Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

MediaCulture

Kill the Messenger: The Tragic Life of Gary Webb

By Doug Ireland, In These Times. Posted October 13, 2006.


Gary Webb, the legendary journalist who scooped the big papers and found himself punished for it, teaches the lesson that it's often dangerous to speak truth to power.
Advertisement

Reviewed: "Kill the Messenger: How the CIA's Crack-Cocaine Controversy Destroyed Journalist Gary Webb" by Nick Schou, Charles Bowden (Nation Books, 2006).

With "Kill the Messenger" (Nation Books/Avalon), Nick Schou, an editor at Orange County Weekly, provides a meticulous, balanced account of the life of Gary Webb, the former San Jose Mercury News reporter who, despite minor errors, basically got it right when he wrote the biggest story of his career. That story lifted the rug on a historical episode the mainstream media didn't want to touch: How the Central Intelligence Agency turned a blind eye to drug dealing in furtherance of its covert support for the Nicaraguan contras. For his efforts, Webb was hounded out of journalism after a ferocious assault from America's most prestigious newspapers, which Schou documents in painstaking and shameful detail. When Webb -- who had once shared a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting -- committed suicide in December 2004, it was the last chapter in a real-life American tragedy.

Webb was not the first one on to the story. AP reporter Robert Parry had been forced out of his job at the wire service for pursuing it. The U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Narcotics and Terrorism, chaired by Sen. John Kerry, conducted an investigation into the contras' drug trafficking in 1987-88 that had documented (among other things) how CIA cargo planes ferried arms to the contras and then carried cocaine back to military bases and remote airfields on the return flights. But, as Schou notes, "Because of its sensitive nature, the committee … sealed most of the testimony, and Kerry's investigation got scant play in the national news media."

The Kerry investigation was mainly concerned with cocaine coming into the U.S. East Coast. Webb's 1996 series for the Mercury News, based on a yearlong investigation, looked at the cocaine traffic in Los Angeles, which was then known as "the crack capital of the world." Webb detailed how "Freeway" Ricky Ross, the first '80s crack millionaire and a crack kingpin in L.A.'s South Central neighborhood, had been supplied with crack cocaine by Nicaraguan exiles and contra supporters with CIA connections. Webb discovered an affidavit from the L.A. County Sheriff's Department that said that the coke profits of Ross' suppliers "are transported to Florida and laundered through … a chain of banks in Florida. … From this bank the monies are filtered to the Contra rebels to buy arms in the war in Nicaragua."

Webb's articles, however, were unjustifiably hyped by the Mercury News' editors, who, according to Schou, were hungry to compete with the media Big Boys. The series ran with war-sized headlines and a silhouette of a man smoking a crack pipe superimposed on the official seal of the CIA. "Dark Alliance: The Story Behind the Crack Explosion," screamed the paper, with a subhead claiming that "Crack Plague's Roots Are in Nicaraguan War."

The story got away from Webb and took on a life of its own, fueled by anger and despair in black communities being destroyed by the crack epidemic and the lethal gang wars surrounding it. As Schou puts it, "Dark Alliance" created an alliance of conspiracy theorists, from some "on the left who believed the CIA had deliberately started the crack epidemic to commit genocide against black people" to "right-wing followers of Lyndon LaRouche, who saw the story as further proof that George Bush Sr. and the Queen of England belong to a secret cabal that controls the planet." Opportunistic politicians like Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-Ga. -- who exclaimed on the floor of Congress that "CIA" stood for "Central Intoxication Agency" -- seized on Webb's story to grab headlines for themselves. The "Dark Alliance" series quickly became a national cause célebre.

The Los Angeles Times -- embarrassingly scooped on its own turf by Webb -- reacted by assigning no less than two dozen reporters to what one of them described as the "Get Gary Webb Team," running a takedown series on the "Dark Alliance" stories that dwarfed them in size. The Washington Post and the New York Times piled on with multiple stories discrediting not just what Webb had written, but Webb himself, delving into his past to come up with mud to throw. Most of these papers' "deconstructions" of Webb's reporting were based on unnamed government sources. But the damage was done. In the end, the very Mercury News editors who'd made exaggerated claims for Webb's series publicly disowned him in an editorial while refusing to print stories Webb wrote further documenting his series. Demoted to a remote police beat, Webb left the paper.

Unable to get another reporting job on any U.S. daily, his marriage destroyed by the intensity of his "Dark Alliance" experience, a depressed Webb killed himself. In Schou's telling, he was the victim of incompetent editors and of a media feeding frenzy that the Washington Post's own ombudsman later described as misplaced. Throughout Kill the Messenger, Schou does fresh reporting that bolsters some of Webb's findings. He also interviews some of those who helped incinerate Webb and who now admit they went overboard. The book is an important cautionary tale for anyone considering a career in investigative journalism. And the moral is: It's often dangerous to speak truth to power.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gary, webb, journalism, cia, la, times

Doug Ireland has been writing about power, politics and the media since 1977. A former columnist for the Village Voice, the New York Observer and the Paris daily Libération, among others, his articles have appeared everywhere from the Nation to Vanity Fair to POZ. He's a contributing editor of In These Times. He can be reached through his blog, Direland.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from MediaCulture! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Freedom of speech on paper!
Posted by: werewolf on Oct 13, 2006 2:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Freedom of speech comes with a price in a democracy as well. Thats the sad fact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The editor who betrayed Garry Webb. Posted by: off-the-radar 2
KGB
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 13, 2006 2:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The KGBs and CIAs of the world do have their ways of executing those who reveal any of their secrets and making it look like suicide or whatever else would seem plausible to bought medias around the world. They are also capable of 9/11 type incidents to further the agendas of their crooked presidencies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gary was assassinated by the US.
Posted by: Ghoulman on Oct 13, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's clear that the neocon crowd from the Reagan years wanted Gary dead. Revenge is not beyond the people in Washington.

I loved how his suiside was reported; with TWO gun shots to the head. Yeeeaaaaaaa.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Assasination is an American value Posted by: jreinhart1
» Gary was assassinated by Jerry Ceppos Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: "Do What He Did" Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Get real
Posted by: commonMan on Oct 13, 2006 4:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To say "he was the victim of incompetent editors and of a media feeding frenzy" is continuing the cover-up. He was attacked and discredited by the corporate media and made to look like a conspiracy theorist to distract the public from the truth. And the last straw was when San Jose Mercury News threw him under the bus by printing a disclaimer about the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly! Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
Dec 2004
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 13, 2006 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dec 2004 was a very low point for the anti-drug war community.

His suicide terrified me. I read about his suicide a couple of weeks after it happened. Terrifying or terrorizing? I was scared, really scared. (See, terrorism works!)

At this time I was just starting to 'come out' and gettin A LOT of negitive attention.

My hubby, as usual, believed the mainstream press on this one, we had a terrific fight about that. He used to be a reporter and yet always seems to take the consertive, fully digested and presented as fact, view on stories like this. I don't understand that kneejerk response, but the world is full of it.

Thanks for priniting the review and reminding me how far our entire community has come in 2 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not to be paranoid, but... Posted by: BurtonLT
well, since his alledged "suicide", there have been 23 other reporters.....
Posted by: Prophit on Oct 13, 2006 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.... investigative reporters, I should say, who have either been murdered or arrested (like Greg Palast) for their independance and search for the truth. Most have been killed in Iraq and most by friendly fire, ..... yeah, sure, friendly my 'a'. LOL Makes you wonder if he really did commit suicide.

I have no evidence to the contrary, but there is sufficient coincidences to cause questioning of such an event.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pre-meditated killing
Posted by: werewolf on Oct 13, 2006 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"OXFORD, England - A coroner ruled Friday that U.S. forces unlawfully killed a British television journalist in the opening days of the Iraq war...." Associated Press

And know why he was killed? Read below form the same story:

"Lloyd and the three other ITN crew members were some of the few Western reporters who covered the fighting on their own, while most others were embedded with U.S. or British forces"

The embedded journalists are censored by the US Military while the ITN journalists were independant and, therefore, could report the whole truth about the War which US/UK wanted to hide. All independant journalists who may have had ideas to cover the war truthfully had to be given a dreadful warning by a murderous EXAMPLE at the very beginning itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pre-meditated killing Posted by: This Old Brit
"Suicide" and plane crashes
Posted by: cielo on Oct 13, 2006 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hunter S. Thompson, working on a subversive story about what really happened at the WTC "killed" himself too, and Sebnator Paul Wellstone died in a place crash "accident". Being famously outspoken on the Left seems to result in a shortened lifespan in the Land of Free Speech (that only the rich can afford).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One More: Posted by: makeadifference
» Thanks! Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: Thanks! Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: "Suicide" and plane crashes Posted by: hankgeorge
A Gary Webb Experience
Posted by: StuartH on Oct 13, 2006 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did a story for a weekly alternative paper in 1989, in which I merely described the crack scene in a mid sized city. In the process it was not hard, once pretty well into it, to see that there were lots of people standing out on streetcorners in certain parts of town and that these were getting arrested over and over. Meanwhile, the source of the inventory was in the affluent parts of town and beyond, in the rural areas where someone could land a small plane on a private airstrip without notice. One of the best things affluence buys is privacy.

Getting access to the streetcorner drug scene was not very difficult. People were wary, suspicious and potentially violent, but available. Access to private rural airstrips was something else.

The editors I was dealing with were supportive, but the very real prospect of being sued by people with a lot of money to spend on lawyers was very scary. Most independent or alternative newspapers are marginal operations. A bullshit lawsuit might not win, but it would drain enough resources to hurt and possibly undermine the business.

At the time I didn't pick up on a CIA connection, but it was possible to figure out that people who could deal in millions of dollars under the table were not working class people. One person who actually got convicted for drug dealing was a land speculator who borrowed typically large amounts of money just before a recession. The interest payments were very high and drug importing was a tempting way to cover them.

In that context, where important people with a lot of money were getting very tempted to deal in planeloads of crack, it wouldn't be very hard for the CIA to be involved. One could be suspicious why small planes headed for certain rural airstrips owned by "above reproach" wealthy citizens were ignored by border monitoring radar.

Webb went a step beyond being suspicious and actually found a way to tell the hidden story. He was a true hero and I hope this book makes that clear to more people.

Another journalist I know, was a brilliant young reporter for the university daily newspaper. He went down to Mexico after he graduated to make his mark by investigating collusion by the police in drug dealing along the border. Before too long, he was arrested, with drugs planted, and put in a Mexican jail. It took a year for his family to get the bribes together for his release, but by that time he had developed a brain fever that left him so brain damaged he couldn't pull his thoughts together well enough to recognize friends or his mother.

Yes, investigative reporting can be dangerous. That only underscores the courage needed to delve in hidden truths, and how miraculous accomplishments like those of Gary Webb are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Big Screen Posted by: edith
There's plenty more that's not covered
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 13, 2006 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One major scandal is how the administration is rigging the financial markets to get the price of commodities down, the level of the Dow up. It's done with futures and derivatives and gaming the technical hedge funds (who's trades are computerized and "automatic"). Nobody in the main stream media has ever addressed this.

Now the derivatives markets have a nominal value 10 times greater than the GDP of the world. Another Long Term Captial default and the system collapses like a house of cards, the price of commodities will soar and the dollar will take on the value of toliet paper.

In the main line media, the only one close to telling the truth was legendary investor Jim Rogers, who got the boot from CNBC in favor of Larry Kudlow, a financial version of a yellow smiling face.

Let's see what these clowns have to say when disaster hits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Um-m-m, about that "suicide"...
Posted by: fool-on-the-hill on Oct 13, 2006 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As others have noted here, there were TWO shots fired into Gary Webb's brain.

HOW THE %$#^*& DOES A PERSON FIRE TWO SHOTS INTO HIS OWN BRAIN???!!

Any firearms afficianadoes out there who can explain this to me? (Please DON'T spout any nonsense about "reflex actions" quicker than a bullet!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Um-m-m, about that "suicide"... Posted by: spacemarine83
UK minister urged Aljazeera bombing
Posted by: rwa on Oct 13, 2006 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thursday 12 October 2006

David Blunkett, the UK's former home secretary, has said that during the 2003 invasion of Iraq he suggested to Tony Blair that Britain's military should bomb Aljazeera's television transmitter in Baghdad.


Aljazeera television said on Thursday that Blunkett's claims - made in an interview with Britain's Channel 4 television to be aired on Monday - support its belief that the US and Britain deliberately bombed its Baghdad offices during the war.

Ahmed al-Sheikh, editor-in-chief of Aljazeera's Arabic channel, said; "This adds to the growing number of evidences that will one day prove that the attack on Aljazeera was premeditated ... at the highest levels.

"Aljazeera was being targeted at the time because the people who were waging war on Iraq didn't like what it was showing."

Two weeks after Blunkett pressed the prime minister to attack Aljazeera, the American military bombed the station's Baghdad offices, killing journalist Tareq Ayoub.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is the story repeating in Afghanistan?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 13, 2006 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, for a more complete story on the Iran-Contra-Cocaine-Arms connections, see http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/121304.html. Congress banned support for the Contras, so Bush & Co. began looking into 'creative financing solutions'.

This dynamic was also present in Vietnam. Let's recall what a Burmese general had to say during the Vietnam war, when the CIA was covertly arming Hmong hill tribes in the easter mountains of Vietnam: "To fight, you need weapons, and to buy weapons, you need money - and in these hills, the only money is opium".

Incidentally, check this story (2004) Hmong deer hunter kills 8 in Wisconsin. Here was a guy who was used by the US govt, fled to the United States, and was then subjected to racist taunts - his response was hardly surprising.

By the way, I knew the head of a Bay Area airline insurance company who was approached by the CIA, along with many other area pilots, in the late 60's about flying into Eastern Vietnam for unspecified purposes - the pay was phenomenal, but he turned it down (for obvious reasons).

But to take this up to the present day, the exact same thing is going on in Afghanistan. US, Canadian and British troops moving in made alliance with regional anti-Taliban warlords, all of whom were involved in heroin and opium traffic. Opium cultivation is now booming, and apparently even the Taliban are now supporting it - they need money to buy guns and ammo as well. There are also geostrageic implications:

http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/qdimu.html
"In the present case, most of the opium and heroin exiting Afghanistan now flows north into the oil-and-gas-rich states of Central Asia where the US seeks to gain influence. This traffic is chiefly controlled by the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), an overtly Islamist terrorist group that is said to have threatened (in conjunction with bin Laden, as I have reported elsewhere ) the offices of US oil companies in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.

Despite these facts, the relationship between the US and the IMU is far too complex to make the IMU an obvious target for the US "war against terror." If the CIA, via its sister agency the Pakistan ISI, can maintain a degree of control over the drug flow reaching the IMU, this confers a degree of influence over not just the IMU but the Government of Uzbekistan."


Gary Webb got it right, and the three US major dailys - the NYT, the WP, and the LAT - well, let's just say that they often serve as little more than the mouthpiece of the government.

I think if we knew the whole story, there'd be a lynch mob chasing the Bushes down the street.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Webb's DVD Commentary
Posted by: pixiequix on Oct 13, 2006 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This might be a bit obscure, but, one of the most amazing Gary Webb pieces I know of, is the DVD commentary he supplied for the now devastatingly prophetic Tim Robbins movie, "Bob Roberts". Webb simply lays out the details regarding the highly illicit "contras". No bullshit, just the facts; it's really quite amazing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Webb's DVD Commentary Posted by: insulaparadigm
Some country huh?
Posted by: paschn on Oct 13, 2006 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the foul swine Reagan along with "true American hero" Ollie North are lauded as "heroes".
A nation of sheep,led by a cartel of whores, controlled by big business. Welcome,...to the REAL Evil Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some country huh? Posted by: christii
I knew Webb
Posted by: lessbread on Oct 13, 2006 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I worked with Gary at the California State Assembly between 1998 and 2000 and I have to disagree with the way the article summarizes his death as a result of depression spawned from being blacklisted and divorced. I have no doubt those experiences were difficult for him, but enough to drive him to suicide? I find that dubious. The last time I saw him he was on his way back to the office after spending his lunch hour playing field hockey. That was in 2001. I don't know what your experience is like, but in my experience, seriously depressed middle aged people don't play field hockey. Maybe subsequent events compounded his despair, but suicide doesn't fit with the Webb that I knew.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Finally... Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Nicaragua
Posted by: aonghus36 on Oct 13, 2006 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think one of the ways we can honor Gary's memory is to do something ironic, like keeping up with what is happening in Nicaragua. Anyone curious about what is going on there after all these years? We can find out at NicaNet:the nicaragua network. http://www.nicanet.org/ I have purused through it, and think it'll be well received by the viewers of AlterNet and Alternet themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Was It "Opportunistic" Of Cynthia McKinney To Publicize Webb's Story?
Posted by: Douglas on Oct 13, 2006 4:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Poor Cynthia McKinney. She is by far the most politically correct and probably the most decent Democratic member of congress. Many of her "radical" views rub liberals and neo-Liberals (Doug Ireland types) the wrong way for some inexplicable reason. One would think that Doug Ireland would commend her for supporting Webb's reports on the floor of the House of Representatives. Instead he calls her efforts "opportunistic." And Liberals wonder why so many on the "left" feel contempt for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Contempt Toward Liberals
Posted by: rwa on Oct 13, 2006 6:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that Liberals who malign McKinney are supremicists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MURDER INC @ AMERIKA
Posted by: Hal on Oct 13, 2006 7:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Unable to get another reporting job on any U.S. daily, his marriage destroyed by the intensity of his "Dark Alliance" experience, a depressed Webb killed himself. In Schou's telling, he was the victim of incompetent editors and of a media feeding frenzy that the Washington Post's own ombudsman later described as misplaced."

This is arrant garbage. It can’t even qualify as limited hangout.

Webb was leaned on by an entire DC-MSM brothel in the employ of corporate crime. His marriage and life were “destroyed” by a Murder Inc that makes any common mafia look quaint.

“War on drugs” is phony as “war on terror”. But with over a trillion dollars a year cooked and washed thru money center banks and Fortune 100 companies every year – that should be no surprise. A bulk of the “war on drugs” blood money trade is (of course) CIA controlled for the usual suspects.

And a “suicide” with 2 bullets to the head? That says it all.


* "Defrauding America" by Rodney Stich, which documents ongoing
CIA and DEA narcotics trafficking
* "White Lies: The CIA, Drugs and the Press" by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair on the long twisted history of CIA narcotics
trafficking and media coverups.
* "The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade"
by Alfred W. McCoy, which documents CIA sanctioned drug dealing since the Vietnam War.
* "Dark Alliance: The CIA, The Contras and the Crack Cocaine Explosion"
by Gary Webb, on the facts of CIA drug traffickers, which Hitz's
Inspector General report suppressed
* "The Big White Lie: The CIA and the Cocaine/Crack Epidemic" by
Michael Levine, a veteran DEA undercover agent for 25 years who
stumbled into CIA protected narcotics trafficking in South America.
* "Drugging America" by Rodney Stich, a former federal investigator
who documents decades of CIA drug trafficking and the phoney War on Drugs
* "Powderburns: Cocaine, Contras and the Drug War" by DEA agent
Celerino Castillo III and Dave Harmon who write about US Government
collaboration with drug smugglers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real terrorists
Posted by: codybryan on Oct 13, 2006 8:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I spent two years in Thailand between 1972 and 1974. I was in the U.S. Air Force working in radio and TV stations in Udorn and Utapao. I personally saw Air America pilots. We did nothing but support the biggest pimps and dope dealers in the area because they were anit-Communist. This is not new. It’s just gotten bigger.

Does anyone here really think that we would support regimes that oppress working class people in other countries, and not bring those policies back home?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fallen warrior
Posted by: insulaparadigm on Oct 13, 2006 11:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With profits at maybe 500 to 600 billion dollars and a lot of that being laundered by US banks /wall street , the drug war will never end. It is a major part of economic well being.
combo it all with some clandestine operations from our governnnet... dangerous mix.
If this all was out to all the public - what would we do about it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Full Dark Alliance Series and Other Facts
Posted by: I3IVIIVI on Oct 14, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Full Dark Alliance series available here thanks to The Fund for Authentic Journalism.

The people I know who know Gary Webb say it was a suicide.

But the larger point is that it was a media assassination years before, not individuals going 'over the top' who are now vaguely apologetic for helping destroy a human being and better journalist than any of them have ever been, but a systemic response to truths that expose government and corporate evil (see the burying of the Cincinnati Enquirer's Chiquita banana exposé for another textbook case).

And off-hand slander against Cynthia McKinney adds to the feeling that this review is more about containing the damage to the establishment that Gary Webb's truths unleashed than it is in Webb's tradition of solid reporting exposing deep corruption.

Again, go here to see the series for yourself and keep looking around there for more on Gary Webb, and those who self-consciously try to continue on the path he was walking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WEAK, WEAK, VERY WEAK!!!
Posted by: fiskhus on Oct 14, 2006 11:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story is not a "historical incident" - it is ongoing and continues to this day because the same people who profit from the drug trade are still in control of the Whte House and the CIA/NSA mafia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here and there
Posted by: talkville on Oct 15, 2006 1:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We congratulate ourselves on our 'freedom of the press'. In Russia, another journalist pays mysteriously -not with money, with life. The techniques used here are more nuanced; anyoned delving outside the 'proper boundaries' can be managed and administered out of attention. This is not to say we've not had our journalists and whistle-blowers simply disposed of by 'unfortunate accidents'. In a 'free society', we have plenty of 'lone kooks' to do the dirty absolution work. Rove calls it 'damage control' and 'risk management'. Truth is not to be up-held, it's to be managed - here and there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the book
Posted by: insulaparadigm on Oct 17, 2006 12:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has anybody gotten this book?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

two cheers for the CIA
Posted by: BurtonLT on Oct 19, 2006 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the CIA is bringing in drugs...why is that bad?

In the 1960s the New Left promoted drug use as a way to expand one's mind and break free of the boundaries of society. Drugs and radical activism were intimately related.

So why has the left today suddenly "gotten religion" and joined in the anti-drug crusade? You'd think that the left would know better than to support the war on drugs, given the way that the war on drugs has torn up much of the Bill of Rights as well as being used as an excuse for the police to incarcerate the underclass.

So why does the left today do the PR work for the war on drugs by condemning the CIA for involvement in drug trafficking and spreading more fear of drug use?

Any thoughts on this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a victim
Posted by: sr on Nov 4, 2006 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a comment for you. I worked for a company owned by the CIA for the purposes of narcotics trafficking, although I did not know it at the time. When I found money being laundered, that was the start of a 4 year harrassment nightmare that continues to this day. You see, I am a relative of the man that runs all their drug ops. It sounds like you think like they do. It is ok to sell drugs to pay for other "black ops" that are "important to this country". Now that I now know how PSYCHO the CIA is, I guess I can understand why they think that causing misery is ok for the "better".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CIA Narcotics Trafficking
Posted by: sr on Nov 4, 2006 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can tell everyone first hand what this adiministration has done to this country. I worked for several years for a CIA owned lage company that moves drugs and launders money, although I did not know it at the time. But when I found money being "moved", that began a 4 year nightmare of harrassment. I have a close relative that is the architect of all the CIA;s drug ops. So it is easy to see why they became nervous. I was then approached by a company in Miami that has empty warehouses and "nothing to sell". This company was owned by a CIA/Israeli owned bank called the Hamilton Bank in Miami. I now believe that money for the 911 hijackers was laundered through this bank, as was lots of South American money that went to the first Bush Jr. campaign. When I filed a FOIA on this company with the NSA, they called me on the phone to find out what I knew about it. Well, they now know what I know. The FBI asked me if I am "threat to Bush"? Well, I guess I am scaring somebody... I need legal help, and legitimate press to get this story out. I assume the only reason I am still alive is because I have a relative in low places at the CIA......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: replying to your previous comment
Posted by: sr on Jan 15, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The previous comments are CIA disinformation crap. But thats OK, becuse I am going to kill the agents that are harassing me. Mr Gottuso, you are dead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

victim
Posted by: sr on Jan 19, 2007 8:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are doing the same thing to me, because my cousin is the guy at the CIA who runs the drug operations and what I know about it. They are keeping me from working and running me broke. File a Freedom of Information Act with CIA on a company named Hunter Douglas, it is classified by Executive Order!!! They are based in the Netherlands, and it ain't tulips they export. Also, I need legal help and I need my story to be published. Contact me here with a way for me to properly identify you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]