Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
The Times Sees No Evil
Also in Media and Technology
How the Media's Tarring of Hillary Hurt Obama Too
Eric Boehlert
Digital TV: A Giveaway to Corporate Media
Bruce Dixon
Progressive Media's New Smackdown Power: Why Swiftboat Tactics Aren't Working in '08
Eric Boehlert
Communication Breakdown: How Cell Phones Hurt Communities
Benjamin Dangl
Arizona Shock Jock's Dangerous Call for 'Bloodshed' in Polling Places
Rory O'Connor
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake
The biggest news from the digital frontier may be the advent of community internet – low-cost, high-speed broadband services provided by municipal governments and community groups via local networks.
Hundreds of cities and towns – from Philadelphia and San Francisco to Granbury, Texas, and Scottsburg, Ind. – recognize broadband internet access as a public necessity, no different from water, gas or electricity. Especially in rural and underserved urban areas, community internet promises to narrow the digital divide.
Telecom and cable companies are pushing laws across the country that would restrict local competition and cut off consumer choice. This newsworthy battle finally graced the front-page of the The New York Times on Feb. 17, with a story pegged to Philadelphia's ambitious plans to turn the city into "one gigantic wireless hot spot."
The real problem with James Dao's piece wasn't its tardiness – other papers covered similar ground months ago – but the way the Times failed to question the true motivations of its sources.
The first quote in the story goes to Adam Thierer, identified as "director of telecommunications studies at the libertarian Cato Institute and the author of a soon-to-be-released study criticizing the Philadelphia plan." He tells the Times: "The last thing I'd want to see is broadband turned into a lazy public utility."
Dao fails to note that the Cato Institute is funded by Verizon, SBC Communications, Time Warner, Comcast and Freedom Communications – all companies seeking to put a stake through the heart of homegrown broadband systems. Thierer is little more than an industry sock puppet.
Dao then goes on to interview David L. Cohen, executive vice president of Comcast, who asks: "Is it fair that the industry pay tax dollars to the city that are then used to launch a network that would compete with our own?"
Fair enough. But again, Dao fails to alert readers to his source's conflicts of interest that might impugn his integrity. In a previous incarnation, Cohen served as chief of staff to then Philadelphia Mayor Edward G. Rendell. Rendell has since moved into the governor's mansion, while Cohen jumped to the private sector.
But Cohen still has Rendell's ear, which might explain why the governor ignored widespread public opposition and signed a bill into law last December that prevents other Pennsylvania communities from offering competitive broadband services. Though the Philadelphia plan secured a last-minute reprieve, the rest of the state got shafted.
Timothy Karr is the Executive Director of MediaChannel.org
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »
| More Opinion: | ||
|
Why Do We Need to Talk About the Female Orgasm? Sex and Relationships: Because female sexual empowerment is important. By Susan Crain Bakos, Sexy Prime. September 4, 2008. |
How My 7-Year-Old Learned About Pre-Marital Sex from John McCain Sex and Relationships: I wholly believe in educating my child about contraception. But given that he is 7, I could have waited a few years for that particular talk. By Karen Dolan, AlterNet. September 3, 2008. |
The Department of Labor in the Bush Years: A Damage Assessment Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: Under Bush, the Labor department has been stacked against workers' rights. By Rep. George Miller, Huffington Post. September 3, 2008. |