Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Digital Media Marketplace: The Next Frontier for Media Reform

By Jeffrey Chester, AlterNet. Posted January 10, 2007.


The future of the progressive movement depends on our ability to harness the power of digital media.
Advertisement

On Friday, several thousand U.S. media activists will converge in Memphis to attend the Free Press group's "National Conference for Media Reform." Much of the conference is focused on current and upcoming public policy battles designed to help make this country's media system more democratic. Right now there is greater interest in media policy than we have seen since the 1960s.

Among the key concerns is fighting against the Federal Communications Commission's current plan to permit greater consolidation of our nation's newspapers and broadcast stations; battling Congress over the broadband Internet (network neutrality); and highlighting the lack of ownership of media outlets by women and people of color. These are important topics, but the real action it requires must take place outside of the D.C. beltway.

With network neutrality legislation now being introduced in the new Democratic-controlled Congress [VIDEO], it is likely that many attending the Free Press conference will leave Memphis feeling that fighting for its passage should be the progressive media movement's top priority. After all, hundreds of thousands of activists, bloggers and media makers just successfully fought to a standstill plans by the former Republican-controlled Congress to pass legislation giving phone and cable companies greater control over the future of the Net in the United States.

But our most urgent task is to proactively intervene to shape -- on behalf of progressive values -- the emerging commercial digital communications system. This will require a strategic intervention to create sustainable "new media" services that help harness the power of digital media to better promote social justice. Our digital media system will have the capability to help "define" political and social "reality" for the majority of Americans. Unless progressives can seriously "program" the new media -- in every community and across the nation -- we will face even greater obstacles promoting our agendas.

Critical moment of media transition

Urging that activists focus on a commercial communications strategy may sound strange coming from someone who has devoted much of his adult life to public interest media policy. But it's important to be strategic at this critical moment of media transition. A powerful and ubiquitous system delivering personalized and interactive content is emerging. Soon most of us will be connected to an "always-on" media system of communications -- via the principal "platforms" of PCs, cell phones and increasingly digital TV sets.

It's this new system we should be concerned about, as it will have the capability to influence the attitudes and behaviors of the majority of Americans. As Wall Street and the major media companies recognize, the distinctions between broadcast and cable TV channels and the Internet are beginning to disappear. The commercial media industry, fueled by the hundreds of billions spent each year by advertisers and marketers and also backed by Wall Street, is helping create what will be our new media reality.

They understand the power and the potential profits from this country's (and much of the world's) "converged" media system. They have strategically invested in this new system to help ensure they can play a leading role in the evolution of broadband (and reap the many billions in profits).

For example, there were more than $72 billion worth of entertainment and media mergers alone in 2006. That followed a spate of similar deals between 2004-2005 worth $244 billion, according to a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers (involving the content, distribution and technology sectors). The same study noted that there have also been 2,200 corporate alliances in the media, telecommunication, and technology sector since 2001. We all know that Rupert Murdoch's Fox acquired MySpace in 2005 for around $600 million (in a deal ultimately involving Google). Google itself spent more than $1 billion last year to scoop up YouTube (all of this to better serve the interests of advertisers, by the way).

But not much is known about the myriad corporate alliances designed to help determine our digital destiny, with giants such as Cisco, H-P, Microsoft, Disney/ABC, GE/NBC, Apple, Yahoo and Intel in various partnerships. Although the new media, including podcasts, broadband videos, and RSS feeds, now offer an explosion of alternatives, media diversity may really be on a short digital leash.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: new media, new media, media reform, media reform, digital, digital, media consolidation, media consolidation

Jeff Chester is executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy (www.democraticmedia.org) in Washington, D.C., a nonprofit group focusing on digital communications. His book "Digital Destiny: New Media and the Future of Democracy" was just published by The New Press.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Leni, stand aside- it's Triumph of the Id
Posted by: edith on Jan 10, 2007 1:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So progressives should get into the venture capital business to own some new media? I suspect many have; they just do it to make a living, as opposed to tout a platform of policy. Where does all the money come from that poured into the Clinton, Gore, Dean and now other "progressive" candidates?

Where do the millions raised by green organizations come from? Partly from small contributors but less than conservative organizations, progressive groups do rely on 'progressive captialists", many of whom make their money in the relatively clean media business(no sweatshops, at least no sweat). Profit attracts venture capital, and digital media, once the US is wired up with HDTV and high end phones, which seems to be rapidly happening, is the place to make huge profits as programming costs per viewer collapse with the installatiion of the network, largely at consumer expense.

Look at SATV or direct TV now. How much "progressive" programming exists? Right. On satellite radio, a few stations for jazz and Grateful Dead/jamband fans exist, and that's good. But the Pacifica model does not seem to be spreading. (Actually, the Pacifica model, the entertainment side apat, is 1950's technology, with interviews and recordings of icons like Noam Chomsky floating on the airways like some old recordings of six hr Fidel speeches from the '70's.)

Newsflash to progressives: today's youth,even if progressive, have an attention span of several minutes-one song's worth of download. So no one is going to be featuring long winded discussions of biofuels on digital media soon. And how many reruns of Gore's infomercial do you think will be demanded?

More real time violence, more sports, ever more expansive sex and reality programming is the Future. Sort of like 1984. Perhaps the Pentagon can turn a profit by owning some digital download sites where viewers can watch SOF clean out terrorists in real time in Mogadishu, complete with interviews with both sides and close-in shots of sucking wounds. Viewers can vote as to whether Al queda or the Special Forces will return next week for the grand prize of say a major African city.

Politics if it means covering "debates" and documentaries on starving Sudanese by earnest versions of Bill Moyers is Boring. Very 19th century.

The town square has been bulldozed for the latest Home Depot or more likely a viewer participant electronic action game where "viewers" can participate in ongoing violence or sex themselves.

It's the far right, not the left, which will galvanize around the instinctual explosion that digital media promises. This is not a "cool" intellectual media, Mcluhan style. (so '60's, so yesterday).

Triumph of the Id. The Fuehrer will be proud.

They're meeting in Memphis. Of course. A Dylanesque Irony, to be stuck inside of Mobile [digital media] with the Memphis Blues again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why private
Posted by: Rshaw on Jan 10, 2007 2:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for-profit media is not the answer, it just replicates the problems we have with our current system - it doesn't matter if a progressive starts it. Is it even progressive to start a for-profit media company? Not in my opinion.

We need a non-profit public interest media system, which we have started with sites like these.

Check out the myspace style online community at FreeSpeech TV
http://community.freespeech.org/

We need to support the COA News Network too
http://coanews.org/alerts

For-profit is not the answer!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old fashioned still works
Posted by: anothername on Jan 10, 2007 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I considered attending the Media Reform conference but decided it would be too much of the same approaches that I read about on a regular basis, the same type of approaches that let Al Franken's radio group collapse.

Youth may have short attention spans, but give them something of value and they still pay attention. Plus, I have heard many of these attention-challenged youth express concerns that they do not know enough about politics and government.

The problem with progressive media reform is captured in the paragraph about Iraq and related topics. Progressive media reform will only work if it returns to what it once did, i.e., not only offer new angles on the major topics, but also report on stories that rarely receive any attention. This requires getting out and talking with people, listening to one person after another talk, and being able to put all of those separate stories together in a meaningful media publication or broadcast.

The newspapers of old understood limited time and space. That is why the lede included the who, what, where, why, and how. The newspapers of today care about the emotional impact and that is why many articles no longer include more than a partial who and what, and if we as consumers of news are lucky, we might even receive a hint of where, why, and how.

I have written before, albeit with the feeling of being on a drifting ice berg in an ice age of old, of my opinion that media reform is not so progressive or effective. What I'm seeing in media reform does not impress me and does not make me want to give money to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Effective Communications
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 10, 2007 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live less than 8 miles from the venue where this conference is being held and did not hear a peep about it on-air, online or otherwise until last week. By that late hour, volunteers were no longer being accepted. Registration is $195 for the full event and day passes are not available. All or nothing.

Maybe it does not resonate with anyone else, but the options of $200 or stay home are not particularly enticing or encouraging. All or nothing. How is one to get their feet wet when the minimum price for admission is $200. The same is true about about bringing a friend along for $200. It's a barrier

I'm glad the event is being held in Memphis, because the area is a poster child for so much of what is wrong in America. It's a community sharply divided by income, class, ethnicity, education and race. Harshly anti-union. Of course, Clear Channel's 2 TV and 7 radio stations will completely ignore the conference as will the rest.

It would be a wonderful thing for local and regional activists and others interested to get a rare chance to see how we are really not so alone. $200 is a boatload of money for many of the people most in need of hearing the message.

The Delta and the sunbelt need a thriving progressive movement and need to be engaged by those more organized, experienced and well-funded. I applaud them for holding their conference in Memphis. I condemn them for doing so in such a way as to keep it out of the hands of those most in need of it. It's like parading a gourmet meal behind bullet proof glass through a homeless encampment.

You can look, but do not touch. You can know, but do not taste. You can hear, but do not speak.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crashing the Gate
Posted by: friggazoa on Jan 10, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Media reform is not enough, as J. Chester declares here. The net neutrality issue is terribly important but should not be the only focus because of the time it takes to work through the system he calls "the revolving door." It should be noted, and stated as often as possible, that progressive visionaries/activists of any new media have always worked to build a myriad of new doors (whether anyone was watching in the beginning or not.) This has been done many times in the underground of Amerikan history.

Presently, there is an artistic, populist, and very democratic, revolution going on. Though today's youth is often judged for having a short attention span and being engrossed with violence, sex, & trivial pursuits, remember what your parents said about your generation. To be fair, we should not discount that youthful art & innovation is what inevitably drives the progressive voice to stream around & through the cracks in law-thick, lackered doors of bureaucracy. Young artists, visionaries & entrepeneurs are good at condensing a message. They cut to the quick-- refreshing & powerful-- the difference between droning wind and Imagist poetry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]