Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Real Journalists Don't Make $5 Million a Year

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted June 26, 2008.


Unlike the media's Brokaws and Blitzers, real journalists don't have cozy relationships with the powerful. Real journalists are feared.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Washington has become Versailles. We are ruled, entertained and informed by courtiers. The popular media are courtiers. The Democrats, like the Republicans, are courtiers. Our pundits and experts are courtiers. We are captivated by the hollow stagecraft of political theater as we are ruthlessly stripped of power. It is smoke and mirrors, tricks and con games. We are being had.

The past week was a good one if you were a courtier. We were instructed by the high priests on television over the past few days to mourn a Sunday morning talk show host, who made $5 million a year and who gave a platform to the powerful and the famous so they could spin, equivocate and lie to the nation. We were repeatedly told by these television courtiers, people like Tom Brokaw and Wolf Blitzer, that this talk show host was one of our nation's greatest journalists, as if sitting in a studio, putting on makeup and chatting with Dick Cheney or George W. Bush have much to do with journalism.

No journalist makes $5 million a year. No journalist has a comfortable, cozy relationship with the powerful. No journalist believes that acting as a conduit, or a stenographer, for the powerful is a primary part of his or her calling. Those in power fear and dislike real journalists. Ask Seymour Hersh and Amy Goodman how often Bush or Cheney has invited them to dinner at the White House or offered them an interview.

All governments lie, as I.F. Stone pointed out, and it is the job of the journalist to do the hard, tedious reporting to shine a light on these lies. It is the job of courtiers, those on television playing the role of journalists, to feed off the scraps tossed to them by the powerful and never question the system. In the slang of the profession, these television courtiers are "throats." These courtiers, including the late Tim Russert, never gave a voice to credible critics in the buildup to the war against Iraq. They were too busy playing their roles as red-blooded American patriots. They never fought back in their public forums against the steady erosion of our civil liberties and the trashing of our Constitution. These courtiers blindly accept the administration's current propaganda to justify an attack on Iran. They parrot this propaganda. They dare not defy the corporate state. The corporations that employ them make them famous and rich. It is their Faustian pact. No class of courtiers, from the eunuchs behind Manchus in the 19th century to the Baghdad caliphs of the Abbasid caliphate, has ever transformed itself into a responsible elite. Courtiers are hedonists of power.

Our Versailles was busy this past week. The Democrats passed the FISA bill, which provides immunity for the telecoms that cooperated with the National Security Agency's illegal surveillance over the past six years. This bill, which when signed means we will never know the extent of the Bush White House's violation of our civil liberties, is expected to be adopted by the Senate. Barack Obama has promised to sign it in the name of national security. The bill gives the U.S. government a license to eavesdrop on our phone calls and e-mails. It demolishes our right to privacy. It endangers the work of journalists, human rights workers, crusading lawyers and whistle-blowers who attempt to expose abuses the government seeks to hide. These private communications can be stored indefinitely and disseminated, not just to the U.S. government but to other governments as well. The bill, once signed into law, will make it possible for those in power to identify and silence anyone who dares to make public information that defies the official narrative.

Being a courtier, and Obama is one of the best, requires agility and eloquence. The most talented of them can be lauded as persuasive actors. They entertain us. They make us feel good. They convince us they are our friends. We would like to have dinner with them. They are the smiley faces of a corporate state that has hijacked the government and is raping the nation. When the corporations make their iron demands, these courtiers drop to their knees, whether to placate the telecommunications companies that fund their campaigns and want to be protected from lawsuits, or to permit oil and gas companies to rake in obscene profits and keep in place the vast subsidies of corporate welfare doled out by the state.

We cannot differentiate between illusion and reality. We trust courtiers wearing face powder who deceive us in the name of journalism. We trust courtiers in our political parties who promise to fight for our interests and then pass bill after bill to further corporate fraud and abuse. We confuse how we feel about courtiers like Obama and Russert with real information, facts and knowledge. We chant in unison with Obama that we want change, we yell "yes we can," and then stand dumbly by as he coldly votes away our civil liberties. The Democratic Party, including Obama, continues to fund the war. It refuses to impeach Bush and Cheney. It allows the government to spy on us without warrants or cause. And then it tells us it is our salvation. This is a form of collective domestic abuse. And, as so often happens in the weird pathology of victim and victimizer, we keep coming back for more.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, journalism, tim russert, russert

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, is a Senior Fellow at the Nation Institute. His latest book is Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi Civilians.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
the real KOOL-AID STATE [FASCISM usa]
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Jun 26, 2008 1:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A decent piece but for some obvious howlers. For one:

“These courtiers blindly accept the administration's current propaganda to justify an attack on Iran.”

No.

These MSM “courtiers” do nothing of the kind. They are the lowest lowlife rung of the ruling class and they know it. If they didn’t spread lies for their corporate monopoly paymasters, they would be nixed in a heartbeat for replacement.

And Obama willing to cheerfully fund endless sham genocide as he betrays the nation for a FISA spy state while the media continues to sell 9/11 “war on terror” of a thousand lies? Well, that’s just par for the course.

It’s all just that much more proof America is a Fascist state masquerading as “capitalist” so-called “democracy”.

“And, as so often happens in the weird pathology of victim and victimizer, we keep coming back for more.”

On this I would sadly agree.

And it's the reason our nation has grown to be so despised the world over. It’s not just about a murderous, psychopath Washington-media-“education” axis owned by Fascists. It is about most Americans that have lost their morality with their minds and spirits to a Fascist nightmare you would need to be dead asleep to buy into.

As the late George Carlin so often said, the “owners” have “got you by the balls”. Carlin well knew that America under tinhorn Fascism is no better than a Kool-Aid State (a Corporate Monopoly State, to be more precise.

So, roll over and take it, America.

You deserve it. At least until you decide you don’t.




“The minority, the ruling class at present, has the schools and press, usually the Church as well, under its thumb. This enables it to organize and sway the emotions of the masses, and make its tool of them.”
Doctor Albert Einstein (in a letter to Sigmund Freud 7/30/1932. 1879-1955)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the real KOOL-AID STATE [FASCISM usa] Posted by: beautifulady2003
please stop blaming all Americans for what's wrong, chris--very unhelpful
Posted by: Suzon on Jun 26, 2008 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We cannot differentiate between illusion and reality. We trust courtiers wearing face powder who deceive us in the name of journalism. We trust courtiers in our political parties who promise to fight for our interests and then pass bill after bill to further corporate fraud and abuse.

I have worked long and hard (unpaid) to detect the reality hidden behind the screen and I trust no courtiers. George Carlin was far from alone in his refusal to turn a blind eye to the facts. There are millions who don't buy into the myths. Remember that despite ridicule from the corporate media, Al Gore won the election in 2000.

Yes, there are dupes, charlatans and idiots among us, but we won't reclaim our rights as citizens with defeatism. If I were running Alternet, I'd send every article which makes the assumption that we are all to blame for what's wrong (guilt by association!) back to the author for a rewrite.

Remember Valley Forge. Did George Washington sustain the troops with glum thoughts? I don't think so.

Yes, things have been very difficult. The future is uncertain. But truth and the ideal of liberty and justice for all are tremendous sources of power and inspiration.

Advantage-seeking cowards and brutes have only spurious entitlement to cling to. Government based upon truth and justice is humanity's birthright--we can and will get it back!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is a bizarre misfire
Posted by: Moonray on Jun 26, 2008 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I usually enjoy Chris Hedges' articles, but this one leaves me wondering if someone spiked his herbal tea with something more exotic. Hedges is right on about those show biz "journalists" and should have quit while he was ahead. Trying to conflate Obama's vote on the telecom bill with journalistic shilling just doesn't work from any angle.

I also dislike the telecom bill and wish Obama hadn't voted for it, but I also realize that Obama is down in the political pit doing the actual fighting. He has to make decisions based on the political realities of the moment as he sees them. I trust him to do that in a way that's best for the nation in the long run, whether I like a particular piece of legislation or not. Hedges' tantrum on this issue doesn't help anything and weakens his credibility as a journalist -- a relatively low-paid, real journalist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FORGET ABOUT IT
Posted by: thebeerdoctor on Jun 26, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So if someone has the temerity to point out that the junior Senator from Illinois is slipping you the soap, his supporters howl to the moon. There is no such thing as journalism. There is only good or bad or mediocre writing. If you question the authority of the present order, you are reduced to the back waters where people with nothing better to do than hang out with computers, will critique your latest mini-opus. But. if you believe that some historic figure in the history of journalism, say an Ida Tarbell, would find a spot on the Microsoft General Electric Television Network? Hey, forget about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real journalists make $10 an hour and get out of the biz by the time they're 25
Posted by: Jasonix on Jun 26, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Idealistic kids go into journalism thinking that they'll change the world. Colleges have journalism departments that raise kids hopes. But when they get out into the real world, they find out the truth - real journalists work for weekly or small-town daily papers, make $10 an hour, and have marginal benefits. Not only that, but the small-town publishers know very well that they can't piss off the advertisers that keep their papers afloat, so you'll never get to do a story that's pro-union or exposes any kind of corruption in town government or business. The wages aren't enough for people to survive on (except for a few women who find it to be an amusing hobby who marry men with real jobs), but the bosses demand 100-percent devotion and claim the right to make you work any time of day, any day. Technically, most reporters are hourly workers (there is no such thing as a "professional journalist"), but the bosses demand that you punch in, punch out after 40 hours, and go back to work for free. If you don't work free overtime, you're fired.

As a result, any journalist with talent flees the profession by the time they're 25. Public relations, advertising, and corporate communications are full of journalism refugees who got smart. That's why "seasoned journalists" are mostly sour old coots with little talent and merely average intelligence, in sharp contrast to the veterans of virtually any other discipline that requires a college education.

The exception is the top newspapers like the New York Times or Chicago Tribune. There, the children of the elite (often, though, the least talented ones who lacked their parents' balls for business) step right from Boston University, Wellesley College, Stanford U., or wherever straight into jobs at the nation's top papers. Someone from a working-class family can spend 25 years working their way up through the ranks, and if they manage to finally make it to a paper like that, it'll be as a freelancer who gets sent to dangerous places like Iraq.

Any college student would be a fool to go into journalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» couldn't agree more Posted by: deborama
» RE: couldn't agree more Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Amen, amen, amen Posted by: Jasonix
Title says it all--real journalists are POOR
Posted by: solitarysherlockian on Jun 26, 2008 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shilling for the powerful--as the Wolfies and Toms do, is just legally prostituting journalism for big bucks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amen to this article...Still, there are REAL differences between McCain & Obama!
Posted by: Midwesterners on Jun 26, 2008 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree with almost everything Mr. Hedges has said in this article--as well as most of his work in general--nevertheless, it would be TRAGICALLY foolish to think that there are only cosmetic differences between McCain and Obama!!! Of course, Senator Obama's vote on the recent FISA bill was very disappointing. However, if all of us believed this time around in 2008 that there are no other substantive differences between the two candidates, then we all could vote for Ralph Nader this November and have a repeat of the results of the 2000 Election!! And tell me that things would not have been different all over the globe if Bush had not been elected in 2000!

So while I totally agree that the MSM is full of nothing but "prostitutes" at almost every level--with the FEW AND VERY NOTABLE EXCEPTIONS of Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow or Bill Moyers--
I think it would be a crime against humanity to sit this presidential election out and bemoan the fact that Obama is just one more "courtier" and not everything we want him to be at this moment in time.

As far as I am concerned, the act of "not voting" in November 2008 is JUST as morally reprehensible as the act of "voting Republican." Certainly, the world, the planet and the globe--and not just "we" folks in America--cannot afford to have yet another Republican Administration!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wolf Blitzer?!
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Jun 26, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hearing anyone submit the idea that Wolf Blitzer is a journalist, has been taking massive doses of Rush Limbaugh's tonic, Oxycodone.

I saw him speak to a CANADIAN CROWD, he had he timerity to ask CANADIANS if we knew that there had been a genocide in Rwanda.

The 80's old doll, all done up with red lipstick and in her fur, turned to me and said, "How stupid does he think we ARE?! That was our guy, Romeo D'allaire being left to fend for our troops. IDIOT!!

I could have agreed with my lovely compatriot more.

Wolf Blitzer, a journalist?! I hope I stop laughing long enough to get the breakfast dishes done without breaking any.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This world of sin
Posted by: Vic Fedorov on Jun 26, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
insofar as the media doesn't cover how oppressive and deformed the institution of school is, regulating individuals en masse for years without discussion of the structure,

and insofar as the media doesn't demand that the economy, which most compells the many discussing together, be discussed in local free assemblies,

And that the media does not know the tenth amendment's reservation of powers for the state or the people, in free assembly, has been unconstitutionally usurped for local elected officials, or that the media even know the form of free assembly is for decision-making by many citizens.

Or that the media does not question the falseness of dominance in some sports by a certain races.

Or that the media doesn't even inquire into what christian terminology such as the kingdom of god even means,

Or that they accept a burned out judiciary that honors the few reasoning and not a form for the many discussing,

I move that all journalists are bad,

And that this totalitarian limitation of information is a trait associated with communism more than fascism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This world of sin Posted by: Lauren
Rove is Hitler's Goebbels & The MSM is the Former Soviet Politboro
Posted by: Midwesterners on Jun 26, 2008 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't agree more with Mr. Fedorov's comments above! Fascism, totalitarianism or whatever label you want to give it!!!

I have maintained for years (since even before 2000) that Hitler or the former USSR could only have dreamed of having a propaganda machine work as smoothly as our MSM! Rove is Joseph Goebbels--and like his predecessor Goebbels, Rove doesn't even need to prod the MSM anymore: The Corporate MSM automatically does what Rove wants it to do now anyway!! And the MSM is the Soviet Politboro of today--unconsciously goose stepping to the Republican/Corporate demands! (Of course, as I said above here, there ARE some major exceptions to this "rule"--such as Olbermann, Maddow or Moyers, who certainly are NOT corporate puppets!)

BUT STILL, as I ALSO said above, it would be an enormous mistake--of cataclysmic proportions--to stay home and not vote for Obama. Obama may not be everything we want, but he is better than the alternative of four more years of Republican Reign! And hopefully, we have learned from history how heinous and horrific the "Republican Alternative" is!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are _you_ a real journalist Chris?
Posted by: daniel1982 on Jun 26, 2008 10:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see your income tax return.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Propaganda and change.
Posted by: walterik on Jun 27, 2008 12:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone really believe that there will be a change?Obama is an intelligent young man, but he is already in the claws of the powerful, only a little different personnel. The financial disaster the US is facing will make it impossible. Forecasting is difficult, aspecially if it involves the future:)
I would be inclined to believe that it will be years and years before an orderly return to financial stability and a decent living for the working class will be happening. Can't you see the handwriting on the wall?
W.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JOURNALISTS.......LOL.............
Posted by: pacto on Jun 27, 2008 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SORRY BUT THERE ARE NO JOURNALISTS. ONLY A BUNCH OF OPIONATED SENSATIONALIST WEANED ON THE ENQUIRER AND STAR, AS THE ROLE MODEL,YOU COULD HARDLY CALL THEM REPORTERS,THEY JUST SIT AND READ THE PROMPTER AND MOUTH THE OPINION OF THE PRODUCERS,WHO SPIN SPIN SPIN UNTIL A PERSON TRYING TO FIND FACTS ENDS UP WITH A HEADACHE. C.N.N. CERTAINLY, NOT, NEWS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's infotainment, not news
Posted by: janelynne on Jun 27, 2008 7:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Journalism has become parisitic to corporate special interests. Media does not serve the democracy, and as corporations have found themselves favoring profit over the interests of United States of America, so have the sycophants that we generously call "journalists", done the corporate bidding. Climate change, sustainable energy, health care regulation? The sponsors are not interested. The "journalists" are told what to report and what to under-report. The corporations do not want reform. They want so called "free market" pandemonium and gluttonous profiteering.

I don't know who will be able to clean up the corruption of the main stream media. There is simply no watchdog left to do the job. The fox, pardon the pun, is watching the hen house. We need a new media. We need change. And we need an informed public who attaches itself on the internet, dawn to dusk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You hit the nail on the head! Posted by: Midwesterners
Power of the Press
Posted by: sfjack on Jun 27, 2008 9:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right on the mark, Chris. How often do we get the truth in the media? I know from personal experience. My ex is a "journalist", a television reporter for many years, and I saw firsthand how power works in the press. Most journalists mirror what they read on press releases, give the powers-that-be plenty of air-time and end up sounding like all the other stations in town. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. The power of the press is truly frightening.
Sorry, but I do believe in Obama much more than McCain, of course. The one I really believe is Kucinich, and we all know what happened to him for telling the truth. Scary as hell, is it not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Power of the Press Posted by: JSquercia
hedges right on Russert media shortcomings, but
Posted by: whealeydj on Jun 28, 2008 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like some others i think attack on Obama is unwarranted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Can't Handle The Truth
Posted by: rgoalierob on Jun 29, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-To borrow from "A Few Good Men".
If we had REAL journalism, our "democracy" would have been dissolved by a revolution. Instead, we sat on our asses and watched Bush/Cheney performed a coup of their own.
We'll see when we're ready to see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one . . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jun 30, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . has ever gone broke underestimating the intelligence of the public.

As it turns out, the Sage for Our Age, indeed, the Sage For the Ages, was one Phinias T. Barnum, when he said: "There's a sucker born every minute."

You bet we're being played -- and with technology, there is sooo much more with which to do the playing. The Romans gave the people bread and spectacle, but what we're getting, at least the middle class, is bullsh*t and reality television. The "bread" is rapidly disappearing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement