn of the information age, the idea of "media viruses" didn't come around until the popular techno-culture critic Douglas Rushkoff coined the phrase in the mid-'90s. The term refers to the exponential spread of ideas over the web through improved, accessible media channels in a way analogous to the rapid spread of real viruses in a biological population: explosive and sweeping, with a lasting effect.

At the time, Rushkoff's vision of media viruses catapulting critical thought over the Internet was heady and optimistic: he considered media viruses -- be they in the form of footage of the Rodney King beatings or rumours of counterculture bars promoting "smart drugs" -- to be naturally resistant to oversimplified, mainstream dogmas by virtue of the fact that they had to be thought-provoking if they were to be absorbed and relayed to others. In Rushkoff's cyber-future, advanced media communications and word-of-mouth would filter out stale ideas and accelerate the evolution of new ones, part of a grand cultural and social evolution.

But it didn't take long before his idealism was taken down a notch. In 1999, he confessed in an interview for the intellectual website The Edge that he felt the self-regulating "datasphere" he once envisioned was as vulnerable to exploitation as anything else.

"I suddenly realized that the people who had put my books on best-seller lists were not those Mondo 2000-era hackers and Internet homesteaders I so admired, but rather the public relations and advertising industries," he said. "I had been selling 'cool' to corporate America. My books were primers, required texts for young executives on how to take advantage of new media to do the same old thing they were doing before. That's when I realized that we were in an arms race and that I was just as caught up in it as everyone else."

It was around this time that the term viral marketing really started to take hold and word-of-mouth started to take on a whole new meaning.

Friends let friends validate

Sean Moffitt is a rare kind of marketing agent: he's a word-of-mouth marketing (WOMM) specialist. His company, Agent Wildfire, is one of two or three buzz-marketing firms working in Canada today, and started up only about two-and-a-half years ago. But in contrast to Rushkoff's fearful portrayal of parasitic advertising agents, he seems quite amiable and transparent about what he does and what his company is trying to achieve.

So how does his business work, exactly? Essentially, his firm hires people like your hypothetical friend at the bar to hype electronics, cars, restaurants and other products to their friends.

The process is customized for each product and company, but the standard procedure goes something like this: recruit influential people within a specialty or social network, allow them to familiarize themselves with a product, give them the means by which they can relay their product assessments to other people (over the Internet or by some other channel) and provide them rewards for reporting back on how the product was received and criticized by their peers.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: advertising

Momoko Price is the current features editor of The Ubyssey newspaper at the University of British Columbia.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
SELLING US OUT!
Posted by: Rshaw on Mar 17, 2007 2:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm amazed that this publication would provide a positive slant on what amounts to corporate mind manipulation. These Buzz marketers do this type of thing without informing people! This is evil, and it's also in the process, pushing consumerist, hyper-individualists values over collectivist values.

If anyone wants critical media/culture articles I suggest another indy media site: COA News

check out the media section

Why do we so easily give into this sort of thing?

Alternet seems to be selling out to commercial Interests. It might be time to move on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SELLING US OUT! Posted by: skewitall
» Virus at COA News Posted by: TerryS
Todays Flash Tomorrows Trash
Posted by: hole11 on Mar 17, 2007 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's junk. I haven't bought anything new that I am totally proud to own. Most I have to take back to get refunds because they fail or have some sort of manufacturing defect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Want to fight back???
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 17, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Want to fight back?

Start spreading your own viral message... on every wall, on every billboard, on every advertisement. The difference is... you aren't selling another fucking product.

Carry a marker and start seeing the opportunities to say something meaningful in a world full of meaningless chatter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Want to fight back??? Posted by: Habaro
» Something more like... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
There is an immunization to this nonsense
Posted by: doctorsquared on Mar 17, 2007 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
called critical thinking. If people could be taught to evaluate all truth claims (e.g. "this [insert product name] is the best for [whatever]; you have got to get one") based upon evidence, and to do independent research about those claims before forming an opinion, the "media virus" would be stopped dead in its tracks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Consumerism didn't happen overnight and it ain't going away overnight either.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 17, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll take the multi-prong approach to getting us out of being sold out.

1. If it's advertised a lot, be very suspicious and do HEAVY research and investigation before buying it.

2. If it's not advertised much or at all but it looks good, research there also but do an actual comparison of that and its most advertised adversary.

3. Always give neutral responses to show-offs. NEVER react showing a strong like or dislike for the product. Think of it this way, you don't pick a partner based on a mere infatuation, do you?

4. If the product is new, wait a while and then if nothing has seriously replaced it, check it out. Plenty of reviews would have come out on the product and if they didn't, chances are those products were worthless SCAMS only made possible by hyped advertising.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This seems to me...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Mar 17, 2007 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... part of the "anything you can get away with is legit" attitude of business these days, as fostered by the Neocons. It runs the gamut from quietly increasing nicotine levels in cigarettes to this viral advertizing to silencing the media, then the law, about poisoned counties, water supplies, etc. Anything goes - as long as it turns a profit.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What if you found out your friend wasn't really your friend???
Posted by: lessbread on Mar 17, 2007 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This entire article was absurd. I think it's important to be informed about the latest marketing tricks, but with a critical approach not a happy go lucky one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Supercilious Reactionaries
Posted by: Astroboy on Mar 17, 2007 3:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, I can't believe how so many on AlterNet come across with such a chip on their shoulder over a simple article about advertising and marketing.

Whether you like it or not, you are a consumer. And like it or not, you will consume and they will market to you.

The article is a complement to today's consumer, suggesting how hard it is to decieve us, and that it's financial suicide to them when they get caught.

WE have the power, NOT them.

What's the big friggin' deal? Don't have a functioning brain?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Supercilious Reactionaries Posted by: bornxeyed
» Bravo Posted by: thistleblower
**WHY DOES THIS PICTURE SHOW A WOMAN WITH A GUN AT HER HEAD??**
Posted by: maribelle on Mar 17, 2007 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet--WHY does the picture accompanying this article on the home page show a man with a GUN AT A WOMAN'S HEAD?? That looks like some kind of sick, snuff porn.

PLEASE PLEASE REMOVE THIS PICTURE--it is extremely violent, unneccesary and triggering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

heh
Posted by: sourtster on Mar 17, 2007 6:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't it be great to walk into a bar and say "look at my sponsor child in _____. Aren't they cute? and get paid for that.
I've been one of those people trying to stop strangers on the street it's close to impossible... a very demoralizing experience to say the least. My poor performance damaged things - but I have two kids across the globe. guess i sold myself. which is what I always want to do.

Other viral ideas to try out:
I just gave money to this organization aren't I fucking awesome...

Britney Hilton Timberlake the IIIrd just got out from volunteering at a soup kitchen (not rehab) isn't that so cool!

screw modesty - people don't pay attention to that. I want to hear more about the generous celebs (not the ones screwing up) Less Dr. Phil and more oprah giveaway orgasm specials.

People show me their ipods all the f-ing time - I'm gonna start asking questions lol.... "are you getting paid for this" how awkward lol. My friends are whores :)

I'm gonna start showing off my "kids" lol - I like this idea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: heh Posted by: Habaro
The author is right about Sony, Sony Sucks
Posted by: lorenwrigley on Mar 17, 2007 8:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I bought my second Vaio notebook, just last November, my first being four years ago. I opted for a VGNsz430, stylish, very light, very poorly constructed. It's the poorest constructed peice of electronics I have ever owned. The keyboard keeps popping up, the glossy screen scratches easlily, the cheap plastic frame around around the screen is loose and dust particles, big ones, have lodged beeath it and are visible.
Because of this Sony contraption, I optd to purchase a not-a-Sony brand of LCD HD 42 inch television for my parents (maybe tjhere is a reason Sony offers 2 years no interest, no paymnet on aall of their high end products - the reasonis they suck). I'll never buy another Sony anything - ever - again.
I'm buying a Mac next month, and if I can't find some poor soul to remove this sony shit I own, at any price, I'm going to smash it to smithereens, for real, I hate it that much.
Oh yeah, their service, sure, send it in, we may get it back to you in three weeks, maybe not. But at least the sent me a box. Whoopie.
How's that for Viral advertising? Go buy Sony, not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

liberalibrarian@earthlink.net
Posted by: liberalibrarian on Mar 17, 2007 10:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Malcolm Gladwell's book "The Tipping Point" talked about contagion, stickines, rule of 150, etc. A good read for thinking about the viral nature of all marketing. A smart consumer gets on their library website (or visits their library --gasp) and checks out Consumer Reports, Value Line, EBSCO --0h so many reviews...

Tell you what, let's start viral marketing, say, Peace? Small cars? Biofuel? End to Drug Wars? Tax reform?How do we do that? That's what I want to know. BTW, I don't even subscribe to cable and I certainly don't have a cell phone...(I did research my computer and no, it's not a Sony :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"How did you hear about our product/service/lifestyle choice?"
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 18, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Word of mouth" gets checked a lot, so some marketing wanker decides to set up buzz marketing schemes, working off the basic notion that people in groups tend to act like a herd of sheep... which is more or less true: gives one a feeling of 'strength in numbers' - everyone over the cliff now, don't lag behind!

But why stop with new flavors of beer, or the latest MP3 player? How about "Well, isn't it good we got rid of Saddam, even if he had no WMDs and no links to 9/11 or Al Queda? After all he did torture and repress the Iraqi people... wait - let's forget the second part..."

There's a reason that the public relations industry in the US is worth billions of dollars - and as people move away from television and print advertising opportunities, more and more of advertising / public relations / government propaganda and psychological operations are moving to the new Internet media, and into other 'public spaces'.

One can attempt to ignore this, or one can play interesting games - ever see the work of UK graffitti artist Banksy? Tools needed: a piece of cardboard for making stencils and a can of spray paint.

The main thing to remember about buzz marketing is that it has to be done in secret; in fact PR is getting more and more secretive: the main corporations are Edelman, Burson Marsteller, Golin/Harris, Euro RSCG, Fleishman-Hilliard and Ruder Finn -though there are many more, like the Rendon Group, Qorvis Communications, Military Public Relations, Government Public Relations - if you haven't recognized by now that you're living in a propaganda nation, wake up a little.

For example, the front pages of most American newspapers have more to do with manipulation of public opinion than with 'news reporting'. Shocking? Unsupported? A ridiculous assertion? No, just business as usual...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Shill
Posted by: TerryS on Mar 18, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Shill

"A shill is an associate of a person selling
goods or services who pretends no association
to the seller and assumes the air of an
enthusiastic customer."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill

This article is enthusiastically supporting
the new industry of professional shills. The
question is, did Alternet shill here?

Two more examples of shilling are
Armstrong Williams and Maggie Gallagher.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn
/articles/A36545-2005Jan25.html

So what is Alternet's position on shilling?
Did Alternet get paid to run this pro-shill
article?

I'm a big fan of Alternet, but if shilling is
ok with them, then I should get my news elsewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

don't talk to strangers
Posted by: Mr. Heathen on Mar 18, 2007 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your mom says she likes "Tide" detergent. Your dad's in love with his "GMC" truck. Your best friend wears a hat with a "swoosh" on it. Your lover is wearing underwear with ads on them. Your neighbors are proud "Coors" drinkers. When you go to a nightclub, you are surrounded by mirrors featuring ads with your own face staring back at you. "Rolling Rock" has made YOU a shill. The musical artists in your life are all shills for "GIBSON", "FENDER", "YAMAHA" ,"MARSHALL" etc. Don't even try to read, listen to NPR, or watch "commercial-free" TV. Even "Free Speech TV" has a panel show which features commercials followed by light-hearted discussion about the ads. Most insulting of all, are ads for the thing the ads are on!Companies don't have to pay us a cent for it. WE PAY THEM! - in spite of the fact that nearly everything they sell us is the result of artificially created demand and manufactured with a maximum of unnecessary features/patents and planned obsolescence. We're on the big tit, locked in, and sucking so hard we're creating giant holes in the sky.
We're walking, talking, and blogging pavlovian poster kids practically unable to move without banks, businesses, cops and other snoops tracking every fart.
But, watch out for people. They might be up to something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What About Viral/Grassroots Marketing in Politics?
Posted by: gandhi on Mar 19, 2007 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was disappointed that this article did not even touch on the political players in this viral marketing game. Do you really think that Bush's GOP and their associates have not been actively engaged in this stuff for the last decade?

On my own blog I have extensively detailed the PR work of a bogus US "charity" called Spirit of America. These guys work with the US military to orchestrate "good news from Iraq" stories like painting schools, etc. They have been hugely successful with the wingnuts and have now expanded operations to Afghanistan, Lebanon and other countries. They have also employed a company called Direct Impact to help spread the viral marketing word on their behalf.

Wake up, folks. How many of those wingnut comments you read might be paid propaganda? Would it surprise you if Karl Rove had a team of paid wingnut commenters posting the latest GOP talking points all over the blogosphere? Don't you think some top rightwing bloggers might be getting a little backhander every now and again, just like their Big Media mates? I am looking forward to the day when a whisteblower steps forward and blows the lid on this stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RB
Posted by: RBurgess on Mar 19, 2007 6:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A friend would not shill you, if they do, that is not a friend.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» EXACTLY Posted by: JoshuaLudd