Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

TV For the Rest of Us

By Monica Mehta, AlterNet. Posted May 27, 2005.


For those of us who haven't thrown our television sets out the window, the fall season provides five interesting new picks featuring affairs of state, the wrongfully convicted, and Martha Stewart.

The majority of new shows that air on network TV every fall season are ignorable -- okay, horrendously bad. There are always the same old character types: do-good doctors, chintzy gigolos and boring Average Joes. But of the new shows the networks announced last week, the political junkies among us might check out five that throw affairs of state, high-powered women, and the wrongfully convicted into the mix.

Among the most talked-about is ABC's "Commander-in-Chief," in which Geena Davis stars as the first female president of the country. Davis, an outspoken supporter of the Democratic Party, will play a vice-president whose boss suddenly dies, leaving her in the prime position. A long, leggy ex-model taking over the Oval Office can only happen on TV, but the idea is a nod to Hillary Clinton's anticipated 2008 presidential run. Hopefully Davis will have a better run than Patty Duke, whose 1985 turn as female prez in ABC's "Hail to the Chief" lasted only a handful of episodes.

Continuing the political theme, Jerry Bruckheimer ("CSI," "The Amazing Race") will exec produce an NBC drama about "the nation's ultimate fortress" -- the Pentagon. The show stars Benjamin Bratt and Dennis Hopper, and will feature lots of tension-filled moments in which intelligence officers have to decide between protecting the homeland and protecting people. Expect a patriotic nod to the country's current quandaries, with a few "real-life inspired" plots thrown in.

Speaking of quandaries, Martha Stewart continues the high-powered women theme as she take on the role of the Donald on NBC's "The Apprentice." The format will remain the same but the "show will be tailored to Martha's personality and brand identity." Does this mean contestants darning doilies and whipping meringue? Or will they be forced to decorate a prison cell? Either way, reality shows have been the vehicles of comeback for a number of celebs, so expect a revival of the blond bob.

Rounding out the not-guilty pleasures, the wrongfully convicted get a nod in two new procedural dramas next season: ABC's "In Justice" and Fox's "Just Legal." In the first, non-profits rule as lawyers at the Justice Project fight to get the innocent out of jail. In the second, Jay Baruchel and Don Johnson become "defenders of the accused and crusaders for the unjustly wronged." The "ripped from the headlines" plots should be a nice change from NBC's "Law & Order," in which 99% of the defendants are guilty before ever even being thought of as innocent.

It remains to be seen how much these new political and legal shows will play off the current climate, and how much they'll deviate from the norm. In a season being derided for its copycat line-up (more than 10 new network shows are blatant imitations of shows already on air), viewers may end up desperate for some real change.

Digg!

Monica Mehta is an associate editor at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Grand Illusion
Posted by: 42Years on May 27, 2005 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now I won't have to tune in to those programs. That leaves two shows that I might watch if I'm not carving duck decoys.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Um Yeah,
Posted by: nakis on May 27, 2005 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pull back cranial dome, remove cerebral cortex, drool......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JH
Posted by: Jeanne on May 27, 2005 5:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sounds as if you are actually advocating that viewers tune in. Your descriptions sound like rubbish to me. I wouldn't waste my time on any of the shows mentioned. Their "pedigrees" alone eliminate them from consideration...come on, "The Great Race", "The Apprentice", "CSI--anything". Thank god for cable and dvr.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JH Posted by: maxpayne
What the.......
Posted by: chetvan on May 27, 2005 6:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did I somehow end up at the People Magazine website?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

justasking
Posted by: justasking on May 27, 2005 8:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are so many of the posts on this website so angry, meanspirited, and downright vitriolic?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: justasking Posted by: chetvan
» RE: justasking Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: justasking Posted by: chetvan
thanks for the review/preview
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on May 27, 2005 10:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ABC's "In Justice" ... non-profits rule as lawyers at the Justice Project fight to get the innocent out of jail.

I don't watch much tv, but that sounds like it might be good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great article, Mehtha.
Posted by: maxpayne on May 28, 2005 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't let the rightwing fascists let you down. They don't understand why people like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'reilly, Donald Trump, and other corporate media screw-wits continue to corrupt their minds into voting against their own economic interests !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New TV Programs
Posted by: davidt on May 29, 2005 10:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anyone answer this question?

Why do TV writers criticize the current viewing prospects then trumpet these "few different, worthwhile alternatives" that are more of the same material that was presented for ridicule?

Who in the hell cares if Mawthah Stewaht shits in her panties or not?

But I am sure some will salivate all over the impending decision about which brand of toilet paper she uses to wipe with.

Pull the plug and go read a book about how Americans are getting screwed "every which-a-way".

Or stay dumb, lobotomized and buy this swill that passes for innertainment, in between those enlightening ads that is.

Hey, how is this for an idea?

The United States of Advertising.

The Network Masters will do a demographic study and...tune in tomorrow...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: New TV Programs
Posted by: maxpayne on May 30, 2005 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amen to that !

Surely, our country seriously needs to clamp down on the growing illiteracy rates. Lack of decent education and open-mindedness is why this country is losing on everything. As a first step to cure the problem, I stronly recommend that everyone read this article on what should really be done about education which neither the Democrats or Republicans even come close to touching much less addressing or solving:

FIXING OUR SCHOOLS IS NOT ABOUT MORE MONEY

How To Make The Public Education System Top Notch Without Breaking The Bank

by Christopher C. Ballatine

http://www.moderateindependent.com
/v2i4schools.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: e: New TV Programs Posted by: davidt
Poor Martha, and other comments on our televiewing options
Posted by: Upanaway on Jun 1, 2005 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What on earth did Martha do that Nancy Brinker didn't do (while sitting on a corporate board that sold off their shares leaving stockholders with $2-$3/share stock all the while serving as a non-profit board chair, and earning money for sitting on for-profit boards)? I didn't know either but after the Prez made Ms. Brinker an ambassador and immunized her, surely that set a precident Martha's attorneys overlooked for a much lesser "crime."

Between cable and TV there is very little to pursue save for NET. Oh, Animal Planet is pretty good, first runs that is, as are Discovery and National Geographic, but its really not for viewing its for sporting, don't ya think?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

KUDOS to you people
Posted by: LStokes on Jun 6, 2005 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please people, just because the website chooses to cover more mainstream topics like TV and lifestyles doesn't mean they're "fluff pieces." A website can have more to it than all hard-hitting political pieces all the time. I for one appreciate the lighter tone and the entertainment coverage that Mehta has been providing. We have to be in touch with the regular folk as well, not just be stuck in our highbrow towers looking down upon everyone and everything. We should try to be more open-minded, and not stuck in our little hole of leftiness all the time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]