Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Domenech's Downfall

By Jane Hamsher, AlterNet. Posted March 30, 2006.


Liberal bloggers exposed the Washington Post's new conservative blogger as a plagiarist and a bigot. Who will the Post hire next?
Advertisement

The brutal three-day career of Ben Domenech, the WashingtonPost.com's newest ex-blogger, was characterized by Washington Post ombudsman Deborah Howell as "a f****n' disaster." Nobody is quite sure how it came to pass.

When WashingtonPost.com announced on March 21 that its new blogger would be Regnery Publishing's Ben Domenech, editor of such high-profile conservatives as Ramesh Ponnuru, Michelle Malkin and Hugh Hewitt, the decision surprised few regular readers of the Post. Editor-in-chief Len Downie said late last year that the White House was critical of the coverage it was getting from the Post.com's Dan Froomkin. Howell subsequently declared Froomkin "a highly opinionated liberal" and announced that Jim Brady, editor-in-chief of the WashingtonPost.com, would probably be supplementing their ranks with a conservative blogger -- in the interest of balance.

It was somewhat surprising that Froomkin, whose popular column, "White House Briefing," should be considered a "liberal" at all, as he habitually calls on both liberal and conservative sources. More and more, however, applying a critical eye and appropriate skepticism to a troubled administration results in a journalist being tagged (and dismissed) as partisan.

More surprising was the fact that Domenech could be considered a corrective to Froomkin in terms of experience. As an 18-year veteran journalist, a graduate of Yale and the editor of Harvard University's Nieman Watchdog, Froomkin had little in common with the 24-year-old Domenech who had neither finished college nor worked as a journalist.

Domenech is the son of a Bush administration official and Jack Abramoff associate, Doug Domenech. In addition to working for Regnery, he has written speeches for John Cornyn, co-founded the conservative website RedState.com and boasted that he is "the youngest member of the Bush administration." He is a self-professed, hardline GOP loyalist.

In his debut post on March 21, Domenech devoted his new column -- entitled "Red America" -- to bashing liberals and chiding his fellow Post.com employees for their ignorance about the Reagan-era Patrick Swayze vehicle, "Red Dawn." By the time Post.com opinion editor Hal Straus declared him "an internet pioneer, an accomplished writer and someone who is willing to challenge sloppy thinking even if, occasionally, he finds it on the GOP side of the aisle," the battle lines had been drawn.

Liberal bloggers like Digby and Brad DeLong announced, "This is going to be fun."

By 6 p.m, that evening Atrios had unearthed a story from June of 2002 in which Domenech attributed a quote to George Bush that Bush never made and sourced it to an AP article he was never able to produce. He later retracted the story, but online curiosity about his history was now piqued. Intrepid researchers like James from Your Logo Here began looking into Domenech, and it soon became apparent that either Jim Brady was not fully aware of the person he had hired, or his judgment in doing so was questionable.

It was quickly revealed that Domenech's RedState alter ego was Augustine, who had said on the day of Coretta Scott King's funeral that she was a communist, and that it was inappropriate for the president to be in attendance. This echoed the racist critics of the civil rights movement who had used the attack to discredit the Kings around the time of the Montgomery bus boycott. Domenech was forced to make a half-hearted apology, expressing his regret that the situation was "overblown." Jim Brady declared himself "satisfied."

Others were not. Brady had already set himself at odds with liberal bloggers in January of this year. When Deborah Howell published a column writing that Jack Abramoff gave money to Democrats as well as Republicans, the liberal blogging community quickly alerted them to the fact that he hadn't. But rather than print a correction, the Washington Post adopted a "hang tough" position.


Digg!

Jane Hamsher is an author, producer and political blogger who writes for both firedoglake.com and the Huffington Post.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
GOPs Best and Brightest?
Posted by: owlbear1 on Mar 30, 2006 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, Yep, Yep...

GOP motto?
Lie, Steal, Cheat. Whatever it takes to 'Win'.
Power or Money
Also known as GREED!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Who will the Post hire next?" In the interest of fairness and objectivity, I nominate...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Mar 30, 2006 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I nominate Jayson Blair!

Mark Twain said: "That awful power, the public opinion of a nation, is created in America by a horde of ignorant, self complacent simpletons, who failed at ditching and shoemaking, and fetched up in journalism on their way to the poorhouse."

Oh, the freakin' horror. Another no-talent writer to add to the list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sucking Up
Posted by: Taurus on Mar 30, 2006 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess the WaPo editors have been jealous of the NYT because of those mash notes by Elizabeth Bumiller where she writes deathless fan prose about Bush's IPod and how on-time he is for cabinet meetings. The inanity of her work is impressive.

Bumiller wrote about Bush's punctuality not just once, but twice, and the second time it was after THE PRICE OF LOYALTY exposed Bush's cabinet meetings as stage-managed to death and absolutely meaningless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is serious, objective journalism dead???
Posted by: kencohen on Mar 30, 2006 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truthful, thoroughly researched and vetting jounalism had been a core pillar of our free society and the well of information for informed debate. Instead, the hysterical, fallacious, hyberbolic rants consuming the media have reduced us to blathering idiots. It is a dark day when veritable newspaper like the Washington Post sells out to the Bush Administration's strong arming to suppoprt this yellow journalism. The Washington Post now joins the ranks of the Boston Herald and NY Post.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes... Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
I'm going to rip off Bill Maher
Posted by: mythbuster on Mar 30, 2006 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't the problem, to steal a thought from Bill Maher, that "balance" now requires giving fact and fiction equal weight? While there may be two sides to every argument, there are not two sides to every fact. Challenging that notion is the Right's greatest success. If we can't agree on the facts, then they can never be proven wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, that's "truthiness" as Stephen Colbert has pointed out.
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Mar 30, 2006 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Truthiness" sounds true but has no factual basis. So, if you provide "balance" with "truthiness" somehow that is the new journalism. The stench is unbearable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nope. Posted by: ABetterFuture
clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Mar 30, 2006 9:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Washington Post used to be a pretty good newspaper. How did it become a whorehouse pimping for Bush and the GOP?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: clinker Posted by: nanapantyhead
barking up the dead tree
Posted by: cold2touch on Apr 3, 2006 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if their "best and brightest" are worse and dimmer than our "worst and dimmest" and yet they manage to win elections (with a friendly nudge from Diebold), what does it say for America?

Emigrating to Venezuela ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]