COMMENTS: 44
Three Myths About the Internet That Refuse to Die
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
Myth: The Internet Is Free
This is my favorite Internet myth because it has literally never been true. In the very early days of the Net, the only people who went online were university students or military researchers -- students got accounts via the price of tuition; the military personnel got them as part of their jobs. Once the Internet was opened to the public, people could only access it by paying fees to their Internet service providers. And let's not even get into the facts that you have to buy a computer or pay for time on one.
I think this myth got started because pundits wanted to compare the price of publishing or mailing something on the Internet to the price of doing so using paper or the United States Postal Service. Putting a Web site on the Net is "free" only if you pretend you don't have to pay your ISP and a Web hosting service to do it. No doubt it is cheaper than printing and distributing a magazine to thousands of people, but it's not free. Same goes for e-mail. Sure it's "free" to send an e-mail, but you're still paying your ISP for Internet access to send that letter.
The poisonous part of this myth is that it sets up the false idea that the Internet removes all barriers to free expression. The Internet removes some barriers, but it erects others. You can get a few free minutes online in your local public library, maybe, and set up a Web site using a free service (if the library's filtering software allows that). But will you be able to catch anyone's attention if you publish under those constraints?
Myth: The Internet Knows No Boundaries
Despite the Great Firewall of China, an elaborate system of Internet filters that prevent Chinese citizens from accessing Web sites not approved by the government, many people still believe the Internet is a glorious international space that can bring the whole world together. When the government of a country like Pakistan can choose to block YouTube -- which it has and does -- it's impossible to say the Internet has no boundaries.
The Internet does have boundaries, and they are often drawn along national lines. Of course, closed cultures are not the only source of these boundaries. Many people living in African and South American nations have little access to the Internet, mostly due to poverty. As long as we continue to behave as if the Internet is completely international, we forget that putting something online does not make it available to the whole world. And we also forget that communications technology alone cannot undo centuries of mistrust between various regions of the world.
Myth: The Internet Is Full of Danger
Perhaps because the previous two myths are so powerful, many people have come to believe that the Internet is a dangerous place -- sort of like the "bad" part of a city, where you're likely to get mugged or hassled late at night. The so-called dangers of the Internet were highlighted in two recent media frenzies: the MySpace child-predator bust, in which Wired reporter Kevin Poulsen discovered that a registered sex offender was actively befriending and trolling MySpace for kids; and the harassment of Web pundit Kathy Sierra by a group of people who posted cruelly Photoshopped pictures of her, called for her death, and posted her home address.
Despite the genuine scariness represented by both these incidents, I would submit they are no less scary than what one could encounter offline in real life. In general, the Internet is a far safer place for kids and vulnerable people than almost anywhere else. As long as you don't hand out your address to strangers, you've got a cushion of anonymity and protection online that you'll never have in the real world. It's no surprise that our myths of the Internet overestimate both its ability to bring the world together and to destroy us individually.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: amiabledave on Jun 20, 2008 5:59 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How are people defining dictatorship? Is there any validity to such an ominous charge?
It seems to me that in a dicatorship, I wouldn't be on the Internet hurtling insults at political leaders without a knock at the door. I haven't seen any roundup of people on the way to the furnace, nor have I seen any book burnings.
I don't get it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: Quannah
» You really do live . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: John Annis
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: pomes
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: pomes
» The Patriot act,....
Posted by: Bbear41
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: PaulK
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: pomes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Jun 21, 2008 1:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like any other Tool, the Internet and all the devices attached to it can be routes to either regaining or relinquishing of power for those who would seek liberation, justice, and equity.
And few things are more liberating than a clear and INTER-active understanding of the technologies and other means of communication available. Keep up the work, Annalee!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cordas on Jun 21, 2008 2:32 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Internet knows no boundaries.... Sitting here at my PC, with my internet connection I can look at just about anything I want on the web (assuming I am prepared to pay for pay sites) if I was so inclined I could find out how to build a nuke, look at sick pictures of young children, or the latest footage of people being killed in Iraq. I can also read sites such as Alternet and other radical sites.... My internet is effectively without boundaries.
The internet can be full of danger, if I where unaware of the risks. However a little knowledge goes a long way in this regard.
What am I saying.... That the Myths brought up in this article aren't quite as black and white as the author makes out, I am not actually disagreeing with anything she says as she does raise valid points, but she is sometimes rather limited in the scope of the questions she asks. I think that in the next 5 - 10 years the internet is going to undergo huge changes, and there is going to be a fight for its soul and the 3 Myths talked about here are going to be integral to that fight.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: More Myths...
Posted by: Survivor77
Comments are closed-
Posted by: andor on Jun 21, 2008 5:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: duh
Posted by: talkville
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davesilvan on Jun 21, 2008 8:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davesilvan on Jun 21, 2008 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chorton on Jun 21, 2008 12:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now we have a great window of opportunity for disseminating news and opinions and for organizing - for however long it remains open. We need to be expanding our boundaries to reach all the people, not just the activists and the news junkies, and we need to be developing structures and practices that can survive a possible reaction.
I have registered the site www.newschain.org to pursue one such approach: developing a culture of disseminating blocked news stories person-to-person.
As I conceive of them, news chain alerts are vehicles for news stories, of national interest and importance, that have been widely ignored by the media. For this to work, people need to feel free to pass them on without committing to a stand on the issues referred to.
Thus News Chain Alerts have no instructions about what to think or do, except for the claim that they are important stories that weren't covered by the major media. The articles they point to - as much as is possible - are from recognized sources, are not opinion pieces and are more news than analysis. This is not a news service, not a roundup of stories we think people should be paying attention to. If it's on ABC and CNN, and I want people to pay more attention to it or do something about it, I might send out an email to my personal list to talk about that, but I won't label it a "news chain alert". And they aren't there to promote a particular agenda. For example I don't really care very much about Barr and the Libertarian Party, and I am not a Ron Paul booster. Neither are friends of the working people. But Barr adopting an anti-war platform and Paul getting 26% of the Republican vote in Idaho were stories of national interest - they were on the wire services and were picked up in Europe! - about trends that could affect the elections. The Major Media saw fit to ignore them - across the board. They met my criteria. I sent out news chain alerts for both stories.
It will take work to build this. We need to build recognition and support for the idea, establish a project with integrity and defend that integrity.
I need help with this project.
Tasks ahead that I see:
*Immediate*:
Building a leadership group.
Finding out who is already doing stuff like this, or is set up to do it, and making contact with them.
Setting up a website, planning a publicity campaign and designing a way of measuring effectiveness and effects.
*Ongoing*:
Maintaining the site.
Handling stories:
- Identifying possibly unreported stories.
- Verifying that they are from a reliable source and that they have not been covered by the major media.
- Evaluating their importance and interest.
- Then deciding whether to launch them.
- Disseminating them.
Ongoing promotion and publicity.
Ongoing organizing and networking.
Ongoing research.
If you see anything here you'd like to talk about or participate in, let me know. Or if you know of anyone we should be talking to, let them know or send me their contact info.
chrisahorton@yahoo.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lamar on Jun 21, 2008 10:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How safe can the internet possibly be if you can be nailed for $150,000+ just for having a connection?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Join the EFF
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Join the EFF
Posted by: lamar
» I Am Spartacus
Posted by: frantaylor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Jun 21, 2008 10:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There will be internet "refugees" roaming the Earth as nomads, seeking unrestricted access to the internet.
I will be among them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Only in the Stupid USA
Posted by: frantaylor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ArtemInox on Jun 22, 2008 2:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.addictedtoaggravation.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: teanatl on Jun 22, 2008 10:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Europe in the 14Th century was in the throes of the Dark Ages. It was a rough century...the Hundred Years' War, the Crusades, and the Black Death, which claimed the lives of nearly half the population of Europe. It's no wonder so many people predicted the end of the world would come soon. It was easy to think the seven horsemen of the Apocalypse had been set loose upon the earth. Of course, just as the darkest hour is before the dawn, there followed a "reawakening" or Renaissance...greatly facilitated by the invention of a device that made communications much faster and cheaper, allowed widespread access and furthered the sharing of ideas, knowledge and skills. Sound familiar...it was called the printing press. But for it's invention the Renaissance might never have spread beyond a few city states in Italy and the Modern World as we know might never have been born.
The Internet can have a similar impact on our time but it's anything but inevitable. Any technology, no matter how awesome, is but a tool. The Internet is capable of being used for great good or for great evil if it falls into the wrong hands. It's up to us to insure it doesn't and continues to be an agent of creative destruction in the post Modern World.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» A little Internet lesson
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: A little Internet lesson
Posted by: teanatl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Landbaron on Jun 22, 2008 3:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not really
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Free
Posted by: Landbaron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frantaylor on Jun 22, 2008 6:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Technologies falling under the generic name of "steganography" can hide information inside of other information that appears to be completely legitimate. A typical image, even such as the ones on this web page, can have an extraordinary amount of information hidden inside them, with no artifacts detectable with the eye or even by sophisticated software designed to look for it. It's a cat and mouse game to be sure, but those with information to spread WILL be able to do it.
Myth 2: Control
The Internet is NOT under the control of the ISPs, or the government. The people CAN take back the Internet with mesh networking and community networks.
Myth 3: Surveillance
The Internet transmits all data, encrypted or not. It doesn't care. Data can be encrypted with mechanisms that are virtually possible to decrypt. Combined with Steganography, encrypted messages can pass through firewalls and censors. You can choose very large encryption keys. and it would take someone longer than the known life of the universe to decrypt your message, even if every atom in the entire universe were turned into a powerful computer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sprightx on Jun 22, 2008 7:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While many people will say that there are forms on censorship and content control this is only true of websites that require registration and abbiding the terms of a contract. By registering you accept that the webmasters and mods have the right to remove or edit your published content if they deem it inapropriate, be it for any reason.
"We seek to encourage intelligent, thoughtful and respectful conversation and debate in these forums, and we reserve the right to moderate as we see fit.
AlterNet will not tolerate:
personal attacks on our writers or readers
excessive profanity
racist, sexist or other discriminatory or hateful language
comments that are off-topic or irrelevant to the story or discussion at hand
Readers who fail to follow these guidelines may have their comments deleted and their commenting privileges disabled with or without warning."
That is alternet's policy on comments, if me or anyone else fails to comply our posts will be deleted, but this does not mean the internet is not a free medium of expression and communication, in fact, all of us on here previously agree to these terms to be able to post. There are tens of thousands of websites and communities that do not moderate their user published content; if you are naive enough to believe that free internet refers to monetary costs, or are unable to find these websites, anything you say on the matter isn't worth reading.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ehm... no?
Posted by: pomes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cyr3n on Jun 23, 2008 8:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do the technophobes cling to this belief that people who use computers and Internet access regularly are somehow anti-social illiterate disconnected bums? I'd vouch the opposite. People who use (graphical) Internet access and its accompanying protocols (IRC for instance) are way more socially connected than some toothless goober who frequents his/her local pub. The idea that physical proximity is a requirement to being a "social" is totally flawed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 4. The Internet makes people anti-social
Posted by: Landbaron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: captbobalou on Jun 26, 2008 7:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Internet is not the cables, signals and computers that relay them: it is a set of standards and protocols that are freely available to anyone wishing to connect to networks of computers that use TCP/IP internetworking protocols.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 27, 2008 10:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is accurate. Even Newt Gingrich has backed Al Gore on this statement.
There used to be an emergency communications system called Arpanet, which was not publicly available. Al Gore took the initiative, as a senator, to make this system publicly available. That was how the internet as we know it first came to be. High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991
Now, I think that it was a giant giveaway of taxpayer funded research to private concentrations of capital. It makes no sense that we have to pay to use technologies that we paid to create. And if you're rich enough, you can buy stock in some company which exists because of taxpayer research, and then you can make MORE money from publicly created technology. But that, as they say, is a whole nother story
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another myth: Al Gore claimed to have invented it
Posted by: pomes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pomes on Jun 27, 2008 3:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DARPA is the same agency that now wants to push Total Information Awareness, LifeLog, and the Sentient World Simulation using behavioral data mined from our internet use (among other sources). Try googling or reading those on Wikipedia.
What I'm saying is, among its many other uses, the Internet, just like the phone network, was designed to make it easier to monitor and keep tabs on us, to profile us behaviorally, and to predict our future actions.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FURonnie on Jul 3, 2008 10:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: amiabledave on Jun 20, 2008 5:59 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How are people defining dictatorship? Is there any validity to such an ominous charge?
It seems to me that in a dicatorship, I wouldn't be on the Internet hurtling insults at political leaders without a knock at the door. I haven't seen any roundup of people on the way to the furnace, nor have I seen any book burnings.
I don't get it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: Quannah
» You really do live . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: John Annis
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: pomes
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: pomes
» The Patriot act,....
Posted by: Bbear41
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: PaulK
» RE: I can buy the corruption, but a dictatorship?
Posted by: pomes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Jun 21, 2008 1:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like any other Tool, the Internet and all the devices attached to it can be routes to either regaining or relinquishing of power for those who would seek liberation, justice, and equity.
And few things are more liberating than a clear and INTER-active understanding of the technologies and other means of communication available. Keep up the work, Annalee!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cordas on Jun 21, 2008 2:32 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Internet knows no boundaries.... Sitting here at my PC, with my internet connection I can look at just about anything I want on the web (assuming I am prepared to pay for pay sites) if I was so inclined I could find out how to build a nuke, look at sick pictures of young children, or the latest footage of people being killed in Iraq. I can also read sites such as Alternet and other radical sites.... My internet is effectively without boundaries.
The internet can be full of danger, if I where unaware of the risks. However a little knowledge goes a long way in this regard.
What am I saying.... That the Myths brought up in this article aren't quite as black and white as the author makes out, I am not actually disagreeing with anything she says as she does raise valid points, but she is sometimes rather limited in the scope of the questions she asks. I think that in the next 5 - 10 years the internet is going to undergo huge changes, and there is going to be a fight for its soul and the 3 Myths talked about here are going to be integral to that fight.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: More Myths...
Posted by: Survivor77
Comments are closed-
Posted by: andor on Jun 21, 2008 5:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: duh
Posted by: talkville
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davesilvan on Jun 21, 2008 8:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davesilvan on Jun 21, 2008 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chorton on Jun 21, 2008 12:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now we have a great window of opportunity for disseminating news and opinions and for organizing - for however long it remains open. We need to be expanding our boundaries to reach all the people, not just the activists and the news junkies, and we need to be developing structures and practices that can survive a possible reaction.
I have registered the site www.newschain.org to pursue one such approach: developing a culture of disseminating blocked news stories person-to-person.
As I conceive of them, news chain alerts are vehicles for news stories, of national interest and importance, that have been widely ignored by the media. For this to work, people need to feel free to pass them on without committing to a stand on the issues referred to.
Thus News Chain Alerts have no instructions about what to think or do, except for the claim that they are important stories that weren't covered by the major media. The articles they point to - as much as is possible - are from recognized sources, are not opinion pieces and are more news than analysis. This is not a news service, not a roundup of stories we think people should be paying attention to. If it's on ABC and CNN, and I want people to pay more attention to it or do something about it, I might send out an email to my personal list to talk about that, but I won't label it a "news chain alert". And they aren't there to promote a particular agenda. For example I don't really care very much about Barr and the Libertarian Party, and I am not a Ron Paul booster. Neither are friends of the working people. But Barr adopting an anti-war platform and Paul getting 26% of the Republican vote in Idaho were stories of national interest - they were on the wire services and were picked up in Europe! - about trends that could affect the elections. The Major Media saw fit to ignore them - across the board. They met my criteria. I sent out news chain alerts for both stories.
It will take work to build this. We need to build recognition and support for the idea, establish a project with integrity and defend that integrity.
I need help with this project.
Tasks ahead that I see:
*Immediate*:
Building a leadership group.
Finding out who is already doing stuff like this, or is set up to do it, and making contact with them.
Setting up a website, planning a publicity campaign and designing a way of measuring effectiveness and effects.
*Ongoing*:
Maintaining the site.
Handling stories:
- Identifying possibly unreported stories.
- Verifying that they are from a reliable source and that they have not been covered by the major media.
- Evaluating their importance and interest.
- Then deciding whether to launch them.
- Disseminating them.
Ongoing promotion and publicity.
Ongoing organizing and networking.
Ongoing research.
If you see anything here you'd like to talk about or participate in, let me know. Or if you know of anyone we should be talking to, let them know or send me their contact info.
chrisahorton@yahoo.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lamar on Jun 21, 2008 10:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How safe can the internet possibly be if you can be nailed for $150,000+ just for having a connection?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Join the EFF
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Join the EFF
Posted by: lamar
» I Am Spartacus
Posted by: frantaylor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Jun 21, 2008 10:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There will be internet "refugees" roaming the Earth as nomads, seeking unrestricted access to the internet.
I will be among them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Only in the Stupid USA
Posted by: frantaylor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ArtemInox on Jun 22, 2008 2:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.addictedtoaggravation.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: teanatl on Jun 22, 2008 10:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Europe in the 14Th century was in the throes of the Dark Ages. It was a rough century...the Hundred Years' War, the Crusades, and the Black Death, which claimed the lives of nearly half the population of Europe. It's no wonder so many people predicted the end of the world would come soon. It was easy to think the seven horsemen of the Apocalypse had been set loose upon the earth. Of course, just as the darkest hour is before the dawn, there followed a "reawakening" or Renaissance...greatly facilitated by the invention of a device that made communications much faster and cheaper, allowed widespread access and furthered the sharing of ideas, knowledge and skills. Sound familiar...it was called the printing press. But for it's invention the Renaissance might never have spread beyond a few city states in Italy and the Modern World as we know might never have been born.
The Internet can have a similar impact on our time but it's anything but inevitable. Any technology, no matter how awesome, is but a tool. The Internet is capable of being used for great good or for great evil if it falls into the wrong hands. It's up to us to insure it doesn't and continues to be an agent of creative destruction in the post Modern World.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» A little Internet lesson
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: A little Internet lesson
Posted by: teanatl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Landbaron on Jun 22, 2008 3:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not really
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Free
Posted by: Landbaron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frantaylor on Jun 22, 2008 6:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Technologies falling under the generic name of "steganography" can hide information inside of other information that appears to be completely legitimate. A typical image, even such as the ones on this web page, can have an extraordinary amount of information hidden inside them, with no artifacts detectable with the eye or even by sophisticated software designed to look for it. It's a cat and mouse game to be sure, but those with information to spread WILL be able to do it.
Myth 2: Control
The Internet is NOT under the control of the ISPs, or the government. The people CAN take back the Internet with mesh networking and community networks.
Myth 3: Surveillance
The Internet transmits all data, encrypted or not. It doesn't care. Data can be encrypted with mechanisms that are virtually possible to decrypt. Combined with Steganography, encrypted messages can pass through firewalls and censors. You can choose very large encryption keys. and it would take someone longer than the known life of the universe to decrypt your message, even if every atom in the entire universe were turned into a powerful computer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sprightx on Jun 22, 2008 7:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While many people will say that there are forms on censorship and content control this is only true of websites that require registration and abbiding the terms of a contract. By registering you accept that the webmasters and mods have the right to remove or edit your published content if they deem it inapropriate, be it for any reason.
"We seek to encourage intelligent, thoughtful and respectful conversation and debate in these forums, and we reserve the right to moderate as we see fit.
AlterNet will not tolerate:
personal attacks on our writers or readers
excessive profanity
racist, sexist or other discriminatory or hateful language
comments that are off-topic or irrelevant to the story or discussion at hand
Readers who fail to follow these guidelines may have their comments deleted and their commenting privileges disabled with or without warning."
That is alternet's policy on comments, if me or anyone else fails to comply our posts will be deleted, but this does not mean the internet is not a free medium of expression and communication, in fact, all of us on here previously agree to these terms to be able to post. There are tens of thousands of websites and communities that do not moderate their user published content; if you are naive enough to believe that free internet refers to monetary costs, or are unable to find these websites, anything you say on the matter isn't worth reading.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ehm... no?
Posted by: pomes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cyr3n on Jun 23, 2008 8:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do the technophobes cling to this belief that people who use computers and Internet access regularly are somehow anti-social illiterate disconnected bums? I'd vouch the opposite. People who use (graphical) Internet access and its accompanying protocols (IRC for instance) are way more socially connected than some toothless goober who frequents his/her local pub. The idea that physical proximity is a requirement to being a "social" is totally flawed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 4. The Internet makes people anti-social
Posted by: Landbaron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: captbobalou on Jun 26, 2008 7:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Internet is not the cables, signals and computers that relay them: it is a set of standards and protocols that are freely available to anyone wishing to connect to networks of computers that use TCP/IP internetworking protocols.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 27, 2008 10:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is accurate. Even Newt Gingrich has backed Al Gore on this statement.
There used to be an emergency communications system called Arpanet, which was not publicly available. Al Gore took the initiative, as a senator, to make this system publicly available. That was how the internet as we know it first came to be. High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991
Now, I think that it was a giant giveaway of taxpayer funded research to private concentrations of capital. It makes no sense that we have to pay to use technologies that we paid to create. And if you're rich enough, you can buy stock in some company which exists because of taxpayer research, and then you can make MORE money from publicly created technology. But that, as they say, is a whole nother story
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another myth: Al Gore claimed to have invented it
Posted by: pomes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pomes on Jun 27, 2008 3:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DARPA is the same agency that now wants to push Total Information Awareness, LifeLog, and the Sentient World Simulation using behavioral data mined from our internet use (among other sources). Try googling or reading those on Wikipedia.
What I'm saying is, among its many other uses, the Internet, just like the phone network, was designed to make it easier to monitor and keep tabs on us, to profile us behaviorally, and to predict our future actions.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FURonnie on Jul 3, 2008 10:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Half-Naked Hot Chicks and Beer: The Sexist Guyland of the Super Bowl Beer Commercial
Can Obama and Dems Overcome the Right's Talk Radio Monopoly?
Why We're Addicted to Disaster Porn




