COMMENTS: 68
Watch Rachel Maddow's Debut Show Launch on MSNBC Tonight: She Fights Lies Uttered by Politicians, Repeated by Media
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
It goes without saying that Maddow has myriad fans from every walk of life. (Feel free to visit the "unofficial" Rachel Maddow fan site.) Still, the Masher finds it rather astounding how much goodwill and admiration is being beamed to Maddow -- and how many unabashed sexual crushes. She must be feeling a super glow. When AlterNet posted The Nation's article about Maddow by Rebecca Traister, the staff was astounded. AlterNet commenters are a very critical and cranky bunch -- and many a writer has freaked out, run away and decided not to engage with the sharp-tongued denizens of the AlterNet underground. But not for Maddow. It was a near-unanimous lovefest. There were hundreds of glowing love letters (hopefully we'll get a chance to share some of them with you soon).
The corporate media hasn't quite known what to make of Maddow, since her rise seems to have no historical parallels. The best way they have been able describe it is as the second coming of Keith Olbermann, for whom she has substituted on his signature show Countdown. According to New York Times TV writer Bill Carter, the emergence of Maddow, along with Olbermann, has "led to an unofficial rebranding of MSNBC as the liberal alternative to Fox News, which is dominated by conservative hosts like Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity."
Of course Maddow is very different from Olbermann in style, temperament and approach. No doubt her show will strike a different chord than the sometimes bombastic approach that has made Olbermann Bill O'Reilly's bete noir and a very popular TV dude, but he hasn't exactly brought subtle analysis to cable TV. The Masher guesses that Maddow will be more unpredictable. In a telephone interview with Carter, Maddow discussed her new role:
"This is great; getting a regular cable show is something I've wanted," Ms. Maddow said. She acknowledged that the intensity of the presidential race meant that will remain the focus through the election and probably for the first 100 days of a new administration. But she said she would likely reshape the show as more of a general news program after "this political Christmas" has come to an end. That is the kind of show she does on Air America, and she will continue that show after she joins MSNBC, she said. As for being branded another partisan voice from the left, Ms. Maddow said she was no more partisan than any other host in cable. "I am who I am," she said. She dismissed the expected criticism from the right, saying, "Everybody likes to work the refs to make their own kind of political hay."Probably the most important task that Maddow will tackle is to be the media's best lie detector. You can tell from this great clip of Rachel doing "Countdown" after McCain's speech that Maddow is going to aim her guns, not just at the McCain-Palin lies being spewed like the oil gushers they lust for -- and they have integrated all of them into their stump speeches -- but at the whole of corporate media, for accepting the words of these liars at face value. The lies perpetuated in the McCain and Palin speeches about Barack Obama bordered on the absurd, like Obama writing two memoirs but never sponsoring and passing any legislation, which is ludicrous; or his never working across the aisle with political opponents, when that is actually what he is known for; or his planning to raise taxes on all Americans rather than on only the tiny slice of the richest among us, which is his plan.
Needless to say, it is a tough job fighting lies. But if anyone can counterattack in this street fight of dirty politics and stick the dagger in deeply with charm, calm and super smarts, it is our Rachel Maddow.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Sep 8, 2008 4:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amy Goodman and Keith Olbermann now have company in their ranks of excellent journalism. Heaven knows they have paid the price, yet they keep on speaking the truth and calling the liars to the carpet.
Rachel's MSNBC show is much awaited and I hope it's the dawning of a new era.
Yes, I have hope, as long as there are those journalists who will keep the power of the media as truth tellers and exposers of lies and corruption.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Jeff Zucker:the art & science of deceit
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Jeff Zucker:the art & science of deceit
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Jeff Zucker:the art & science of deceit
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Gramma Kitty
Posted by: LionHeart
» RE: Gramma Kitty? oh come now!
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: www.suekatz.com on Sep 8, 2008 4:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope she gets to interview Palin soon.
Good luck.
Sue
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I hope she gets to interview Palin soon.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: When In Doubt on Sep 8, 2008 4:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just maybe, we can survive this election period.
A new dragon-slayer. Women will be heard.
And, none too soon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mainspark on Sep 8, 2008 4:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And why not? The opposite (of smart, truth-telling JOURNALISM) exists and even flourishes. Please don't make me reveal the network, okay?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The other side of the coin.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: madcat007 on Sep 8, 2008 5:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: rachel Rocks!
Posted by: sasquuatch55
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sfischo on Sep 8, 2008 6:08 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Steve Schmidt people are tarring Obama successfully with all the traditional Republican rhetoric that we thought wouldn't work anymore given reality on the ground. The Dems seem positively quadriplegic in their inability to react on the fly and offset the continued erosion of support.
Has Rachel spoken with any Democratic party insiders who have a clue? I spoke FtF with my Dem. congressman and he was as upset as I was about what's happening with the Obama campaign strategy--and that was before the Palin bomb hit the electorate.
I am very pessimistic as nothing I see suggests that we are not in for 4-8 more years of Republican policies and that I have seen someone like Rove and Steve Schmidt literally pull the stake out of the heart of the Republican corpse and reanimate it in a matter of weeks. How can they be so bloody deft and we be so inept!?!?!?!?!?! When do we stop overestimating the savvy of the American public? Is it over for the Democratic party?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: cellorelio
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: sfischo
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» RE: "When do we stop overestimating the savvy of the American public?"
Posted by: Lauren
» In a perfect world....
Posted by: CatDad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cellorelio on Sep 8, 2008 6:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I even wrote her fan mail telling of my crush on her (and I'm a gay man). That seems to be an almost universal response to her. People just fall in love, regardless of their gender or orientation.
I guess that's because Rachel offers us something no one else in popular culture seems to be able to. Honest, intelligent dialogue on topics of great import delivered in a kind, gentle, and often amusing way.
Kudos Rachel, for making it to the big time on your own terms. Kudos MSNBC for recognizing that your audience is savvy enough to handle the truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ADNK on Sep 8, 2008 6:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This all by itself will make her unique on the TV machine! I can't wait.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SHE will use the "L" word.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Sep 8, 2008 8:12 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So now MSNBC gives Rachel Maddow a show? When will MSNBC learn? You would think they would see after the horrible failures of Air America and Keith Olbermann , MSNBC would get it.
The American people do not want to be force feed liberal views.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: Gisele
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: herronsmith
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: bmikkelsen
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: CatDad
» $10 more to Obama in Ky Lake Dave's name
Posted by: Beck
» RE: $10 more to Obama in Ky Lake Dave's name
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» $10 more. And she was great against Buchanan last night.
Posted by: Beck
» So, its ok for shills like
Posted by: TruthBeTold
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 8, 2008 8:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've got to hand it to MSNBC. They certainly have come a long way in a decade. Instead of trying to imitate FUX Noise (they actually used to have a program hosted by Michael Weiner!) they now have tilted ever so slightly to the left by granting a forum to Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow.
Just my luck....The girl of my dreams is gay....[SIGH]
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
The Black Republicans
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: achel! Rachel!
Posted by: LionHeart
» RE: achel! Rachel!
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zepher on Sep 8, 2008 9:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Would if I Could
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Cable bills.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bmikkelsen on Sep 8, 2008 10:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, the only thing at this point that can counter msm's corporate agenda is greed. We need to make sure Maddow's ratings are good enough to send a message. Tell everyone you know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You go, girl!
Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: You go, girl!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: You go, girl!
Posted by: BreeMass
Comments are closed-
Posted by: herronsmith on Sep 8, 2008 10:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thinkverybig on Sep 8, 2008 11:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: collins101 on Sep 8, 2008 12:53 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: collins101; Ten dollars will be donated to Obama in your name
Posted by: collins101
» RE: collins101
Posted by: koolwoman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lindat on Sep 8, 2008 1:17 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plus, Maddow is tainted as Olbermann's protoge, just when Olbermann is self-destructing (again). What is this, the 4th network job Olbermann's blown up in?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I feel bad for Rachel. Just when she gets her show,
Posted by: donl51
» RE: I feel bad for Rachel. Just when she gets her show,
Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: I feel bad for..?
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romans1 on Sep 8, 2008 1:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mainstreet on Sep 8, 2008 1:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 8, 2008 1:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice to see Rachel get her show. There'll be plenty of material to use to unravel the layers upon layers of lies that our goverment, country and culture was built on, from creationism to the lies of a so-called, "election".
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rupertmundy on Sep 8, 2008 1:41 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh, Please!
Posted by: madcat007
» I'll keep track for you, rupertmundy. Two months.
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Oh, Please!
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jreal on Sep 8, 2008 5:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real issues are going to come out and this will be fun to watch.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BreeMass on Sep 8, 2008 7:19 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
;)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zipper696 on Sep 8, 2008 9:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Couple of points, that set with the revolving red/white/blue screens is a MESS and why are we treated to production staff walking about in the background? That's so CNN...
And the "Ms.Information" sequence has the most godawful muzak backing, PLEASE drop it, Rachel.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 8, 2008 9:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lilly
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Sep 8, 2008 4:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amy Goodman and Keith Olbermann now have company in their ranks of excellent journalism. Heaven knows they have paid the price, yet they keep on speaking the truth and calling the liars to the carpet.
Rachel's MSNBC show is much awaited and I hope it's the dawning of a new era.
Yes, I have hope, as long as there are those journalists who will keep the power of the media as truth tellers and exposers of lies and corruption.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Jeff Zucker:the art & science of deceit
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Jeff Zucker:the art & science of deceit
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Jeff Zucker:the art & science of deceit
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Gramma Kitty
Posted by: LionHeart
» RE: Gramma Kitty? oh come now!
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: www.suekatz.com on Sep 8, 2008 4:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope she gets to interview Palin soon.
Good luck.
Sue
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I hope she gets to interview Palin soon.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: When In Doubt on Sep 8, 2008 4:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just maybe, we can survive this election period.
A new dragon-slayer. Women will be heard.
And, none too soon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mainspark on Sep 8, 2008 4:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And why not? The opposite (of smart, truth-telling JOURNALISM) exists and even flourishes. Please don't make me reveal the network, okay?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The other side of the coin.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: madcat007 on Sep 8, 2008 5:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: rachel Rocks!
Posted by: sasquuatch55
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sfischo on Sep 8, 2008 6:08 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Steve Schmidt people are tarring Obama successfully with all the traditional Republican rhetoric that we thought wouldn't work anymore given reality on the ground. The Dems seem positively quadriplegic in their inability to react on the fly and offset the continued erosion of support.
Has Rachel spoken with any Democratic party insiders who have a clue? I spoke FtF with my Dem. congressman and he was as upset as I was about what's happening with the Obama campaign strategy--and that was before the Palin bomb hit the electorate.
I am very pessimistic as nothing I see suggests that we are not in for 4-8 more years of Republican policies and that I have seen someone like Rove and Steve Schmidt literally pull the stake out of the heart of the Republican corpse and reanimate it in a matter of weeks. How can they be so bloody deft and we be so inept!?!?!?!?!?! When do we stop overestimating the savvy of the American public? Is it over for the Democratic party?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: cellorelio
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: sfischo
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: The demise of the Democratic Party?
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» RE: "When do we stop overestimating the savvy of the American public?"
Posted by: Lauren
» In a perfect world....
Posted by: CatDad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cellorelio on Sep 8, 2008 6:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I even wrote her fan mail telling of my crush on her (and I'm a gay man). That seems to be an almost universal response to her. People just fall in love, regardless of their gender or orientation.
I guess that's because Rachel offers us something no one else in popular culture seems to be able to. Honest, intelligent dialogue on topics of great import delivered in a kind, gentle, and often amusing way.
Kudos Rachel, for making it to the big time on your own terms. Kudos MSNBC for recognizing that your audience is savvy enough to handle the truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ADNK on Sep 8, 2008 6:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This all by itself will make her unique on the TV machine! I can't wait.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SHE will use the "L" word.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Sep 8, 2008 8:12 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So now MSNBC gives Rachel Maddow a show? When will MSNBC learn? You would think they would see after the horrible failures of Air America and Keith Olbermann , MSNBC would get it.
The American people do not want to be force feed liberal views.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: Gisele
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: herronsmith
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: bmikkelsen
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: CatDad
» $10 more to Obama in Ky Lake Dave's name
Posted by: Beck
» RE: $10 more to Obama in Ky Lake Dave's name
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: History shows Rachel Maddow will probably fail.
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» $10 more. And she was great against Buchanan last night.
Posted by: Beck
» So, its ok for shills like
Posted by: TruthBeTold
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 8, 2008 8:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've got to hand it to MSNBC. They certainly have come a long way in a decade. Instead of trying to imitate FUX Noise (they actually used to have a program hosted by Michael Weiner!) they now have tilted ever so slightly to the left by granting a forum to Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow.
Just my luck....The girl of my dreams is gay....[SIGH]
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
The Black Republicans
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: achel! Rachel!
Posted by: LionHeart
» RE: achel! Rachel!
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zepher on Sep 8, 2008 9:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Would if I Could
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Cable bills.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bmikkelsen on Sep 8, 2008 10:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, the only thing at this point that can counter msm's corporate agenda is greed. We need to make sure Maddow's ratings are good enough to send a message. Tell everyone you know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You go, girl!
Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: You go, girl!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: You go, girl!
Posted by: BreeMass
Comments are closed-
Posted by: herronsmith on Sep 8, 2008 10:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thinkverybig on Sep 8, 2008 11:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: collins101 on Sep 8, 2008 12:53 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: collins101; Ten dollars will be donated to Obama in your name
Posted by: collins101
» RE: collins101
Posted by: koolwoman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lindat on Sep 8, 2008 1:17 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plus, Maddow is tainted as Olbermann's protoge, just when Olbermann is self-destructing (again). What is this, the 4th network job Olbermann's blown up in?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I feel bad for Rachel. Just when she gets her show,
Posted by: donl51
» RE: I feel bad for Rachel. Just when she gets her show,
Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: I feel bad for..?
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romans1 on Sep 8, 2008 1:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mainstreet on Sep 8, 2008 1:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 8, 2008 1:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice to see Rachel get her show. There'll be plenty of material to use to unravel the layers upon layers of lies that our goverment, country and culture was built on, from creationism to the lies of a so-called, "election".
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rupertmundy on Sep 8, 2008 1:41 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh, Please!
Posted by: madcat007
» I'll keep track for you, rupertmundy. Two months.
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Oh, Please!
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jreal on Sep 8, 2008 5:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real issues are going to come out and this will be fun to watch.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BreeMass on Sep 8, 2008 7:19 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
;)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zipper696 on Sep 8, 2008 9:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Couple of points, that set with the revolving red/white/blue screens is a MESS and why are we treated to production staff walking about in the background? That's so CNN...
And the "Ms.Information" sequence has the most godawful muzak backing, PLEASE drop it, Rachel.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 8, 2008 9:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lilly
Posted by: luzmejor
Half-Naked Hot Chicks and Beer: The Sexist Guyland of the Super Bowl Beer Commercial
Can Obama and Dems Overcome the Right's Talk Radio Monopoly?
Why We're Addicted to Disaster Porn




