Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Right-wing Radio

By Sarah Posner, AlterNet. Posted April 5, 2005.


Religious broadcasters are squeezing community radio right off the FM dial.
Advertisement

The story of low-power radio is a cautionary tale on how a progressive victory can quickly be turned to conservative gain. Thanks to Rupert Murdoch, Clear Channel, and Sinclair Broadcasting, the right wing has long dominated corporate media. Now religious broadcasters are busy pushing community radio right off the FM dial.

Low-power FM (LPFM) radio is a service created five years ago by the Federal Communications Commission in response to an effective lobbying by progressive activists -- that enables schools, churches, civic associations, or clubs to establish their own neighborhood radio stations. Yet this vision of locally operated, independently programmed, and not-for-profit media is being threatened with extinction before it even gets off the ground.

The Dream of Low Power Radio

For years, media reform activists have fought valiantly to force the FCC to issue licenses for low power radio stations. Their dream: to create a space on the radio dial for true locally produced community programming, untainted by the profit considerations of large media conglomerates. Low power radio would finally give voice to those who needed it most: people of color, low-income communities, local organizations.

Five years after their victory, community radio has become the bastion of Christian programming. LPFM is being squeezed off the radio dial by religious broadcasters who are gobbling up FM frequencies at an astonishing speed. Their weapon of choice: low power translators.

While much of the media coverage of rightwing groups and low power radio has focused on low power licenses -- they represent about half of the applications (344) for the FCC low power licenses -- these broadcasters dominate low power frequencies primarily by acquiring translator licenses.

Translators, which range in power from 10 to 250 watts, were created by the FCC to help boost signals of existing stations in areas where the terrain can hamper their signals. Christian broadcasters use these translators to transmit programs from their bigger full-power stations. Unlike commercial stations which can only have a translator within the receivable range of the full-power "parent" station non-commercial groups such as religious broadcasters can place their translators at any distance and feed them via satellite or other means. As a result, one full-power station can be used to broadcast programming across a number of states, vastly extending its reach, especially in rural areas. And the more translators take up low power frequencies in a community, the less room for local radio stations on the FM dial. More importantly, Christian radio networks can gain access to small communities without having to produce any local programming -- since the FCC forbids translator stations from airing such programming.

The end result: community radio is literally being crowded off the radio by religious broadcasters.

The most notorious of the Christian broadcasters who abuse translator licenses is Calvary Chapel of Twin Falls, Idaho, which owns only 34 full-power radio stations, but transmits programming to 361 translators across the country from its flagship station, KAWZ.

While Calvary Chapel is by far the biggest user of translators, other such major broadcasters of Christian radio programming have large number of such stations of their own. They include the American Family Association Radio, Bott Radio Network, Bible Broadcasting Network, and Moody Bible Institute of Chicago. The combined heft of these broadcasters adds up to a level of audience penetration that's simply astonishing. Take, for example, "Portraits of Freedom," a syndicated program hosted by Alan Sears, the president and chief lawyer of the James Dobson-backed Alliance Defense Fund (ADF). And now look at the map of the stations and translators that broadcast this program. Translators, in essence, have become the backbone of a powerful radio empire of the religious right that reaches people in every corner of America.


Digg!

Sarah Posner is a writer and former attorney who most recently practiced at Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, where she brought legal challenges to court secrecy and litigated consumer rights and civil rights cases. She is a contributing writer for Gadflyer.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Right-wing media
Posted by: johntindale on Apr 5, 2005 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christian organizations have been in the media since its creation. Johannes Gutenburg's reason for building a printing press was to publish religious literature. Billy Graham knew that television was key in the early days of his ministry. Pat Robertson was a key element in the early days of cable television-selling cable boxes door-to-door in the Virginia Beach/Newport News area.
The thing the left doesn't get is that Christians have a mandate, a core belief handed down to them through the generations from Jesus himself.
Its called the Great Commission, and it instructs Christians to go into the whole world and preach the gospel to every living creature. So as long as there are forms of mass communication, there will be Christians who use them. Black, white, hispanic, liberal or conservative, Democrat and Republican. Christians want you to hear their message, and if you took the time to listen, you might learn some things about how to run a successful grass-roots campai

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Right-wing media Posted by: heykapp
» RE: RE: Right-wing media Posted by: nakis
» RE: Right-wing media Posted by: Mythsaje
» RE: Right-wing media Posted by: ssmall
LPFM stations have priority over translators
Posted by: chuckroste on Apr 5, 2005 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The FCC Rules give priority to LPFM stations and NOT translators!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is an old campaign
Posted by: bookwoman on Apr 5, 2005 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Several years ago, I heard a story that Right Wing Broadcasters were getting license for the low numbered end of the FM band. Their plan, at that time, was to mount high output stations in the same range as NPR and college stations. It was thought at that time, that the plan was to "drown out" what was considered sources of "Liberal" (read anyone who criticized the Christian Right) voices. It sounds as if this failed, and they are now using this relatively new source of power instead. My problem with these broadcasters is not that they are Christian but that they call themselves Christian. I, as a practicing Christian, don't consider what they are "selling" as the teachings of any Christ I ever worshipped.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is an old campaign Posted by: OutdoorsPro
The fundemental belief at the core of this is insulting
Posted by: GeneK on Apr 5, 2005 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For someone to make the assertion that "Religious broadcasters are squeezing community radio right off the FM dial" pre-suposes that religious broadcasters are NOT part of the community.

Would there be the same crying and knashing of teeth if the religious broadcasters were not predominatly Christian, conservative and (even worse to the left) speak to a moral code and right vs. wrong???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOD KNOWS YOU NEED WORD!!!
Posted by: WONDERWALEYE on Apr 5, 2005 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no problem with giving the religous stations some of the rock music spots, and I hope you know that you need his word more than a lot of trash in these recordings!! ISNT IT A SHAME THAT GOD GETS THE LOWER POWER SPOTS?? GOD speaks to you in many different ways. Don't you think it would be a good idea to keep his airways open? After what i see going on in this country, I wonder if we should'nt really take IN GOD WE TRUST off our money. If GOD no longer bestows HIS blessings on this country we won't have to worry about such a thing, as you will listen to only what your told to listen to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: GOD KNOWS YOU NEED WORD!!! Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: GOD KNOWS YOU NEED WORD!!! Posted by: Dr Kilovolt
» RE: GOD KNOWS YOU NEED WORD!!! Posted by: Mythsaje
I'm ready to listen....
Posted by: Karieson on Apr 5, 2005 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As soon as god personally gets on the airwaves, himself, not through some delusional christian translator, I will then say give God all the time and airwaves God wants. Meanwhile, keep your translations of god to yourself. I don't believe in imaginary friends, or enemies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Logic police.
Posted by: Tsudiia on Apr 5, 2005 5:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've always thought it was incredibly arrogant of people to assume they have the slightest idea what God would want. An omnipotent consciousness capable of influencing and/or directly controlling everything in existence would be so far beyond our miniscule comprehension as to be impossible to describe. Now look into the night sky and take into account that the nearest galaxy of comparable size to our own is the Great Nebula in Andromeda, located approximately 2 million light years away. Presuming to know the mindset of such a being is beyond ludicrous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Logic police. Posted by: Mythsaje
» RE: Logic police. Posted by: dennyduke@earthlink.net
NCE station rules
Posted by: gandalf1954 on Apr 5, 2005 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are strict rules on the operation of a broadcast station in what is known as the NCE portion of the FM band. NCE (non commercial educational) stations operate on frequencies below 92.1 mhz. The key word in the description of an NCE station is EDUCATIONAL. What this means is that not only can these stations not broadcast 'commercials', they can not URGE ACTION, but only EDUCATE and INFORM. If a rapture right NCE station (BTW for this to apply the main frequency must be below 92.1 mhz, the translators can be on any frequency)urges ANY action such as 'call your congressman' or 'protest this ungodly descision by.....' then anyone can file a complaint with the FCC. Its easy and you can do it online.
So I URGE (!) you to keep an ear tuned to what they are doing and file a complaint EVERY time you hear what sounds like an urge to action.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NCE station rules Posted by: Mythsaje
Yes, progressives SHOULD learn a lesson from the right wing
Posted by: tomkara on Apr 6, 2005 3:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Progressives don't have radio space because they often lack vision for action. Where could a clueless progressive wannabee broadcaster turn to? No doubt the right has groups to finance, organize, provide technical support for broadcast wannabees. The only group I found for community broadcasting sent me a fairly unhelpful packet mostly about fund raising. I contacted community radio stations so I could get a grasp of how one becomes a community broadcaster and nobody replied. The left also needs a Rupert Murdock equivalent who can buy commercial stations which aren't, like Air America, strictly talk. The left needs to appeal to more than the choir. They need to embed their message in an innovative entertainment format. Commercial radio today is largely blighted with boring music. The left could exploit this vacuum, coupling high quality music with with progressive views.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yaegl
Posted by: platergus on Apr 6, 2005 6:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The same process is evident in Australia.We have a regulatory process which allocates frequencies to localised community stations. A Christian based organisation called REMA syndicates its programmes through such local stations. It seems to have little trouble persuading the regulatory authority to grant it precedence over genuine community groups. One would take less exception if the Church based broadcasting was truly local

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]