Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Hidden Life of Garbage

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted October 31, 2005.


An interview with Heather Rogers, the author of a new book about our ever-increasing 'waste stream' and the people and corporations that feed it.
The Hidden Life of Garbage
The Hidden Life of Garbage
Advertisement

If you have ever wondered, in the face of our ever-expanding landfills and increasingly elaborate packaging of consumer goods and consumption, what happens to the all the garbage, then Heather Rogers' informative and provocative new book, Gone Tomorrow: The Hidden Life of Garbage, published by the New Press, is for you.

It is not a shock that the United States is the number one producer of garbage on the planet; with just 5 percent of the global population we generate 30 percent of the world's trash. The average American throws away a staggering 4.5 pounds of rubbish daily -- that's 1,600 pounds each year, according to Rogers. And garbage is also a global problem; today the middle of the Pacific Ocean is six times more abundant with plastic waste than zooplankton.

So how did we get to this point? Garbage production doubled in the U.S. over the past 30 years, yet waste is increasingly hidden, and the focus on recycling is fading along with it. Rogers says this situation came about through an alignment of manufacturing and marketing forces, combined with goals of the mega-garbage collection companies like Waste Management and Browning Ferris, and even some environmental laws which ended up helping the mega-companies.

Together, the persistent twin emphasis on growth -- our ever expanding consumptive society -- and the encouragement of easy disposal has made it seem painless for us to increasingly evolve to a virtually "throw away" society. With new technologies the impact is particularly pernicious and the impact is often on the Third World, our society's garbage dump. Just think for a moment about how many televisions, computers, screens, cell phones, iPods and other devices and gadgets you and your office have tossed out over the past decade.

Rogers' book, stuffed full of hundreds of fascinating factoids, combines a history of garbage collection with a political analysis of how social and economic forces have created a great garbage monopoly, in much the same way that a few companies dominate many key markets until the "free markets" are no longer remotely competitive.

Mixed in with Rogers' analysis, the reader will encounter fascinating garbage stories of incinerators and mega-dumps, of waste streams and marketing schemes, all aspects of today's waste-addicted culture. Rogers brings an emotional voice to the narrative as the garbage story is both fascinating and appalling, sharing her feelings of being both awe struck and disgusted. Garbage: it really is quite a story.

In the end, while there is plenty to be discouraged about, the book also has heroes and some smart garbage solutions from reformers, ideas to which municipal leaders, like New York's Mayor Bloomberg, are paying some attention.

Heather Rogers sat down with AlterNet in late September at a noisy Cosi's Cafe in Greenwich Village for the following interview. An excerpt from the book accompanies the Q & A.

So why did you write the book? Tell me a little bit about the experience.

I wrote the book because I wanted to know what happened to my garbage. I knew that it disappeared -- and I knew that it didn't. I also was interested in this system that, if it failed to work, whole cities could be brought to a grinding halt. I wanted to know more about what garbage collecting looked like and how it really worked -- something so integral to the way a city functions.

Once I started looking into garbage, I realized that it was this really great way to talk about the way the market works, and its relationship to labor and nature. Also, it was an excellent way to talk about the larger environmental crisis, just through this everyday substance of garbage.

What was your mood while writing it?

It was up and down. There were definitely periods of time when I was very depressed by it ... but also times when I felt good.

I noticed that some of the language you used: "mysterious," "oddly fascinating," "awesome eerie scenes," "metabolism of the market," led me to think you went through some kind of a journey in this sometimes fascinating, sometimes disgusting world.

Yeah. It's true. It was exciting because going to an incinerator, going to a landfill, I got to see these things that are normally hidden from view in our society; certain things are kept in hiding and garbage is one of them. Production is another. To get to go into that realm and see it is kind of exhilarating. You do feel like you're going into a place you're not supposed to be. And also it's horrifying. I had nightmares after I went to see this landfill in Pennsylvania that I write about in the book.

There are key metaphors that I'd like you to comment on. One of them is the massiveness issue -- the mega-facility in Morrisville, Pa. you mentioned -- the 6,000 acres of garbage. Tell me about that as a response to the garbage problem, how massiveness has become the way with which garbage is dealt.


Digg!

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Waste handling in Wyandotte
Posted by: churchofone on Oct 31, 2005 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All trash being picked up in this city must have a "trash tag" in order to be picked up. The city provides each household with 100 tags per year - enough for 2 cans per week, with 2 "free" trash weeks per year. If you use up your tags, you buy more at $1 each.

We also have a subscription service for yard waste pickup and curbside recycling, as well as an excellent drop-off recycling program that is free and includes yard waste, clear and brown glass, 1 & 2 plastics, cans, magazines, batteries, motor oil, office paper and cardboard. It is amazing how much cardboard we recycle every week!

In a household of 2 adults, we barely fill one can per week. We've accumulated a lot of spare "trash tags" due to our willingness to recycle. I used to give them to the neighbor family of four, but since they make no effort to recycle, I've stopped doing so. Someone needs to pay the price! They usually put out 3-4 cans of trash per week and I don't want to encourage that by making it free. What I don't get is why they drop off yard waste for recycling, but not household. Both functions occur in the same municipal yard, about a mile away.

More cities need to adopt programs that make those who create more trash pay the price for doing so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Waste handling in Wyandotte Posted by: churchofone
» RE: Waste handling in Wyandotte Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Recycling - the North vs the South
Posted by: Xandra on Oct 31, 2005 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We recently moved to Houston, TX from Green Bay, WI and were surprised at the lack of recycling programs. Little Green Bay, WI and surrounding areas have very good recycling compared to this city. In WI we recycled paper, glass and plastic bottles and metal cans on a bi-weekly basis. There were collection points for hazardous materials including e-garbage (there was a charge by the pound for computers etc) and composting for yard debris. Here on the NW side of Houston we have found a few paper recycling boxes and I have heard that there is a composting area for yard debris and building material but there is no regular pickup of any recyclables.
The prevailing attitude here seems to be shop and consume as much as possible. The streets downtown are clean but away from that area the highways and side streets are littered with trash and even the high end shops have trash scattered about in their parking areas. We have spotted people throwing coffee cups out of car windows as they drive down the street.

And I was surprised to find that "green energy" is much more expensive than in WI. There we paid through Public Service a monthly fee for blocks of 100 kw of energy and the same kilowatt rate as non-green energy. Here there is a monthly fee and a kw rate of 12.8 cents (compared to 8.8 cents for non-green energy).
It is also rare to see solar panels on homes. Considering the amount of sunlight that Houston receives, solar energy could be a valuable source of energy here which would save fossil fuels for those areas of the country that do need those fuels to produce electricity and heat.

But of course that would be progresive thinking and Houston, TX is very conservative. With the big oil producers here, this state will remain backward in it's energy, recycling and conservation policies all the while promoting itself as a wonderful place to be.

While we are here, we will try to enlist our neighbors to start local recycling programs and to educate people about green energy and less consumption.

We will certainly be glad when our family obligations are complete here and we can move back to the progressive north.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Germany
Posted by: MPatronik on Oct 31, 2005 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Germany's recycling system is great. It's amazing how it is such a fundamental part of daily routine. The candybar wrapper goes "im Gelden Sack" instead of in the rubbish bag, which is expensive so as to promote more recylcing.

I was a recycling advocate in the States before I went to Germany, and when I came back I incorporated that consciouness into my routine as much as I could. Luckily, my rural Mississippi town had the means by which to recycle anything except for glass. It's really amazing how much one can save from going into landfills by recycling things like the cardboard boxes beer comes in.

It helped my town because they sold it off to industry for reuse, but it was just a great feeling. Every couple weeks I could count on feeling good by taking the bin down to the recycling center. I wish more people would take advantage of that sense of feeling smart by keeping an object like a tin can from going to waste.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rrravengrrrl
Posted by: ravengrrrl on Oct 31, 2005 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to live in San Francisco, which recycles and resuses over 50% of their waste. I now live eastern Kern County, in the desert of SoCal. Kern Co. is also one of the poorest counties in CA and doesn't provide many services for its people. They have NO recycling out here. All the trash gets thrown into a dump which is on the slope above our town - and upstream of our aquifer, where the town pumps all its water in private and municipal wells.

I remember in the 90's working for MassPIRG and asking people to consider packaging waste when purchasing items. Where has that mentality gone? Now they're even developing disposable video cameras. Disgusting!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

whatever happened to incinerators ?
Posted by: cobrajet on Oct 31, 2005 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHy cant we burn the garbage and use it to fule energy plants, create steam, etc...
Why bury it in the ground .. what a waste for waste.
Make people pay by the pound.. we will have it cheap then, since we receycle so much...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ipods -- reduce or increase waste?
Posted by: HighCarbDiet on Oct 31, 2005 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
people thought computers would reduce waste, but they had the opposite effect. i wonder if the same will be true for ipods. new, "upgraded" models of ipods keep coming out and people keep buying them. instead of CD & cassette packaging (most of which is easily recyclable) filling landfills will we now be discarding tons of "obsolete" ipods, which are difficult to recycle, and are more likely to contain some hazardous materials?

whether ipods will create more physical waste or not, i think they will definitely make music (art) even more "disposable" than it's already become. download a song, listen a few times, then delete into the ether...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Opportunity
Posted by: Edward George on Oct 31, 2005 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is hardly a secret that the biggest handicap the Democrats have is that all they have to offer is "say no to Bush." No secret that all that Clinton did was apply some intelligence to the Republican policies, "the best Republican President we ever had". No secret that Gore is the only potential presidential candidate that agrees with real people as revealed by polls. But polls don't ask about our garbage and Gore is not communicating clear exciting new sweeping perspectives goals and plans.

Garbage is the product of capitalism/corporatism, of greed-is-good pushed with the best sales pitches and con games money can buy, and never a hint at the down side. Actually we know the world is drowning in our greed residue but it's corporately hidden and we are kept too busy with the flood of new toys to think about it. Currently the only residue that is being talked about is invisible atmospheric and chemical water pollution. Solid waste garbage is much easier to understand and more emotionally disgusting. This problem is made to order as a center piece for the Democratic Party and it's tentacles cover an enormous territory. Be it solid, gaseous or liquid it's all garbage; it's all products of corporatism/capitalism and the economic wealth is a sham. Outdoor toilets were real world and now when you flush your fancy toilet that fancy hundred dollar dinner doesn't disappear into some fourth dimension.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Atlanta
Posted by: MT512 on Oct 31, 2005 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm the only person in my office who gives a hoot. I commandeered some trash cans for my own little office recycling program. I told myself from day one that I wouldn't be digging through people's trash cans or trying to make them feel guilty, yet I see very little participation.

One lady was telling me at her desk how great it was that I was doing this and how she's all into recycling. In the course of talking with her for about five minutes, I watched her throw three different recyclable items into her trash can.

I think that's a big problem. People do just a little and convince themselves they're so green.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My momma always said......
Posted by: Michiganman on Oct 31, 2005 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GARBAGE IS AS GARBAGE DOES.
Until we make garbage expensive to get rid of, Joe Citizen will continue to put it all in one pail and have it hauled away at 16.00 a month. Another consequence of huge corporate monopolies.
PS We do recycle but only because our county has a program.
PSS We've lived in other places that had no easy alternative and didn't recycle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

merikans live in a bubble
Posted by: dadanbetty on Oct 31, 2005 9:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am from the states but I do not reside there anymore. It sickens me when I witness the "massconsumerwastecultural" that goes on there around the clock. Here we are approaching the chri$tian calender year of 2006 and my brother and his wife whom reside in the Seattle area still do not recycle. Would you believe me if I told you they had a 4 year old daughter as well?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Germany 2nd
Posted by: usmail4matt@gmx.net on Nov 1, 2005 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really enjoyed reading this article since it points out possiblities of a new development of waste conciousness and told me some more facts. I also enjoyed the comments since they put the facts into perspective.

I'm living in Germany and therefore always did recycling (well, not before reunification of east and west).
There are some common things in our daily routine, such as the yellow bag ("Gelber Sack") that contains recycable things (plastic, industry trash etc, mainly all that stuff having a so-called green-point ("Grüner Punkt") whereby the industry is forced to pay to have the recycling refinanced before the green point can be put on the packaging, which is elementary for the most consumers). You pay for any waste, and villages often have waste tag subscriptions. Further, we have - as already told - a system for refillment with a small deposit amount. Even if one is too lazy to carry back bottles to the store to get back the deposit, someone will do that. That's why you won't find any unbroken bottle on our streets - its carried away at night by poor people not having any other revenue. This increased when this system was advanced for cans as well (you rarely find any market offering cans any more because of this system *).
Further on we recycle glass separated into colors (green, brown, white).
I don't know how all the trash is handled and whether it is not being put altogether again after separation because machines can do it more reliable than we can. In fact, we have landfills and incineration too but at a far smaller level, e.g. without compostable trash.

The main reason for such a progress in trash recycling is not the only law but the conciousness of the people.
Simply think of how many plastic bags you get when buying something from the supermarket. In Germany all Markets I know do not even give you a single bag without demanding extra money. You simply have to reuse your bags or to pay for their recycling implicitly.
I've seen that even McDonalds tries to be most efficient not producing too much trash. Everything is already-recycled paper carrying the green point, you don't get napkins by default but have to take them yourself reading the hint "only take as much napkins as you really need", etc.
This behaviour is necessary to please the german consumers.

[...]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Germany 2nd..
Posted by: usmail4matt@gmx.net on Nov 1, 2005 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[...]

Anyways, being reminded everyday not to produce too mush trash isn't very easy to stand. It's always a compromise, but if you have such a conciousness not only with consumers which are expecting as little packaging as necessary, but in the corporation managements theirselves, you can produce even environment friendlier stuff.
We should take our responsibility for coming generations having to deal with our stuff such as rotten iPods and that kind of stuff not really necessary for life but for economy. And at that point there must be laws, since without common commandments every corporation would have economic disadvantages when behaving better than others. And that's part of governmental strategies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crawford WV
Posted by: krisboose on Nov 1, 2005 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was recently on a long 3 1/2 month road trip around the States and spent a few days in Crawford West Virginia. It's a town of 40 some people. One cannot drink the water there...I'm not sure why, but it's got a very strong smell of gas and it's a bit flameable. So, a lot of bottled water is consumed. In the 3 days I visited, a household of 3 people consumed enough water and other beverages to fill a large couple gallon trash bag. And guess what? Yep, no recycling program or anywhere that I could find to take it. I ended up hauling this trash bag away with me and giving it to a worker at a rest stop on my way to Atlanta. He was emptying recycling bins and I stopped him and yanked this huge bag out of the trunk of my car. Unreal!!

Peace,
Kris

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Crawford WV Posted by: sgtmartin1
Heather Rogers speaking in New York
Posted by: tworiddles on Nov 1, 2005 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heads up to those in the New York area: Heather Rogers is speaking November 15 at a progressive think tank called Demos. Here's the info from their website (www.demos.org):

Garbage Economy: The US Market's Reliance on Trash

Tuesday, November 15, 2005 | 12 - 2pm

Join Demos, Green Worker Cooperatives and Journalist Heather Rogers in discussing her new book, Gone Tomorrow: The Hidden Life of Garbage. Combining a gripping exposé with a potent argument for change, Rogers' book traces the connections between modern industrial production, environmental standards, consumer culture and our throwaway lifestyle.

This event will also feature as a respondent Omar Freilla of Green Worker Cooperatives, a South Bronx-based non-profit organization working to create "green collar" jobs and worker ownership in one of the country's most polluted and economically depressed neighborhoods.

Register online or call 212/633-1405 x533

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for this article.
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Nov 5, 2005 9:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't expect to be reading about garbage this evening, but I found it really interesting.

I kept thinking about a favorite book while reading this article and wanted to share.

Nick Shay, the central character in Don Delillo's Underworld, is a waste management man and the landfills he deals with become a metaphor for the decades covered by the book.

Way off topic, but recommended highly.

New on EWM: “Operation Choke the Chicken”
DHS won’t be caught with its pants down by Avian Flu

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paper (and non-corrugated cardboard) Garbage
Posted by: Spiffster on Nov 19, 2005 7:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in a rural town that doesn't recycle paper. We compost what we can, but there is also colored and cardboard waste. Is it better to burn it or landfill it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]