Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Readers Write: Women Waiting To Exhale
Also in Media and Technology
How the Media's Tarring of Hillary Hurt Obama Too
Eric Boehlert
Digital TV: A Giveaway to Corporate Media
Bruce Dixon
Progressive Media's New Smackdown Power: Why Swiftboat Tactics Aren't Working in '08
Eric Boehlert
Communication Breakdown: How Cell Phones Hurt Communities
Benjamin Dangl
Arizona Shock Jock's Dangerous Call for 'Bloodshed' in Polling Places
Rory O'Connor
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake
AlterNet editors were floored by the number of thoughtful, engaging comments readers posted in response to Jennifer Baumgardner's article of June 1, Women Waiting to Exhale.
In her story, feminist author/activist Baumgardner reported on the Exhale clinic in Oakland, Calif., which runs a non-judgmental post-abortion talk-line that focuses on "supporting women's experiences, rather than legal rights or lobbying."
Baumgardner also mentioned other abortion-themed projects currently being unveiled by women across the country. From zines like Emily Barcklow's Our Truths/Nuestras Verdades, to Web sites like I'm Not Sorry and Pregnancy Options, to documentary films such as The Abortion Diaries and the author's own Speak Out, Baumgardner noted that the growing number of women talking openly about the conflicting emotional impact of abortion is part of a growing cultural shift "in the national conversation. From 'Keep your laws off my body' to...talk about feelings and sadness, and even (gasp) whether fetal life has value."
Of course, the idea of women who have had abortions debating "whether fetal life has value" is controversial -- and not just for the anti-abortion contingent. It's especially divisive terrain among pro-choicers, who have traditionally downplayed abortion's ethical ambiguities in favor of focusing on the procedure's legal accessibility and safety.
"I'm not surprised at all by the response," says Baumgardner via e-mail. "People have a lot to say about this issue. Obviously, my bias is toward the people who think it's high time we had this conversation more publicly. But I'm intrigued by the people who think that I -- and my sources -- have simply bought into right-wing brainwashing."
The lively comments provoked by Baumgardner's article moved us to highlight them in a forum of their own.
Malkaa began a mini-debate when she wrote, "I was appalled and disappointed in your article about counseling after abortion. Jennifer has bought into right-wing propaganda. Most polls show that the overwhelming reaction to abortion is relief... I was especially taken aback by the statement that women who have an abortion because they couldn't afford another child feel awful about it. That is a blatant lie for most of us...What is wrong with our young people today?"
Reader Xenacat agreed: "This article is the most appalling example of right-wing propaganda cloaked in phony concern for women that I've seen in a long time. Right-wing religious groups have long played up the 'counseling' aspect, the feelings of 'sadness,' etc. It is merely another manipulative tool to get women to buy into the anti-reproductive rights camp."
She continued: "The truth of the matter is that the overwhelming majority of women are just grateful that they can end a pregnancy, period. It is pretty cut and dry: the sense of relief is far greater than...thoughts of motherhood...Enough with the conservative guilt tripping. We don't need this tripe in AlterNet."
Ouch. Thankfully, many readers felt differently. Terihu noted, "Yes, the INITIAL reaction includes relief, but for MANY women -- not all, but many -- there are other complex feelings mixed in... What is so awful about acknowledging the wide range of experiences with abortion? Your rigidity, claiming your own experience as the 'right' one, is as damaging as the psycho right-wingers insisting that it's a sin. Not everyone falls neatly into these two ends of the spectrum...there are shades of gray that both sides are purposely choosing to ignore. If your goal is to be a compassionate advocate of women's rights, you should be more open to listening to real women's talk about their real lives."
Draylinjae added: "I applaud the author's fearless exploration of all of the honest aspects of peoples' feelings. She's promoting a forum for the total acceptance...of women's feelings. Everyone is different. Every BODY is different. Just because you felt relief doesn't mean someone else can't feel horrible following an abortion, even if it IS the best decision for that woman. Why should we be afraid to admit that deciding to have an abortion is difficult? For most women, I think it is a difficult decision, but one that needs to be protected."
Gargirl agreed: "Women who seek abortions need all their emotional responses...accepted by those of us who are ardently pro-choice. They deserve our help and loving concern, not our censure. They are not mind-controlled dupes of the right wing; they are women experiencing painful emotions after a medical procedure...The fact that you experienced no mixed emotions does not invalidate the emotions of other women... Having mixed emotions can happen over choosing which of two parties to go to on a Saturday night, why are you shocked that some women experience mixed feelings over ending a pregnancy?"
Laura Barcella is an Associate Editor at AlterNet.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »