Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

MediaCulture

Beasts on the Bus

By Matt Taibbi, AlterNet. Posted April 15, 2005.


Being on the campaign trail is like being trapped in a zoo exhibit with no shelter from the crowd, where the penalty for touching your own genitals is death.
Beasts on the Bus
Advertisement

Editor's Note: This is an edited excerpt of Matt Taibbi's new book, "Spanking the Donkey: Dispatches from the Dumb Season" (The New Press).

The traveling press pool is a high-class cage.

It takes a while to see it, but once you do, it's hard to miss how completely U the Important National Pundit is sealed off from the outside world. On a typical day you awake in your hotel and very early in the morning—six or six-thirty is a typical hour—have to bring your bags down to one of the campaign "sherpas" or "shepherds," who arranges for its delivery to the plane. After that there is usually a half-hour or so in the hotel lobby. Then it is a bus to the airport, a security sweep on the tarmac, a flight to somewhere or other, then another single-file trip to the bus, which takes you straight to the event.

I didn't notice this at first, but very often, when the press bus arrives, there is another handler waiting right at the bus door. When you step off the bus he is literally pointing in the direction of the press filing center, normally a concrete room somewhere deep in the ass of whatever building the event is being held in. In case you miss that, there are always big paper arrows on the ground pointing you in the right direction, with signs that say things like "PRESS FILE." At one stop in New Orleans, these arrows were plastered for a stretch leading a full 200 yards between the outdoor area where Kerry's speech was being held and the Cajun restaurant the campaign had converted into a filing center.

"Yeah, it's funny," said Evan Richman, the affable photographer for the Boston Globe. "When you first get on the trail, you think: why are they treating me like an idiot? But then, after about a month, you're like—okay, this way, huh?" He mimicked lowering his head and following the signs.

At the event you do have free roam of the place. You can stay in the special walled-off press area, or you can mingle with the "public," that is, the people who came to the event. The idea that this somehow represents contact with the outside world, however, is a little problematic. After all, these are all people who came to see the candidate. They have that in common. And the setting is, of course, completely artificial. Everything is scrupulously clean and shiny and ready for television. Behind the candidate there is usually a platform where a statistically representative sample of the human racial gene pool is standing in a cheerfully supportive pose. The people.

After the event you go back to the file room, and file. From there it is the same routine as before: bus, plane, bus, event, bus, plane, bus. At the end of the day, often very late in the evening, you arrive at a ridiculously expensive hotel where a big fluffy bed with no fewer than five down pillows is begging you to plop down and collapse. There is never quite enough time to get a full night's rest. Ordering your wake-up call, you begin the next day on exactly the same schedule.

The isolation is so total that during some stretches the journalists, like prisoners, actually have to search out little cracks in the system just to smuggle in cigarettes. Among the staffers on the Kerry campaign, the preferred method is to send the baggage sherpa, a cheerful, sleep-deprived soul named Pat Shearns, to make runs during the events. Poor Pat often sleeps less than two hours a night. He hopes to have a few days off before November.

From inside this hermetically sealed universe, the cream of the national political press corps somehow has to come up with oceans of insightful material. Photographers take 500 pictures a day. Most reporters have to file at least once a day, sometimes twice; the wire service people often have to do more than that. At each stop, the Beast is waiting in that filing room to be fed. But with the gathering of material needing to take place literally at the speed of existence, how is this possible? Where can the information come from?

Answer: they have to feed it to you.

New Orleans

The spread at the filing center in New Orleans was about par for the course: massive in scale, with a local flavor, so you know where you are. There was boiled crawfish, crawfish étouffée, red beans and rice with sausage, ratatouille, braised catfish, bread pudding, and rolls with parsley butter. Praline cookies. Fresh-brewed iced tea. The speech that day was to contain an escalation of anti-Bush rhetoric, something about the president's foreign policy being really reckless and irresponsible.


Digg!

Matt Taibbi lives in New York. He covers politics for Rolling Stone and the New York Press.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from MediaCulture! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ms
Posted by: PeterPeter on Apr 15, 2005 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is needed is a dialogue between the people and the candidates. During last presidential campaign, there was no way the "people", the voters, could ask questions of the candidates. So many questions never asked. What did the candidates stand for on dozens of issues? The campaigns are too managed.
Kerry should have won. Why was the environment never mentioned. Supposedly the majority of Americans are interested in any impact of the environment...yet no appeal to this interest.....to select the candidate who was aware of environmental issues.....was ever raised.
Every email that came from the Kerry camp mostly asked for money. Here is the perfect medium for getting directly to the voters, to explain candidates views, to exhibit their intelligence.......all wasted in this constant appeal for money, and nothing else.
What the Democrats need is to convert more people to the Democratic point of view....to get more votes. What we Democrats needed were emails that we could forward to our Republican friends that might get them to change their minds.
Instead we got stuff to pass amongst ourselves...to amuse ourselves, but that did nothing to convince others that the Democratic Party ideals were better than the Republican's.
It seemed that in the effort to offend no-one, Kerry was afraid to criticize; to stand up for what he believed.
PeterPeter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What they really want from us. . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Apr 15, 2005 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I gave $25 to every candidate and cause that solicits me by e-mail, I'd end up as one of the homeless, wandering the streets muttering to myself about socialism.

So, when I read the latest e-mail from some political group or candidate for whatever office, I involuntarily scan for the word, "donate." When I find it, my mouse-button finger involuntarily clicks on "trash." In the beginning these were voluntary actions; but they have been repeated so many times in this political season that the "scan-click-trash" response has become utterly Pavlovian.

I sometimes think that candidates and causes, no matter how important or heartfelt their messages, consider each of us as little more than a computer terminal attached to a wallet. I have written to many explaining my economic situation and offering my time instead, and their responses have fallen somewhere between form-letters (again asking for donations) and silence.

I understand the difficulty in dealing with large numbers of supporters; but as the article points out, rich people talking to rich people, but coldly asking for money from not-rich people, does not motivate the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drivel
Posted by: jasbinsek on Apr 16, 2005 12:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does every outlet for the Democratic Party let such useless articles on their website? If you can tell one that doesn't, please let mo know so I can start going there instead of here...PLEASE!!! AlterNet is becoming more and more pointless each time I visit - and I am sympathetic to its premise!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same for Both Sides
Posted by: sourpuss on Apr 17, 2005 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neither party directly connected with ordinary Americans, they only had special campaign agendas. The Repubilcans do have their NRA, Christian fundamentalists, and corporate powers that be, who they direct their message at, but this is not meeting with ordinary Americans. And the same goes for Democrats who pretend to speak for the downtrodden but avoid their neighborhoods.
God help us, but the mainstream media is owned by the "military - industrial complex". Now all we get is the news they want us to hear. I am one of those freaks who checks out FAIR and let me tell ya' they are way ahead of the game.
Journalists today come off an assembly line out of college, where they all are pretty, sound nice, and mouth the company line. You better get your news off the internet cuz the so called "professionals" are no longer the fourth estate, they are bought and paid for by the first estate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Loser or Fake?
Posted by: grizzly_adams on Apr 18, 2005 1:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good point that just because it's already been said that the circus is vacuous, it still needs to be said. But asTaibbi is busy unmasking the frauds, he tries selling us on the idea that he's a "small time loser." Come on! Of all the fake attempts to come off as a regular guy, this takes the cake. Taibbi comes from the upper-class in Manhattan, his father and mother are both famous TV reporters, he is a strapping jock who played professional basketball in Mongolia and traveled the world, and is a full-time Rolling Stone writer (meaning rich). Taibbi's writing is often sharp. But positioning himself as a fraud-unmasker, then trying to push his own fake persona on his readers just to earn their sympathy, is offensive to real small-time losers. I know this is the current fashion, to pretend you're a small-time loser, but Taibbi needs to be smarter than that, and he needs to treat his readers with more respect than this. I was going to get this book, but not now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kill yourselves
Posted by: schwibs on Apr 18, 2005 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
99% of journalists shold do the world a favor and kill themselves. Seriously, kill yourselves. Quit polluting the airwaves and papers with your "unbiased" bullshit. Take a fucking stand on something and go with it. You people have straddled the fence for so long you have no balls left. Seriously, kill yourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

press bus coverageof election campaigns
Posted by: janet on Apr 19, 2005 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Problem might be more with the candidates than with the reporters. The candidates did not say anything honest or real about either what they were running for or about the major problems facing the nation. On the Democrat side, there was Abughraib and need for responsability to be taken, there was the use of depleted uranium weapons, there was the environment and its degradation, there was the war on Iraq and the reasons given for it, there was the war on terror and its questionable existence, there was US policy planning to rule the world by military force, to put weapons in space, to press for free trade issues only when they favored the US etc. I looked at Party web page and found no mention of these things. They are still not anything the Democratic Party leadership cares about, though much of the public does. The candidates probably said nothing in speeches either since the purpose of the round the country campaigning is for all to be able to hear the central message. There is no reason for a press bus or plane to follow the candidates around at all. They can but don`t present the central messages of the candidates. When the candidates say trivia, of course, it is impossible.
The Republicans slid around their dominate the world by force objectives on the campaign literature although it is available in US govt. documents. They have been dishonest about not planning to honor the Social Security surplus fund and have not proposed cutting payroll taxes to levels matching outgo as logical counterpart of not honoring the obligations of the fund,
etc. There was much reporters could have explained to the public without following Bush and crew on his rounds. They failed to do so. Yes, it is a useless expense to have press bus coverage, good coverage of policy platforms is not being made by the press, and the candidates themselves say nothing or fudge issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]