Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Is CNN Getting Kicked Out of Russia?

By Yasha Levine, eXiled Online. Posted September 12, 2008.


Putin may strip CNN of its Russian broadcasting rights after it refused to air a 30 minute exclusive interview he gave the network.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


You probably didn't know that CNN censored Putin for being just too darn sensible. Yep, it's true. About two weeks ago, Putin gave the network an exclusive 30-minute interview. And you know what happened? Nothing. It was never allowed to air. CNN doesn't know it yet, but that decision might have cost them their Russian broadcasting rights.

On August 29, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin met with senior political correspondent Matthew Chance for a CNN exclusive interview. "This was unprecedented access to Russia's powerful prime minister, the former KGB spy now increasingly at odds with Washington," an overly dramatic voice-over introduced the segment as Chance and Putin enjoyed pre-game banter and a walk through the courtyard of Putin's palatial Sochi residence. Once seated, Chance didn't waste any time with his provocative questions:


Matthew Chance: But it's been no secret either that for years you've been urging the West to take more seriously Russia's concerns about international issues. For instance, about NATO's expansion, about deployment of missile defense systems in eastern Europe. Wasn't this conflict a way of demonstrating that in this region, it's Russia that's the power, not NATO and certainly not the United States?

Vladimir Putin: Of course not. What is more, we did not seek such conflicts and do not want them in the future.

That this conflict has taken place -- that it broke out nevertheless -- is only due to the fact that no one had heeded our concerns.

I think both you and your -- our -- viewers today will be interested to learn a little more about the history of relations between the peoples and ethnic groups in this regions of the world. Because people know little or nothing about it.

If you think that this is unimportant, you may cut it from the program. Don't hesitate, I wouldn't mind.

It was a prescient comment. Not only did CNN delete Putin's historical roundup of relations between Russia, Georgia and South Ossetia going back to the 18th century that followed, the network cut out almost everything else as well. Despite the "unprecedented access" hook, for its U.S. feed, CNN reduced the 30-minute interview into a series of sound bites that seized and ridiculed Putin's crackpot theory that the Republican party started the war to boost McCain's ratings. CNN's international audience, enjoying the news from hotel rooms all round the world, got to see a little more of the the footage. But most of it had to do with Russia's ridiculous "non political" decision to ban some American poultry importers from doing business with Russia because of their poor quality control standards. CNN's intentions were clear: Putin must come off looking like a fool. And it seemed Putin gave them the perfect material. Embargoes on dead chickens and global neocon conspiracies? Gosh, what serious self-respecting world leader would start talking this kind of gibberish? Even Ahmadinejad doesn't sink that low. Well, the chicken meat embargo might have been a little weak, but the neocon conspiracy I'm not so sure about. But more on that later.  (You can see the heavily edited interview clips on CNN website, but the network never made the full version available. But you can see it on Russian TV.)

Not surprisingly, this didn't go down none too good with the Prime Minister. See, as it turns out, when Putin told CNN he wouldn't mind if they cut some of his comments, he wasn't exactly being honest. Not only did he mind, but he was sovereignly pissed off to find the entire interview censored. After all, he is the one that usually does the censoring. And it's not like he gives out TV interviews every month, or even every year. If I'm not mistaken, the last interview Putin gave to American TV was waaaay back in 2000, when he was on Larry King Live making crude comments about the sinking of the Kursk submarine.



And then there's the issue of Saakashvili's CNN time. Just in the past month, Saakashvili has appeared a dozen times on the network giving interviews averaging 5 to 10 minutes each. As CNN correctly pointed out, Putin is a former KGB spy, so he knows all the details, down to the nearest second. And that's exactly why he's taken it as a personal insult from CNN's headquarters (and probably more proof of an international media/government conspiracy against him). But he just might have the last word.



The word on the street here is Putin is out for blood. It's payback time. According to a source with high-level government connections, the Russians are planning punitive actions against CNN. At this point, it is just a rumor, but they are preparing to kick out about half of the half-dozen Western journalists working at CNN's Moscow bureau. Sooner or later they're going to have to apply for a visa renewal and that's when it's gonna go down. They'll be denied, clean and quiet like. We can only pray that the tool Matthew Chance is up for a new visa soon.



So why did CNN decide to cut the interview? The thing is, Putin came off pretty darn well. Sure, the chicken embargo was embarrassing, but the McCain/neocon conspiracy theory wasn't as crazy as some would want you to believe. Gary Brecher has been saying all along that this little war had the mark of a half-baked neocon plan for world domination. As Gary says, Georgia's move makes no sense at all from a Georgian perspective. Somebody must have told those idiots they'd be safe to retake South Ossetia. And who better than Cheney?

In general, Putin was able to strike an unusually sympathetic chord during the interview. It sure wasn't anything like the grotesque interview he gave eight years ago, where he made that cruel "it sank" Kursk joke. This time around, he was level headed, reasonable and, most importantly, very convincing and believable -- not what you'd expect from the evil Stalin/Hitler hybrid personality being pushed on the American public. And that worried the hell out of CNN editorial staff, enough to make them crudely censor the entire thing and hope no one noticed.

So, what parts of Putin did CNN leave on the cutting room floor?

Putin the anti-Stalinist:

Therefore, those who insist that those territories must continue to belong to Georgia are Stalinists: They defend the decision of Josef Vissarionovich Stalin. [It was Stalin who first split up Ossetia and gave the southern half to Georgia.]

Putin the caring:

For us, it is a special tragedy, because during the many years that we were living together the Georgian culture -- the Georgian people being a nation of ancient culture -- became, without a doubt, a part of the multinational culture of Russia.[C]onsidering the fact that almost a million, even more than a million Georgians have moved here, we have special spiritual links with that country and its people. For us, this is a special tragedy.

Putin the peaceful:


You and I are sitting here now, having a quiet conversation in the city of Sochi. Within a few hundred kilometers from here, U.S. Navy ships have approached, carrying missiles whose range is precisely several hundred kilometers. It is not our ships that have approached your shores; it's your ships that have approached ours. So what's our choice?

We don't want any complications; we don't want to quarrel with anyone; we don't want to fight anyone. We want normal cooperation and a respectful attitude toward us and our interests. Is that too much?

Putin the conscientious business man:

Construction of the first gas pipeline system was started during the 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, and for all those years, from the 1960s until this day, Russia has been fulfilling its contract obligations in a very consistent and reliable way, regardless of the political situation.

We never politicize economic relations, and we are quite astonished at the position of some U.S. administration officials who travel to European capitals trying to persuade the Europeans not to buy our products, natural gas for example, in a truly amazing effort to politicize the economic sphere. In fact, it's quite pernicious.

It's true that the Europeans depend on our supplies but we too depend on whoever buys our gas. That's interdependence; that's precisely the guarantee of stability.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: cnn, vladimir putin

You can email Yasha Levine at levine@exiledonline.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Honestly...
Posted by: Benjaminsjw on Sep 12, 2008 12:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... I don't agree with all Putin's decisions, and I disagree with the way he has limited free speech in Russia, but I'm sure that he makes a better "world leader" than Bush, Cheney or McSame could ever be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Honestly... Posted by: richholland
» Honestly... If Bush was anywere close to Putin Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: Honestly... Posted by: heliana
» RE: Honestly... Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Honestly... Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Honestly... Posted by: TagsNOLA
» Honestly too Posted by: eran.ru
Send in Becky Anderson
Posted by: Bobsays on Sep 12, 2008 3:06 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That deeply hot presenter would convince me to let them stay. Or maybe Hala Gorani? Deploy the hotties shock and awe!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Send in Becky Anderson Posted by: disc golf
» RE: Send in Becky Anderson Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Send in Becky Anderson Posted by: john mont
They Deserve It!
Posted by: Godfather89 on Sep 12, 2008 3:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont care who says what, why would CNN delete an entire exclusive interview with someone the American people are interested with in these times? The only reason that comes to mind is because, it goes against the interest of the US Corporations and Government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They Deserve It! Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: They Deserve It! Posted by: peacefullaim
thanks mr president
Posted by: willd4change on Sep 12, 2008 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for another neocon cluster fuck. You know, the media in the US are so aligned with the government because of big bussiness it doesn't surprise me the interview was cut. Thank GOD for the internet. I wonder if palin thinks it is GOD plan to kep the US populace in the dark too (crazy evangelical bitch). I hope the Russians do throw their asses out. Then they need to buy air time on PBS and tell america the truth. Maybe just maybe some of the country will wake up and smell the crap our government is shoveling. Buy guns and ammo now before the right to bear arms gets axed too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thanks mr president Posted by: TagsNOLA
Censorship.
Posted by: Last Chance on Sep 12, 2008 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CNN must have gotten orders direct from the White House. I wonder what Ted Turner thinks about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Censorship. Posted by: Karina
» RE: Censorship. Posted by: Last Chance
Tabloid journalism
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on Sep 12, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice mix of fact and rumor. Have any stock tips?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tabloid journalism Posted by: mainspark
Part of pattern.
Posted by: chorton on Sep 12, 2008 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US press has shown remarkable discipline in killing stories they don't want the public to see. This is not the first time news concerning Putin has been cut. Last May he declared Russia's conclusion that Iran was not working on a nuclear weapon. Trust him or not, this was a key position statement by the leader of a nuclear power, one which could become involved if the US goes to war with Iran. As such it was certainly news, important to consider in the debate over whether to start such a war. The story was carried by Reuters and made headlines all across Europe. It was completely shut out of the US corporate media, including NPR.

Are these decisions coming from Bush? From the CIA (one of whose own heads NPR?) From a group of billionaire media barons who meet at exclusive country clubs? From the "Shadow Government" headed by Bush, Sr., Dick Cheney and a few other Godfathers? The Trilateral Commission? The Freemasons? Or (as some right-wing anti-interventionists would have us believe) a Zionist Cabal? Or is it - as I believe - an expression of the consensus of the top thousand families, or the top ten-thousand, absorbed like the air they breathe by the media barons and heads of the top agencies who then execute it? We have no direct way of knowing how it works at present. But a review of which stories get censored makes it very clear that our news is being manipulated, very systematically and effectively tilted toward war and the projects of the Empire and away from any empowerment of the people and our movements. Many writers on these pages have shown how the stories that do run get shaded and trimmed to support those interests. The very language with which people are being equipped to think about these things is being systematically shaped.

The genius of this arrangement is that it is done so invisibly, behind the scenes of an apparently competitive, unscripted, spontaneous and even rancorous "media circus", that most people, even most of those working in the media, still believe we have a "free press". The importance of web-based alternative news sources such as AlterNet - which allow us to glimpse what is going on behind the curtain and to start freeing our minds from the Empire's mental traps - cannot be overstated; but we urgently need to keep looking for ways to reach a wider audience, never more so than over the next few months!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Part of pattern. Posted by: Dboy
CNN want to keep the western populace in the dark
Posted by: Masdar on Sep 12, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is clear that the people directing the affairs of CNN want to keep the western populace in the dark when it comes to information from Russia. It may well be time for all people to turn off their televisions, tear up their news papers and prepare for the change that the fundamentalist religious groups have in store for the sane people in the world or you could take up the bucket of tar with feathers and mark these talking heads for what they are which is purveyors untruths for corporate media backed by the government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CNN
Posted by: Archie1954 on Sep 12, 2008 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now my decision to refrain from watching TV "news" is vindicated. I started by tuning out Faux then the major networks including CNN. I didn't trust them to tell the truth, the whole truth and I was right. All my news now comes from the Internet and I can cross check the facts very easily. I don't want some half baked talking head telling me what to believe!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CNN Posted by: larkztngue
Ok, I believe you now
Posted by: JayGatsby42 on Sep 12, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My Russian-American wife who has access to Russian television asked me recently why CNN had not carried the lengthy interview that Putin had recently given to CNN since news of it had been carried in the Russian media.

I had no answer for her other than to say that I doubted that CNN was deliberately burying the interview and that we had probably just missed it when it was broadcast. It seems now that her suspicions of CNN censorship were justified.

Unfortunately this means that I'm in line for a good serving of "I Told You So!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ok, I believe you now Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
CNN, Human Rights Watch
Posted by: shinseiji on Sep 12, 2008 9:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NGO arms of the Pentagon & U.S. State Dept.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C(a)NN(ed)
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Sep 12, 2008 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American journalism took an enormous step backward when CNN censored Vladimir Putin. It was never shown in America, and it would have been nice to have heard him speak about some of Russia's concerns, and they are many.
He is right in saying Russia doesn't have its navy in the Great Lakes or in Chesapeake Bay, or in the Gulf.
I've been in journalism all my life and this is the worst we can do to offend our Slavic friends. Putin is no fool. And neither are the Russians. They know we have subs and anti-missiles and radar stations ringing their country from Europe, Alaska, Japan and in the Arctic. So imagine if they had subs and missiles placed in the Puget Sound. Your tax dollars at work, here.
What was CNN's goal? Why must we antagonize Russia? It seems they can't do anything without someone meddling around their domain.
Is CNN emulating Fox News? Some American journalists seem to march in step with the party line that Russia is Mr. Mean and everything they do is suspect. So what we would say to tennis star Dinara Safina? The Russians need a hug, someone to say to them "we love you and we don't want war to come your way."
It would be helpful if American journalists if they're to report from Vladivostok to learn Russian language and culture before they attempt to censor news stories from Russia. I'm sure those who are over there are fluent in Russian and know a great more than most, but please be honest. That, my friends, is bias.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: C(a)NN(ed) Posted by: mainspark
When new agencies become the propaganda apparatus
Posted by: ikonoklast on Sep 12, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of the gov't, they need to be replaced. I'm doing my part by tuning out of the Faux News/disinfo channels, but the more important question in this era of media consolidation is: how do we build a genuine free press that can report with minimal bias on issues of real importance while reaching the widest possible audience?

With very few and occasional exceptions, the media conglomerates work only to advance their own economic and political interests. They have failed us; they no longer serve the purpose for which they were intended. We need to kill them, loot their corpses, and build something useful in their place (in a metaphorical sense, of course).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The letters "CNN" stand for Censored News Network
Posted by: larkztngue on Sep 12, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A year and a half ago I marched with 50,000 others on Saturday March 17th, 2007 in a Anti-War protest in Los Angeles. We all marched by the CNN building-at their doorstep on the street their building is on. As I looked up at the CNN building I saw people inside pressed up against the windows looking down on us. One could say that the news came to them that day.
I had two friends watching CNN at their homes-Nothing on TV. Sunday and Monday I looked in the CNN website and after extensive searching found an small article written by AP-not by CNN.
CNN is NOTHING but a propaganda tool-I suggest that everyone turn them off-along with ABC, NBC, CBS, and FNC. They in my opinion, do not report the news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The letters "CNN" stand for Censored News Network Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
CNN
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Sep 12, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They should be kicked out. What the heck do they need to be there for anyways?

Jiff
www.anonymize.us.tc

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We have been screwing Russia since the fall of the Berlin Wall
Posted by: PaulC on Sep 12, 2008 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The collapse of the Russian economy in 1997 was a direct result of the heavy-handed and misguided intervention of free market extremists at IMF. Even worse, they were responsible for the collapse of democracy and the rise of the mafia oligarchy that Putin has been at war with.

When Putin came hat-in-hand to Bush in 2000 to urge a large mutual reduction in nuclear warheads Bush completely ignored him and instead started backing out of nuclear proliferation treaties and upgrading our warheads.

Bush thought Russia was crippled economically and militarily but he did not foresee the rise in oil/gas demand and surge in prices that enabled Russia to overcome its collapsed industrial economy in favor of its new resource export economy.

Even so, Bush still mocks Putin by pushing hard for NATO expansion and for placement of surface-to-air missile batteries on Russia's doorstep.

So now Putin is reverting back to cold war status - pushed by Bush and neocon meddling in Russian affairs for the past 20 years.

Bush wants a new cold war because the military industrial complex want it. This is what our foreign policy has become - not unlike that of the former USSR.

Maybe a better moniker for the US would be the USSA.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whitewash
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 12, 2008 12:50 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neocon conspiracy angle as described here is a whitewash. It's not about a conspiracy to get McCain elected, Putin simply makes the mistake (willfully or otherwise) of believing there is a two party system in the US. (I believe he knows better.) The author of this article propagates the idea that this was an election ploy in order to discredit the idea on the basis of illogical irrational motive. Same thing happened 30 years ago with the hostage crisis. It's not about Reagan or McCain's petty ambitions. Its about the New World Order. The conflict began on 8/8/08. That is another powerful bit of occult symbolism. Same goes with the Georgian President eating his tie. It is very important that everyone devote some time into understanding how the occult rulers try to tie these powerful occult events into our sham elections. They do that so they can draw in the support of the other side of the arch, the "republican" side in this case. They do that with every issue they can, because it polarizes the general population in a situation where no polarization should exist.

Anyway, here are some other Putin quotes from the interview that curiously were not included:

"We are being portrayed as the aggressor."

Cut because it is CNN's intention to portray Russia as the aggressor.

"I have here the chronology of the events that took place on August 7, 8 and 9. On the 7th, at 2:42 p.m., the Georgian officers who were at the headquarters of the joint peacekeeping forces left the headquarters, walked away from the headquarters -- where there were our servicemen, as well as Georgian and Ossetian servicemen -- saying that had been ordered to do so by their commanders. They left their place of service and left our servicemen there alone and never returned during the period preceding the beginning of hostilities. An hour later, heavy artillery shelling started."

Cut because it would undermine the mission of portraying Russia as the aggressor.

"But it is not just a matter of the U.S. administration being unable to restrain the Georgian leadership from this criminal action; the U.S. side had in effect armed and trained the Georgian army."

This is not a conspiracy theory.

"We have serious reasons to believe that there were U.S. citizens right in the combat zone. If that is the case, if that is confirmed, it is very bad. It is very dangerous; it is misguided policy"

This also is not a conspiracy theory.

"there are grounds to suspect that some people in the United States created this conflict deliberately in order to aggravate the situation"

This is a conspiracy theory, but the logical basis is quite strong. Means, motive and opportunity...

"In Afghanistan, things are not getting any better; what is more, the Taliban have launched a fall offensive, and dozens of NATO servicemen are being killed.

In Iraq, after the euphoria of the first victories, there are problems everywhere, and the number of those killed has reached 4,000.

There are problems in the economy, as we know only too well. There are financial problems, the mortgage crisis. Even we are concerned about it, and we want it to end soon, but it is there."

All facts. What follows is conjecture.

"A little victorious war is needed. And if it doesn't work, then one can lay the blame on us, use us to create an enemy image, and against the backdrop of this kind of jingoism once again rally the country around certain political forces.

I am surprised that you are surprised at what I'm saying. It's as clear as day."



For more info, google: russia flotsam occult symbolism

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Fine Print
Posted by: aonghus36 on Sep 12, 2008 2:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the U.S. Constitution, we have a free press.
It never says anything about whether they must be truthful, although they are disallowed slander, I assume. Who would have thought? Not only do we have a censored media, but we have them censoring themselves. From a certain point of view, that is ingenious, an evil genius to be sure, but ingenious nevertheless.
I guess selling out is a right, too. It is the flip side of "doing your own thing". What a tragedy, especially the way they are able to get simple people to vote against their own interests by pushing their emotional buttons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ofcourse CNN and BBc like msot of anglosaxon media msut be kicked out from rest of the world
Posted by: avatar_singh on Sep 12, 2008 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CNN got s=dumbed down when after 92 it started taking so many english and british media people. the same fate happend to Al jareeja when the british bastrd frost becamse lead person there.
If you want tyo know how low bred and low human beings are thse anglosaxon people as journalists and as false propagandist see this article..

http://www.antiwar.com/pilger/?articleid=13444


September 11, 2008
A Murderous Theater of the Absurd


Try to laugh, please. The news is now officially parody and a game for all the family to play.

First question: Why are "we" in Afghanistan? Answer: "To try to help in the country's rebuilding program." Who says so? Huw Edwards, the BBC's principal newsreader. What wags the Welsh are.

Second question: Why are "we" in Iraq? Answer: To "plant a western-style open democracy." Who says so? Paul Wood, the former BBC defense correspondent, and his boss Helen Boaden, director of BBC News. To prove her point, Boaden supplied Medialens.org with 2,700 words of quotations from Tony Blair and George W Bush. Irony? No, she meant it.

Take Andrew Martin, divisional adviser at BBC Complaints, who has been researching Bush's speeches for "evidence" of noble democratic reasons for laying to waste an ancient civilization. Says he: "The 'D' word is not there, but the phrase 'united, stable and free' [is] clearly an allusion to it." After all, he says, the invasion of Iraq "was launched as 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'." Moreover, says the BBC man, "in Bush's 1 May 2003 speech (the one on the aircraft carrier) he talked repeatedly about freedom and explicitly about the Iraqi transition to democracy ... These examples show that these were on Bush's mind before, during and after the invasion."

Try to laugh, please.

Laughing may be difficult, I agree, given the slaughter of civilians in Afghanistan by "coalition" aircraft, including those directed by British forces engaged in "the country's rebuilding program." The bombing of civilian areas has doubled, along with the deaths of civilians, says Human Rights Watch. Last month, "our" aircraft slaughtered nearly 100 civilians, two-thirds of them children between the ages of three months and 16 years, while they slept, according to eyewitnesses. BBC television news initially devoted nine seconds to the Human Rights Watch report, and nothing to the fact that "less than peanuts" (according to an aid worker) is being spent on rebuilding anything in Afghanistan.

As for the notion of a "united, stable and free" Iraq, consider the no-bid contracts handed to the major western oil companies for ownership of Iraq's oil. "Theft" is a more truthful word. Written by the companies themselves and US officials, the contracts have been signed off by Bush and Nouri al-Maliki, "prime minister" of Iraq's "democratic" government that resides in an air-conditioned American fortress. This is not news.

Try to laugh, please, while you consider the devastation of Iraq's health, once the best in the Middle East, by the ubiquitous dust from British and US depleted uranium weapons. A World Health Organization study reporting a cancer epidemic has been suppressed, says its principal author. This has been reported in Britain only in the Glasgow Sunday Herald and the Morning Star. According to a study last year by Basra University Medical College, almost half of all deaths in the contaminated southern provinces were caused by cancer.

Try to laugh, please,
In the meantime, Justin Webb, the BBC's North America editor, has launched a book about America, his "city on a hill." It is a sort of Mills & Boon view of the rapacious system he admires with such obsequiousness. The book is called Have a Nice Day.

Try to laugh, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liam on the Left
Posted by: Liam on Sep 12, 2008 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What......someone doubts the Georgia invasion was for any reason but a attempt to get Grampy McBush's ratings up????

Anyone who watches any network for "news" is an idiot! And the only war in the world that counts for Americans is the one going on in the United States and it is a class war that will ultimately lead to another civil war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Liam on the Left Posted by: Zeugitai
Rumor or not, CNN well deserves it . . .
Posted by: barbatus on Sep 12, 2008 3:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . after they shown the footage of the Tskhinvali, devastated by the Georgians, as a background for a story about Gori, supposedly ruined by the Russians. "The best name in news," indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, once they are kicked out...
Posted by: feduphoosier on Sep 12, 2008 4:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... they won't have to worry about not reporting any more important news out of Russia. They can go back to what they know best anyway: Britney Spears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Criminal Conspiracy and Complicity to Commit Treason Charges!
Posted by: Bearzerker on Sep 12, 2008 8:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is a sad state of MSM affairs when the public must get their news from fake news programs!

I would like to see criminal conspiracy and complicity to commit treason charges
leveled at all the top executives of all Corporate controlled MSM news outlets,
and be taken immediately!

Why?... because they took pages directly from Joseph Goebbels play book;
1.)by assisting in the subversion of truth, in order to lead us into war.
2.)support in diverting TRILLIONS of taxpayers dollars and by profiting in this action.
3.)by supporting GRAFT, GREED & CORRUPTION
3.)material and emotional support of illegal detention and torture, plus condoning these activities including against their own [eg. competitors reporters photographers etc.]
4.)and by providing material and logistical Intelligence and Support contrary to existing conventions knowing that this will effect future war correspondents ability to perform their duties.

and all this was done for one reason... for the bottom line! ...PROFIT!...

But what really pisses me off is,
how the corporate executives running this dog and pony show made it look so ...[sl]easy...
SOMETHING/ANYTHING... MUST BE DONE!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'Joseph Goebbels' Quotes;

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The
lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

"It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion."

"During a war, news should be given out for instruction rather than information."

"The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


We must ensure a quality control mechanism to
eliminate Propaganda emanating from government agencies.

This can easily be done by revoking broadcasting rights to broadcast News information. News should never be infotainment trivalised for the bottom line, news reporting is a serious business and should be classified as such by being a privilege to broadcast... that being by issuing licenses that is separate from their regular broadcast licenses!

Simply put... a broadcast license fee structure should be reviewed yearly and with bottom line penalties for corporate structures that do not have regulated news coverage, rewarding those that do have licensed news reporting by being exempt from the yearly somberquete.

News licensing guidelines must be enforced to ensure non-governmental interference in the future, their-fore the licensing body MUST BE non-political.
[Don't need a repeat of Colin Powell's son issuing broadcast licenses now do we, never forget that]
To much damage has been brought through the corporate streamlining of news and information sources to our societies detriment, action is needed now.
Crimes have been perpetrated by and through this medium, and the sheeple "DO" care!

to all the Patrick Fitzgerald's out there... where are you?
now... right NOW... is your time!


jdfu

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: cnn has been fox2
Posted by: mainspark on Sep 12, 2008 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess that answers your question!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's a link to the video:
Posted by: Dboy on Sep 12, 2008 9:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Youtube has the video (they have everything) complete with English subtitles. This link is to Part I. The rest of the interview (II and III) are at youtube as well:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwC5q-zMQnw

The US gets SO little news out of Russia that's it's almost a crime to censor this interview. However after watching it I can certainly guess why it was done. There's just too much in this interview. It almost *humanizes* the Russians. And this simply must not be allowed if we are to have the new cold war that the neocon crowd is busily working on.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Putin, Thugs, and Sense
Posted by: hadashito on Sep 12, 2008 10:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Putin may be a clever and ruthless thug. At least I think he is, given my conviction that he has ordered political murders, among untold numbers of other crimes. But sometimes even a thug does something that makes good sense. Booting out cowards, hypocrites, and shameless spinners like CNN makes good sense.
Of course, when it comes to controlling the media message and their coverage topics, our corporate media bosses are the USA answer to Putin's tactics. Putin's immediate motivation may not be laudable, but it at least demonstrates that he has the cojones our mainstream media lost years ago or maybe never had - - except for Fred Friendly's CBS News some years ago. Fred's gone but still appreciated by many. And CNN has been a dismal failure since Ted Turner sold it off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hello, Reuters!
Posted by: celeborn on Sep 13, 2008 2:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice to get that tip from you, chorton, about Reuters. I just made them my home page in my browser! Come on Reuters, don't sell yourself out and don't let us down! We want to know the truth! Like John Pilger tells history!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dipconsult
Posted by: dipconsult on Sep 13, 2008 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This comes on top of the write off by the Western media as an anti-Americsan rant of (then President) Putin's extremely important and sensible speech to the Munich security conference on 2 October 2007. In this he offered Russia's collaboration if the United States renounced its attempt to create a uni-polar world which was neither acceptable, nor possible (given the disastrous worldwide fall-out from "Iraq").

But then only three months later early in 2008 came Bush's push to extend NATO to Georgia and the Ukraine and his insistence on putting a radar sysem in Czechoslovakia and Poland.

The message Russia got? The US had not abandoned the neo-conservative dream of a unipolar "New American Century". And the West was simply not interested in the hand of friendship it had offered.

At our(JP Diplomatic Consultancy) website is Putin's speech in full, plus our piece about Russia/Europe relations after the Georgia fiasco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CNN's suppression of the Putin interview is worthy of contempt
Posted by: Garvagh on Sep 14, 2008 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kind of idiots are making the calls at CNN?
Are they stooges of the neocons and the war profiteers? Keep in mind there is a great deal of overlap.

Mikheil Saakashvili is regarded by Turkey as a loose cannon and virtual madman who could start a world war. Let us remember that Turkey warned the US the invasion of Iraq was an act of total imbecility. Russia also warned the US the overthrow of Saddam Hussein was dangerous and counter-productive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement