Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

U.S. Journalist Photographs Grisly Aftermath of Attack in Iraq, Gets Booted by Military

By Dahr Jamail, IPS News. Posted July 5, 2008.


An embedded U.S. journalist said the military tried to censor him after he posted photos from Fallujah.
zoriahiraqwardahrfinal
Fallujah Attack
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

U.S. journalist Zoriah (who publishes only under that name) says he was censored by the U.S. military in the Iraqi city of Fallujah after photographing Marines who died in a suicide bombing.

On Jun. 26, a suicide bomber attacked a city council meeting in Fallujah, 69 kms west of Baghdad, between local tribal sheikhs and military officials.

Three Marines, Cpl. Marcus Preudhomme, Capt. Philip Dykeman, and Lt. Col. Max Galeai, assigned to 2d Battalion, 3rd Marine Division based in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, died in the attack.

The explosion also killed two interpreters and 20 Iraqis, including the mayor of the nearby town of Karmah, two prominent sheikhs and their sons, and another sheikh and his brother. All were members of the local "awakening council," one of the U.S.-backed militias that have taken up arms against al Qaeda in Iraq, according to U.S. and Iraqi authorities.

Zoriah was embedded with Marines on a patrol one block from the attack when it occurred. He had originally turned down the option of going to report on the city council meeting that was bombed.

Zoriah ran with the Marines he was with to the scene of the attack. "As I ran I saw human pieces...a skull cap with hair, bone shards," he told IPS during a telephone interview from the so-called Green Zone in Baghdad. "When we arrived at the building it was chaotic. There were Iraqis, police and civilians running around screaming. Bodies were being pulled out of the building."

"I went in and there were over 20 people's remains all over the place," Zoriah continued, "Of the Marines I jogged in with, someone started to vomit. Others were standing around, not knowing what to do. It was completely surreal."

"At that moment I realized this was far beyond anything I'd experienced, and I realized I wanted to focus and make sure I could capture what it felt like, and the visual horror," Zoriah explained.

"I thought, 'Nobody in the U.S. has any idea what it means when they hear that 20 people died in a suicide bombing.' I want people to be able to associate those numbers with the scene and the actual loss of human life. And to show why soldiers are suffering from PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder]," Zoriah told IPS.

Zoriah was taken out of the building by Marines, but then allowed back inside where he took one last photo of the carnage before they closed the scene to him.

"We spent most of the rest of the day as Marines picked up body parts and put them in buckets and bags," he said.

In an Iraqi Police station in Karmah, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) was brought in to investigate the bombing. Zoriah's photos were the only ones of the scene, so the NCIS team asked for them.

"I made them copies, but then one of the Marines came in and told me to delete my memory card after I give them the photos, and I refused," Zoriah told IPS, "I told the NCIS that if they forced me to delete them, I would stop sharing them. So they stopped pressing that issue."

Zoriah said that he was following the rules for embedded journalists. "That evening, during the debriefing, the guys [Marines] I was with told me that the higher-ups had said I was a stand-up guy and behaved well and to treat me well. The guys I was with were all very much on my side."

Zoriah explained to IPS that he meticulously showed his photos to the Marines he was with to make sure he was not going to show any photos that would upset the family members of the deceased Marines. "They were all okay with them, so then about 96 hours after the bombing I published the photos on my blog."

Then things got interesting.

"Tuesday [Jul. 1] I awoke to a call in their combat operations centre, and the person on the phone told me they were a PAO (Public Affairs Officer) at Camp Fallujah, and he wanted me to take my blog down right away," Zoriah told IPS. "I asked them why, and was then called back after five minutes by a higher ranking PAO who claimed I had broken my contract by showing photos of dead Americans with U.S. uniforms and boots."

Zoriah said the PAO claimed he was not allowed, by the embed contract, to show dead or wounded U.S. citizens or soldiers in the field. "I never signed any contract for that," Zoriah said.

He was called back after another five minutes and told his embed was terminated and they would send him back to Baghdad on the next flight. He was then taken back to Camp Fallujah where he said, "Everyone was extremely angry and fired up at me."

Nevertheless, the lower ranking Marines he had embedded with "were on my side, and they told me they thought that what was happening was wrong."

Zoriah explained that he grew nervous when the flight was canceled due to a sandstorm, and then a security guard was assigned to him.

"I started to feel uncomfortable with this," Zoriah explained. "The next day, Gen. Kelly, [Major General John Kelly, who is the Commanding General of the I Marine Expeditionary Force] wanted to have some words with me. I was to meet with him at 3 pm, and we sat outside in the sun for two hours and he never showed."

Zoriah was told he would be flown out that night, but he was deleted from the flight and told that General Kelly wanted to see him, so he waited again until Thursday, Jul. 3. Again the general did not appear, so Zoriah was given an official letter about the grounds for the termination of his embed, signed by Gen. Kelly, and flown to Baghdad.

"Now, as I think about it, I think they needed the extra time to figure out what they were going to say about my dismissal," Zoriah said. "Their original reason ended up being bogus, so they had to figure something else out."

The letter he was given stated reasons for his dismissal as "you photographed the remains of U.S. soldiers", "you posted these images along with detailed commentary", and "by posting the images and your commentary you violated 14 H and O of the news media agreement you signed."

In addition, the letter, which Zoriah read to IPS, stated, "By providing detailed information of the effectiveness of the attack and the response of U.S. forces to it, you have put all U.S. forces in Iraq at greater risk for harm."

Zoriah feels the reason for his dismissal is otherwise.

"The bottom line is that the thing they cited as the reason for my dismissal was 'information the enemy could use against you.' They realized, probably from keeping track of my blog, that I was not showing identifiable features of a soldier ... and they couldn't find a reason to kick me out. Because it was a high ranking person who got killed, they were all fired up."

Zoriah concluded, "Up to that point they said it was because I showed pictures of bodies with pieces of uniform and boots. The letter, though, doesn't mention that at all. I checked the document I had about ground rules for media embeds, and I followed them."

The Pentagon would not comment on the story when contacted by IPS, saying they had no information on Zoriah's case beyond what Central Command had already posted.

This story was corrected after publication.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, censorship

Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who reports from Iraq.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lucky Journalist!!
Posted by: talkville on Jul 5, 2008 2:02 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very fortunate that the 'censorship' attempt he experienced was still of a more abstract and ideal kind!!.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Lucky. Why is no one allowed to show the carnage since the Murderer has been in???
Posted by: Turiye on Jul 5, 2008 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is going from the sublime to the ridiculous. We know the Murderer REFUSES to show flag draped coffins[cardboard boxes]being unloaded from C5's, only time was when the Japanese Photographer got some shots, during Vietnam they showed them being unloaded, it's a grim damn reminder and the Murderer wants everything to appear as if flowers, roses and republicans. Then the supposed embeds, weren't embeds, then the supposed Military analysts, they were WTF were they, media message multipliers?idk, now they are letting embeds in to DO their JOB and they're being pissed around with. Someone we in VFP are familiar with CaseyJPorter, Iraq Veterans Against War, ivaw.org, he has been going back and I don't know why they're allowing it, he's been in Iraq a few times Active Duty, he posts on YouTube, everything.
Last night I read on another site, "Google Ordered to Hand Over Millions of YouTube User Details to Viacom."
Read it at, http://www.commondreams.org/2007/07/04/10112/

ISP addresses and all. This country sucks. I hate you Murderer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Murderers trying to manage the crime scene
Posted by: coldham on Jul 5, 2008 4:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can't know that Iraq is real. We are only allowed to know what the military fascists want us to know...i.e. that Iraq is settling down. It's election time here and stuff like this ruins the con job that "were winning."

Our marines,by the way, are all murderers according to the rules we applied to the Germans back in 1945-46, from the grunt to General Kelly to the President.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Thomas
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jul 5, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes Dictator Bush and his Global Domination efforts look bad!

JT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am surprised he wasn't killed like the others
Posted by: Sushi on Jul 5, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More journalists have met untimely deaths in Bush's war than entire wars in the past. Bushy don't like the documenting of his mass-murder spree. Someone might use it to make a case against him.

Sushi
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FMA in Massachusetts
Posted by: FMABBI on Jul 5, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article and this photo makes me cry. How very sad indeed it is to see what a horrible atrocity this war is. A picture is worth a thousand words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FMA in Massachusetts Posted by: observing
LUCKY GUY
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Jul 5, 2008 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to be alive -- they could well have taken him out as they have other journalists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who Have they 'Taken Out'?? Posted by: gellero1
On censorship
Posted by: Blondinista on Jul 5, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A month or so ago, the Washington Post printed on its front page a photo of a two-year-old Iraqi boy being pulled dust-covered and limp from the rubble left by an American airstrike. He later died. It was one of those powerful, haunting images that will stay burned in your memory, like the image of the little Vietnamese girl running from a napalm attack.

The reaction from some readers to that photo was anger that the Post printed such a picture where "children might see it," and not anger that American airstrikes are killing Iraqi toddlers.

So it would seem there are people who prefer the pretty lies of censorship, rather than the ugly, inconvenient truths of war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Silencing the news
Posted by: chorton on Jul 5, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pressure to silence individual reporters is part of a larger picture that includes silencing entire major stories! For example, House Continuing Resolution 362, which calls on the President to commit an act of war against Iran, now has 220 co-sponsors and is expected to be brought to the floor soon for a vote under rules that would allow just 20 minutes of debate. Over the course of the month since it was introduced, it has received scant coverage.

Yahoo carried an opinion piece that mentions this bill on June 27; the CBS website carried a report from Politico on June 25, but there is no indication that it was aired; The Baltimore Chronicle on July 2 carried a statement about it by Congressman Ron Paul, and Newsday carried an opinion piece about it on June 27.

To date there has been no mention of this resolution, none, on ABC, NBC, MSNBC, FOX, CNN, PBS, NPR, BBC, AOL, msn, USA Today, the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Christian Science Monitor or The Los Angeles Times! It is fairly safe to say that most people are unaware of it.

If you are tired of having important stories - such as a Congressional resolution that demands of the President that he commit an act of war against Iran - being given the silent treatment by the media, and you feel that this story must be more widely known, cut and paste this News Chain Alert and distribute it as widely as possible.

Together we can break the Media Barons' chokehold on the news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Silencing the news Posted by: Alterina
What happened to the First Amendment here?
Posted by: reelectnoone on Jul 5, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me get this straight.

A man in uniform, sworn to uphold and protect the Constitution of the United States of America ordered this reporter to hid facts from US Citizens. Ordered him to delete actual front line news from the internet? Fired him because he refused to cave and waive his first amendment rights as well as our right to be informed of the truth of the war?

Surely this was not one of OUR military people trying to deny the first amendment?

Gasp!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the pictures? Where's the News Chain Alert
Posted by: common intelligence on Jul 5, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wher and how can people be made aware of the censored war and criminal activities?

Alternet doesn't Show any.
The whole bloody web has become a labrinth to weed through for some of the most simple yet important news to be spread among the people so that they can be aware of the truth.

Any direct links should be made here on Alternet if they won't put pictures with the news and commentaries.
Here's your chance ALTERNET to up the anti.
Start getting images and news links with the Site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Pictures Posted by: Rapunzel
» RE: Where are the pictures? Alternet.... Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
Operation MOCKINGBIRD, anyone?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jul 5, 2008 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anyone is surprised by any of this, he's either been comatose for forty years or he's a colossal fraud (neo-conservative Bush Leaguer).
He sure as hell knows nothing of Nazi WW-2 propaganda - or propaganda in general.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Linasay
Posted by: linsayb on Jul 5, 2008 9:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a former Army PAO I can tell you that the actions taken by the Marines were completely wrong. You were well within your rights to publish what you did. As long as you didn't post the photos or mentioned names before the next of kin were contacted you're in the clear. As for their argument about your pictures showing tactics and putting future missions at risk, they are wrong. The regulations usually only apply to showing pictures of damaged military equipment, specifically Humvees, as this could show weaknesses in the equipment that could be targeted in the future. The military is also not allowed to confiscate your photos, just recommend what you should or should not publish. I'm glad you were able to hold on to the original photos. Keep up the good work. If you really wanted to, you could fight their decision through legal avenues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have seen the pictures!
Posted by: ongre08 on Jul 5, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zoriah's Blog page

http://www.zoriah.net/blog/suicide-bombing-in-anbar-.html

I can handle it, but our leaders do not want the truth to be presented to the people, it may stop them from shopping this weekend.
I am deeply impressed with the journalists in war-zones. It is a largely thankless job that must cause harm to their outlook on life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing Much has Changed in 40 Years - Except It Got Worse. Check Out This John Lennon Interview
Posted by: opmoc on Jul 5, 2008 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmR0V6s3NKk

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks Dahr Jamail once again, best reporting out of Iraq.
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jul 5, 2008 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Always a pleasure, though the reports are often horrific, to read some actual journalism. I've followed Dahr Jamail's reports, especially the history of American attacks on the city of Fallujah.

This report is one among many that point out just how lawless the occupation of Iraq is.

Makes sense historically, you see the so called 'Right' learned from Nixon the belief (though false) that the Vietnam Conflict (never an actual war, for some reason) was lost due to the journalists showing pictures night after night of the horror of war on Americans TVs every night. So these days, the military (who seem to have forgotten where their balls are not to mention their own laws, regulations, and loyalty to the Constitution instead of Texas oil fuckers) has been ordered to censor journalists. Sometimes, Marines just kill the journalists (especially independent or non American). Anyone recall the Italian journalist whos car was shot to pieces at a roadblock within the greenzone? The guys with the camera on the roof of a hotel during the initial invasion (yea, that abrams tank wasn't just driving by)?

The shameful censorship by the US military seems to point out a giant shift in US military regulation... that orders are above their oath to the Constitution... which has some thing about freedom of the press in it. So I hear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Garvagh
Posted by: Garvagh on Jul 5, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an important story, and it relects all too clearly the systematic effort to perpetuate the Bush administration's idiotic adventure in Iraq by preventing as far as possible the dissemination to the American public of graphic evidence of the continuing carnage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pictures
Posted by: modeler on Jul 5, 2008 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saw the photographs of three dead Marines on PBS on July 4. I wondered what they might have looked like after being killed. This article explained it. Of course the Bushit decider would not those photos published. He probably would puke if he saw them. These yellowbellied bastards Bush, Cheney and quite a few more in their administration avoided their obligations to the country during the Vietnam war by hook and crook and than sent thousands into death and misery. And honest people suffer for telling the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zoriah Miller's latest comments from Iraq
Posted by: Earthian on Jul 5, 2008 1:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here are the two latest commentaries from photojournalist Zoriah Miller:

Yesterday, July 4:

http://www.zoriah.net/blog/2008/07/happy-fourth-of.html

July 04, 2008

Happy Fourth of July - Update on Zoriah’s Situation

I would like to wish a Happy Fourth of July to all of the Marines, soldiers, and military personnel who struggle to survive and bring order in a chaotic situation in Iraq.

On this American Indepedance Day, my heartfelt goodwill extends to their families back home, and to the Iraqi’s and Afghans who live day in and day out in a climate of uncertainty and fear.

May all of you find peace and unity and return to your lives, families, and children safe and unharmed.

I have been banned from documenting the conflict in Fallujah and Anbar Province by the U.S. Marine Corps. Today, I wait in Baghdad’s Green Zone to find out if I will blacklisted completely and forced to leave Iraq.

I stand firm in the belief that I have been unjustly censored by the U.S. Military for reporting strictly under the guidelines given to me.

To all of the U.S. Marines and their families who have emailed me and voiced their support of the post and of the issue as a whole I want to extend a special thank you.

(Go to his actual blog to see photos there.)

And July 3rd:

http://www.zoriah.net/blog/2008/07/zoriah-embed-te.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Publish the pictures, Alternet...
Posted by: ceraiteri on Jul 5, 2008 3:31 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...or don't publish the article. You can't have it both ways.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you talking about the black and white picture
Posted by: jsong123 on Jul 5, 2008 4:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with low image quality? I don't see the use of this picture for anything.

Here is a war picture that begins to show the horror.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Civil_War

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Truth for a change
Posted by: ynotu on Jul 5, 2008 4:57 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God forbid we might see actual pictures of what is really going on over there.........that people are dying; our servicemen.

Fortunately, the government can't choreograph everything although it sounds like they try mighty hard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes, The Truth for a change Posted by: topbrick
Wayne
Posted by: mysteyman09 on Jul 5, 2008 6:31 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regarding imbedded journalists, in Vietnam reporters had almost unrestricted access to the battlefield.
In the Reagan Bush apocalyhptic vision reporters should be seen and not heard.
And, when you talk about carnage ,True carnage is when a 2000 lb bomb crashes on a
village hospital as it did in Somalia. Talk about body parts. US Military are not the only victims of US bombs falling from the sky.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Civilians have no idea
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Jul 6, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of how horrific war is, and Bush et al want to make damned sure it stays that way--that was obvious from the first time they censored pictures of coffins returning to the Air Force base in Dover.

I remember during Vietnam how those photos--and those of the young girl running from the napalm, the North Vietnamese man being shot in the head, and television footage--began to make people face what *really* was happening, the carnage and the waste. Gawd forbid that happens now, we might actually do something to stop this hideous occupation.

The photographer and his motives should be commended and respected. He did what is right--and thus will be punished unmercifully.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Civilians have no idea Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
AT LEAST WE KNOW WHERE THE JOURNALIST IS & ALL THE PIECES...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jul 7, 2008 8:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, AMERICANS could have 'acquired the photographer' based on "Blessed Bloody St. Michelle Malkin" (of the Pontius Pilate's Finishing School)'s finely honed 'terrorist target scanning skillz'

FEAR THE PRESS!: they might tell someone what we should know we're paying to have done...

┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A (Deleted) Picture Is Worth....
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Jul 8, 2008 3:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Distorting the slaughter in Iraq, according to high-ranking Marine officials.
First and foremost as a journalist, I work at a newspaper and I see everyday which photos are censored and which are published, if they're pictures of murder victims and/or other unfortunate unpleasantries of life, such as vehicluar wrecks, etc. we don't show gore and body parts. But we have on occasion.
A photographer snapped pictures of an accident and in the background were a person's brains lying on the highway. Not too many readers could identify that, but it is true. Most times media organizations will not publish "disturbing" photos like that.
You get the point. We have a saying in the profession that "if it leads, it bleeds; but we do exercise prior restraint.
Another person claims in this site that Americans don't see the flag-draped coffins arriving at Dover A.F.B. because they didn't come home with all their parts intact. We don't have any ideas on what an American-maded clsuter bomb does to Iraqi children; and sometime last year a brave Iraqi woman took photos of children buried under a pile of rubble in Baghdad after a U.S. air strike. She also snapped pictures of people lying on the streets with bullet holes in them after a raid near Sadr City by American forces in 2004.
The woman also took pictures of a pregnant woman who was hit by an Air Force bomb and the blast exposed her torso; the fetus miraculously survived but had to be delivered on the spot. She was six months pregnant. The photos of these horrors made us wince.
None of these phots were ever shown on American television.
Journalists are prevented from doing their job in Iraq when you have the military saying you can print this or that. And yes, we can point out the number of Amefican and Iraqi deaths, but without the pictures, you have no idea what's really going on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement