Media  
comments_image Comments

It's Time the Justice Dept. Got Serious About Hacking Allegations by Rupert Murdoch's Media Empire

When will the Justice Department get serious about Murdoch?
 
 
Share

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com/stocklight

 
 
 
 

The following article first appeared on the  Nation.com. For more great content from The Nation, sign up for their email newsletters  here.

So it turns out that when Rupert Murdoch  told MPs here looking into the  phone hacking scandal that it was “the most humble day of my life,” he didn’t really mean it. Had his fingers crossed behind his back. If the revelation that the man behind Fox News, the New York Post and The Wall Street Journal might not always tell the truth doesn’t strike you as “hold the front page” stuff, it’s still well worth listening to the  tape of Murdoch’s March meeting atThe Sun here that surfaced last week on the investigative journalism website  Exaro and was later broadcast on Channel Four television.

In it the  billionaire tyrant faces a group of about twenty-five journalists, some of whom face charges either because of their role in phone hacking or for making illegal payments to police officers and public officials—the focus of Operation Elveden, which saw two more  Sun reporters arrested last month. Only last April, Murdoch told the  Leveson Inquiry that “paying police officers for information is wrong.” But on the tape Murdoch can be clearly heard saying, “Payments for news tips from cops: that’s been going on a hundred years, absolutely.”

He continues: “When I first bought the News of the World, the first day I went to the office…and there was a big wall safe.… And I said, ‘What’s that for?’ And they said, ‘We keep some cash in there.’ And I said, ‘What for?’ They said, ‘Well, sometimes the editor needs some on a Saturday night for powerful friends.”

When some of the journalists complain that they have been hung out to dry by the company’s  Management and Standards Committee—which reports to former New York City schools chancellor  Joel Klein—who turned over millions of internal e-mails to prosecutors, Murdoch  assures them the company “haven’t given them anything for months.”

Far from the contrite figure he presented at the Leveson Inquiry, Murdoch is defiant, dismissing the scandal—which has so far seen more than twenty of his current or former employees arrested—as “next to nothing.” Nowadays when the police ask for information company lawyers are no longer cooperative, responding “No, no, no—get a court order. Deal with that,” Murdoch tells them. And should any of those arrested be convicted, he assures them “I’m not allowed to promise you—I will promise you continued health support—but your jobs—I’ve got to be careful what comes out—but frankly, I won’t say it, but just trust me.”

Murdoch’s first problem is that they don’t trust him—at least not all of them, since at least one of them secretly taped this meeting and then leaked the tape. That matters because of Murdoch’s second problem—namely that the tape, while probably not admissible in court, is compelling prima facie evidence that Murdoch knew his employees made a regular practice of paying “ bungs” (bribes) to police officers and other public officials. Which puts him personally right in the crosshairs of the US Justice Department for multiple violations of the  Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Only a few weeks ago Murdoch biographer Michael Wolff  speculated that one aim of the move, finalized last week, to split Murdoch’s empire into a publishing arm containing his British and American newspapers and the 21st Century Fox entertainment business, was to facilitate a settlement with the Justice Department—paid for out of the $2.6 billion cash hoard assigned to the publishing arm. In order to be politically acceptable, any such settlement would need to be accompanied by exactly the kind of gestures of contrition which the leaked tape have now shown to be completely worthless.