COMMENTS: 217
Laura Ingraham: Right-Wing Radio's High Priestess of Hate
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
Laura Ingraham is ... different. Not only is Ingraham younger than many other conservative radio personalities (at 45, she's more than a decade from Limbaugh's cohort), and the only female among them, but she also brings to the airwaves a snarky brand of aggressive humor fused with an attack-dog sensibility that she expresses with a chalk-on-gravel voice. Her goal is not to assert her own glory, but to rip apart her enemies, which include everyone from liberals and "elites" to, from time to time, even President George W. Bush and presidential hopeful John McCain. Her style of argumentation is bare-bones simple; in a 1997 piece for Salon.com, Eric Alterman wrote that Ingraham just laughed in response to a position he took on television during the 1996 election. How could he counter that?
Ingraham often uses laughter as a weapon. One of her show's most popular parodies, "But ... Monkey," interposes the sound of a screeching monkey over a sound bite from a political figure. Victims have included Democratic senators Harry Reid and Barbara Boxer as well as conservative gurus like columnist Charles Krauthammer. Other regular segments include "Deep Thought of the Day" and "Lie of the Day." Ingraham also makes great use of pop culture clips (she plays the theme song from the television show "Flipper" when discussing John Kerry), and her production values are generally superb. Like many other successful hosts, she is often very funny, and her rapid-fire pacing and easy banter with her younger male producers (all three are in their early 20s) has more in common with the liberal "Stephanie Miller Show" than the hard-line commentary sometimes heard on conservative talk shows. At a deeper level, however, despite the comedy, Ingraham takes what she does quite seriously.
The rabid nature of her assault against immigration reform is a good example. Ingraham has perhaps been more strongly anti-immigration than any other talk personality except Michael Savage. Her show even features a regular segment called "The Illegal Immigration Sob Story" alert, in which she reads news pieces she feels are biased toward illegal immigrants. When she had White House spokesman Tony Snow on her program, she began by asking him why the Bush administration was dragging its heels on immigration reform. After sarcastically apologizing for interrupting his talking points, she said, "69 percent of Americans, 85 percent of the GOP, 55 percent of the Democrats want the border enforced. Does that affect you guys, or do you guys just blow it off?"
In the two-for-one combination that all too often serves conservative radio well, Ingraham once claimed that the immigration bill was an attempt by the mainstream media to make more people liberals. Anyone who still wonders whether talk radio had an influence on the bill's defeat should look at Ingraham's numbers; with more than 5 million weekly listeners, she is tied with Glenn Beck as the fourth most listened to radio talk show host in America. Alterman wrote that Ingraham's popularity is due to her having "something more important than knowledge or experience. ... She has star quality." She is also fearless: She once confronted CNN host John Roberts for calling her "outspoken," saying, "Do you guys introduce liberal commentators that way?"
She's more aggressive than Limbaugh, more blatant than Hannity, and more rational than Beck or Savage, and although she often supports many of them (erroneously stating, for example, that Limbaugh never claimed the Clintons murdered Vince Foster), she is equally willing to call them out. She walked out of a "Hannity & Colmes" installment after the Don Imus "nappy-headed ho's" controversy was twisted into a discussion of Democratic vices, and once asked on her radio program after an appearance on "The O'Reilly Factor," "Why is Bill O'Reilly afraid of George Soros?" (In the same broadcast, Ingraham accused columnist Helen Thomas of working for Hezbollah, which has been identified by the U.S. government as a terrorist group.)
Ingraham was born and raised among the wealthy in Glastonbury, Conn., one of the state's richest suburbs, although her mother worked as a maid to support the family. She went to Dartmouth University and became the first female editor of the conservative Dartmouth Review, where conservative author Dinesh D'Souza, a former boyfriend, also worked. While there, she secretly sent a reporter with a tape recorder to a campus gay students association meeting; she then outed the students in print and sent tapes of the meetings to the students' parents. In the magazine she called association members "cheerleaders for latent campus sodomites." (In 1997, more than a decade later, she wrote an article in the Washington Post detailing how she had changed her views in light of her brother Curtis' coming out as gay.)
After graduating from Dartmouth, she went to work for the White House as a speechwriter; like her peers, conservative radio talkers Mark Levin and Hugh Hewitt, Ingraham began her professional career as a Reagan employee. She also obtained a law degree from the University of Virginia and clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas. In 1995 she appeared on the cover of the New York Times Magazine -- wearing a friend's hip, leopard-print miniskirt -- to illustrate an article about rising young conservatives. She then became both a regular MSNBC pundit and a commentator on the "CBS Evening News," where she once asked Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres if the United States should bomb Libya or Syria in retaliation for a TWA flight explosion whose cause was unknown. Ingraham argues politics the way lawyers argue cases, as if there can be no possible interpretation other than her own. She is a class-A schmoozer who understands and exploits her verbal gifts to the fullest. Her skill for networking, along with her willingness to go for the jugular, has allowed her to break into the boys' club of conservative radio.
In the late 1990s, she briefly hosted her own MSNBC cable television show, "Watch It!" (17 months and three time slots later, she joked that it should have been called "Watch It Get Canceled!"), and then, in 2001, launched "The Laura Ingraham Show" on radio. Ingraham's particular blend of humor and argument apparently translated more effectively on radio than on television, and the Talk Radio Network now syndicates her show on nearly 325 terrestrial stations (it's also available on Sirius and XM satellite radio). She has survived both a breast cancer scare and a broken wedding engagement, and continues to mock the establishment sardonically for three hours daily.
Ingraham has made more than her share of controversial comments, with frequent guest appearances on television affording her as much prominence as her radio work (for someone whose own television show was relatively short-lived, she spends a tremendous amount of time on other people's programs). She's no Neal Boortz, but she's certainly more outrageous than, say, Hugh Hewitt. In one of her most famous incidents, on Election Day 2006 Ingraham encouraged listeners to jam the phone line of a toll-free Democratic Party service for reporting voting problems. No tangible consequences came of it (the Democrats won anyway), but it did put Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy up in arms.
Perhaps the greatest controversy of Ingraham's career, however, came from comments she made about the Iraq War. In March of 2006, Ingraham went on a six-day tour of Iraq, visiting hospitals, orphanages and Iraqi villages. Upon returning to the United States, she appeared on NBC's "Today Show" to criticize the mainstream American media for its unwillingness to report "the truth" of the Iraq situation. She said that NBC had focused on programming "Where in the World is Matt Lauer?" and that "to do a show from Iraq means to talk to the Iraqi military, to go out with the Iraqi military, to actually have a conversation with the people instead of reporting from hotel balconies about the latest IEDs going off."
Washington Post writer Jonathan Finer later reported that Ingraham "rarely, if ever, spent a moment outside the protection of U.S. forces or a night outside a military base." Finer compared her experience with that of the Iraq-stationed journalists she criticized, "almost all of whom operate without military protection." While the National Review's Tim Graham applauded Ingraham for bringing out the "facts the media self-defense teams ignore," MSNBC host Keith Olbermann said on his show "Countdown" that Ingraham had dishonored the memory of the 80 American journalists killed and others kidnapped in Iraq, and that her comment "was not only unforgivable of her, it was desperate and it was stupid."
Ingraham's stance on women's issues is divided at best; around the time of Clarence Thomas' Supreme Court appointment, she joined with a conservative group called Independent Women's Forum that formed a committee to attack and discredit Anita Hill's sexual harassment testimony against Thomas. (Independent Women's Forum's other activities included testifying in Congress for defunding the Violence Against Women Act and against affirmative action.) While she has criticized Fox for gratuitous, sexually explicit programming and helped lead a media campaign against the misogynistic rapper Akon, she also co-hosted a three-part PBS special on "the gender wars," which explored "whether the advancement of women in virtually all areas of society can be achieved without a retreat, in some way, on the part of men." One need not guess where Ingraham, a convert to Roman Catholicism, stands on a woman's right to choose.
Among prominent female political figures, Hillary Clinton in particular provokes Ingraham's ire. Her first book, The Hillary Trap, tried hard to make the case that Clinton was actually setting women's rights back by arguing for special status for them. "The complaints of Western feminists look like petty self-absorption when you line them up against human rights abuses in Third World military dictatorships," Ingraham wrote.
Ingraham also argues that a vocal minority -- the "elites" -- is threatening American values, and they should pipe down for the majority's sake. Elites include anti-war demonstrators and university professors ("It's well known that in the 1960s, leftists conquered the academies"). There is also no love lost between Ingraham and Europeans, who she believes fail to understand and appreciate America's love for "God, guns and the death penalty."
Ingraham's third book, Power to the People, was released on Sept. 11, 2007. The patriotic timing was deliberate; the book is partly memoir but is mostly devoted to annihilating what she calls the "pornification" of America, an increasing cultural tendency toward flaunted sexuality and the loss of traditional values. She calls the book "a rallying cry for common sense and good old-fashioned American ideals of patriotism, family, faith and country," one that encourages people to take matters into their own hands. In its first week, the book ranked third on the Amazon.com best-seller list.
"We are the government," Ingraham said in an interview promoting the book. Controlling people by telling them how to think for themselves is a nice piece of demagogic trickery, though hardly original among the conservative bloc that crowds talk radio today. Ingraham has proved to be a master at such trickery -- and like her or not, she's every bit as funny, as appealing and as dangerous as each of her male peers and friends.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 7, 2008 12:14 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LI is boring. Attempts to construe her as "funny" by the author are abysmal. Her points are rote from and right-wing or left-wing playbook: defeat the message by disparaging the messenger. Julius Caesar or any other politico could host her show, or many of air-so-called-america's, with a bent towards turning a dime.
Yawn.
Have a nice Saturday.
P.S. Is anyone really buying the book? Just curious as to whether folks are paying for opinions they could get out of the south end of a north-facing bovine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:She must be boring. Even the article about her was boring.
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Plugging for the book is nice.
Posted by: particle
» RE: Plugging for the book is nice.
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ericthefool on Jun 7, 2008 12:47 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LI does not deal with facts, she lives in High school where she thinks ad hominem attacks are the norm, where spin is not lying, and where honor is to the dollar.
LI is a traitor. There is no other word for her.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: carbon-based
» Welcome back troll boy
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: Welcome back troll boy
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: Welcome back troll boy
Posted by: Libsrule
» Troll to dumb poster....
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Troll to dumb poster....
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Earth to Whatever
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Troll to dumb poster....
Posted by: carbon-based
» "Jane Fonda was an entertainer as well" - as what?
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: "Jane Fonda was an entertainer as well" - as what?
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Welcome back troll boy
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: john mont
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: john mont
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: That explains a lot.
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carbon-based on Jun 7, 2008 3:50 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She doesnt raise the emotions ( positive or negative) like Ann Coulter which makes you want to watch her.
Seems the wave these days is shocking talk radio/TV. Whats up with Americans that everything has to be "reality" TV of shock the senses..what happened to accurate and calm debate!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No big deal
Posted by: Sissy
» Bingo!
Posted by: mainspark
» RE: No big deal
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: No big deal
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: No big deal Oh YES IT IS! You watch FAUX NOISE, it is certainly a Big Deal, TROLL!!!
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: No big deal Oh YES IT IS! You watch FAUX NOISE, it is certainly a Big Deal, TROLL!!!
Posted by: carbon-based
» Reality TV is 'real' for most Americans...
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: No big deal
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: No big deal
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: No big deal
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: No big deal
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: No big deal
Posted by: Longdream
» You made me spit my coffee...
Posted by: robbie.seal
» Doesn't matter what you want.
Posted by: robbie.seal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 7, 2008 3:53 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: john mont
» Old, wrinkled but MONIED men look *REALLY* good to a few women. . .GACK!
Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: The World's Oldest...
Posted by: bloominblacksheep
» RE: Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: weenie
» RE: Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: astockton
» RE: Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: brock_samson
» RE: Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: Longdream
Comments are closed-
Posted by: deb.dellapiana on Jun 7, 2008 4:05 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Laura, and the rest of them, would be okay if they could engage in a civil discussion. However, they aren't interested in civility. They are nasty and vicious. They do not care about hurting others. They think the ends justify the means, so it's okay to spread falsehoods about others.
And Laura's thought processes are, well, infantile at best. This is the woman who decided that Barack Obama wasn't ready for the big time because he wasn't wearing an American flag lapel pin.
George Bush, on the other hand, does. So, therefore, an ex-alcoholic party boy and, at best, AWOL fly boy who lies at will, starts illegal and unnecessary wars, didn't bother to serve but sends others' to die, is qualified to run this country because he wears an American flag lapel pin. That's her kind of twisted mentality.
Go away, Laura, and take Sean-boy, Savage, Imus, and Limbaugh with you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:AND HAVE PEOPLE THINK?
Posted by: davidg
» RE: AND HAVE PEOPLE THINK?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: AND HAVE PEOPLE THINK? You believe they have an ordinary thought process????
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: knight
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: john mont
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: LindaB
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: damian7
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: They're all the same, It's NOT A WAR IT's an ILLEGAL OCCUPATION & HUH? UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS!!!!!
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: They're all the same, people
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nonaste on Jun 7, 2008 4:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Compare her to Thom Hartman to see what I mean.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: what a shame
Posted by: 1voter
» RE: what a shame
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: what a shame - 1voter is a TROLL.
Posted by: Quannah
» It is Shocking
Posted by: Persephone8
» RE: It is Shocking
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: It is Shocking
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: It is Shocking
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: It is Shocking
Posted by: Persephone8
» RE: what a shame
Posted by: nonaste
» Yes!
Posted by: Persephone8
» RE: what a shame
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: 1voter
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: kick
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: spicegirl
» RE: Yes, there is.
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: mainspark
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Well hey there!
Posted by: Tom Degan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Elurby on Jun 7, 2008 4:48 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#######
Does Laura Ingraham - or Limbaugh or
Savage or Beck - break the rules for
sound logic in their opinions?
I'm reminded of iconic feminist Gloria
Steinem's response to ABC correspondent
John Stossel, after reporting on the
science of why boys and girls are born
unequal in certain behaviors, to which
report Steinem blurted out on NATIONAL
TV:
"Logic doesn't matter!"
Not one columnist/pundit picked up on
that astounding claim!, not even among
right-winger columnists/pundits, as
sound logic is the FOUNDATION of the
West's advancements so far beyond any
other civilization in world history--
the foundation of the scientific
method.
Well, she had summed up liberals'
liberalism--the entirety of the liberal,
Marxian, do-gooder mind infecting Western
civilization towards a very bad end:
"Logic doesn't matter!"
TO REITERATE:
That sums up the Left in politics, as IT
IS DRIVEN by EMOTION not REASON--and sums
up why leftists are so angered by reason-
driven conservatives on radio talk-shows.
#######
#######
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: aogfc
» RE: she's a step-an-fetch like Clarence Thomas and the rest.
Posted by: warble
» RE: she's a step-an-fetch like Clarence Thomas and the rest.
Posted by: bloominblacksheep
» RE: she's a step-an-fetch like Clarence Thomas and the rest.
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Elurby
» RE: Didn't Stossel also say that boys play with action figures instead of dolls?
Posted by: LindaB
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Tombo
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Laura Ingraham: projection
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Laura Ingraham:Sound Logic? Nothing Logical @ LI, SOURCES for Gloria Steinman, please....
Posted by: Turiye
» Yes. She does, and they do.
Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Buttface
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Elurby on Jun 7, 2008 5:37 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
=======
P.S.
Read my essay about
radio shockjock
Howard Stern:
How Humor Advances Evil in the West
http://shockjockhowardstern.blogspot.com/
=======
=======
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hey spammer.
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: Hey spammer.
Posted by: Elurby
» RE: Hey spammer.
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Shockjock Howard Stern is not (on the Left)
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Shockjock Howard Stern is not (on the Left)
Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Shockjock Howard Stern's Evil Use of Humor (on the Left)
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warble on Jun 7, 2008 5:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whenever I see her and her talk about her friends and her schools, I am glad that she has warned us about the enemies of America but I cringe. I see them as a bunch of terrorists doing more damage to this nation than any Osama Bin Laden could. While America crumbles under a war, economic collapse, global warming, a corrupt congress, labor failures etc. etc. etc. we only have LI and her ilk to thank. Bin Laden or Hitler or Stalin could never have pulled off this kind of destruction. Who could have damaged America more than G.W.Bush, Laura Ingram, Rush Limpbough,Hugh Hewitt and the rest of these savages? They have really messed up America more than any enemy could have. And these are supposed to be "god-bless-America" patriots.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They have destroyed America trying to sieze power
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Lauren:
Posted by: warble
Comments are closed-
Posted by: arclight7 on Jun 7, 2008 5:58 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I'm sure she reciprocates.
Posted by: Beck
» RE: She's hot.
Posted by: john mont
» RE: She's hot. You Are Not! COCHON!!!!!!@
Posted by: Turiye
» not all that hot, imo
Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Sorry, I Occasionally Read the National Enquirer
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Jun 7, 2008 6:40 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Johnny Tripp
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Wow! Please, are you 12? Go home kid, you bother me...
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: Wow!
Posted by: carbon-based
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelectnoone on Jun 7, 2008 8:28 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am always impressed to see someone of her wit and education succeed. I don't have to agree with her to admire her....but I find that in some cases I do agree.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I am a liberal, but....
Posted by: reelectnoone
» POST REPAIR ! Blog keeps chopping of post.
Posted by: reelectnoone
» RE: I am a liberal, but actually you aren't or how in the world would you know of her wit???
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: I am a liberal, but....
Posted by: carbon-based
» Until the "Fairness" Doctrine
Posted by: robbie.seal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Longdream on Jun 7, 2008 8:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
» RE: Bobby Decker AKA a rapist jerk
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goeswithness on Jun 7, 2008 8:57 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh, so tired of this
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Oh, so tired of this as we all are, there are MN's of us, these articles loose the GOP freaks on
Posted by: Turiye
» RE: Oh, so tired of this
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goeswithness on Jun 7, 2008 9:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this always strikes me as curious too: a man can have absolutely no respect for a woman and still want to put his body inside hers. For me, disliking somebody makes him absolutely unattractive to me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So interesting how guys...
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: So interesting how guys...
Posted by: yellow
» RE: So interesting how guys...
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: So interesting how guys...
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: So interesting how guys...
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: So interesting how guys...
Posted by: leafsong1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gwazdos on Jun 7, 2008 9:14 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goeswithness on Jun 7, 2008 9:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Well, honey, I'm not sure about your own logic
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: Well, honey, I'm not sure about your own logic
Posted by: Turiye
» The Female of the species is more 'deadlier' than the male..
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Well, honey, I'm not sure about your own logic
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zepher on Jun 7, 2008 10:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We still allow free speech in the United States, but I must draw the line at the profanity and racial slurs and character assassinations they perpetuate. Is the law of the airwaves applied equally or is it a selective matter??
Faces contorted with rage are scary and voices, like body language, are disgusting and hurt my ears. I never listen to Ingram for these reasons.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If You Listen to Hate Jocks, TV and watch Cspan
Posted by: Turiye
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zepher on Jun 7, 2008 10:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We still allow free speech in the United States, but I must draw the line at the profanity and racial slurs and character assassinations they perpetuate. Is the law of the airwaves applied equally or is it a selective matter??
Faces contorted with rage are scary and voices, like body language, are disgusting and hurt my ears. I never listen to Ingram for these reasons.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cllundgren on Jun 7, 2008 10:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Carl Lundgren
Chair, Bronx Greens
Green Party of New York State
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Irrelevance
Posted by: warble
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on Jun 7, 2008 11:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if she went to all those individuals and apologized to them at that later point? I wonder how their lives fared from then on? Possibly some benefited, but I imagine some were castigated and traumatized.
on Election Day 2006 Ingraham encouraged listeners to jam the phone line of a toll-free Democratic Party service for reporting voting problems.
If that's not a felony, it comes very close to one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another R-winger, out for herself
Posted by: Turiye
» The phone thing isn't...
Posted by: robbie.seal
Comments are closed-
» RE: In a word
Posted by: gendershaman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 7, 2008 12:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of us here realizes that Ingraham and her compatriots of the media are nothing more than actors reading lines? You really believe that every issue or argument can be rationally reduced to just two - "liberal" and "conservative" points of view? There is a political "liberal" or "conservative" way to answer questions of physics, math, chemistry or the like. To determine the effectiveness of military tactics? Economics? Education?
Well, come to think of it, now that I recall things like global warming, I can also guess what the answer is.
As I said, all that's here for some people is sociology - of little the league and Pop Warner.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Global Warming -v- Idiotic Politicians ...
Posted by: Cathyc
» Global Warming & Idiotic Politicians ...
Posted by: robbie.seal
» RE: Seventy-Two, eh?
Posted by: Longdream
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Buttface on Jun 7, 2008 2:23 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
negative and hostile ad hominem ridicule with
about as much intellectual substance as
schoolyard name calling fits.
Ridicule and derisive laughter will have to
suffice when you have no rational rebuttals.
She's a bore.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeanne on Jun 7, 2008 4:25 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who?
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Jun 7, 2008 7:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romans1 on Jun 7, 2008 7:19 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fascinating
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Fascinating that YOU ARE A TROLLLLLLLL
Posted by: Turiye
» Wow!!!
Posted by: robbie.seal
» RE: Fascinating that YOU ARE A TROLLLLLLLL
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Fascinating
Posted by: carbon-based
» If they did...
Posted by: robbie.seal
Comments are closed-
» RE: What is she?
Posted by: Turiye
» What's that?
Posted by: robbie.seal
» RE: What's that?
Posted by: Bibsisis
» And you are?
Posted by: robbie.seal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jun 7, 2008 7:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Marcus Aurelius said, "The best revenge is not to be like them."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Best Weapon
Posted by: Bibsisis
» If they could have...
Posted by: robbie.seal
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: spaghetti happens on Jun 8, 2008 6:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Persephone8 on Jun 8, 2008 7:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can see that the intent and structure of what is happening in American media is almost identical.
It is REALLY important that we understand that this is WAY beyond Democrat- Republican or Liberal and Conservative. Almost ALL
members of the Congress and Senate vote the same way.
Congressionalrecord.org
www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/
a_three_sections_with_teasers/votes.htm/votes.htm
Globalism and Globalization are taking the place Stalinist and
Nazi totalitarianism.
The media is owned. Their agenda is united. Media black outs,
disinformation fear, lies are the basis of FOX news, CSPAN
CNN and corporate owned media.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_propaganda
www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwtwo/
nazi_propaganda_gallery.shtml
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3686/is_199904/ai_n8828623
www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread162778/pg1
If you read this information- you will totally get what has been and
is happening in this country !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:What is happening is Laura Ingram
Posted by: warble
» Laura Ingraham is part of a bigger agenda
Posted by: Persephone8
» Worse Than Fascists: Christian Political Group...
Posted by: Persephone8
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgoalierob on Jun 8, 2008 7:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Miller and her team are ACTUALLY funny.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» ...but I could!
Posted by: hurricane hugo
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sofla100 on Jun 8, 2008 8:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Democritus on Jun 8, 2008 3:03 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Turiye on Jun 8, 2008 11:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robbie.seal on Jun 9, 2008 12:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will check out some of the things the author says LI did, like the Dartmouth thing. I had not heard that. Shameful if its true.
Ever listen to the shows on the other side of the isle? My wife thinks I'm crazy when I do. I figure if you listen to both sides, you might find the truth in the middle... Maybe I am crazy...
Lefties hate LI, and Limbaugh and Hannity and Fox News, but they miss a big point... They are getting ratings. So much so, that CNN has changed the way it does business, and is now doing better in the ratings. I saw a couple of posts saying how "obsolete" or worthless talk radio shows are. They are getting the ratings. Are you going to sit there and say, "Its because the mass is made up of idiots."? May be true, but how elitist of you...
This book is nothing different than the "100 People Ruining America" or "Shut Up and Sing" books. Take the time to tune to the other side of the isle and listen to what they are saying. If nothing more than to get your blood boiling or give you a laugh. Then decide why these folks are getting the ratings.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I looked up two of the Accusations.
Posted by: robbie.seal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 10, 2008 6:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FLNonny on Jun 10, 2008 2:59 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One if by land and two if by cyberspace!! The Trolls are coming!! The Trolls are coming!!
Posted by: yellow
» Please do not try to neoconfuse me
Posted by: robbie.seal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pangea on Jun 12, 2008 6:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Folks, let us not respond to articles about LI or Fox
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RandomX on Jun 12, 2008 7:13 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On another Note The SO CALLED "Fairness Doctrine" will never Pass Constitutional muster IF and I am sure WHEN this LAME attempt to shut up and Limit the rights of Americans and what they want to listen to The talk Hosts have Audiences cause Conservatives Love them And Libs love to Whine about them (Wanna lil CHEESE with that LOL) anyways thats it untill I see something else worth layin the Smack down about
Phil
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Erick Erickson Is the New CNN Go-to Bigot, Misogynist and Homophobe
Let's Drop the Good Guys vs. Bad Guys Talk, We Need to Grow Up as a Species
Racist Right-Wing Shock Jock Who Threatened the Lives of Judges Beats Jail Rap for Second Time




