MEDIA AND CULTURE  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 217

Laura Ingraham: Right-Wing Radio's High Priestess of Hate

Shock radio host Ingraham is a master of sounding funny and appealing while dishing out the same hate speech as Sean Hannity.
June 7, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
The following is an excerpt from Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio by Rory O'Connor with Aaron Cutler (AlterNet Books, 2008).

Laura Ingraham is ... different. Not only is Ingraham younger than many other conservative radio personalities (at 45, she's more than a decade from Limbaugh's cohort), and the only female among them, but she also brings to the airwaves a snarky brand of aggressive humor fused with an attack-dog sensibility that she expresses with a chalk-on-gravel voice. Her goal is not to assert her own glory, but to rip apart her enemies, which include everyone from liberals and "elites" to, from time to time, even President George W. Bush and presidential hopeful John McCain. Her style of argumentation is bare-bones simple; in a 1997 piece for Salon.com, Eric Alterman wrote that Ingraham just laughed in response to a position he took on television during the 1996 election. How could he counter that?

Ingraham often uses laughter as a weapon. One of her show's most popular parodies, "But ... Monkey," interposes the sound of a screeching monkey over a sound bite from a political figure. Victims have included Democratic senators Harry Reid and Barbara Boxer as well as conservative gurus like columnist Charles Krauthammer. Other regular segments include "Deep Thought of the Day" and "Lie of the Day." Ingraham also makes great use of pop culture clips (she plays the theme song from the television show "Flipper" when discussing John Kerry), and her production values are generally superb. Like many other successful hosts, she is often very funny, and her rapid-fire pacing and easy banter with her younger male producers (all three are in their early 20s) has more in common with the liberal "Stephanie Miller Show" than the hard-line commentary sometimes heard on conservative talk shows. At a deeper level, however, despite the comedy, Ingraham takes what she does quite seriously.

The rabid nature of her assault against immigration reform is a good example. Ingraham has perhaps been more strongly anti-immigration than any other talk personality except Michael Savage. Her show even features a regular segment called "The Illegal Immigration Sob Story" alert, in which she reads news pieces she feels are biased toward illegal immigrants. When she had White House spokesman Tony Snow on her program, she began by asking him why the Bush administration was dragging its heels on immigration reform. After sarcastically apologizing for interrupting his talking points, she said, "69 percent of Americans, 85 percent of the GOP, 55 percent of the Democrats want the border enforced. Does that affect you guys, or do you guys just blow it off?"

In the two-for-one combination that all too often serves conservative radio well, Ingraham once claimed that the immigration bill was an attempt by the mainstream media to make more people liberals. Anyone who still wonders whether talk radio had an influence on the bill's defeat should look at Ingraham's numbers; with more than 5 million weekly listeners, she is tied with Glenn Beck as the fourth most listened to radio talk show host in America. Alterman wrote that Ingraham's popularity is due to her having "something more important than knowledge or experience. ... She has star quality." She is also fearless: She once confronted CNN host John Roberts for calling her "outspoken," saying, "Do you guys introduce liberal commentators that way?"

She's more aggressive than Limbaugh, more blatant than Hannity, and more rational than Beck or Savage, and although she often supports many of them (erroneously stating, for example, that Limbaugh never claimed the Clintons murdered Vince Foster), she is equally willing to call them out. She walked out of a "Hannity & Colmes" installment after the Don Imus "nappy-headed ho's" controversy was twisted into a discussion of Democratic vices, and once asked on her radio program after an appearance on "The O'Reilly Factor," "Why is Bill O'Reilly afraid of George Soros?" (In the same broadcast, Ingraham accused columnist Helen Thomas of working for Hezbollah, which has been identified by the U.S. government as a terrorist group.)

Ingraham was born and raised among the wealthy in Glastonbury, Conn., one of the state's richest suburbs, although her mother worked as a maid to support the family. She went to Dartmouth University and became the first female editor of the conservative Dartmouth Review, where conservative author Dinesh D'Souza, a former boyfriend, also worked. While there, she secretly sent a reporter with a tape recorder to a campus gay students association meeting; she then outed the students in print and sent tapes of the meetings to the students' parents. In the magazine she called association members "cheerleaders for latent campus sodomites." (In 1997, more than a decade later, she wrote an article in the Washington Post detailing how she had changed her views in light of her brother Curtis' coming out as gay.)

After graduating from Dartmouth, she went to work for the White House as a speechwriter; like her peers, conservative radio talkers Mark Levin and Hugh Hewitt, Ingraham began her professional career as a Reagan employee. She also obtained a law degree from the University of Virginia and clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas. In 1995 she appeared on the cover of the New York Times Magazine -- wearing a friend's hip, leopard-print miniskirt -- to illustrate an article about rising young conservatives. She then became both a regular MSNBC pundit and a commentator on the "CBS Evening News," where she once asked Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres if the United States should bomb Libya or Syria in retaliation for a TWA flight explosion whose cause was unknown. Ingraham argues politics the way lawyers argue cases, as if there can be no possible interpretation other than her own. She is a class-A schmoozer who understands and exploits her verbal gifts to the fullest. Her skill for networking, along with her willingness to go for the jugular, has allowed her to break into the boys' club of conservative radio.

In the late 1990s, she briefly hosted her own MSNBC cable television show, "Watch It!" (17 months and three time slots later, she joked that it should have been called "Watch It Get Canceled!"), and then, in 2001, launched "The Laura Ingraham Show" on radio. Ingraham's particular blend of humor and argument apparently translated more effectively on radio than on television, and the Talk Radio Network now syndicates her show on nearly 325 terrestrial stations (it's also available on Sirius and XM satellite radio). She has survived both a breast cancer scare and a broken wedding engagement, and continues to mock the establishment sardonically for three hours daily.

Ingraham has made more than her share of controversial comments, with frequent guest appearances on television affording her as much prominence as her radio work (for someone whose own television show was relatively short-lived, she spends a tremendous amount of time on other people's programs). She's no Neal Boortz, but she's certainly more outrageous than, say, Hugh Hewitt. In one of her most famous incidents, on Election Day 2006 Ingraham encouraged listeners to jam the phone line of a toll-free Democratic Party service for reporting voting problems. No tangible consequences came of it (the Democrats won anyway), but it did put Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy up in arms.

Perhaps the greatest controversy of Ingraham's career, however, came from comments she made about the Iraq War. In March of 2006, Ingraham went on a six-day tour of Iraq, visiting hospitals, orphanages and Iraqi villages. Upon returning to the United States, she appeared on NBC's "Today Show" to criticize the mainstream American media for its unwillingness to report "the truth" of the Iraq situation. She said that NBC had focused on programming "Where in the World is Matt Lauer?" and that "to do a show from Iraq means to talk to the Iraqi military, to go out with the Iraqi military, to actually have a conversation with the people instead of reporting from hotel balconies about the latest IEDs going off."

Washington Post writer Jonathan Finer later reported that Ingraham "rarely, if ever, spent a moment outside the protection of U.S. forces or a night outside a military base." Finer compared her experience with that of the Iraq-stationed journalists she criticized, "almost all of whom operate without military protection." While the National Review's Tim Graham applauded Ingraham for bringing out the "facts the media self-defense teams ignore," MSNBC host Keith Olbermann said on his show "Countdown" that Ingraham had dishonored the memory of the 80 American journalists killed and others kidnapped in Iraq, and that her comment "was not only unforgivable of her, it was desperate and it was stupid."

Ingraham's stance on women's issues is divided at best; around the time of Clarence Thomas' Supreme Court appointment, she joined with a conservative group called Independent Women's Forum that formed a committee to attack and discredit Anita Hill's sexual harassment testimony against Thomas. (Independent Women's Forum's other activities included testifying in Congress for defunding the Violence Against Women Act and against affirmative action.) While she has criticized Fox for gratuitous, sexually explicit programming and helped lead a media campaign against the misogynistic rapper Akon, she also co-hosted a three-part PBS special on "the gender wars," which explored "whether the advancement of women in virtually all areas of society can be achieved without a retreat, in some way, on the part of men." One need not guess where Ingraham, a convert to Roman Catholicism, stands on a woman's right to choose.

Among prominent female political figures, Hillary Clinton in particular provokes Ingraham's ire. Her first book, The Hillary Trap, tried hard to make the case that Clinton was actually setting women's rights back by arguing for special status for them. "The complaints of Western feminists look like petty self-absorption when you line them up against human rights abuses in Third World military dictatorships," Ingraham wrote.

Ingraham also argues that a vocal minority -- the "elites" -- is threatening American values, and they should pipe down for the majority's sake. Elites include anti-war demonstrators and university professors ("It's well known that in the 1960s, leftists conquered the academies"). There is also no love lost between Ingraham and Europeans, who she believes fail to understand and appreciate America's love for "God, guns and the death penalty."

Ingraham's third book, Power to the People, was released on Sept. 11, 2007. The patriotic timing was deliberate; the book is partly memoir but is mostly devoted to annihilating what she calls the "pornification" of America, an increasing cultural tendency toward flaunted sexuality and the loss of traditional values. She calls the book "a rallying cry for common sense and good old-fashioned American ideals of patriotism, family, faith and country," one that encourages people to take matters into their own hands. In its first week, the book ranked third on the Amazon.com best-seller list.

"We are the government," Ingraham said in an interview promoting the book. Controlling people by telling them how to think for themselves is a nice piece of demagogic trickery, though hardly original among the conservative bloc that crowds talk radio today. Ingraham has proved to be a master at such trickery -- and like her or not, she's every bit as funny, as appealing and as dangerous as each of her male peers and friends.
submit to reddit
Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor is the author of Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio by Rory O'Connor with Aaron Cutler (AlterNet Books, 2008). O'Connor also writes the Media Is a Plural blog.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: shock jocks, laura ingraham
 
Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Plugging for the book is nice.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 7, 2008 12:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder where reality begins, and the hard line of profit ends? Not that profit is a bad thing, unless you allow it cloud your judgment to the point of being...at best...laughable.

LI is boring. Attempts to construe her as "funny" by the author are abysmal. Her points are rote from and right-wing or left-wing playbook: defeat the message by disparaging the messenger. Julius Caesar or any other politico could host her show, or many of air-so-called-america's, with a bent towards turning a dime.

Yawn.

Have a nice Saturday.

P.S. Is anyone really buying the book? Just curious as to whether folks are paying for opinions they could get out of the south end of a north-facing bovine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

LI filth
Posted by: ericthefool on Jun 7, 2008 12:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LI is trash. I get to listen to her first thing in the morning. She reads the same, boring Neo-con talking points, ad hominem filth, and down right lies and perpetuates it through American airwaves.

LI does not deal with facts, she lives in High school where she thinks ad hominem attacks are the norm, where spin is not lying, and where honor is to the dollar.

LI is a traitor. There is no other word for her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LI filth Posted by: carbon-based
» Welcome back troll boy Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: Welcome back troll boy Posted by: Turiye
» RE: Welcome back troll boy Posted by: Libsrule
» Troll to dumb poster.... Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Troll to dumb poster.... Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Earth to Whatever Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Troll to dumb poster.... Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Welcome back troll boy Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth Posted by: john mont
» RE: LI filth Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth Posted by: john mont
» RE: LI filth Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth Posted by: Turiye
» RE: LI filth Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: LI filth Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: That explains a lot. Posted by: Longdream
» RE: LI filth Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: LI filth Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: LI filth Posted by: Bibsisis

Comments are closed-

No big deal
Posted by: carbon-based on Jun 7, 2008 3:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watch her from time to time when shes filling in for someone on Fox.. I dont really get her appeal.. Shes as boring as Olbermann and make about as much sense!

She doesnt raise the emotions ( positive or negative) like Ann Coulter which makes you want to watch her.

Seems the wave these days is shocking talk radio/TV. Whats up with Americans that everything has to be "reality" TV of shock the senses..what happened to accurate and calm debate!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No big deal Posted by: Sissy
» Bingo! Posted by: mainspark
» RE: No big deal Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: No big deal Posted by: Longdream
» RE: No big deal Posted by: Quannah
» RE: No big deal Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: No big deal Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: No big deal Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: No big deal Posted by: Longdream
» You made me spit my coffee... Posted by: robbie.seal
» Doesn't matter what you want. Posted by: robbie.seal

Comments are closed-

Laura was a face in the misty light
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 7, 2008 3:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember the very first time I saw Laura Ingraham om MSNBC almost ten years ago. I thought she was the most beautiful woman I had ever seen in my life. I have never been one to fall in love at first sight but I could not help myself. For seven, maybe eight whole seconds, I was hoplessly, head over heels in love - then she opened her mouth....

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The World's Oldest... Posted by: bloominblacksheep

Comments are closed-

They're all the same, people
Posted by: deb.dellapiana on Jun 7, 2008 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Laura Ingraham may sound good, but that's about where her credibility ends. Like Sean Hannity, Michael Savage and the rest of them, she doesn't deal entirely in facts. She likes to whip people into a frenzy.

Laura, and the rest of them, would be okay if they could engage in a civil discussion. However, they aren't interested in civility. They are nasty and vicious. They do not care about hurting others. They think the ends justify the means, so it's okay to spread falsehoods about others.

And Laura's thought processes are, well, infantile at best. This is the woman who decided that Barack Obama wasn't ready for the big time because he wasn't wearing an American flag lapel pin.

George Bush, on the other hand, does. So, therefore, an ex-alcoholic party boy and, at best, AWOL fly boy who lies at will, starts illegal and unnecessary wars, didn't bother to serve but sends others' to die, is qualified to run this country because he wears an American flag lapel pin. That's her kind of twisted mentality.

Go away, Laura, and take Sean-boy, Savage, Imus, and Limbaugh with you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:AND HAVE PEOPLE THINK? Posted by: davidg
» RE: AND HAVE PEOPLE THINK? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: They're all the same, people Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: They're all the same, people Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: They're all the same, people Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: They're all the same, people Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: They're all the same, people Posted by: Walks-in-Storms

Comments are closed-

what a shame
Posted by: nonaste on Jun 7, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's tragic to be born with the tremendous gift of intelligence and use it to become wealthy being one, evil witch. What a waste of talent.

Compare her to Thom Hartman to see what I mean.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what a shame Posted by: 1voter
» RE: what a shame Posted by: Lauren
» It is Shocking Posted by: Persephone8
» RE: It is Shocking Posted by: Lauren
» RE: It is Shocking Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: It is Shocking Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: It is Shocking Posted by: Persephone8
» RE: what a shame Posted by: nonaste
» Yes! Posted by: Persephone8
» RE: what a shame Posted by: Bibsisis

Comments are closed-

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: Yes, there is. Posted by: Longdream
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: INGRAHAM IS A FUCKING GOP WHORE Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Well hey there! Posted by: Tom Degan

Comments are closed-

Laura Ingraham: Does She Break Rules for Sound Logic?
Posted by: Elurby on Jun 7, 2008 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#######
#######

Does Laura Ingraham - or Limbaugh or
Savage or Beck - break the rules for
sound logic in their opinions?

I'm reminded of iconic feminist Gloria
Steinem's response to ABC correspondent
John Stossel, after reporting on the
science of why boys and girls are born
unequal in certain behaviors, to which
report Steinem blurted out on NATIONAL
TV:

"Logic doesn't matter!"

Not one columnist/pundit picked up on
that astounding claim!, not even among
right-winger columnists/pundits, as
sound logic is the FOUNDATION of the
West's advancements so far beyond any
other civilization in world history--
the foundation of the scientific
method.

Well, she had summed up liberals'
liberalism--the entirety of the liberal,
Marxian, do-gooder mind infecting Western
civilization towards a very bad end:

"Logic doesn't matter!"

TO REITERATE:

That sums up the Left in politics, as IT
IS DRIVEN by EMOTION not REASON--and sums
up why leftists are so angered by reason-
driven conservatives on radio talk-shows.

#######
#######

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes. She does, and they do. Posted by: KeepsonTickn

Comments are closed-

Shockjock Howard Stern's Evil Use of Humor (on the Left)
Posted by: Elurby on Jun 7, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
=======
=======


P.S.

Read my essay about
radio shockjock
Howard Stern:

How Humor Advances Evil in the West
http://shockjockhowardstern.blogspot.com/


=======
=======

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey spammer. Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: Hey spammer. Posted by: Elurby
» RE: Hey spammer. Posted by: helenwheels

Comments are closed-

They have destroyed America trying to sieze power
Posted by: warble on Jun 7, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Laura Ingram and her terrorist buddies from the President on Down have screwed America.

Whenever I see her and her talk about her friends and her schools, I am glad that she has warned us about the enemies of America but I cringe. I see them as a bunch of terrorists doing more damage to this nation than any Osama Bin Laden could. While America crumbles under a war, economic collapse, global warming, a corrupt congress, labor failures etc. etc. etc. we only have LI and her ilk to thank. Bin Laden or Hitler or Stalin could never have pulled off this kind of destruction. Who could have damaged America more than G.W.Bush, Laura Ingram, Rush Limpbough,Hugh Hewitt and the rest of these savages? They have really messed up America more than any enemy could have. And these are supposed to be "god-bless-America" patriots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lauren: Posted by: warble

Comments are closed-

She's hot.
Posted by: arclight7 on Jun 7, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've got a chubber for her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: She's hot. Posted by: john mont
» not all that hot, imo Posted by: hurricane hugo

Comments are closed-

Wow!
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Jun 7, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She is hot (or at least the chick used in the picture is). Holy smokes man!

Johnny Tripp
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wow! Posted by: carbon-based

Comments are closed-

I am a liberal, but....
Posted by: reelectnoone on Jun 7, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone has opinions and she is no different. She does have a stage with a conservative audience who pay ( by buying advertisers products ) to hear someone confirm their own opinions. The great thing about America, if the conservatives don't ban it as "anti-American" is the right to free speech. Liberals have their own talking heads. Each talks to their own choir.

I am always impressed to see someone of her wit and education succeed. I don't have to agree with her to admire her....but I find that in some cases I do agree.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I am a liberal, but.... Posted by: reelectnoone
» RE: I am a liberal, but.... Posted by: carbon-based
» Until the "Fairness" Doctrine Posted by: robbie.seal

Comments are closed-

Let's see where Laura and her herd end up
Posted by: Longdream on Jun 7, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when ClearChannel, i.e. Murdoch, no longer owns every radio station on earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.

Comments are closed-

Oh, so tired of this
Posted by: goeswithness on Jun 7, 2008 8:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess I'm just old-fashioned enough to think political discourse should be based on drawing reasonable conclusions from facts, and that if people really had confidence in what they say they believed, they wouldn't have to resort to lies and insults to support it. Am I the only one left?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, so tired of this Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Oh, so tired of this Posted by: Bibsisis

Comments are closed-

So interesting how guys...
Posted by: goeswithness on Jun 7, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of talking about the point of the article, think it's important to announce the irrelevant fact that they find her desirable. Who cares? Are you afraid that somebody might think you're not heterosexual if you don't say so, or is it true that nothing is relevant about a woman except what she looks like? Just wondering. I personally would love to be the meat in a Jon Stewart-Stephen Colbert sandwich, but normally I don't find it relevant for an Alternet discussion.

And this always strikes me as curious too: a man can have absolutely no respect for a woman and still want to put his body inside hers. For me, disliking somebody makes him absolutely unattractive to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So interesting how guys... Posted by: Longdream
» RE: So interesting how guys... Posted by: leafsong1

Comments are closed-

Laura Ingram
Posted by: Gwazdos on Jun 7, 2008 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just want to inform you all that LI is the Daughter of Russ Limballs, her Uncle is Pat Bushanan, same family, same mental sickness!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Well, honey, I'm not sure about your own logic
Posted by: goeswithness on Jun 7, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You draw wide conclusions from just one comment, whose context isn't fully explained. I didn't see this Gloria Steinem/John Stossel thing, but I would wonder how well proven John Stossel's original statement was in the first place. I would say that logic DOESN'T matter, if the point your starting from is a flawed in the first place. If his argument is that men and women are different because male and female babies are different, then he'd better be able to prove they are different in ways that are significant, and in ways that carry on into later life, and that the reasons for those differences are biological rather than because male and female babies are treated differently from birth. See, logic introduces MORE possibilities, not fewer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

If You Listen to Hate Jocks
Posted by: zepher on Jun 7, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you can. Try not to buy into it, though. They are spinning pablum (baby food) and that's about it. I m still forming an opinion of the Air America crowd. Some jocks on it seem to be truthful, but slowly and surely the really honest ones are leaving (Rhodes, Seder for example).

We still allow free speech in the United States, but I must draw the line at the profanity and racial slurs and character assassinations they perpetuate. Is the law of the airwaves applied equally or is it a selective matter??

Faces contorted with rage are scary and voices, like body language, are disgusting and hurt my ears. I never listen to Ingram for these reasons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

If You Listen to Hate Jocks
Posted by: zepher on Jun 7, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you can. Try not to buy into it, though. They are spinning pablum (baby food) and that's about it. I m still forming an opinion of the Air America crowd. Some jocks on it seem to be truthful, but slowly and surely the really honest ones are leaving (Rhodes, Seder for example).

We still allow free speech in the United States, but I must draw the line at the profanity and racial slurs and character assassinations they perpetuate. Is the law of the airwaves applied equally or is it a selective matter??

Faces contorted with rage are scary and voices, like body language, are disgusting and hurt my ears. I never listen to Ingram for these reasons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Irrelevance
Posted by: cllundgren on Jun 7, 2008 10:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does anybody even waste their time on things as irrelevant as radio personalities? This isn't news, information or opinion. It's entertainment..and questionable entertainment at that. In the larger scheme of things, it's a diversion (as is all corporate media) to keep us from thinking about an acting upon the real issues that are destroying our society. If you're wasting your time arguing the merits of the likes of these people, you're taking away time on constructive activities, just as the corporate rulers have planned. I'm disappointed with myself for even addressing this. I could have been organizing some other activity.
Carl Lundgren
Chair, Bronx Greens
Green Party of New York State

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Irrelevance Posted by: warble

Comments are closed-

Another R-winger, out for herself
Posted by: YogiBear on Jun 7, 2008 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
she secretly sent a reporter with a tape recorder to a campus gay students association meeting; she then outed the students in print and sent tapes of the meetings to the students' parents....In 1997, more than a decade later, she wrote an article in the Washington Post detailing how she had changed her views in light of her brother Curtis' coming out as gay

I wonder if she went to all those individuals and apologized to them at that later point? I wonder how their lives fared from then on? Possibly some benefited, but I imagine some were castigated and traumatized.

on Election Day 2006 Ingraham encouraged listeners to jam the phone line of a toll-free Democratic Party service for reporting voting problems.

If that's not a felony, it comes very close to one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The phone thing isn't... Posted by: robbie.seal

Comments are closed-

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: In a word Posted by: gendershaman

Comments are closed-

Get to be seventy-two . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 7, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get to be seventy-two years of age, listen to the news media including the benighted like Ingraham from ten or so, read articles like this and comment like that here, and you finally do it all just as a study of people - sociology for laughs. It's like watching little kids play baseball, football, or basketball.

None of us here realizes that Ingraham and her compatriots of the media are nothing more than actors reading lines? You really believe that every issue or argument can be rationally reduced to just two - "liberal" and "conservative" points of view? There is a political "liberal" or "conservative" way to answer questions of physics, math, chemistry or the like. To determine the effectiveness of military tactics? Economics? Education?

Well, come to think of it, now that I recall things like global warming, I can also guess what the answer is.

As I said, all that's here for some people is sociology - of little the league and Pop Warner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Seventy-Two, eh? Posted by: Longdream

Comments are closed-

Is Laura Ingraham funny?
Posted by: Buttface on Jun 7, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All that Laura Ingraham ever engages in is
negative and hostile ad hominem ridicule with
about as much intellectual substance as
schoolyard name calling fits.

Ridicule and derisive laughter will have to
suffice when you have no rational rebuttals.

She's a bore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Who?
Posted by: Jeanne on Jun 7, 2008 4:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Much as I've heard the name Lindsay Lohan, or Amy Winehouse, I've heard the name Laura Ingraham. But I don't know, or care, who she is, what she does, or, what she thinks. And, I'll thank you not to enlighten me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who? Posted by: Dboy

Comments are closed-

can you say "scum-bucket"??...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Jun 7, 2008 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
n/s...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Fascinating
Posted by: Romans1 on Jun 7, 2008 7:19 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The comments I have read on this story and others are filled with such hate and vitriol, much worse than anything I've heard from Laura Ingraham. I must ask. Do you guys ever listen to yourselves?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fascinating Posted by: Bibsisis
» Wow!!! Posted by: robbie.seal
» RE: Fascinating Posted by: carbon-based
» If they did... Posted by: robbie.seal

Comments are closed-

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: What is she? Posted by: Turiye
» What's that? Posted by: robbie.seal
» RE: What's that? Posted by: Bibsisis
» And you are? Posted by: robbie.seal

Comments are closed-

The Best Weapon
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jun 7, 2008 7:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The best weapon against these louche conservative blowhards is that to which they are fatally allergic: truth. Had Gore defended himself against the "invented the internet" slur, and Kerry against the Swift Boaters, they would have won by clear enough margins to assure their accession. Both of them should have provided a clear, factual, unbiased account of their records and Bush's. I think Obama will do this with McCain and win the election despite the best efforts of these professional liars.

As Marcus Aurelius said, "The best revenge is not to be like them."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Best Weapon Posted by: Bibsisis
» If they could have... Posted by: robbie.seal

Comments are closed-

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.

Comments are closed-

Pot, Meet Kettle
Posted by: spaghetti happens on Jun 8, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where does a person like Laura Ingraham, an Ivy League graduate and former law clerk for a Supreme Court justice, get off whining about the problem of "elites" in this country? Ironic, indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Nazi and Stalinist Propaganda
Posted by: Persephone8 on Jun 8, 2008 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here are some links to info on Nazi and Stalinist propaganda.

You can see that the intent and structure of what is happening in American media is almost identical.
It is REALLY important that we understand that this is WAY beyond Democrat- Republican or Liberal and Conservative. Almost ALL
members of the Congress and Senate vote the same way.

Congressionalrecord.org

www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/
a_three_sections_with_teasers/votes.htm/votes.htm

Globalism and Globalization are taking the place Stalinist and
Nazi totalitarianism.
The media is owned. Their agenda is united. Media black outs,
disinformation fear, lies are the basis of FOX news, CSPAN
CNN and corporate owned media.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_propaganda

www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwtwo/
nazi_propaganda_gallery.shtml

findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3686/is_199904/ai_n8828623

www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread162778/pg1


If you read this information- you will totally get what has been and
is happening in this country !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

She Couldn't Hold Stephanie Miller's Thong
Posted by: rgoalierob on Jun 8, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LI just regurgitates Neocon propaganda.
Miller and her team are ACTUALLY funny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ...but I could! Posted by: hurricane hugo

Comments are closed-

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.

Comments are closed-

It's All About Entertainment and Spectacle
Posted by: sofla100 on Jun 8, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ingraham is all about entertainment and spectacle. Like Limbaugh and the rest of them, this is really where most of her popularity comes from. Of course, she does the usual "working man pandering," just like Limbaugh. You know, for her the "elite" is "the college professors and anti-war protestors." As if this is a population that really has great power or authority in America. You will never see her attacking her sponsors and the hand that feeds her, the real elite in America. The top 1% of Americans that owns 1/2 of America's wealth. That would be verbotim. Instead, she is a testament to pure entertainment, spectacle, and twisted facts to give her that "ordinary man" appeal. An appeal to fools, but it sells. Does she even believe what she is saying? It doesn't matter, it's ratings that count!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Not a nice person
Posted by: Democritus on Jun 8, 2008 3:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that use of the "C" word is deplorable, but if ever it was applicable it applies to Laura Ingraham.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

9 June 2008 @ 2:15 am EST Take this egregious example of women off NOW, Please....
Posted by: Turiye on Jun 8, 2008 11:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
N/F/E

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Same Left or Right
Posted by: robbie.seal on Jun 9, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Say what you will. The voices we hear on either side of the isle do what they can to get ratings.

I will check out some of the things the author says LI did, like the Dartmouth thing. I had not heard that. Shameful if its true.

Ever listen to the shows on the other side of the isle? My wife thinks I'm crazy when I do. I figure if you listen to both sides, you might find the truth in the middle... Maybe I am crazy...

Lefties hate LI, and Limbaugh and Hannity and Fox News, but they miss a big point... They are getting ratings. So much so, that CNN has changed the way it does business, and is now doing better in the ratings. I saw a couple of posts saying how "obsolete" or worthless talk radio shows are. They are getting the ratings. Are you going to sit there and say, "Its because the mass is made up of idiots."? May be true, but how elitist of you...

This book is nothing different than the "100 People Ruining America" or "Shut Up and Sing" books. Take the time to tune to the other side of the isle and listen to what they are saying. If nothing more than to get your blood boiling or give you a laugh. Then decide why these folks are getting the ratings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What is she thinking
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 10, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Controlling people by telling them how to think for themselves is a nice piece of demagogic trickery, that truly started with Ronald Reagan and has been perfected (unfortunately) with this Mis-Administration and their friends. This woman is truly a throw-back to humanity along with all of her talking head friends. While prostituting themselves trying to convince everyone that the emperor does have clothes on they sound like idiots, distorting the facts, lying to justify why the position they are espousing is really right, maybe instead they should really look (without the rose colored glasses) at what is happening to the people because of these policies they keep justifying. Why these people who keep trying to run-away from themselves (due unhappy childhoods) should get their talk on in therapy sessions. Their vitriolic hate of immigrants (their parents came from where?), is an abomination to real humanity. Maybe she should really follow those teachings "to judge no one lest ye be judged" or what about "love thy neighbor" or even "who ever among you is without sin, cast that stone". Maybe if more of those who claim to follow religious teachings would actually put them to work in their lives, this just might be a better world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Funny Liberals
Posted by: FLNonny on Jun 10, 2008 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You guys and this site are too funny. Why not just name it the far left freaky site or the pro-socialist Obama site; that would be appropriate:) As someone who marched with N.O.W. for a decade and was possbily more liberal than many of you, I find it humerous (but pathetic) that so many who supposedly champion free speech, diversity, tolerance and inclusion label conservative talk radio "hate speech" and want it off the air. So much for free speech and tolerance:) I don't listen to Rush or Hannity or Savage or O'Reilly, although once in awhile I read an article on them and learn what the liberal network news (and most newspapers) won't report. That's WHY conservatives go to talk radio; NBC (Obama headquarters), CBS (home of Dan Rather dishonest types) and CNN (yes, called the "Communist News Network" by many conservatives and rightfully so) have been campaigning for liberals every election year; however, they have gone ALL out for Obama this year (covering his faux pas, protecting him, not reporting stories that are honest and make him look bad, etc). I LOVE Laura. I listen to her daily. She's HONEST. She's bright, independent and feminists (especially) should adore her for those qualities (even if she doesn't support killing growing babies for convenience:). She slams Bush and Republicans when she thinks they are wrong; try finding THAT on liberal talk radio (does it even exist?). Many of the things people credit her with ("hate") she says jokingly, although there's usually some truth to her comments and rightfully so. She exposes lousy politicians. lousy govt policy and hypocritical liberals and conservatives. What more could (SHOULD) anyone want? I left the Democratic party after I took the "victim" label from my forehead and saw the TRUTH...all the studies show that conservatives (especially Christians) are giving more in time and money to worthy causes; we're feeding the poor, clothing them, finding them job training and jobs (etc) while liberals want government to care for them EVEN WHEN they have made horrible personal choices throughout life. You think the war is costing us greatly, try handing over the oil reserves and $$ to Iran and terrorists! Obama will be forced to keep U.S. troops there WHILE proposing that 9 Trillion in new spending his party wants. The middle class (ME) and those who worked hard to make it up a notch will be paying for all of you who believe we (the govt) OWE YOU SOMETHING. The man is so dumb he wants to up the tax on capital gains (even though it's been lowered twice and brought in $) and increase the min. wage "yearly." Yep, I wonder how many jobs will be lost because the fool needs an economics 101 course! You all need some good fiscal education, along with personal responsbility AND some honesty when it comes to FREE SPEECH and TOLERANCE. Let's face it, if you don't like it, you want it regulated or stopped. The Democratic party has been hyjacked by the far left....which each one of you seems to be a member of....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Please do not try to neoconfuse me Posted by: robbie.seal

Comments are closed-

Folks, let us not respond to articles about LI or Fox
Posted by: pangea on Jun 12, 2008 6:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Folks, let us not respond to articles about LI or Fox for one week. I see and read 100's or 1000's of words wasted on the neo cons. And for what?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Oh COME ON
Posted by: RandomX on Jun 12, 2008 7:13 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Book and 95% of the comments are GARBAGE (along with the Book) ...Progressives HAD there chance for Talk Radio it was called AIR AMERICA and it went bankrupt cause no could stand to Listen ALL DAY to how bad AMERICA is and how IT`s ALL our fault...I listen to a LARGE amount of talk Radio My Favorites are Rusty Humphries and Tammy Bruce (a Progressive who saw how Libs are Ruining America Can I get a HALALUYA for Tammy LOL :P )The only person I have even seen come CLOSE to hate speech in ANY form was possibly Savage I find it FUNNY how progressives think the Truth is Hate....Reminds me of a quote I heard on Rusty`s Show... "To Anger a Conservative LIE to him....to Anger a Liberal tell them the truth".

On another Note The SO CALLED "Fairness Doctrine" will never Pass Constitutional muster IF and I am sure WHEN this LAME attempt to shut up and Limit the rights of Americans and what they want to listen to The talk Hosts have Audiences cause Conservatives Love them And Libs love to Whine about them (Wanna lil CHEESE with that LOL) anyways thats it untill I see something else worth layin the Smack down about

Phil

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS