Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Marketing Narnia

By S. Brent Plate, The Revealer. Posted December 26, 2005.


Disney's Christian marketing of The Chronicles of Narnia -- and its reluctance to talk about it -- underscores the raging debate over the film's meaning.
Advertisement

Several newspaper reporters phoned me in the weeks leading up to the opening of The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe, the big-budget, semi-CGI adaptation of C.S. Lewis's much loved children's story. Since I published a book on Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ, reporters wanted an expert quote on the marketing of the Narnia film, and whether this would be a "Passion for kids."

They were responding to some buzz about the marketing techniques, that the folks at Disney were working with Motive Entertainment to hit some of the same evangelical Christian markets that helped promote Gibson's film to controversial big returns at the box office. Disney, careful not to alienate anyone, downplayed these so-called "grassroots" marketing techniques and said that only 5% of the marketing budget was directed toward specific Christian groups (churches, parachurch organizations). With a marketing budget estimated at $120 million...well, you do the math. That's a lot of posters, postcards, CDs, and workbooks to serve as "resource guides" (read, "tools for evangelism," "bible study spinoffs") for church leaders. (Much of this is available through the website, narniaresources.com.)

Disney's reluctance to make much of these alternative targets was based on a fear that non-Christians, and even many Christians, would be turned off by the idea that The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe was nothing but a veiled Christian story. But I think what people really react against is the highjacking of mythology through marketing, the attempt by some Christian groups to straightjacket a multi-faceted story into a single interpretation. This is not to say that a multi-faceted story can't be interpreted in a variety of ways, including the Christian allegorical one, but it is the mode of doing this that is abrasive. The single interpretation comes not through thoughtful, engaged dialogue, but through flashy four-color brochures, quick-paced "teaching" videos, and Christian-themed merchandising.

Motive Marketing often outsources the physical production and distribution of marketing products to a company called Outreach, which specializes in "church communication and outreach tools." In the current climate of movie promotion, and church growth, one company sources to another, which sources to another, which sources to another. Big business this. Alongside a monthly magazine publication, a training division (including seminars and training), and events programs (including comedians, motivational and "Narnia speakers"), Outreach provides bundles of promotional items for churches. As if shopping for wedding ideas or family reunions, Outreach's "church communications products" provide the church growth customer with theme packages such as the "seasonal" (including Christmas, Easter, or the 4th of July), "design themes" (including The Passion, patriotic, or Da Vinci Code), and "ethnic" (including Asian, Hispanic, Caucasian, multi-ethnic, or "MLK products"). As they state on their website, "The Marketing Products division provides start-to-finish church marketing and communication tools. Services include concepting, layout and design, personalization, printing, demographic analysis, address list acquisition, addressing, sorting, mailing and customer service follow-up." When a church buys a product from a third party that includes services such as "personalization," or "concepting," one quickly begins to see why this marketing of mythology might grow tiresome. Buying personalization?

Many have noted that C.S. Lewis would not have approved of a filmic adaptation of his books since he realized the literary imagination was distinct from a visual rendering. Creatures and scenarios originally described with words simply aren't meant to appear as visual images -- which is why so many films attempting to depict the biblical book of Revelation are doomed to visual failure: apocalypse is a literary genre. Yet, if Lewis would have balked at the film, he would have done so even more at the flashy marketing of his story, as given through Motive and Outreach. He also would not have been happy with the singular interpretation, the Christian message, being foisted on Narnia through these techniques.


Digg!

S. Brent Plate, an assistant professor of religion and the visual arts at Texas Christian University, is the author/editor of several books, including Re-Viewing the Passion: Mel Gibson's Film and Its Critics.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So how does author rate the movie?
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Dec 26, 2005 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of us might not go to see this movie, because the Ultra rightwing Christians are trying to make it a Christian story. I was hoping that author would rate the movie. I am sure like Harry Potter readers that CS Lewis readers might find the movie less complex than book. That is one of the points this article makes. I am a die hard Harry Potter reader and when I saw the last movie, though exciting it was not complex. I have not read CS Lewis books, probably because they just were not presented to Southern Elementary students in the late 40s, when I was reading such things. Of course we were still fighting the War Between the States from 2nd grade on, I was from Seattle so everyone called me a Yankee. The could not understand Washington state was not even a state then. And when I went to junior high, I never found CS Lewis, no internet. LOL

I will probably just wait for the dvd to our. I do not like the vibrations the far right evangelicals give off. That could trigger a panic attack and I would have to leave the movie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The movie's fine Posted by: Xanthippe
» RE: The movie's fine Posted by: tomcat
» Wrong on all counts Posted by: Xanthippe
» RE: Wrong on all counts Posted by: Lizka
» A couple of notes Posted by: simplexdesign
qsfqs
Posted by: grener on Nov 10, 2006 2:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
esi | esi1 | esi2 | esi3 | esi4 | esi5 | esi6 | esi7 | esi8 | esi9 | esi10 | esi11 | esi12 | esi13 | esi14 | esi15 | esi16 | esi17 | esi18 | esi19 | esi20 | esi21 | esi22 | esi23 | esi24 | esi25 | esi26 | esi27 | esi28 | esi29 | esi30 | esi31 | esi32 | esi33 | esi34 | esi35 | esi36 | esi37 | esi38 | esi39 | esi40 | esi41 | esi42 | esi43 | esi44 | esi45 | esi46 | esi47 | esi48 | esi49 | esi50 |

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fqsf
Posted by: grener on Nov 10, 2006 2:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
roj | roj1 | roj2 | roj3 | roj4 | roj5 | roj6 | roj7 | roj8 | roj9 | roj10 | roj11 | roj12 | roj13 | roj14 | roj15 | roj16 | roj17 | roj18 | roj19 | roj20 | roj21 | roj22 | roj23 | roj24 | roj25 | roj26 | roj27 | roj28 | roj29 | roj30 | roj31 | roj32 | roj33 | roj34 | roj35 | roj36 | roj37 | roj38 | roj39 | roj40 | roj41 | roj42 | roj43 | roj44 | roj45 | roj46 | roj47 | roj48 | roj49 | roj50 |

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]